logo
Fed's rate-cut delay intact as inflation fears override Trump pressure

Fed's rate-cut delay intact as inflation fears override Trump pressure

Reuters2 days ago
WASHINGTON, July 18 (Reuters) - The case for a U.S. interest rate cut remains unresolved as Federal Reserve officials head into their policy meeting later this month, with data showing fresh signs of higher inflation and President Donald Trump intensifying his demands for lower borrowing costs.
Trump appeared near the point of trying to fire Fed Chair Jerome Powell this week, but backed off with a nod to the market disruption that would likely follow, and the U.S. central bank's policy rate outlook remains virtually unchanged despite the drama. Fed officials haven't mentioned raising rates, but headlines about an imminent Powell firing caused U.S. Treasury yields to jump, not exactly what Trump wants as he yearns for cheaper financing for massive federal deficits.
The Fed, though, is tasked with keeping inflation stable, not lowering government financing costs, and it is expected to hold its benchmark rate steady in the 4.25%-4.50% range at its July 29-30 meeting. The Fed last cut rates in December, after which it began factoring in the possible impact on prices from import tariffs that Trump quickly began imposing after returning to the White House in January.
Rate cuts are expected to resume later this year, with investors anticipating a quarter-percentage-point reduction in September.
But those odds slipped to nearly 50-50 this week after the Consumer Price Index showed inflation rose to 2.7% in June from 2.4% in the prior month. A trend that saw declining prices for goods is beginning to shift, adding to overall inflation, in a sign businesses may have begun passing some of the tariffs along to consumers.
Powell and other Fed officials said they expected price increases to quicken this summer. They have been reluctant to cut rates until it is clear how much inflation is in train, how long it persists, and whether the economy begins to slow enough to ease the pressure on prices.
Fed policymakers will receive two more months of jobs and inflation data before their meeting in September, and investors - and Trump administration officials - will be listening closely to Powell's post-meeting press conference on July 30 for language that leans towards a rate cut then or not.
In the final comments before policymakers begin a "blackout" period on public statements before the next meeting, the focus remained largely on inflation and how June's uptick showed prices rising across an array of largely imported goods.
Trade and tariff issues are now "the key drivers of the U.S. economic outlook," Fed Governor Adriana Kugler said on Thursday, adding that with price pressures building, the central bank needed to keep rates steady "for some time" to hold inflation and inflationary psychology in check.
"I see upward pressure on inflation from trade policies, and I expect additional price increases later in the year," she said. Maintaining tight monetary policy for now "is important to keep longer-run inflation expectations anchored."
Fed Governor Christopher Waller, mentioned as a possible replacement for Powell, in comments later on Thursday disagreed, repeating his call for a rate cut at the meeting in two weeks to account for what he sees as a coming economic slowdown and the likelihood that the impact of tariffs on inflation won't last.
"With inflation near target and the upside risks to inflation limited, we should not wait until the labor market deteriorates before we cut the policy rate," Waller said in prepared remarks for a speech to the Money Marketeers of New York University.
The Fed used a historically rapid escalation of interest rates in 2022 to help contain a surge of inflation in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic.
By last fall, Fed officials were confident enough that inflation was receding towards the central bank's 2% target that they began to lower rates, delivering three cuts in the final four months of the year.
Trump made criticism of high inflation a centerpiece of his 2024 presidential campaign, pledging that prices would actually fall on his watch while also promising to raise tariffs.
As Trump's inauguration arrived, the economy was still growing above trend and the labor market remained tight. Fed officials and staff worried that while tariffs, like any tax, should in theory have only a one-time price impact, those conditions coupled with the recent bout of high inflation could lead to a more persistent problem.
The focus on tariffs as a source of inflation and a reason for delaying rate cuts has been central to Trump's ire at Powell, but U.S. central bankers this week said the CPI data for June showed why they are concerned, with inflation still above target and possibly poised to move higher.
Kugler estimated that coming data will show the Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index the Fed uses for its inflation target increased 2.5% in June, while the "core" measure excluding food and energy items rose 2.8%, higher than in May.
"We may be at an inflection point," as far as inflation is concerned, Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic told Fox Business a day after the CPI release. Nearly half of goods saw price increases that annualize to 5% or more, he said, a ratio he uses to monitor inflation's breadth during the pandemic surge. That was double the share in January.
"The headline number moved away from our target, not towards it ... We've seen the highest increase in prices that we've seen all year," Bostic said. "We are seeing things underlying in the economy that suggest inflation pressures are up ... The price pressures are real."
In economic projections issued in June, Fed officials expected PCE inflation to hit 3% by the end of this year but still anticipated being able to cut rates by half a percentage point - far short of the massive reduction Trump wants with his call for a 1% Fed rate.
No Fed official has endorsed that Trump idea, with caution still the favored approach.
"It's important to note that it's still early days for the effects of tariffs, which take time to come into full force," New York Fed President John Williams said this week. "Though we are only seeing relatively modest effects of tariffs in the hard aggregate data so far, I expect those effects to increase in coming months."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

McDonald's, the only firm serving up income with a side of growth
McDonald's, the only firm serving up income with a side of growth

Times

timean hour ago

  • Times

McDonald's, the only firm serving up income with a side of growth

How do you fancy having your standard of living cut in half when you are too old to do anything about it? That's the dismal prospect facing many who are preparing for retirement with life savings that lack protection against the insidious effects of inflation — and it's part of the reason why the government is on a drive to get more of us investing. Even apparently small reductions in the purchasing power of money can have big effects over the 20 years or so that the typical pensioner can expect to spend in retirement. According to the Office for National Statistics, the consumer price index (CPI) measure of inflation was 3.6 per cent over the year to June, while the retail price index (RPI) measure was 4.4 per cent. You can see why politicians and their public relations people prefer to quote CPI, while the gilt or bond markets — where governments borrow from international institutions — reckon that RPI is a better measure of what's really going on. Either way, if those rates of inflation remained unchanged, CPI would cause the purchasing power of your money to plunge 50 per cent in 20 years, while RPI would do so in just 16 years and four months. Politicians and everyone working in the public sector need not trouble their heads about any of this, because their defined benefit pensions have inflation protections subsidised by the good old taxpayer. But all of us in the private sector, who must pay for our own retirement with defined contribution pensions, had better think about how we can preserve — or even increase — the purchasing power of our savings. That's why this 66-year-old DIY investor, unlike most financial journalists, keeps banging on about dividends, or the income that some funds and shares can deliver. It is important to be aware that dividend yields — the income that shares pay, expressed as a percentage of their price — are not guaranteed and can be cut or cancelled without notice. High-yield investments often entail high risks, as demonstrated dramatically when Houthi rebels recently sank a bulk carrier ship in the Red Sea. Fortunately this was not one of the 20 vessels operated by Tufton Assets, formerly Tufton Oceanic Assets (stock market ticker: SHPP), but the inherent risks of investing in shipping are reflected in the rewards of this top yielder in my Isa, which pays 8.9 per cent income. It's only fair to add that Tufton shares I bought for 86p in August 2021 cost exactly the same today — so they have achieved no capital growth at all. But, more positively, income from the shares has increased by an annual average of 6.5 per cent over the past five years, according to the independent statisticians at LSEG, formerly the London Stock Exchange Group. The past is not necessarily a guide to the future. But a high and rising tax-free income does provide two reasons to be cheerful when many other economic indicators make me fearful. Much the same can be said about Greencoat UK Wind (UKW), a £4.4 billion fund that manages offshore wind farms. This is the second highest yielder in my Isa, delivering nearly 8.2 per cent income, with dividends rising an annual average of 7.6 per cent over the past five years. If that rate of ascent could be sustained it would double shareholders' income in less than a decade. Less happily, this is another example of the risk that seeking high dividends can lead to low or no capital returns; Greencoat shares I bought for £1.45 in August 2023 now cost just £1.21. • Is it worth buying shares in Greencoat UK Wind? That's why it could make sense to consider less income today in the hope of more capital growth tomorrow. For example, Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure (EGL) is another self-descriptive investment trust — it yields 3.9 per cent, with dividends rising 5 per cent on the same basis as above. Neither number is quite as exciting for income-seekers as those mentioned earlier, but Ecofin shares I bought for £1.52 in September 2019, as reported here at that time, cost £2.20 at close of trade on Friday. That helped this fund, focused on a wide range of electricity and gas companies, become the fifth most valuable holding in my portfolio. Exchange traded funds (ETFs), investment and unit trusts may reduce the risk inherent in stock markets, which is a big worry for pensioners who cannot make up for losses with a bit of overtime or a pay rise. These pooled funds can diminish risk by diversifying our exposure over dozens of different companies, countries and currencies. That should mean they don't all go down at once. Investing directly in a single business might be more risky but can also be more rewarding. For example, the world's biggest fast food business, McDonald's (MCD), yields 2.4 per cent income, which has risen an annual average of 7.5 per cent over the past five years. Even more remarkably, it has increased shareholders' income every year since 1976. That makes it what Americans call a 'dividend aristocrat' — a Standard & Poor's share that has raised dividends for more than 25 years. • My six sovereignty shares can help you and the UK at the same time Never mind the macroeconomics, I invested 2 per cent of my life savings in McDonald's when I paid $95 in July 2014, as reported here at that time. They cost $298 on Friday, supersizing this shareholding to become the second most valuable among 50 constituents of my forever fund. This just goes to show that income-hungry investors can have our burger and eat it. Either way, with or without fries, I'm lovin' it. Short-term share price shocks can create opportunities for long-term investors, and it's better still when dividends pay us to be patient. Consider the world's biggest chocolate maker, whose share price plunged by 13 per cent on the day it unwrapped bad news earlier this month. Few folk in Britain have heard of the Swiss business called Barry Callebaut (BARN) but many enjoy its produce, which it sells to better-known retail brands including the Cadbury owner, Mondelez, and the KitKat maker, Nestlé. High cocoa prices following a poor harvest have hit all the above, as more expensive ingredients eat into profits. Just two countries, Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana, produce nearly 70 per cent of the world's cocoa. Barry Callebaut shares traded above 1,600 Swiss francs last year but I bit into them at SwFr766 in April, as reported here at that time. They had bounced back to SwFr950 earlier this month before another profits warning prompted that double-digit meltdown, when I doubled my stake at SwFr858 on Monday. They traded at SwFr1,016 on Friday. These shares yield 3 per cent gross dividend income, which has risen by a measly average of 2.2 per cent a year over the past five years. Similarly, Nestlé shares I bought for SwFr65 in March 2014 cost SwFr77 last Monday and yield 4 per cent income, rising by 2.5 per cent a year. I have no idea what will happen next to cocoa farmers in west Africa, and my sticky fingers may get burnt, but I suspect current share prices will look cheap in future. Short-term volatility is baked in but so is the long-term craving for chocolate. • Full disclosure: Ian Cowie's shareholdings

Top politician who's a 'shoo-in' to win the 2028 presidential election
Top politician who's a 'shoo-in' to win the 2028 presidential election

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Top politician who's a 'shoo-in' to win the 2028 presidential election

Vice President JD Vance has came out as the apparent favorite to win the 2028 presidential election, according to a prediction market. The 40-year-old is favorite to become the next commander in chief with a 27 percent chance already, according to Polymarket. In second place was California Governor Gavin Newsom with a 14 percent chance, which has fallen two percent according to the market. Democratic firebrand Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez closely trails the Golden State leader with a ten percent chance. Others close by the top three frontrunners included Pete Buttigieg with eight percent, and Marco Rubio, with a six percent chance. Outsiders included incumbent president Donald Trump, with a three percent chance, even though he cannot run for a third term, and his son Donald Jr., with the same. Trump has toyed with the idea of running for a third term, despite the Constitution stipulating that presidents are limited to two four-year terms. In late March he told NBC News: 'I'm not joking, there are methods which you could do it', when asked to elaborate he declined to answer. Vance started fielding questions in February, after just a few weeks in office as the veep, on a potential run for the White House in 2028. Speaking with Fox News in early February he gave little away, saying: 'We'll cross that political bridge when we come to it. 'We'll see what happens come 2028. But the way that I think about this is, the best thing for my future is actually the best thing for the American people, which is that we do a really good job over the next three and a half years.' Newsom has also been questioned on the possibility of running as the Democratic candidate. Speaking with the Wall Street Journal last month, he told the outlet: 'I'm not thinking about running, but it's a path that I could see unfold.' He added that it was too early to make a decision and would wait to see if the moment felt right, the outlet added. In a Daily Mail poll earlier this year, Trump came out on top against all of his Republican rivals in a hypothetical 2028 primary race. Republican respondents were told to presume that Trump's Constitutional hurdles of getting on the ballot again had been cleared to see if there was an appetite for a third Trump time. A whopping 39 percent said Trump would be their first choice, followed by 19 percent who selected Vice President. After that, failed 2024 candidates, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley garnered 6 percent and 4 percent support, respectively. Without Trump in the equation, Vance dominates the 2028 GOP primary, the new polling found. Forty-eight percent of Republicans chose Vance to be the GOP nominee, followed by just 8 percent who selected DeSantis. Trump is barred from running again due to the 22nd Amendment in the U.S. Constitution. Republicans could try and amend the Constitution again to allow presidents to serve more than two terms, as one pro-MAGA congressman has suggested - but there's an extremely high bar to do such a thing. The amendment would need to be proposed by either two-third of both houses of Congress or by a national convention called by two-third of the states. And then the proposal would need to be ratified by three-fourths of the states - either by their legislatures or by special conventions.

Dave Portnoy makes shock U-turn on Caitlin Clark's 'brilliant' rival Angel Reese
Dave Portnoy makes shock U-turn on Caitlin Clark's 'brilliant' rival Angel Reese

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Dave Portnoy makes shock U-turn on Caitlin Clark's 'brilliant' rival Angel Reese

Dave Portnoy has begrudgingly offered some praise to Angel Reese for her new marketing campaign, as he called the Chicago Sky star 'brilliant' on Saturday. Reese, who is leading the WNBA in offensive rebounds per game, has been routinely mocked for her propensity to grab her own misses at the rim. The term 'mebounds' spread across social media, and Reese decided to trademark the phrase last month. Reebok announced on Saturday that the company is set to release the 'Angel Reese 1 Mebounds', and even Portnoy - who is decidedly on the side of Caitlin Clark in her rivalry with Reese - had to credit Reese for her sharp thinking. 'I hate (sports sense) Angel Reese. Hate her,' Portnoy began on X. 'That's how much it pains me to admit how brilliant it was for her team to trademark Mebounds and make it her thing. Brilliant. I hate how brilliant it is.' While the phrase was used by some to denigrate Reese, the two-time All-Star made a TikTok last month to express her affinity for it. Angel Reese 1 Mebounds. All mine. Not yours (yet) — Reebok (@Reebok) July 19, 2025 'Whoever came up with the 'mebounds' thing. Y'all ate that up... anything that comes off that board, it's mine!!', she said. Reese has also begun selling 'Mebounds' apparel on her website. The second-year player has made significant strides in her second season, improving her field goal percentage from 39.1 percent to 44.6 percent and doubling her assists average from 1.9 to 3.8 per game. She set the single-season record for offensive rebounds in her rookie season and is on pace to lead the league once again, as she's averaging a league-leading 3.8 per night. She also leads the league in total rebounds per contest with 12.6. However, her Sky look set to miss the postseason again as they're just 7-15 thus far. Reese, who has competed against Clark since their days in college, clashed with the former Iowa star earlier this season after a hard foul from the Fever guard. During a fiery season opener between Indiana and Chicago, Clark slapped the Sky forward across the arm after she grabbed an offensive rebound, sending her tumbling to the floor midway through the third quarter. Reese was left incensed by the push, leaping back to her feet and making a beeline for the Fever star before her teammates quickly intervened. The pair played together during the All-Star Game last year and have sung each other's praises, though tensions boiled over during that aforementioned moment in the season opener and Clark received a flagrant foul. Clark told ESPN that there was 'nothing malicious' about the play during an in-game interview, a sentiment which Reese shared after the game. Reese and Clark were both named All-Stars in their sophomore campaigns, though Clark will not suit up in the game due to a groin problem. Reese will suit up for the team captained by Napheesa Collier on Saturday night.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store