Hawley meets with autoworker union ‘looking for partners'
Republican Sen. Josh Hawley met with United Automobile Workers president Shawn Fain on Wednesday to discuss working together on pro-labor priorities, his latest bid to build the party's union ties.
The Missourian, who is circulating a framework for pro-labor policymaking among his GOP colleagues and has joined picket lines for the UAW as well as other workers, met with Fain and other UAW leaders at their request on Wednesday. They discussed tariffs, Hawley's proposed labor legislation and how the massive labor group can work with the new GOP-controlled Washington while Hawley and other Republicans try to become more pro-union.
'Their attitude is interesting. They realize that Donald Trump has won the White House. They don't want to be shut out for the next four years. They want to actually see something happen. And so, I think they are looking for partners,' Hawley told Semafor on Thursday.
Hawley is beginning to circulate legislation that would force an end to employers' stalling techniques after workers vote to join a union. He wants to capitalize on Trump's inroads with working-class voters in a Republican Party that's been historically skeptical or downright hostile to unions and their leaders.
There are already signs that identity is changing: The Teamsters were neutral in the presidential race, and their president spoke at the Republican National Convention. Hawley said 'we are getting good traction on our initial efforts here on labor reform.'
Still, the UAW endorsed Kamala Harris for president, and the AFL-CIO is leading a major campaign against the Trump administration's efforts to cut federal spending. Hawley said the UAW leaders told him multiple times that they're not affiliated with one party and 'seemed at pains to dispel' the notion that they're a political organization supporting Democrats.
'They're the ones who brought up tariffs. That's where they started with — Trump's tariffs, and they liked it. So I read all that as: they want to be relevant,' Hawley said. 'It's a good thing for my Republican colleagues to see that labor will work with you if you will do something that's good for working people.'
In the Missouri senator's telling, the UAW leaders said they supported Trump's goal of using tariffs to move auto manufacturing back to the United States from Mexico. He also said UAW leaders support his legislative framework on labor and want to help create a bipartisan coalition to pass pro-union legislation.
It won't be easy to convince Republican leaders to back such an effort. But Hawley said he sees a huge political upside to acting on a labor bill during Trump's second term.
'We could be a working-class party, but we have to deliver. And we've got a chance now, with the most pro-labor Republican president of my lifetime,' Hawley said. 'That's my message to my fellow Republicans.'
Republicans will soon come to grips with their own internal divisions when it comes to unions. Trump's pick for labor secretary, former Oregon Rep. Lori Chavez-DeRemer, will have her confirmation hearing next week before the Senate's top committee on labor issues.
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., a member of that committee, has already said he will oppose her. Chavez-DeRemer has met with Senate Democrats whose votes may be necessary to save her nomination if Republicans rebel against her for being one of the few party members to support the union-friendly PRO Act during the Biden administration.
Hawley said the Senate GOP should give Chavez-DeRemer the same deference given to Tulsi Gabbard, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and other potentially divisive Trump Cabinet picks.
'I know some of my Republican colleagues worry that she's too close to labor. Number one, that's the president's call,' Hawley said. 'They ought to support her, and I hope they will. I think it'll be a bad sign if they don't.'
Hawley's first pro-labor bill has already picked up Democratic and GOP support, Punchbowl News reports.
NBC took a deep into Senate Republicans' skepticism about Chavez-DeRemer.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
7 minutes ago
- The Hill
Newsom: Pentagon lying over LA to justify National Guard deployment
California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) on Monday accused the Defense Department of 'lying to the American people' in justifying deploying National Guard troops to the state to quell Los Angeles protests against federal immigration raids, asserting that the situation intensified only when the Pentagon deployed troops. 'The situation became escalated when THEY deployed troops,' Newsom posted to X, referring to the Pentagon. 'Donald Trump has manufactured a crisis and is inflaming conditions. He clearly can't solve this, so California will.' Newsom was responding to a post from DOD Rapid Response on X, a Pentagon-run account, which claimed that 'Los Angeles is burning, and local leaders are refusing to respond.' President Trump on Saturday deployed 2,000 National Guard troops to the Los Angeles area amid the ICE protests, with White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt saying the decision was made due to 'violent mobs' attacking 'Federal Law Enforcement Agents carrying out basic deportation operations.' While protests have intensified in recent days, devolving at times into violence, the majority of gatherings have been largely peaceful. Still, California National Guard troops began arriving in Los Angeles on Sunday morning, with some 300 deployed on the ground later that day at three locations: Los Angeles proper, Paramount and Compton. White House officials have sought to highlight images of burning vehicles and clashes with law enforcement to make the case that the situation had gotten out of control. 'The people that are causing the problem are professional agitators. They're insurrectionists. They're bad people. They should be in jail,' Trump told reporters on Monday. In addition, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has threatened to deploy approximately 500 U.S. Marines to the city, with U.S. Northern Command on Sunday confirming the service members were 'prepared to deploy.' The use of American troops has rankled California officials, who have said the federal response 'inflammatory' and said the deployment of soldiers 'will erode public trust.' Newsom also has traded insults with Hegseth, calling him 'a joke,' and that the idea of deploying active duty Marines in California was 'deranged behavior.' 'Pete Hegseth's a joke. He's a joke. Everybody knows he's so in over his head. What an embarrassment. That guy's weakness masquerading as strength. . . . It's a serious moment,' Newsom said in an interview with podcaster Brian Tyler Cohen. The tit-for-tat continued when chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell then took to X on Monday to attack Newsom. 'LA is on FIRE right now, but instead of tackling the issue, Gavin Newsom is spending his time attacking Secretary Hegseth,' Parnell wrote. 'Unlike Newsom, [Hegseth] isn't afraid to lead.' Newsom, who has formally demanded the Trump administration pull the National Guard troops off the streets, has declared the deployment 'unlawful' and said California will sue the Trump administration over its actions. 'There is currently no need for the National Guard to be deployed in Los Angeles, and to do so in this unlawful manner and for such a lengthy period is a serious breach of state sovereignty that seems intentionally designed to inflame the situation,' David Sapp, Newsom's legal affairs secretary, wrote in a letter to Hegseth on Sunday. 'Accordingly, we ask that you immediately rescind your order and return the National Guard to its rightful control by the State of California, to be deployed as appropriate when necessary.' In the past 60 years, a U.S. president has only on one occasion mobilized a state's National Guard troops without the consent of its governor to quell unrest or enforce the law. That was in 1965, when former President Lyndon Johnson sent Guard members to Selma, Ala., to protect civil rights protesters there.


San Francisco Chronicle
8 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
AP PHOTOS: Trump's new travel ban takes effect, and some protest
President Donald Trump's ban on travel to the United States took effect Monday. Demonstrators outside Los Angeles International Airport held signs protesting the ban affecting citizens from 12 mainly African and Middle Eastern countries. At Miami International Airport, passengers moved steadily through an area for international arrivals. Tensions are escalating over the Trump administration's campaign of immigration enforcement. The new ban applies to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. It also imposes heightened restrictions on people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela who are outside the U.S. and don't hold a valid visa. This is a photo gallery curated by AP photo editors.
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mass. Sen. Warren: DOGE accessed ‘sensitive' student loan data at Education Dept., calls for probe
U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren says she wants to know how the quasi-governmental Department of Government Efficiency gained access to 'sensitive' student loan information at the U.S. Department of Education. On Monday, Warren and U.S. Sen. Ed Markey, both Democrats, called for the agency's acting inspector general to find out how that breach happened. They were joined by Democratic senators from eight states, including U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut. Warren said lawmakers learned of the potential breach of systems at Federal Student Aid after DOGE, which was helmed until recently by tech titan Elon Musk, infiltrated the agency. In response, Education Department officials revealed that DOGE workers 'supported' a review of the FSA's contracts. As a part of that review, one employee was granted 'read-only' access to two internal systems that held sensitive personal information about borrowers. The agency said it had since revoked that access. But, according to Warren, it did not explain why that access had been revoked, or whether the employee had continued access to other databases. 'Because of the [Education] department's refusal to provide full and complete information, the full extent of DOGE's role and influence at ED remains unknown,' the lawmakers wrote in a June 8 letter to René L. Rocque, the agency's acting inspector general. That 'lack of clarity is not only frustrating for borrowers but also dangerous for the future of an agency that handles an extensive student loan portfolio and a range of federal aid programs for higher education,' the lawmakers continued. Warren, Markey and their colleagues have called on Roque's office to determine whether the department adhered to the Federal Privacy Act, which dictates how the government can collect and use personal information. They also asked Roque to 'determine the impact of DOGE's new plans to consolidate Americans' personal information across government databases.' 'It won't end well for Trump' if he does this amid LA protests, ex-GOP rep says All Ivy League schools are supporting Harvard lawsuit — except these 2 Embassies directed to resume processing Harvard University student visas Over 12,000 Harvard alums lend weight to court battle with Trump in new filing Markey: Trump using National Guard in LA to distract from big cuts in 'Big Beautiful Bill' Read the original article on MassLive.