
Christian Horner Called Out For Being an 'Idiot' By Former F1 CEO After Red Bull Exit
Former Formula One CEO Bernie Ecclestone has slammed Christian Horner for being an "idiot" during his tenure with Red Bull Racing. The 94-year-old F1 supremo has hinted at the reason that likely paved the way to Horner's abrupt Red Bull exit on Wednesday.
Horner led Red Bull Racing for twenty years, winning six constructors' titles and eight drivers' championships. However, Red Bull decided to part ways with him for reasons that are yet to be known.
Ecclestone has allegedly linked Horner's exit to the controversy that erupted during the opening round of the 2024 season, when Horner was accused of inappropriate behavior by a female colleague.
While Horner was cleared of any wrongdoing after an internal investigation, details of the alleged messages he sent to the colleague were shared with all team principals and senior figures in F1 by an anonymous sender.
Red Bull Racing Team Principal Christian Horner talks with Bernie Ecclestone, Chairman Emeritus of the Formula One Group, and Red Bull Racing Team Consultant Dr Helmut Marko before the Formula One Grand Prix of Brazil...
Red Bull Racing Team Principal Christian Horner talks with Bernie Ecclestone, Chairman Emeritus of the Formula One Group, and Red Bull Racing Team Consultant Dr Helmut Marko before the Formula One Grand Prix of Brazil at Autodromo Jose Carlos Pace on November 11, 2018 in Sao Paulo, Brazil. MoreEcclestone blamed Horner for acting like he was 20 in his 50s. He told The Telegraph:
"This other business that he got involved with 18 months ago, he was just an idiot. He was a 50-year-old who thought he was 20, thought he was one of the boys.
"I often wonder, when these situations happen, why if the girl is so upset with the advances of someone, they don't just say, 'Oi you, stop it.'"
In what was most likely a reference to an alleged power struggle within Red Bull Racing last year, Ecclestone also highlighted the power held by Horner within the organization, and how that could have led many to allegedly turn against him when the team began to face problems with the car. He added:
"It would probably have been better if they had said, 'Come in, Christian, sit down,' but the bottom line is that there are people there who thought he was getting away with things, that he was acting as if it was not the Red Bull Ring, but the Christian Horner Ring.
"He got away with so many things. And all the time you're delivering, people close their eyes. But when you stop delivering, people start looking. One or two begin thinking, 'Well, I could do a better job.'"
Horner's dispute with Max Verstappen's father, Jos Verstappen, last year made matters worse. Ecclestone explained that Horner likely found himself in a compromising position in the organization, eventually. He said:
"Genuinely, it was a little bit of a muddle. Christian was the chief executive. If I'm the chief executive of a company, I want to be in charge. I want to do all the things that I think are right, and if I'm wrong, they can fire me, they can say, 'Sorry, bye-bye, you made a few mistakes.' So, the minute Christian can't be in that position to do what he thinks should be done, then for him it's not easy. You can't half-manage something. You need to have someone, I always say, to turn the lights on and off. You only really need one person."
He added:
"I know it was suggested to him he should be a team manager and leave the commercial side to somebody else. But his idea was, 'I am the chief executive.'"
Ecclestone then described Horner's role at Red Bull for the last twenty years, acknowledging his efforts that made the team what it is today, but pointed out an alleged backlash when the car stopped winning races. He said:
"For Christ's sake, who else has done what he has in Formula One? Just for results? You get very few executives who can do everything, from engineering to public relations.
"He had been running the company the way he thought it should be run. For a long time, people were prepared to say, 'OK, fair enough, he's getting the job done.' But as soon as you go off a little bit, people look and say, 'Hang on.' Christian won a lot of championships. He was used to winning. So, it's not easy when you're not winning – and when you know that it's not entirely your fault."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
5 hours ago
- Newsweek
Lance Stroll Destroys 2026 F1 Regulations in Brutal Rant
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Aston Martin Formula One driver Lance Stroll has ridiculed the 2026 F1 car and new regulations, calling the whole exercise a "science project" championship. For the first time in the history of premier class racing, cars will run on 50 percent electric power starting next year, with the other half coming from a conventional internal combustion unit powered by sustainable fuels. 2026 marks the year when F1 enters a new era of regulations. The cars will be lighter and slightly more compact than the current ground effect cars. The 2026 car has been designed to promote closer racing that supports easy overtaking. One of the most standout features will be active aerodynamics on both the front and rear wings, which will replace the current Drag Reduction System. The active aerodynamics will reportedly feature two modes: X-mode for drag reduction on the straights and Z-mode for increased downforce on corners. A manual override system will provide the extra electrical energy for a power boost while overtaking. However, there has been much skepticism from several F1 personalities about whether the cars will enable close racing, especially when they run out of electric energy during races. Stroll expressed his disappointment with the new regulations. He said: Aston Martin's Canadian driver Lance Stroll drives during the first practice session at the Red Bull Ring race track in Spielberg, Austria, on June 27, 2025, ahead of the Formula One Austrian Grand Prix. Aston Martin's Canadian driver Lance Stroll drives during the first practice session at the Red Bull Ring race track in Spielberg, Austria, on June 27, 2025, ahead of the Formula One Austrian Grand Prix. ERWIN SCHERIAU/APA/AFP/Getty Images "We'll get a bit of an idea in the test and then in Australia, but the regulations, I think, are a bit sad. "I have driven it in the sim, and that's why I'm a bit sad. It is a shame that in Formula 1, we're taking the path of electric energy, and we've had to take all the downforce off to support the battery power. "It would just be fun to see some light, nimble, fast cars with lots of downforce, and just to simplify the whole thing a little bit, so less of an energy battery championship science project and more of a Formula 1 racing championship. "So I don't love the idea of the new regulations, and I think a lot of the drivers can agree on that, and I don't think some of them can talk about it for political reasons. "It is exciting to think about cars that can scream a little louder, be lighter and just not depend or focus so much on energy or batteries or the power train, that is not very racey." Stroll's concerns could be valid, and it is likely that F1 and its governing body, the FIA, agree with the general feeling. FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem admitted that the current cars are complicated and expensive to develop. Thus, the sport could revert to V8 engines by 2029. He said: "The current engine is so complicated, you have no idea, and it is costly. R&D [research and development] is reaching $200 million, and the engine is costing approximately $1.8m to $2.1m, so if we go with a straight V8, let's see. "Many of the manufacturers produce V8s in their cars, so commercially it's correct. How much is it? You drop it. The target is more than 50% in everything." "To us, the V8 is happening. With the teams now, I'm very optimistic, happy about it. FOM [Formula One Management] are supportive, the teams are realising it is the right way. "We need to do it soon... you need three years, so hopefully by 2029 we have something there, but the fuel is also very expensive, and we have to be very careful with that. Transmissions are very expensive."


Newsweek
6 hours ago
- Newsweek
NASCAR President Reveals Surprising Threat Amid F1 and IndyCar Pressure
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. NASCAR President Steve Phelps believes that the race series isn't in direct competition with Formula 1 and IndyCar. While NASCAR remains the top choice in terms of viewership within the United States, F1 is building momentum as it brings races to Miami, Austin, and now Las Vegas. Netflix's Drive to Survive is also helping F1 grow its popularity state-side, though Phelps believes that NASCAR faces bigger threats. "Yeah, for us, I actually don't view them as competitors," Phelps said during an interview with CNBC. Ryan Blaney, driver of the #12 Menards/Delta Ford, Chase Elliott, driver of the #9 NAPA Auto Parts Chevrolet, and Ty Gibbs, driver of the #54 SAIA LTL Freight Toyota, race during the NASCAR Cup Series... Ryan Blaney, driver of the #12 Menards/Delta Ford, Chase Elliott, driver of the #9 NAPA Auto Parts Chevrolet, and Ty Gibbs, driver of the #54 SAIA LTL Freight Toyota, race during the NASCAR Cup Series Toyota/Save Mart 350 at Sonoma Raceway on July 13, 2025 in Sonoma, California. More Photo by"Our competitors, I view as more holistically. And I think it's really not just motorsports, actually not even just sports, it's entertainment. And we are competing for that dollar. "We are competing for your time and other people's time because if they're not watching NASCAR, are they watching Netflix? Are they watching movies? Are they watching CNBC? "What are they doing when they're not doing that? So it's super competitive." NASCAR is attempting to combat growing competition by expanding its presence to various platforms. The racing series is available on TNT, Amazon Prime, and Fox, as it tries to expand its reach across multiple streaming services and channels. Along with expanding viewing options, the sport is widening its race schedule and the number of locations. For the first time, NASCAR raced in Mexico, potentially paving the way for future races in other countries. "I believe that global expansion for us is important," he added. "Like most people don't know, we have four racing series around the globe. "We have a series in Canada. We have a series of Mexico. We have a series in Brazil, and we have a series in Europe. All meant to do three things: driver development. "So, getting drivers from other countries to come to our national series, like Daniel Suarez, who graduated from our Mexico series and then went up and raced in our national series and has won races in our national series. He was our Xfinity Series champion." There are logistical concerns regarding further expansion, as teams faced several challenges in getting to Mexico and the other races after. F1, meanwhile, is much more prepared to travel around the world. Its international impact is much larger as a result and Liberty Media is hoping to inch closer to NASCAR and become a bigger threat in America. NASCAR holds long-time roots in the States, but F1's rapid expansion may challenge them sooner rather than later. For more NASCAR news, head on over to Newsweek Sports.


Bloomberg
6 hours ago
- Bloomberg
F1's Growing Pains With Apple TV+ Would Be Worth It
Fresh off earning a box office hit with F1, the movie, Apple Inc. has reportedly outbid ESPN for the US broadcast rights to F1, the actual sport. While F1 has not announced that it has accepted the deal, the nine-figure offer would enrich the elite racing championship. But it comes with a painful trade-off. Since 2018, F1's American viewership has more than doubled on ESPN. Requiring those casual fans to buy an Apple TV+ subscription will throw that cable-led growth into sharp reverse.