BJP ally TDP seeks clarity on SIR, says exercise shouldn't link to citizenship or burden voters
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
New Delhi: Taking a contrarian view on the Special Intensive Revision ( SIR ) of electoral roll , key NDA ally Telugu Desam Party ( TDP ) said the purpose of the exercise should be clearly defined and delinked from citizenship verification , wrapped up at least six months before elections and the burden of proof should not be on the voter.In a four-page representation submitted to the Election Commission of India (ECI) on Tuesday, TDP sought clarity on the SIR's purpose -- a move seen as a guarded way of questioning the on-going exercise in Bihar.Without openly criticising SIR, TDP has made four submissions which are against the current approach of ECI. TDP, whose 16 MPs provide crucial support to BJP-led NDA government at the Centre, has sought clarity on the "scope of SIR" and wants it to be completely delinked from the citizenship question. "The purpose of SIR must be clearly defined and limited to electoral roll correction and inclusion. It should be explicitly communicated that the exercise is not related to citizenship verification, and any field instructions must reflect this distinction," reads the TDP representation. It said adequate time should be given for such an exercise and it should take place "ideally not within six months of any major election". This is contrary to what is underway in Bihar, where a new assembly will be in place by November-end and SIR is underway with elections just three months away.Regarding documentation, TDP stated, "Voters who are already enrolled in the most recent certified electoral roll should not be required to re-establish their eligibility unless specific and verifiable reasons are recorded." TDP has sought to make a distinction between intensive roll revision and electoral roll revision and suggested that the last electoral roll revision be made the base year. This means that for Bihar it should be the electoral roll revision of January 2025 which should be the base year, not 2003. It cited a Supreme Court judgement in Lal Babu Hussein vs Electoral Registration Officer to say "prior inclusion created a presumption of validity and any deletion must be preceded by a valid inquiry."In the Bihar SIR, the ECI sought proof and asked voters to fill a form to ensure inclusion. However, TDP representation said: "The burden of proof lies with ERO or objector, not the voter, especially when the name exists on the official roll".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Wire
16 minutes ago
- The Wire
Day Ahead of Monsoon Session, Opposition Raises Pahalgam, Trump's Claims and Bihar SIR in All-Party Meet
Parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju said that the government is 'ready for discussions with an open heart' but did not provide any clear answers to whether the demands will be heeded to. Union Ministers J.P. Nadda and Kiren Rijiju, along with others arrive to attend the all-party meeting ahead of the Monsoon session of Parliament. Photo: PTI New Delhi: The monsoon session of parliament is set for a stormy start as opposition parties on Sunday (July 20) at the customary all-party meeting convened by the Union government demanded a discussion on the Pahalgam terror attack, US president Donald Trump's continuing claims of ceasefire mediation between India and Pakistan and the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in poll-bound Bihar. The monsoon session of the parliament will begin on Monday, July 21. Following the all-party meeting which was attended by 54 MPs, Union parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju said that the government is 'ready for discussions' but did not provide any clear answers to whether the opposition's demands will be heeded to and said that the Business Advisory Committee (BAC) will take a final decision. He also said that whether it is the US President or anyone else, responses can only be given in parliament when a discussion or statement is being given. 'All parties put forth their positions. From the government we noted down all their points. We have said that to ensure that the House functions properly, the government and opposition should work together with good coordination. We might be political parties of different ideologies but it is everyone's responsibility to ensure that Parliament functions properly – opposition's as well as the government's,' said Rijiju to reporters after the meeting. 'Several important issues have been raised by the members asking for a discussion in parliament. We are ready for a discussion with an open heart. We follow rules and parliamentary traditions,' he added. As the opposition raised Trump's claims of mediating the ceasefire – he claimed it 24 times by some accounts – in the all-party meeting, along with his latest statement that 'five jets ' having been shot down, Rijiju said that whether it is the US president's statement or anyone else, an answer can only be given when a discussion is held in the parliament. 'Whether it is the US President or anyone else, I cannot give an answer here as this is not the proper forum. The correct forum for an answer or a statement is when a discussion will be held in parliament and at that time all answers will be given,' said Rijiju. 'I cannot make any announcement at the moment because the demands and issues raised today by both opposition parties and the ruling alliance will now be taken up in the Business Advisory Committee (BAC). A meeting will then be held under the chairmanship of the Rajya Sabha Chairman and Lok Sabha Speaker, where a final decision will be made,' he said. 'As for notices submitted by members, we cannot deny them. Requesting a discussion is every member's right, and we cannot refuse that,' he added. The monsoon session will be the first parliament session since the Pahalgam terror attack, and the four-day long military conflict with Pakistan following Operation Sindoor. The opposition had made continued demands for a special session of parliament, but the government had not heeded to the demands. 'We have demanded that several important issues are raised in this session, due to which we hope that Prime Minister Narendra Modi addresses the nation through the parliament. Those important issues are Pahalgam – the lapses that led to the attack and the statements made by the Lieutenant Governor. A lot of time has passed and the government will have to speak. The statements coming from the US President today (Saturday), raise questions on the dignity of India, the bravery of the Indian armed forces. Only the Prime Minister can respond to the statements made by the US President,' said Congress' deputy leader in the Lok Sabha Gaurav Gogoi. Gogoi further said that the prime minister must also address concerns arising from the ongoing SIR in Bihar, as well as the two-front axis being built by China and Pakistan that have implications for Indian foreign policy. 'It will be very important for Prime Minister Modi to come to this House and put forth his views on these three subjects,' he said. These issues were decided upon by the INDIA bloc in its virtual meeting on Saturday, July 19, attended by 24 parties. The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) stayed away and said that the alliance was only for the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. However, AAP MP Sanjay Singh, who attended the all-party meeting on Sunday, raised some of the same issues that were highlighted by the INDIA bloc. 'The issue I have raised on behalf of my party is that the US President is repeatedly saying that he got the ceasefire done in the name of a trade deal, the government should give clarification on this," said AAP MP Sanjay Singh. Singh added that the government must also address the slum demolitions in Delhi, the SIR exercise in Bihar, as well as the Air India plane crash last month. Communist Party of India MP Sandosh Kumar P. said that the 'Prime Minister must come to the House and address the Pahalgam terror attack and its subsequent developments. The government did not say anything clearly.' Biju Janata Dal MP Sasmit Patra said that he had raised the 'alarming breakdown of law and order in Odisha under the BJP government.' 'There has been a disturbing rise in heinous crimes against women and children. The tragic self-immolation of a student in Balasore; who had reached out to a BJP MP, the administration and even tweeted to the Odisha's chief minister, Union ministers, and several BJP leaders; has shaken the conscience of the nation. She was an ABVP member, yet her pleas were ignored. Just yesterday, a 15-year-old girl in Puri was set ablaze. Around 20 days ago, the Additional Commissioner of BMC was assaulted by five local BJP leaders. The recent chaos during the Puri Rath Yatra stampede is another example of this lawlessness. These issues will be strongly raised during the session,' Patra said. During the meeting some opposition members also raised the issue of communal remarks made by Justice Shekhar Yadav and demanded that the impeachment notice against him should be taken up. Meanwhile, Rijiju said that the government is in the process of gathering signatures from MPs against Justice Yashwant Varma – at whose house charred currency notes were discovered – and who has filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court challenging the in-house inquiry committee's report indicting him in the case. "I cannot comment on any business in terms of priority because until or unless the matter is passed by the BAC (Business Advisory Committee) with approval by the Chair, it is difficult for me to make an announcement outside… The signature is underway and it has crossed 100 already,' said Rijiju. A total of 100 signatures from MPs are required to move a motion for impeaching a judge. A huge sum of currency notes were discovered at an outhouse of Justice Varma, when he was a Delhi high court judge, during an accidental fire at his residence in the national capital. A committee appointed by then Chief Justice of India Sanjeev Khanna had indicted him following which he had moved the Supreme Court. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
Mint
16 minutes ago
- Mint
'Speak in Marathi or get out': Fight over seat in Mumbai local train turns into language row — Watch Viral video
Once again, an incident of language row has come to light in Maharashtra's capital, Mumbai, where an argument over a seat on a local train turned into a full-blown language war, with one woman telling the other to learn Marathi or 'get out'. The incident happened on Friday evening in the crowded ladies' compartment on the Central Line. The incident was also captured on camera and shared on social media platforms. The video that went viral on social media, showed six to seven women arguing over a seat. During the debate, one woman criticised another female passenger for not speaking in Marathi language. "If you want to stay in our Mumbai, speak Marathi, otherwise get out," she said. Soon after, other local women in the train joined the fight. This incident came amid ongoing language row in Maharashtra, with Raj Thackeray's Maharashtra Navnirman Sena party workers being condemned for targeting and abusing people for not speaking in Marathi. Earlier this month, a shopkeeper in Mumbai's Vikhroli area was assaulted by MNS workers over a WhatsApp status deemed offensive to Marathi people. The video of the incident showed the shopkeeper being forced to apologise publicly while being assaulted. Recently, Shiv Sena (UBT) chief Uddhav Thackeray asserted that he would not accept any attempt by the Maharashtra government to implement a three-language policy in the state. Meanwhile, Maharashtra Navnirman Sena chief Raj Thackeray on Friday said if Hindi was made mandatory for Classes 1 to 5 in schools in Maharashtra, his party will "shut down schools". Speaking at a rally at Mira Bhayandar near Mumbai, he referred to Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis's latest averment that Hindi will be taught in state schools at any costs. Thackerayalso hit back at BJP MP Nishikant Dubey's controversial "patak-patak ke maarenge" remarks. In a counter-attack, Raj Thackeray said, 'A BJP MP said, 'Marathi logon ko hum yahan pe patak patak ke maarenge'... You come to Mumbai. Mumbai ke samundar mein dubo dubo ke maarenge.'
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Case against NCP (SP) MLA Rohit Pawar for shouting at police in Mumbai
The Mumbai police have registered a case against NCP (SP) MLA Rohit Pawar for allegedly obstructing public servants in discharging duty after he shouted at a policeman, an official said on Sunday (July 20, 2025). Rohit Pawar, the grandnephew of NCP (SP) head Sharad Pawar, got engaged in a heated exchange with a policeman at Mumbai's Azad Maidan police station on Friday (July 18, 2025). The incident unfolded after Rohit Pawar had gone to the Azad Maidan police station along with NCP (SP) MLA Jitendra Awhad to meet an injured party worker following a clash in the Maharashtra Vidhan Bhavan building between supporters of Awhad and BJP legislator Gopichand Padalkar on Thursday (July 17, 2025). After the clash, members of both the groups were detained inside the Vidhan Bhavan and were eventually handed over to the police. During the visit to the police station, Rohit Pawar was seen shouting at a sub-inspector in Marathi, 'Keep your voice down, keep your voice down. If you raise your hand, I will teach you a lesson.' Based on a complaint, a case has been registered against Rohit Pawar for allegedly obstructing public servants in discharging duty, an official said.
