Pakistani airline blunder sends passenger to Saudi Arabia instead of Karachi
A Civil Aviation Authority official said they are investigating the unusual incident. "A passenger boarding the wrong flight by mistake can happen, but we have never come across a case where a domestic passenger ended up on an international flight," the official said.
India, Pakistan extend airspace ban for each other till July 24
According to Mr. Shahzain, he was returning to Karachi from Lahore on the night of July 7, 2025 after learning that his child had fallen ill. He arrived at the airport on time and presented his pre-booked boarding pass and was then directed to the lounge and the departure gate.
"There were two AirSial aeroplanes on the tarmac, one headed to Karachi and the other to Jeddah. The staff, without checking properly, put me on the international flight, and I only realised this when, even after two hours of flying time, we did not land," Mr. Shahzain said. While the passenger landed in Jeddah, his luggage reached Karachi.
At the Jeddah airport, Mr. Shahzain was questioned by immigration officials for hours before they realised that he landed there for no fault of him and directed the airline to put him on their next flight to Karachi.
Shehbaz Sharif says Pakistan's nuclear programme is for 'peaceful activities and self-defence'
However, the ordeal didn't end there, as the airline flew the passenger back to Lahore, informing him he would need to arrange his ticket to Karachi.
'I was informed about the illness of my son and decided to return home, as I had gone to Lahore on office work. Instead, I underwent a 15-hour ordeal where I ended up in Jeddah and had to endure hours of interrogation,' Mr. Shahzain said.
Pakistan, Russia sign agreement to revive Pakistan Steel Mills project
The engineer claims the airline staff accepted their mistake in putting him on the international flight from Lahore to Jeddah when he was supposed to fly from Lahore to Karachi.
However, he is still awaiting a formal response and apology from the private airline. "So far, the airline has issued no explanation or apology for my ordeal,' Mr. Shahzain said. AirSial is a Pakistani private airline based in Sialkot.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NDTV
42 minutes ago
- NDTV
Rahul Gandhi Seeks Explanation After Trump Jets Remark, BJP Hits Back
New Delhi: US President Donald Trump's vague statement about five jets being downed during Operation Sindoor has led to a political face-off in India, with Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi calling for an explanation from Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the BJP alleging that he has a "traitor's mentality". In remarks made at a private dinner on Friday, Trump said five jets were shot down during Operation Sindoor, which was India's response to the Pahalgam terror attack in April, but did not specify whether the planes were Indian or Pakistani. "In fact, planes were being shot out of the air. Five, five, four or five, but I think five jets were shot down actually," Trump said. Operation Sindoor began with India striking terrorist infrastructure in nine locations in Pakistan, including the headquarters of the Jaish-e-Mohammed in Bahawalpur and Lashkar-e-Taiba in Muridke, and Islamabad began claiming soon after that it had shot down several Indian jets, including three Rafales, which are the most advanced fighters in the Indian Air Force. India has said there were losses, but has not given an exact number, maintaining what was more important was why they had happened. "What is important is that, not the jet being down, but why they were being down," India's Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan had said, categorically denying Pakistan's claim that six jets had been shot down. "The good part is that we are able to understand the tactical mistake which we made, remedy it, rectify it, and then implement it again after two days and flew all our jets again, targeting at long range," General Chauhan had said. Taking to Twitter on Saturday, Rahul Gandhi posted the video of Trump's remarks and wrote in Hindi, "Modi ji, what is the truth behind the five jets? The country has a right to know." मोदी जी, 5 जहाज़ों का सच क्या है? देश को जानने का हक है! — Rahul Gandhi (@RahulGandhi) July 19, 2025 Hitting back, BJP leader Amit Malviya pointed out that Trump had not said which country the planes belong to and asked the Congress MP whether he was a spokesperson on Pakistan. "Rahul Gandhi's mentality is that of a traitor. In his statement, Trump neither took the name of India nor said that those five planes belonged to India. Then why did the prince of Congress accept him as belonging to India? Why did he not accept him as belonging to Pakistan? Does he sympathise more with Pakistan than his own country?" Mr Malviya asked in a post on X in Hindi. "The truth is that Pakistan has not yet recovered from Operation Sindoor... but Rahul Gandhi is in pain! Whenever the country's army teaches a lesson to the enemy, Congress gets irritated. Anti-India sentiment is no longer a habit of Congress, it has become its identity. Rahul Gandhi should make it clear - is he an Indian or a spokesperson of Pakistan?" he said.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trump claims five jets were shot down in India-Pakistan skirmish
TOI correspondent from Washington : US President Donald Trump on Friday claimed that up to five fighter jets were shot down during the recent India-Pakistan conflict, triggering a social media dogfight between partisans over which country came up trumps in the brief war. At a White House dinner with Republican lawmakers, Trump, who is under political siege domestically over the Epstein tapes, resorted to his oft-repeated claims about being a global peacemaker, citing his role in defusing the India-Pakistan clash. "We stopped a lot of wars. And these were serious. India and Pakistan, that was going on. Planes were being shot out of there. I think four-five jets, maybe were shot down, actually, Trump said, without identifying which country lost the jets or the basis for his claims. "... they were (going) back and forth, and it was getting bigger and bigger, and we got it solved through trade. We said.. We're not making a trade deal if you're going to be throwing around weapons, and maybe nuclear weapons," Trump asserted in claims that have been refuted by New Delhi. Trump also gave a nuclear dimension to the conflict although most analysts say the spat came nowhere near breaching a nuclear threshold. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is it legal? How to get Internet without paying a subscription? Techno Mag Learn More Undo While Pakistanis gloated under the assumption that Trump meant five Indian jets were shot down, India partisans maintained that the US President did not specify which country the fighter planes belonged to and Pakistan too had lost jets in the skirmish. However, top Indian military officials have acknowledged lately that they lost an unspecified number of jets in the initial skirmish, suggesting that they were operating below a certain political threshold before being given a free hand. This resulted in a broader response that put several Pakistani bases and airfields out of commission before the US stepped in to save it. In a recent report, the Economist, citing unnamed foreign military officials, claimed five Indian aircraft were destroyed, including at least one Rafale. The report also said Indian military officials are starting to indicate that the losses may have stemmed from Indian errors rather than technological deficiencies. "Early reports suggested that the decisive factor was the superiority of Pakistan's Chinese-made j-10 fighters and its pl-15 air-to-air missiles. India does appear to have underestimated those. And China may have also tipped the balance by providing Pakistan with early warning and real-time targeting data," the report said. But given India's success later on in the fight, the journal added, the bigger problem might have been how India used its own fighters on the first night of the brief war. It cited an Indian defense attache in Jakarta who told a seminar earlier this month that India lost some aircraft only because its political leadership had ordered its air force not to hit Pakistan's air defences. Instead, they targeted only militant sites on the first day. 'After the loss, we changed our tactics and we went for their military installations,' the attache, Captain Shiv Kumar, was quoted as saying. Most analysts now say that after adopting an initial posture of only hitting terrorist compounds in response to the Pahalgam attack, New Delhi turned it around by lifting the constraints on its military after the setback in the air.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
2 hours ago
- First Post
'We don't consider TRF illegal': Pakistan openly backs outfit that US designated as terrorist
Pakistan Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar has openly supported The Resistance Front (TRF), a terrorist group tied to the deadly Pahalgam attack in Jammu and Kashmir, after the US labelled it a Foreign Terrorist Organisation read more During a fiery speech in the Pakistani Parliament, Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar openly defended The Resistance Front (TRF), a Pakistan-sponsored terrorist group tied to the deadly Pahalgam attack in Jammu and Kashmir and known as a proxy of the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). This came a day after the United States designated TRF as a Foreign Terrorist Organisation on Friday (July 18), triggering concerns in Islamabad. Dar revealed that Pakistan, leveraging its position as a non-permanent member of the UN Security Council, successfully blocked any mention of TRF in the UNSC's condemnation of the April 22 Pahalgam attack, which killed 26 civilians. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Pak Deputy PM Ishaq Dar rejected TRF involvement in the Pahalgam attack and said : 'Alhamdulillah we are the non permanent member of don't consider TRF as the evidence that TRF has carried out the Pahalgam attack or show the ownership of TRF... We… — OsintTV 📺 (@OsintTV) July 18, 2025 'We opposed the mention of TRF in the UNSC statement. I got calls from global capitals, but Pakistan will not accept,' Dar declared. 'TRF was deleted, and Pakistan prevailed.' He went further, challenging the accusations against TRF. 'We don't consider TRF illegal. Show us proof they carried out the Pahalgam attack. Show ownership by TRF. We won't accept the allegation, and TRF had to be deleted from the UN press release,' Dar insisted, despite TRF publicly claiming responsibility for the attack and intelligence from both the US and India linking the group to LeT's infrastructure. US labels TRF as a terror outfit Earlier, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, in announcing TRF's designation as a Foreign Terrorist Organization and Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT), outlined the group's actions and the financial sanctions that would restrict its support networks. 'TRF, a Lashkar-e-Taiba front and proxy, claimed responsibility for the April 22, 2025, Pahalgam attack which killed 26 civilians,' the State Department said. 'TRF has also claimed responsibility for several attacks against Indian security forces, including most recently in 2024.' Rubio described the Pahalgam attack as 'the deadliest assault on civilians in India since 2008' and emphasised that 'these actions demonstrate the Trump administration's commitment to protecting our national security interests and seeking justice for victims of terrorism.' India's External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar praised the US decision, calling it a 'strong affirmation of India-US counter-terrorism cooperation.' In a post on X, he wrote, 'Appreciate SecRubio and @StateDept for designating TRF, a Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LeT) proxy, as a Foreign Terrorist Organisation (FTO) and Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT). It claimed responsibility for the April 22 Pahalgam attack. Zero tolerance for terrorism.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD A strong affirmation of India-US counter-terrorism cooperation. Appreciate @SecRubio and @StateDept for designating TRF—a Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LeT) proxy—as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) and Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT). It claimed responsibility for the… — Dr. S. Jaishankar (@DrSJaishankar) July 18, 2025