L.A.'s Terminal Island buildings listed among America's 11 most endangered historic places
The designation, announced Wednesday morning, is meant to elevate the visibility of the site, which stands as a physical reminder of a story that ended with the incarceration of the island's residents — among an estimated 120,000 people of Japanese descent, most American citizens, who were forcibly removed following the bombing of Pearl Harbor in World War II.
Today, Terminal Island is part of one the country's busiest container ports, and many people don't know that it was the first place from which Japanese Americans were uprooted and sent to government camps such as Manzanar in the Owens Valley.
"It's a story that hasn't been really told," said Los Angeles Conservancy President and Chief Executive Adrian Scott Fine, adding that his organization has been working to preserve Terminal Island's structures for close to two decades. "And if you go there, you're not going to know that unless you stumble across these two buildings and then learn the story, because everything, with the exception of these two buildings, has been cleared away."
The village was home to more than 3,000 people living in small wooden cottages and bungalows. Tuna Street was the main business thoroughfare and home to the two remaining buildings: the dry goods store Nanka Shoten (1918) and the grocery A. Nakamura Co. (1923). The destruction of the village began immediately following its residents' removal in 1942, and over the years more structures were razed as the island grew into an industrial and commercial port.
Historic sites on the annual National Trust list are chosen in part "based on the urgency of the threat, the viability of the proposed solution and the community engagement around the site," said National Trust President and Chief Executive Carol Quillen.
A group of survivors and descendants of the Terminal Island community — the Terminal Islanders Assn., formed in the 1970s — has been crucial to preservation efforts and has partnered with the National Trust and the L.A. Conservancy to propose meaningful and practical preservation solutions. Fine said discussions have included turning the structures into stores selling food and other necessities to port workers, who have few options on the island.
"They were always community-serving, and that would continue the original function and use even today," said Fine, while helping to tell the history.
The Tuna Street buildings are being considered for a historic-cultural monument designation with the city of L.A., a lengthy process that does not totally protect any site from destruction.
The Port of Los Angeles is reportedly considering demolishing the vacant and deteriorating buildings to make room for more container storage. Fine said the port has done a study that found the buildings to not be historic. But razing the buildings, he said, would contradict a master plan that the port hammered out with the L.A. Conservancy in 2013 after the entire island was placed on that year's National Trust list of endangered places.
The report allows the port to conduct a streamlined environmental review leading to demolition, "which they've done for some of the other tuna canneries and structures that were there just in the last 10 years," Fine said. "So in pattern and in practice, we believe that that's very much how they're approaching this one as well."
The National Trust's Quillen said the goal is to highlight "the contributions of these folks to our country's history and economy, and the ways in which this community fought for the rights that we all subscribe to. So when I think about the promise of this country, the ideals that are expressed in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, I want to honor the people whose lives and work exemplified the fight to realize those ideals."
The other 10 sites on the 2025 National Trust list are:
Cedar Key, Fla.
French Broad and Swannanoa River corridors in western North Carolina
Hotel Casa Blanca, Idlewild, Mich.
May Hicks Curtis House, Flagstaff, Ariz.
Mystery Castle, Phoenix
The Chateau at Oregon Caves, Caves Junction, Ore.
Pamunkey Indian Reservation, King William County, Va.
San Juan Hotel, San Juan, Texas
The Turtle, Niagara Falls, N.Y.
The Wellington, Pine Hill, N.Y.
At noon Wednesday, the L.A. Conservancy will hold a virtual program about the history of Tuna Street and efforts to preserve it.
Get notified when the biggest stories in Hollywood, culture and entertainment go live. Sign up for L.A. Times entertainment alerts.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Putin's failed experiment to lure anti-woke Americans to Russia
'He feels like he's been thrown to the wolves right now,' DeAnna Huffman told her YouTube followers two months ago. Her husband is serving in a foreigners unit with Russian officers. 'He's not getting any training,' DeAnna Huffman said, because her husband doesn't speak Russian. Advertisement 'He's needing money,' she said, adding that he had to give the unit 10,000 rubles ($125) for supplies. The Huffmans have been living in what Russian media Advertisement Another American, Chantelle Hare, explained why her family moved to Russia from Texas in The trickle of American emigres calls to mind the larger migration during the 1930s, when hundreds of Americans traveled to the then-young Soviet Union, either to find work or to escape virulent racism in the United States. While there is no reliable, comprehensive account of how those emigrants fared in the self-styed 'workers' paradise,' Many Americans found work in the USSR's explosive factory boom of the early Advertisement Still others, disenchanted, tried to return to the United States, with mixed results. When I posted a query on a Facebook site for former Moscow diplomats earlier this week, a retired consular officer answered: 'I was in Moscow 1992-94 and saw a half-dozen of these American citizens come into the consular section to reclaim their citizenship. They were an interesting group. One older gentleman I remember had been living in a town in the Urals and still had a Chicago accent, although he struggled with getting English words out.' The Depression-era US-to-USSR emigres inspired few imitators. It seems hard to believe that history won't repeat itself with the Huffmans, the Hares, and their disaffected compatriots. The Russians have a saying, 'Khorosho tam, gde as nye,' meaning: 'Things are great, where we are not.' The grass is always greener, until you are standing on the lawn in question. Alex Beam's column appears regularly in the Globe. Follow him
Los Angeles Times
12 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Opinion: Motivation is a myth
Before you start reading on, I can assure you: this is not clickbait. Motivation really is a myth — and I'll show you why. Let's play a game of true or false. True or false? Each and every one of us is procrastinating on one or another task right now. True . True or false? Too often do we feel unmotivated to finish or even start a task. Of course it's true. True or false? You need motivation to start anything in order to finish it. False… now that one must have come as quite a surprise. This leaves you pondering and asking yourself: why? The answer lies in the debunking of the very myth — motivation. To many, this would seem like a sceptical perspective of a 14-year-old intending to lure you out of a state of complacency. But in reality, motivation is only an ephemeral concept that fails to withstand the innate tendencies of human behaviour and mind. Before drawing any conclusions, it is imperative that we unravel the essence of motivation to its core. So, what exactly is motivation? Motivation is regarded as the act of stimulating one's desire to achieve a goal — to summon up this sort of mystical and elusive energy that would propel an individual to 'spontaneously start being productive'. Are you beginning to see the utopian nature of this concept? In an ideal world, this notion may sound like the ultimate key to unlocking productivity and a robust catalyst for action. But here lies the trap. The motivation trap — a trap too many of us have unwittingly fallen into. Dr. Russ Harris, an American psychotherapist, explained it most effectively when he said, 'we wait to feel motivated before we take any action.' Now, what's the problem with that? Well, it sets in motion a vicious cycle wherein, if you only act when you feel 'motivated' enough to do so, you may find yourself waiting indefinitely for the opportune moment to strike. This results in an accumulation of missed opportunities and unfulfilled potential — a world where backwardness dominates. Many people fall victim to the motivation trap, perpetually seeking external inspiration to drive their actions. However, relying solely on motivation can result in inconsistent behaviour and procrastination. Being a transient emotion, it often fails to provide sustained momentum. Consequently, it comes in intervals, and the frequent instances wherein an individual lacks 'motivation' can be nothing short of a bane. Consider this scenario: have you ever felt too lazy to work on a project due the next day, left wanting to go to sleep instead? A situation like this is all too familiar for many, especially for an early bird who yearns for their sleep like me. But have you noticed that once you start studying, your focus and energy gradually increase, and you become more determined to finish the task at hand? This explains the underlying truth behind productivity: motivation does not precede action, and instead, it is an outcome of it. That sense of determination and accomplishment derived after or during a task is motivation. So ask yourself: how many times have you been challenged with a seemingly 'impossible' task, only to discover that taking a few steps towards that goal makes you more motivated to complete it? But if motivation is, in fact, a myth, then the question still lies: what truly facilitates success and productivity? The answer lies in a shift of mindset from motivation to discipline . Discipline, unlike motivation, isn't reliant on a fleeting urge to suddenly initiate work. It's a routine –a habit developed with dedication and persistent work. It entails establishing precise objectives, putting together a meticulous schedule, and adhering to it despite how 'motivated' you are. Admittedly, it is undeniably arduous in nature, but it also produces results like motivation never could. For someone who prioritises outcomes, discipline becomes indispensable. Discipline is the backbone of achievement. Its objective is to completely cut the link between two mutually exclusive concepts, in this case: feelings and action. The first step to fostering life-long productivity is to internally register that your feelings should be inconsequential to the tasks that you consciously want to do. Don't feel like doing it? Do it anyway. This way, the habit of actively taking action and prioritising goals is slowly cultivated. In essence, while motivation may provide a temporary spark, it's discipline that fuels long-term achievement, success, and productivity. This paradigm shift may be hard to fathom at first; however, over time, it will seamlessly engrave itself into your routine and lifestyle. Now, about that one seemingly Herculean and 'impossible' task you are yet to finish. Embrace its challenge, take the first step, and let discipline do its work. What are you waiting for? Related
San Francisco Chronicle
14 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
California's newest invaders are beautiful swans. Should hunters kill them?
On an early August morning, it didn't take long to spot the first pair of huge white swans with orange and black bills and graceful, curving necks as they swam in the marsh along the side of a Solano County levee road. They dabbled in the vegetation as a pickup drove through the Grizzly Island Wildlife Area. A short drive later, past a herd of a dozen tule elk, two more swans appeared in the marsh alongside the dirt road. Then four more. A few hundred yards down the road, out in the distance past a thicket of swaying reeds, dozens of swans swam in the water. For casual bird watchers, the sight of all these majestic animals might be a pleasure and bring to mind swan-themed works of literature, such as 'Leda and the Swan' and 'The Ugly Duckling.' But for wetland biologists and others with a stake in the health of the surrounding Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, the largest estuary on the West Coast, the birds represent the latest — and an exponentially growing — threat to the few remaining wetlands left in California. These are mute swans, native to Europe and Asia. Weighing up to 30 pounds and with a wingspan of up to eight feet, they're the biggest bird in the marsh, and they're not the least bit shy about throwing their weight around. Fiercely territorial, especially during breeding season, they've been known to drown smaller animals and have killed at least one American kayaker. They've displaced colonies of nesting native birds in other parts of the U.S. they have invaded. Mute swans also feed gluttonously on submerged vegetation, destroying the plant life on which other native wetland species depend. 'They might be a pretty, big, white bird … and they may be charismatic, but they can be pretty nasty,' said Brad Bortner, a retired chief of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's migratory bird management programs in Washington D.C. In 2008, California banned anyone without a special permit from keeping mute swans as pets or from importing them into the state. The hope was to head off yet another destructive invasive species taking hold in the state. It didn't work. The mute swan population exploded in just a few years. In 2022, state waterfowl biologists estimated there were 1,500 of them. This spring, they estimated more than 12,000, nearly double the year before. Most of the mute swans are in the Suisun Marsh, a sprawling complex of public wetlands, agricultural lands and private duck-hunting clubs on the outskirts of the Bay Area near Fairfield. 'We keep watching them climb and climb and climb,' said Melanie Weaver, waterfowl coordinator for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. A measure before the state Legislature aims to allow hunters and landowners to shoot the swans for the next five years to try to bring their numbers down to more manageable levels in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and beyond. The hunting groups supporting Assembly Bill 764 essentially ask: If Californians are OK with spending more than $13 million since 2018 to kill nearly 6,000 nutria, the 20-pound, orange-toothed South American rodents that have invaded the same waterways, why not let hunters and land owners do the same to mute swans — but for free? 'If the population gets too large and out of control, it may be beyond our ability then to really effectively manage them,' Mark Hennelly, a lobbyist for the California Waterfowl Association, told the Assembly Water, Parks and Wildlife Committee this spring. 'So we want to get ahead of the problem.' Animal welfare groups object That argument has so far been a surprisingly easy sell in the Legislature, despite California's passionate and influential anti-hunting activists. Similar swan-killing proposals have led to protests in other states. The measure easily passed the Assembly without any lawmaker voting against it. It's now pending in the California Senate. No group has opposed the measure so far, according to the CalMatters Digital Democracy database, but that might soon change. Mute swans, unlike nutria, have a dedicated group of supporters, mostly on the East Coast. Nicole Rivard, a spokesperson for Friends of Animals, said she and fellow members of the animal welfare organization believe mute swans shouldn't be treated like vermin. The birds arrived here through no fault of their own, brought by humans, and they don't deserve to be killed for it, she said. Rivard believes the California legislation is motivated by hunters looking for an excuse to have yet another bird to legally shoot. Currently, mute swans can only be killed by landowners if the birds 'are found to be injuring growing crops or property,' according to state regulations. 'We're anti-hunting, so we don't like the idea that (hunting) might be, you know, part of the reasoning behind this,' Rivard said. Arguing that claims of mute swans' environmental damage and aggression are overblown, Friends of Animals and other groups opposed killing them decades ago, after Mid-Atlantic states proposed eradication when their populations began expanding dramatically in the 1990s and early 2000s. The groups protested, filed lawsuits and proposed legislation to try to stop the killing. They had mixed success. Some states began killing the nonnative swans over the animal welfare groups' objections. Notably, Maryland was able to knock the mute swan population down from around 5,000 birds in the early 2000s to around 200 by 2010. 'Continued control and maintenance operations have reduced that number to just a handful of birds today,' said Josh Homyack, the game bird section leader for the Maryland Department of Natural Resources. In Maryland, government agency employees raided mute swan nests and destroyed eggs, captured and euthanized swans when they were flightless during their feather-molting season and shot them in carefully coordinated operations, Homyack said. The state also issued a few permits to kill the birds to local landowners. In New York, the mute swan lobby got a law passed that made it harder to kill the birds, requiring state officials to 'fully exhaust non-lethal control measures' such as nest destruction and capturing birds and moving them to wildlife facilities ' prior to any lethal removal.' The mute swan population in New York has stayed steady at around 2,000 to 3,400 birds. Charisma matters with invasive species On the East Coast, mute swans have been around since before the turn of the last century. They were first imported as ornamental livestock for zoos, parks and estates. Some of California's mute swans likely came in the same way. Weaver, the California waterfowl coordinator, said others were likely brought in the past few years to chase away Canada geese that have increasingly become a nuisance at parks and golf courses. 'People were buying these (swans), and they were just throwing them out there,' she said. Weaver noted their owners didn't do the responsible thing and clip their wings to keep them from flying off. That's hardly surprising. It's no easy task to grab a hissing 25-pound swan, big and angry enough to swamp a kayaker. So with nothing to stop them, the birds flew to nearby marshlands and began reproducing. 'Here we are, not very many years down the road, with a population that is really increasing at a rapid rate,' Weaver said. So far, California's wildlife agency hasn't enacted a mute swan eradication plan similar to the one it started almost immediately — and publicly promoted — a few years ago, after nutria first started turning up in the San Joaquin Valley. Nutria are similarly destructive feeders on aquatic plants. The South American swamp rodents also burrow holes in levees, posing a threat to the state's flood-control and water-supply infrastructure. Dave Strayer, a retired invasive species expert with the Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies in New York, said he's not surprised state officials haven't been as aggressive with the beautiful mute swans, given the uproar over killing them in other states. He said research has shown that when it comes to invasive animals, charisma matters. The more attractive a problematic non-native species is, the less appetite there is to wipe it out. Stayer gave an example: Few complain about killing common nonnative rats, but you're apt to get death threats at even the suggestion of wiping out ecologically harmful feral cat colonies in the same habitats. He noted that no one has ever complained about efforts to eradicate one of his research subjects, the nonnative zebra mussels that have also invaded California. 'I never had even one person stand up for zebra mussels and say, 'No, these are beautiful, elegant God's creatures' and so forth,' he said. Few wetlands and too many mute swans Supporters of the swan-killing legislation say reducing the number of mute swans should be fairly easy since the giant white birds are easy to spot, identify and kill. Their size and the color and shape of their bills also reduce the risk they'll be confused with other protected bird species, they say. California's native tundra and trumpeter swans would still be protected and illegal to shoot if the bill becomes law. Despite their undeniable beauty, Weaver, the state waterfowl coordinator, sees mute swans similarly to nutria. The swans pose too great a threat to native species reliant on the few wetlands left in California, which has lost at least 90% of the habitats to agriculture and urban sprawl. 'They don't move around the state all that much, and they really like the Delta-Suisun Marsh area, so it's still easy to handle the issue,' Weaver said. 'The longer we wait, it won't be.'
