Researchers try new ways of preserving more hearts for transplants
The new research aims to overcome barriers for using organs from someone who dies when their heart stops. Called DCD, or donation after circulatory death, it involves a controversial recovery technique or the use of expensive machines.
Surgeons at Duke and Vanderbilt universities reported Wednesday that they've separately devised simpler approaches to retrieve those hearts. In the New England Journal of Medicine, they described successfully transplanting hearts to a 3-month-old infant at Duke and three men at Vanderbilt.
'These DCD hearts work just as well as hearts from brain-dead donors,' said Vanderbilt lead author Dr. Aaron M. Williams.
How hearts are saved for donation
Most transplanted hearts come from donors who are brain dead. In those situations, the body is left on a ventilator that keeps the heart beating until the organs are removed.
Circulatory death occurs when someone has a nonsurvivable brain injury but because all brain function hasn't ceased, the family decides to withdraw life support and the heart stops. That means organs can spend a while without oxygen before being recovered, a time lag usually doable for kidneys and other organs but that can raise questions about the quality of hearts.
To counter damage and determine whether DCD organs are usable, surgeons can pump blood and oxygen to the deceased donor's abdominal and chest organs — after clamping off access to the brain. But it's ethically controversial to artificially restore circulation even temporarily and some hospitals prohibit that technique, called normothermic regional perfusion, or NRP.
Another option is to 'reanimate' DCD organs in a machine that pumps blood and nutrients on the way to the transplant hospital. The machines are expensive and complex, and Duke's Dr. Joseph Turek said the devices can't be used for young children's small hearts — the age group with the most dire need.
New ways of preserving hearts
Turek's team found a middle ground: Remove the heart and attach some tubes of oxygen and blood to briefly assess its ability to function — not in a machine but on a sterile table in the operating room.
They practiced with piglets. Then came the real test. At another hospital, life support was about to be withdrawn from a 1-month-old whose family wanted to donate — and who would be a good match for a 3-month-old Duke patient in desperate need of a new heart. The other hospital didn't allow the controversial NRP recovery technique but let Turek's team test the experimental alternative.
It took just five minutes to tell 'the coronary arteries are filling well, it's pink, it's beating,' Turek said. The team promptly put the little heart on ice and raced it back to Duke.
Vanderbilt's system is even simpler: Infuse the heart with a nutrient-rich, cold preservative solution before removing it from the donor's body, similar to how hearts from brain-dead donors are handled.
That 'replenishes the nutrients that are depleted during the dying process and helps protect it for transport,' Williams explained, adding that Vanderbilt has performed about 25 such transplants so far. 'Our view is you don't necessarily need to reanimate the heart.'
More donated hearts are needed
There's a huge need for more transplantable hearts. Hundreds of thousands of adults suffer from advanced heart failure, yet many are never even offered a transplant because of the organ shortage.
Every year about 700 children in the U.S. are added to the transplant list for a new heart and about 20% die waiting. Turek said infants are at particular risk.
Last year, people whose lives ended via circulatory death made up 43% of the nation's deceased donors — but just 793 of the 4,572 heart transplants.
That's why many specialists say finding ways to use more of those hearts is crucial. The new studies are small and early-stage but promising, said Brendan Parent of NYU Langone Health, who directs transplant ethics and policy research.
'Innovation to find ways to recover organs successfully after circulatory death are essential for reducing the organ shortage,' he said.
If alternatives pan out, 'I absolutely think that cardiac programs will be thrilled, especially at hospitals that have rejected NRP.'
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
21 minutes ago
- CBS News
Denver Museum of Nature & Science showing off dinosaur fossil found in parking lot; oldest in city's history
One of Colorado's most astonishing and coincidental fossil discoveries was found earlier this year, right beneath the parking lot of the Denver Museum of Nature & Science, museum officials announced last week. While drilling for a geothermal tap in January, museum scientists decided to take the opportunity to study what lay below the surface. To their surprise, they hit something unexpected: a dinosaur bone. Patrick O'Connor, director of Earth and space sciences at the museum, recalled the moment vividly. "He said, 'there's a fossil in the core,'" O'Connor said. "Really?" What makes the discovery so improbable is how precisely the fossil had to be struck. Crews had to drill in just the right spot, at just the right depth, and then puncture the bone with a core bit only a couple of inches wide. "In the mud was this," O'Connor said, referring to the sample. "It looks like a piece of dinosaur bone." Regardless of its appearance, researchers confirmed that it's the oldest and deepest fossil ever found in Denver. "Given the age of the rocks where this was found, it's estimated to be about 67 million years ago," O'Connor said. "There were not a number of large animals on the surface of the planet at that time other than dinosaurs." "In my 35 years at the museum, we've never had an opportunity quite like this, to study the deep geologic layers beneath our feet with such precision," said Earth Sciences Research Associate Bob Raynolds. "That this fossil turned up here, in City Park, is nothing short of magical." Although scientists don't yet know which specific species it belonged to, they've narrowed it down to a group of plant-eating dinosaurs based on the bone's structure. "The bones that make up their backbone are constructed differently," O'Connor said. "So even though we can't tell you all of the details about it just by looking at the structure of the bone, we know it pertains to one group of plant-eating dinosaurs." The fossil is now on display in the museum's "Teen Rex" exhibit. "Everyone can discover," O'Connor said. "Everyone can participate in science."
Forbes
21 minutes ago
- Forbes
2 Reasons Why You're Experiencing ‘Relationship Burnout,' By A Psychologist
Healthy relationships allow space for give-and-take. But if you constantly put your partner's needs ... More ahead of yours, it can leave you emotionally drained. Being in a relationship naturally shifts your focus from just yourself to sharing a life with someone else. You trade in endless 'me time' for moments spent thinking of them, sometimes even giving up personal opportunities for the sake of the relationship. Maybe you turned down a job in another city because your partner's career kept you where you were. Maybe you canceled your solo travel plans to support them through a rough patch. Maybe you've cared for their sick parents or juggled childcare responsibilities when they were caught up with work. Your partner may also have made their fair share of sacrifices, but it's not about keeping score. Relationships don't need to be transactional. Instead, both partners should be willingly putting in the effort to sustain their relationship. However, a recent study published in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships shows that feeling like you're sacrificing too much is associated with relational stress and burnout. Based on responses from over 700 married individuals, researchers assessed how often people made sacrifices in their relationship and how it impacted their well-being and needs. They also evaluated whether they felt burned out or emotionally exhausted in their romantic relationship. Relational sacrifices involve giving up on your personal interests and desires for your partner, going above and beyond what you need to do for them and offering greater resources them, including time and mental energy. But how much is too much, and when does it start to affect us? The study points to two factors that can influence how we perceive relational sacrifices and whether or not we think they are worth it. These factors affect our experiences of burnout. 1. Relational Equity While it's tempting to act in self-serving ways, in order to form meaningful connections, we must consider others. It takes effort to realize that we don't always need to 'win' arguments or say hurtful things. When we learn to think for those beyond ourselves, our relationships — whether romantic or platonic — evolve into a two-way street. We enter romantic relationships with hopes of a partnership. We hope to receive some relational benefits in return for what we contribute. Such benefits may include love, intimacy, effort, time and generosity. But when we start feeling like we're doing too much and getting too little in return, it leaves us wondering if the relationship is one-sided. This is why relational equity is so important. It's not about doing the exact same things for one another. Rather, it's about making sure that both of you feel that what you give and what you receive is fair, according to what each of you bring to the table. Healthy relationships thrive on balance, without which, you start to feel resentful. When you feel that your partner is taking you for granted, you'll likely feel emotionally worn out, pessimistic and fatigued. This is called 'couple burnout.' Researchers found that lower levels of relational equity are associated with a strong perception that one's sacrifices are harmful. This strong perception of harm is, in turn, associated with higher levels of couple burnout. Often, this burnout happens sooner than you'd expect, especially if you're in a relationship with someone with different preferences, interests and priorities. In such cases, one partner may be going out of their way to accommodate the interests of the other. This threatens not only the well-being of the individual making sacrifices, but also the foundation of the relationship, where one is positioned to 'receive' more than the other. In light of relational equity, it's also important that both partners feel their efforts and contributions are valued, even if they aren't identical. 2. Appreciation For Your Efforts No matter what you do for your partner, whether it's sacrificing your career to become a stay-at-home parent or leaving post-it notes with beautifully packed lunch boxes, you deserve a 'thank you.' In the study, participants were asked if they felt appreciated by their partners, and if their partner expressed admiration and gratitude towards them. Researchers found that feeling appreciated by your partner changes how you see your sacrifices. They tend to perceive their sacrifices as less 'harmful' and more worthwhile for the growth of the relationship. Another 2022 study published in Psychological Science supports this finding, by showing that satisfaction levels tend to drop when people feel they're doing more household work than their partner. The study assessed over 2000 participants, including 476 couples (where both partners participated) from the United States and Canada, focusing on how they shared household tasks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Researchers found that people were less satisfied in their relationship if they felt they were doing more housework, and found the division of labor unfair. However, if they felt appreciated by their partner, they didn't feel as unhappy or frustrated, even when the share of housework wasn't equally divided. This shows that appreciation can go a long way in preventing relationship burnout. 'Feeling appreciated also appeared to buffer against the negative effects of doing less, suggesting that feeling appreciated may offset the relational costs of unequal division of labor, regardless of who contributes more,' the researchers explain. Of course, this doesn't mean that appreciation is the ultimate solution for relational inequity — both partners actively stepping up to do their bit is. Here are some steps couples can take to avoid relationship burnout: It's perfectly normal to have expectations of reciprocity in our relationships, but sacrifices should come with the right intentions. For instance, you shouldn't give in to your partner's demands just to avoid conflict or to be a 'good' partner. True sacrifice should come from a place of care and genuine goodwill for your partner — and it should go both ways. When both partners are willing to make thoughtful sacrifices for each other without losing themselves, the relationship stands a real chance to grow and thrive. Are you feeling burnt out in your relationship? Take this science-backed test to learn more: Couple Burnout Measure
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘The new normal?' What the die-off mystery in the Keys means for endangered sawfish
Nearly two years after one of the planet's rarest fish began washing up dead in the Lower Keys, scientists investigating the deaths say one thing seems certain: whatever caused it will likely be around for years to come. 'We're gonna probably have this tax on the sawfish population indefinitely. We're now introducing a new component of natural mortality that's going to kill somewhere between X and Y number of sawfish,' said Ross Boucek, a marine biologist with the Bonefish and Tarpon Trust. 'The question is how do we recoup that tax?' To do that, they'll need to better understand conditions caused by an ocean heat wave that slammed Florida before the deaths, and to try to find ways to prevent them. READ MORE: As sawfish deaths mounted, wildlife officers and researchers scrambled to respond, records show Months after the record-breaking summer heatwave, which killed coral, seagrass and other marine life, endangered smalltooth sawfish began dying in the winter of early 2024, mostly in the Lower Keys. Boucek, who earned his doctorate looking at impacts from extreme climate events like hurricanes, temperature changes and drought, said scientists feared the prolonged high temperatures would ignite such cascading events. 'With extreme events, there's always going to be some unpredictability to what the ecological response is, which makes them very challenging because you've never seen them before,' he said. 'When you have them, you expect this weirdness to follow.' Florida sawfish once roamed waters from the Indian River Lagoon north to the Carolinas. But loss of habitat from developing coasts and getting caught in commercial fishing nets and longlines nearly wiped them out. Today, they can mostly be found only in South Florida. Eventually, at least 64 sawfish were confirmed dead amid hundreds of reported sightings of sick sawfish. Signs of looming trouble appeared in the Lower Keys months before the sawfish started dying when fishing guides started seeing dozens of other species spinning and showing signs of distress. Few died, so the mysterious ailment was concerning but not alarming. Then sawfish began washing up dead in the same shallow waters, launching an unusual rescue effort. Scientists suspected a bottom-dwelling algae early on after they detected higher than normal levels as part of an ongoing monitoring effort to look for ciguatera. Sawfish belong to the ray family and feed on the sea floor, so it made sense. 'T his heat wave changed something for this algae,' Boucek said, which can bloom and become toxic with an increase in nutrients from either leaky septics and storm run-off, a fish kill or seagrass die-offs. Or, he said, 'something happened to its predators.' That became the prevailing theory — that whatever kept the algae in check was harmed by the extreme heat. 'If there's no cops to keep the bad guys in line, things can proliferate,' he said. 'So the question is, was it nutrients that caused this or was it something that happened to its controlling agents.' Various species of fish later tested found levels of the toxin, along with others that may have interacted to sicken fish. Florida lawmakers provided $2 million to launch an investigation as the deaths mounted. BTT received $1.75 million that it used to set up surveillance measures, tag and track sawfish and begin testing waters. In the fall of 2024, as waters cooled, Boucek said scientists and guides braced for another round of deaths, although some debated whether it would strike again without such a severe heat wave. 'It could be it was this temporary ecological response that we saw, where we have this reverberation of the system,' he said. 'It happens once and then we don't ever see it again at the same intensity.' Then in November, Boucek spotted the first spinning fish. Other sightings followed. In late December, a dead sawfish was found. But by January, things quieted down, with far fewer dead sawfish. By March, the month sightings peaked the year before, there were only about half the number of reports for spinning fish and less than a dozen dead sawfish. Scientists monitoring water also didn't see spikes in levels of the toxic algae that they saw the year before. Boucek said that suggests a number of things: a different toxic algae could be involved. Or it could be that the dead sawfish had been infected during the previous event and were just now dying. It could also mean that there just weren't very many of the endangered fish left for the algae to kill. While scientists continue to look at the source of the toxin and what triggers it, Boucek said a closer look is needed to understand the current sawfish population so it can be better protected. Charlotte Harbor was once considered the main area where sawfish gave birth, and the focus of much of the state's research. But it's possible sawfish critical habitat extends much further, south to Naples, throughout the Ten Thousands Islands and in the shallow bays, creeks and flats in the Everglades and Florida Bay. 'The question really is was that entire southwest coast a nursery habitat or a juvenile habitat for them at one point in time, but now the only places that are available are the ones that are protected and not developed,' he said. Restoring and protecting those areas could help stabilize the population and also benefit tarpon, snook and other fish that share the same waters, he said. That would help prepare for the next time. 'Is this going to be the new normal?' he said. 'If it comes back at the same intensity that it did in the past, I mean we can't lose 54 sawfish every year.' This story was originally published by WLRN and shared in partnership with the Florida Climate Reporting Network, a multi-newsroom initiative founded by the Miami Herald, the Sun-Sentinel, The Palm Beach Post, the Orlando Sentinel, WLRN Public Media and the Tampa Bay Times Solve the daily Crossword
