2036 Olympics: The possible impact of Qatar's bid – DW – 07/29/2025
Given the football World Cup was in the country just three years ago, the eight major global championships the country has hosted this year alone, and the Asian Games scheduled to take place in there in 2030, Qatar bidding for the 2036 Olympics feels like the next logical step for the Gulf country.
The difference this time around is all about scale. There will be 36 sports on show in Los Angeles in 2028, with a variety of disciplines inside each sport. Then there's also the political aspect of an Olympic Games, which is different to that of a football World Cup.
Still, Jean-Loup Chappelet, a professor of public management at the University of Lausanne and Olympic scholar, believes Qatar's history of hosting means they are very capable of hosting a Summer Olympics.
"Having the facilities is not the most important for the Olympics nowadays," Chappelet told DW.
Instead, he said, there are two key criteria that the International Olympic Committee (IOC) has been looking for in a host country in recent years.
"One is political support and the other is popular support. It's more important than the venues. In fact, the venues can be changed, like we have seen a lot in in LA recently and also in Brisbane. So nobody doubts that the venues are available. What is important is political support from the public authorities."
Given the average high temperature in Qatar in July is 44 Celciuis (111 Fahrenheit), hosting a Olympics at that time is out of the question.
"It would have to be in November, like the World Cup 2022," said the Frenchman, who worked on the bid for the 1992 Winter Olympics in Albertville.
"Can we do (that)? It could probably happen, but it's a big problem because the whole sports calendar is organized around the Olympics."
Assuming that were possible, then there's also the question of the two aforementioned criteria. Given that national political support isn't likely to be a problem, attention will turn to popular support.
An easy way to gauge this is through a referendum, as was held in Germany regarding the mere idea of bidding for the 2036 Games.However, Chappelet isn't so sure he can see Qatar conducting something similar.
"In general, the IOC is satisfied with polls," he explained.
"The Polls are conducted by an independent company. So they see what is the (level of) popular support. The problem in Qatar is that the local population is rather small and there's a large migrant population. So the validity of this popular support is to be discussed, for sure."
If that support is also secured, there's also the small issue of dealing with neighbors Saudi Arabia. If Qatar won the bid, this would likely prevent Saudi Arabia from hosting the Olympics for many years. But with the 2034 World Cup already confirmed to be in Saudi Arabia, it would seen likely that the kingdom would want to host an Olympics soon after that.
Assuming none of that is a problem though, the final hurdle is the impact of the IOC choosing Qatar.
"Human rights are quite important" Chappelet said. "Especially for the construction of the facilities, the state and the workers. And so there were big problems there. Qatar made some efforts but the the image-perception of Qatar is not as good as it can be for other countries."
Depsite years of criticism though, the World Cup did take place in Qatar.
"It's not insurmountable," Chappelet said. "It can be done. Of course they [IOC] will have a lot of criticism, but the question is whether the IOC wants to to to bear all this criticism or whether they will take another less risky path?"
Chappelet believes the confirmation of Qatar's bid will force the others into action.
"It means they have to rehab a little bit," Chappelet said. Given the heat, the current doping issues and the poor athletes results, Chappelet believes that India is already out of the running. South Korea is also in the mix but the strength of their bid depends on the outcome of municipal voting for the mayor of Seoul next year, while Chile is likely one for the more distant future given it will be Asia's turn. The Games are supposed to rotate every season, and with the 2028 edition to be in North America and 2032 in Oceania, the 2036 Olympic Games should be in Asia or Africa, who have never hosted before.
That puts Qatar and Indonesia in a good position, although Chappelet believes Istanbul has a strong chance.
"It [Turkey] is a major country, and it has bid several times. It has a booming economy, of course they have problems also like many other countries, maybe with human rights, but it's also a Muslim country, which I think is an argument," Chappelet said. "The Muslim world should get the Games one one day."
The final decision is expected to be delayed until 2027 after newly elected IOC President Kirsty Coventry recently said IOC members wanted to be more involved in the selection process and to allow for a thorough review of how previous hosts were selected.
"There was overwhelming support from the IOC members for a pause to be done, and a review of the future host election process," Coventry said.
"Members want to be engaged more in the process and secondly there was a very big discussion in and around when should the next host be awarded."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
8 hours ago
- DW
The lawsuit that could change football – DW – 08/06/2025
Transfer fees and wages have become as much a part of the football discourse as goals and titles. But a new lawsuit aimed at FIFA and football associations including Germany's could force sweeping changes. A compensation claim that could be worth billions of euros and involve 100,000 footballers who have played professionally in the European Union over the last 23 years may alter the financial landscape of the sport. The Dutch foundation Justice for Players (JFP) has launched a lawsuit against global governing body FIFA. Also named as co-defendants in the case are the German Football Association (DFB) and those of France, Belgium, the Netherlands and Denmark. "It will amount to billions," Dolf Segaar, a lawyer and board member for JFP, told DW. "It's not only about money. It is about fair rules, which we believe are important as well. We intend to discuss the settlement for compensation, but we want as well for this to be a trigger to find new rules on behalf of clubs and players, so that there is a better functioning labor market in the football industry." The lawsuit follows a landmark ruling from the European Court of Justice (ECJ) last October in a case brought by former Real Madrid and France player Lassana Diarra. The midfielder had wanted to terminate his contract with Lokomotiv Moscow in 2014 but was unable to join a Belgian club after leaving Russia because Lokomotiv owned his registration and he did not have what was described as "just cause" for termination. The ECJ ruled that the FIFA transfer laws which applied at the time "impede the free movement of professional footballers wishing to develop their activity by going to work for a new club." The organization tweaked those laws in December, but much less stringently than advocates had hoped for. Unlike in regular EU labor law, footballers are bound by contracts they sign when they join a club or renegotiate a deal. Therefore, unlike other workers, they cannot seek work elsewhere without their employer agreeing to a fee with another interested party for a transfer – or until their contract expires. Even exiting on contract expiration is a relatively new concept in football, having been introduced only in 1995 after another landmark case known as the Bosman ruling – named after the player who brought the case. Jean-Louis Dupont, the lawyer for Diarra and Belgian player Jean-Marc Bosmanat the time, is advising JFP. The Bosman ruling changed football significantly, giving players greater power over their careers and contributing to the enormous wage growth at the top end of the sport in the last 30 years. Christina Philippou, associate professor in accounting and sport finance at the University of Portsmouth in England, thinks that a settlement or win in court for JFP could have a similarly significant impact. "Inevitably, if you are saying that somebody can walk away from a contract, then that restructures the system," she told DW. "The power shifts, and that makes it more like normal employment cases." Philippou explained that footballers are currently considered "intangible assets" by clubs, assigning them a value in a club's accounting and allowing for some leeway in terms of spreading value over a long-term contract and other such practices. This is particularly important given that European clubs often have to adhere to financial rules of profit and sustainability from domestic leagues and European football's governing body, UEFA. Given the financial interests at stake, she expects JFP to come to an agreement with the associations and FIFA that maintains some sort of tweaked transfer system, though adds that it could see transfer fees reduce greatly or disappear. "The transfer fee is effectively buying you out of your contract. Now if we revert to normal employment rights, which is effectively what this case is looking like, then that does away with this entirely." She also predicts we could see a further rise in wages for those at the top of the game, with Europe becoming even more attractive to non-EU players as a result, and perhaps a shortening of contract lengths. Long-term contracts could become redundant if a player can walk away from a deal any time without much of a transfer fee. This may, in turn, be problematic for smaller clubs who rely on player sales while players lower down the leagues would face greater risk from injury or illness should shorter term contracts become even more usual. Seegar, too, expects some change to the transfer model but thinks negotiations will mean it's not so drastic. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video "I still believe that if you are transferred from one club to the other, there still will be a kind of compensation from payment by one club to the other for the transfer of the player under an existing contract. "I'm not sure whether masses of players will terminate their agreements without just cause, because you want to go to another club, and if you are seen as an unreliable player that easily terminates his contracts, why would another club take the risk?" The Dutch lawyer told DW that, given JFP only sent the letters out on Monday, few players are signed up yet. With the case being brought in the Netherlands, those residing there will automatically be represented. But any player who has played professionally in the European Union or the UK, whether male or female, since 2002 will be eligible. He does not "believe that it is a big challenge" to attract players to join the lawsuit. "It's not important whether or not you transferred during this period. It is just because of your diminished negotiation position and the disincentives caused by the rules that you have suffered damages," he said. JFP claims players earned 8% less over the course of their career as a result of FIFA's transfer rules. Should Seegar and JFP be successful, the cost to FIFA and national football associations in the EU could be massive. For the EU countries with high-paying leagues, like Spain, Germany and France, penalties could be ruinous for clubs, who may be passed on the costs by their FAs, given they pay players' wages. "A lot of clubs are loss-making as it is," Philippou said. "That could be quite problematic. It's a lot of money and as it's a damages claim, (it) would have to be paid short term. It's not something where you can talk about how you restructure and fix the system, it's something that you have to find money for now." Reports suggest that FIFA have been given until early September to answer the threat of legal action. JFP expects the case to get to court in 2029 if a settlement cannot be reached in advance. While FIFA have not yet responded to a DW query, the DFB confirmed to DW that they had received correspondence from JFP which was "now being reviewed internally," adding that they are "currently unable to comment on the content or further details."
DW
a day ago
- DW
Fact-check: Trans athlete ban in women's sports, fair or not – DW – 08/05/2025
The participation of transgender athletes in women's competitions has been a hotly debated topic for years. Trump and the new IOC presidency have given it new impetus. A look at the facts. The debate about transgender women athletes in competitive sports has been going on for years. In the United States, President Donald Trump recently signed a decree banning trans women athletes from women's sports at the national level. Many federations have already tightened their participation rules. World Aquatics ruled back in 2022 that swimmers who had gone through male puberty could no longer compete in women's competitions, while, in March 2025, World Athletics announced that it would be introducing gender eligibility tests featuring cheek swabs to determine the presence of the "SRY" gene and thus of a Y chromosome. The tests, which could also include dried blood tests to measure testosterone levels, have been criticized by experts on both scientific and moral grounds. Changes could also be on the horizon for the Olympics, with the newly elected IOC President Kirsty Coventry speaking out in favor of stricter restrictions for women's categories. DW Fact check looked at the latest studies and spoke with experts. Read the complete article here.
Int'l Business Times
2 days ago
- Int'l Business Times
With Six Months To Go, Winter Games Organisers Say They'll Be Ready
Six months before the start of the Winter Olympics, Italian organisers say that, after years of ups and downs, they are on schedule. "Preparations are progressing steadily and according to the timeline we have set," Andrea Varnier, the chief executive officer of Milan-Cortina 2026 Olympic and Paralympic Organising Committee, told AFP. The Olympic opening ceremony is on February 6, though curling kicks off the action two days earlier. The Paralympics open a month later on March 6, though curling again breaks the ice two days beforehand. "We are currently in the core phase of operational implementation," said Varnier. Simico, the public company responsible for delivering the Olympic facilities, last week promised that "all the planned sports construction projects will be completed before the start of the Olympics". Organisers have made a point of delivering a low-cost Winter games after recent extravangances. Sochi, in Russia in 2014, cost at least $40 billion (34.5 bn euros at current exchange rates). Pyeongchang, in South Korea in 2018, came in at over $12 bn. The Covid-hit Games in Beijing in 2022 officially cost $4 bn, but financial analysts said that including infrastructure costs put the total at around $38bn. Milan-Cortina estimate their final bill will be 5.2 bn euros ($6 bn). Of that 3.5 bn euros is going on infrastructure and 1.7 bn euros on staging the Games. The Games are using a host of existing venues - emphasising the point by holding the closing ceremony in the almost 2,000-year-old Roman amphitheatre in Verona. Organisers say that avoiding new construction reduces not only costs but environmental impact. This approach also means the Games will stretch across northern Italy from Cortina in the Dolomites in the east 350 kilometres to the western suburbs of Milan, with other "clusters" spread through the Alps. "As with any complex global event, challenges are part of the process," said Varnier. "We are moving forward with confidence." One of the few new venues will be briefly the Milano Santa Giulia Ice Hockey Arena before assuming its intended role as the multi-purpose Eventim Arena after the Games. While organisers have managed to avoid being lumbered with a little-used speed-skating track by temporarily converting two exhibition halls at the Milan fair grounds, another group of sports with few participants created a political and construction headache. Because Italy did not have a track for the bobsleigh, luge, and skeleton events, organisers considered using existing sites in Austria or Switzerland. Matteo Salvini, the second-in-command and Minister of Transport in Giorgia Meloni's hard-right government, insisted in late 2023 that the events be held in Italy. That meant a breakneck race to build a track in Cortina. It was completed just in time for pre-approval in March. Accommodation, which often poses a logistical and financial problem for Olympic organisers, seems to be locked up. The Milan Village, six seven-storey buildings to be converted into university dorms after the Games, will be delivered in "early October" despite the recent legal troubles of its developer, the Coima group. In Cortina, 377 prefabricated modules will be installed by the end of October. While it is not clear if Italy's ski star Federica Brignone, who won the overall World Cup and a world title last season but smashed her left leg, will be fit to compete, the organisers revealed in July the design of the medals she would be chasing. They will weigh 420 grams in bronze and 500 grams in gold and in silver. The designer promised the medals will endure better than a few of those from last year's Paris Games. Some 220 medals, which contained a small piece of scrap metal from the Eiffel Tower, had to be replaced because they quickly turned black or rusted. "We cannot allow what happened in Paris to happen again," said their designer Raffaella Panie. That leaves just one unknown. The Italian meteorological service, contacted by AFP, said it was unable to predict whether there would be enough snow next February. The organisers said they were not worried. "We'll be ready," they said. Ready to deliver: Milan-Cortina chief executive Andrea Varnier AFP Uphill task: the sliding track in Cortina was ready in time for its March deadline AFP Rust-proof: Milan-Cortina say their Olympic medals will stand the test of time AFP
