Tesco sent emergency stocks to bail out M&S during cyberattack
Britain's biggest supermarket stepped in to supply emergency stocks of Marmite and Coca-Cola to Marks & Spencer while it was hit by a crippling cyberattack, its boss has revealed.
Ken Murphy, chief executive of Tesco, said that M&S and some of the Co-Op's independent societies asked Booker,Tesco's wholesale arm, for support sourcing products while their supply systems were down.
'Over the period when they've been impacted, Booker has supplied both M&S and Co-op with products and supported them in any way they could,' he said. 'They asked us to supply products and we said yes.'
• Business live blog: All the latest news as it happens
In M&S's case, Booker is understood to have increased deliveries of third-party branded items, such as the household staples Marmite and Coca-Cola, and shipped more items directly to shops.
The main Co-op Group did not request assistance for its supermarkets but it is understood that some of its independent societies temporarily turned to Booker. Independent Co-op societies are consumer co-operatives that operate independently within the Co-operative Group while maintaining their own distinct ownership and governance.
The support was short-term and both companies have since restored their operations following the cyberattack.
M&S was arguably the worst affected: its online business was knocked offline for nearly two months. It has warned that the attack is likely to dent its profits this year by at least £300 million.
M&S relaunched its website this week and resumed online orders, prompting a surge of customer demand. Many shoppers had left items in their online baskets, ready to buy once the site came back online. The company declined to comment on which products had proved most popular since the relaunch.
The request for support from Britain's largest supermarket highlights the severity of the disruption and also reflects a rare moment of collaboration in the competitive grocery sector.
Tesco, which reported an increase in like-for-like sales over the past three months, insisted that this had not been because of the cyberattacks at M&S and Co-Op.
'We haven't seen any uptick in activity or attacks since some of our competitors were attacked,' Murphy said. 'We haven't seen any material changes.'
He emphasised that cybersecurity was at the 'top of my inbox on a daily, weekly basis. We stay on top of cyber all the time. We have invested continuously in upgrading our cyber capabilities because this is a moving target all the time. As the sophistication of potential attackers improves, we have to keep investing behind it.'
'We stay very vigilant. We invest substantially behind it. We seek to learn from what's going on in the industry.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
30 minutes ago
- BBC News
Housing plans on edge of village spark objections
Plans for a new housing development on the edge of a Surrey village have been met with opposition. The developer, Mac Mic Strategic Land Limited, proposes to build 250 homes in Blundel Lane, south of the Polyapes Scout Camp in Stoke D'Abernon.A spokesperson for the company said: "The development aims to create a well-planned, connected and integrated sustainable extension to Stoke D'Abernon."According to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, nearly 90 objections oppose the application, with one saying the scheme - called The Paddocks - was an "inappropriate urban development". One objector said the site would impact existing residents who use local amenities. "The environmental and ecological impact will also be significant with the loss of trees and the destruction of habitat for wildlife," they documents reveal the development includes highway improvements and new pedestrian crossings. 'Least affordable places' Councillor David Lewis said the new development could see a "40% increase in the village's population".He said the changes were "completely unworkable" for the current infrastructure and added the development would create an "urban sprawl on the green belt and could merge into Oxshott".In line with council policy, Mac Mic plans to deliver 125 affordable homes at the development site. The company website states: "The Borough of Elmbridge is one of the least affordable places to live in England with the highest median house prices outside of London."
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Letting banks loose is back on the agenda as UK politicians chase growth at any cost
As the old ways of turning a profit become more difficult – from assembling cars to selling soap powder – politicians of all stripes want the City to inject some dynamism into the economy. From Labour to Reform, the siren call of London's financial district is strong. If only, they ask, the wheels of the banking industry could be cranked to spin faster, surely much more money could be generated and we would all be rich. While Rachel Reeves boasted of the huge benefit to economic growth from public investments in rail and renewable energy as central pillars of the government's spending review, in truth it is not enough to propel the economy forward. To generate the kind of income that will pay for the next 30 years of an ageing society, plans to link Manchester and Liverpool by a marginally faster and more reliable train, though good in itself, is not the answer. The Treasury knows it is just an upgrade to existing services and will deliver only incremental returns. To turbocharge growth, the chancellor wants private money to take the lead, partnering government to share the burden of building bridges and tunnels and spurring investments in whizzy new ventures. And as a start, the Treasury wants the shackles taken off the bankers so they can become more inventive in the way they make money, taking risks that were previously frowned upon, if not banned, and rewarding themselves accordingly. It is 18 years since Northern Rock's high-risk mortgage lending began to unravel and 17 years since Lehman Brothers went bust. Long enough, it seems, for memories to fade, and with them concerns about the damaging consequences of light-touch regulation. That said, it's easy to see why the temptation to let the banks loose is back on the agenda. UK banks are among the most profitable in Europe and London plays host to the largest number of foreign banks. The UK's unicorn businesses – those privately held startup companies worth more than £1bn – rank in number behind only the US, India and China. Some startups are considered to be at the forefront of the financial technology boom, including Revolut and Monzo. What could be better for Britain than to leverage a fintech industry that already has a worldwide reputation? Revolut has championed handling funds invested in cryptocurrencies, and for this service, and its banking and wealth management, it has emerged as the most successful European fintech of the past decade. It was valued at $45bn last year. And there is no stopping the chief executive, co-founder and 25% owner, Nikolay Storonsky. He plans to expand into mortgages and consumer lending to challenge the major lenders, as well as growing in the US. Monzo is the digital bank best known for its coral pink debit cards. After 10 years, the company announced its first profit last year, of £15.4m, after more than doubling revenues to almost £900m. Reeves also wants pension funds to take more risks, which is a boon for an asset management industry that has fallen out of favour with the public in recent years due to its high charges and failure to deliver returns that better passive investments. Last week, the House of Lords financial services regulation committee gave Labour's mission a boost. It attacked the main City watchdogs – the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority – for having 'a deeply entrenched culture of risk aversion'. In a report that the Treasury will have privately welcomed, the committee said the regulators were partly to blame for holding back economic growth. If the FCA and PRA, which have already pledged to reduce the paperwork and oversight of the City, become more trusting of its ability to manage risk, there is likely to be a sugar rush of activity, much as there was during the noughties. Labour has helped get the ball rolling by lifting the bankers' bonus cap, to allow publicly listed banks to join the bonanza of rewards enjoyed by executives in Revolut and Monzo. Monzo may have made only £15.4m profit but this modest sum was not to be re-invested. It was enough to warrant big payouts, including a £12m bag of cash and shares that Reuters said most likely went to the chief executive, TS Anil. Underscoring how light-touch regulation is matched by executive pay bonanzas, a report last month by the jobs website eFinancialCareers found that bonuses in the UK's investment banks had risen by 26% year on year, beating their equivalents in Asia, Europe and the US. The average bonus payout for a City executive was about £110,000. And the trickle-down effect works in finance. At junior levels, bonuses increased by as much as 133%, the survey found. Labour's backbench MPs know how this play ends. After all the partying and profit-making, there will be a severe hangover. And when that happens, the taxpayer is asked to save the day. Somehow, the profits of the financial sector belong to the bosses and the losses belong to the people.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Vodafone terminates contracts of 12 franchisees who joined £120m lawsuit
Vodafone has terminated the contracts of 12 franchisees who have continued running the brand's high street stores while also being part of a £120m high court claim against the telecoms group. The legal case was launched in December, when 62 franchisees claimed Vodafone had 'unjustly enriched' itself at the expense of scores of vulnerable small business owners by slashing commissions to franchisees operating the mobile phone company's retail outlets. A dozen of the claimants had remained in the franchise programme even though they had joined 50 former colleagues in pursuing the legal case. Some of the 62 said they had had suicidal thoughts because of the pressure exerted by the telecoms group – while many claimed the company's actions made them fear they would lose their livelihoods, homes or life savings after running up personal debts of more than £100,000. Vodafone, which says the legal claim is worth £85.5m, has consistently argued the case is 'a complex commercial dispute between Vodafone UK and some franchise partners and we refute the claims'. Responding to news that the 12 current franchisees are having their contracts terminated, a Vodafone spokesperson said: 'We are focused on building a successful and thriving franchise programme. As a result, we have a clear duty to do everything we can to support those franchise partners who are committed to our joint success. 'The dispute has been ongoing for over two years and a number of the claimants have remained within the franchise programme and had their contracts renewed during that time. However, we are increasingly concerned about the impact negative campaigning is having on our franchise programme.' The spokesman added: 'After careful consideration, and with disappointment, we therefore decided it was no longer viable for us to work with franchise partners who are supporting the negative campaign against the business.' A franchise is a type of licence that allows a company to sell a product or service under another business's brand name, in return for paying certain costs such as rent and wages. As part of their deals, Vodafone franchisees were paid commissions based on the handset and airtime revenues they generated from customers visiting their stores. The court papers allege that the FTSE 100 company acted in 'bad faith' by unilaterally cutting fees to its franchisees; imposing swingeing fines on them totalling thousands of pounds for seemingly minor administrative errors; and then pressuring them into taking out loans and government grants to keep their businesses afloat. Vodafone said it strongly refutes that the company 'unjustly enriched' itself and said it had conducted a number of investigations into the allegations, which resulted in the company making 'a number of improvements to our franchise partner programme'. The group's investigations 'concluded that some actions between Vodafone and franchise partners had not always adhered to the standards we expect, however no evidence of misconduct was found'. The mobile operator has added that it had paid back almost £5m to franchisees including the 'retrospective reimbursement of fines and clawbacks'. It has since emerged that, two years before the high court claim was launched, whistleblowers had warned a series of senior Vodafone executives that scores of its franchised store owners faced financial ruin. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Meanwhile, talks to settle the dispute ended without resolution last month – leaving the case potentially heading for the high court. Vodafone announced earlier this month that it had sealed a £16.5bn deal to combine its British arm with its rival Three UK. The merger, first proposed in 2023, creates the UK's largest mobile operator with a network of more than 27 million subscribers. On Thursday, the new VodafoneThree joint venture said it planned to close some of its almost 650 stores on high streets and in shopping centres where the two former brands had outlets in close proximity. The Vodafone chief executive, Margherita Della Valle, has previously said: 'The commercial dispute is specifically between Vodafone UK and some of our franchisees. Our first joint attempt at mediation has not resolved the dispute despite our best engagement. We remain open to further discussions as the process continues.'
