House committee issues subpoenas for Epstein files, depositions with Clintons and other officials
The Republican-controlled committee also issued subpoenas for depositions with former President Bill Clinton, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and eight former top law enforcement officials.
The committee's actions showed how even with lawmakers away from Washington on a monthlong break, interest in the Epstein files is still running high. Trump has denied prior knowledge of Epstein's crimes and claimed he cut off their relationship long ago, and he has repeatedly tried to move past the Justice Department's decision not to release a full accounting of the investigation. But lawmakers from both major political parties, as well as many in the Republican president's political base, have refused to let it go.
Since Epstein's 2019 death in a New York jail cell as he awaited trial for sex trafficking charges, conservative conspiracists have stoked theories about what information investigators gathered on Epstein — and who else could have been involved. Republican lawmakers on the House Oversight Committee nodded to that line of questioning last month by initiating the subpoenas for the Clintons, both Democrats, as well as demanding all communications between President Joe Biden 's Democratic administration and the Justice Department regarding Epstein.
The committee is also demanding interviews under oath from former attorneys general spanning the last three presidential administrations: Merrick Garland, William Barr, Jeff Sessions, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder and Alberto Gonzales. Lawmakers also subpoenaed former FBI directors James Comey and Robert Mueller.
However, it was Democrats who sparked the move to subpoena the Justice Department for its files on Epstein. They were joined by some Republicans to successfully initiate the subpoena through a subcommittee of the House Oversight Committee.
'Democrats are focused on transparency and are pushing back against the corruption of Donald Trump,' Rep. Robert Garcia, who is the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, told reporters last month. 'What is Donald Trump hiding that he won't release the Epstein files?'
The committee had previously issues a subpoena for an interview with Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's former girlfriend, who had been serving a prison sentence in Florida for luring teenage girls to be sexually abused by the wealthy financier but was recently transferred to a Texas facility. However, the committee's Republican chairman, Rep. James Comer, has indicated he is willing to delay that deposition until after the Supreme Court decides whether to hear an appeal to her conviction. She argues she was wrongfully prosecuted.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
30 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump's 50% tariffs fail to hit $30 bn of Indian exports: Pharma, smartphones exempted
Despite US President Donald Trump's decision to double tariffs on Indian goods to 50% from August 6, a major chunk of Indian exports worth nearly $30 billion remains untouched for now. Key sectors like pharmaceuticals and electronics including smartphones and semiconductors continue to enjoy exemptions under a carve-out list that shields them from higher duties. The tariff hike, justified by the Trump administration as a response to India's continued procurement of Russian energy and arms is expected to impact India's labour-intensive export segments. However, shipments of critical products such as medicines, mobile phones and energy supplies have been spared at least for the moment. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In FY25, India exported pharmaceuticals and electronics worth $10.5 billion and $14.6 billion respectively to the US, together accounting for over 29% of its total exports to America which stood at $86.5 billion. Interestingly, India's petroleum exports amounting to $4.09 billion have also been excluded from the latest tariffs due to their placement in the energy exemption list. These high-value categories had previously escaped the initial 25% tariff announced on July 30 as well. While these exemptions offer temporary relief, uncertainty remains. Trump has warned of tariffs going as high as 250% on foreign-manufactured pharmaceuticals and the status of smartphones may shift depending on future policy decisions. The executive order signed on August 6 clarified that all goods currently listed under exemptions would continue to receive preferential access to the US market at lower or zero tariffs. The original 25% tariff was introduced after talks to finalise a limited trade deal between the two countries collapsed. That move, which takes effect on August 7, paved the way for this latest escalation. India and the US are still working towards concluding a broader Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA), targeted for finalisation by the end of the year.
India Today
30 minutes ago
- India Today
How India can turn Trump's tariffs into a strategic advantage
US President Donald Trump has imposed an additional 25% tariff on Indian goods, citing India's continued purchase of oil from Russia. The new tariff, announced on Wednesday, will come into effect 21 days from August 7. This move takes the duty on some Indian exports to as high as 50%, making it one of the steepest tariffs faced by any American trading sharp increase in duties come at a time when trade talks between the two countries had already reached a dead end. The White House has not yet responded to questions about whether similar action will be taken against other countries, including China, which also imports oil from India is facing pressure and uncertainty, some voices from the Indian business community are looking at the situation Mahindra, Chairman of the Mahindra Group, shared a detailed response on social media, urging the country to turn this moment into a long-term his post, Mahindra called attention to the 'law of unintended consequences' and gave examples of how other countries are responding to global tensions in a way that may lead to future pointed to the European Union, where countries like France and Germany have increased defence spending. 'Germany has moderated its fiscal orthodoxy, which may well catalyse a resurgence in Europe's major economies. The world could gain a new engine for growth,' Mahindra also spoke about Canada, where internal trade barriers between provinces have long been an issue. In response to global economic shifts, the country has started working to break down these barriers, which could make its economy more resilient and bring the provinces closer to a common these examples, Mahindra asked whether India could also use the current situation to make meaningful progress. 'Just as the 1991 forex reserves crisis triggered liberalisation, can today's global 'Manthan' over tariffs yield some 'Amrit' for us?' he then laid out two specific areas where India could act right Mahindra said India must focus on improving the ease of doing business. He stressed that the country needs to go beyond slow and small reforms and create a true single-window system for all investment clearances. Even though many investment rules are controlled by individual states, he suggested that a group of states could lead the way by joining a national platform. If India shows that it can offer speed, simplicity and predictability, it could become a trusted and attractive location for global investors, especially in today's uncertain Mahindra highlighted tourism as an area with untapped potential. 'Tourism is one of the most underexploited sources of foreign exchange and employment,' he wrote. He called for faster visa processing, better facilities for tourists, and the creation of dedicated tourism corridors. These corridors, according to him, should have clean and secure surroundings and serve as model areas that could inspire other with these two steps, Mahindra also laid out a broader list of suggestions to boost India's economic resilience. These include providing liquidity and support to small and medium enterprises, speeding up infrastructure projects, pushing for more manufacturing through Production Linked Incentive (PLI) schemes, and reducing import duties on manufacturing inputs to help Indian companies stay competitive ended his message with a call for India to focus on turning this setback into a path for progress. 'Let the unintended consequences we create be the most intentional and transformative ones of all,' he added that while other countries may act in their own interest, India too must focus on making itself stronger. 'We cannot fault others for putting their nations first. But we should be moved to make our own nation greater than ever,' he said.- EndsTune InMust Watch advertisement
India Today
35 minutes ago
- India Today
How Trump United India, China, and Russia, against America
Donald Trump's second-term foreign policy has triggered a geopolitical earthquake that may be reshaping the global order in ways Washington never intended. His aggressive trade tactics, including a 25% tariff on Indian goods and threats of 100% tariffs on China, are inadvertently pushing three historical rivals closer together in what could mark the beginning of a new Eurasian power axis. advertisementThe catalyst for this unexpected alignment came in 2025 when Trump launched his economic war against India with a brutal 25% tariff on Indian goods. His justification was India's continued imports of discounted Russian oil, with Washington painting New Delhi as an enabler of Putin's war machine. Trump's rhetoric was characteristically blunt: "India is funding the enemy." For India, whose economy relies heavily on exports to the United States as its largest export destination, the trade shock felt like betrayal rather than partnership. What particularly stung New Delhi was the hypocrisy: the same West that condemns India's Russian oil purchases quietly continues buying Russian uranium, palladium, and fertiliser. The message from Washington was clear - rules for thee, but not for double standard has eroded trust and triggered something deeper: India's search for energy sovereignty. The country's foreign policy has long prided itself on strategic autonomy, but Trump's aggressive and transactional approach has made policymakers in South Block question whether America can be trusted as a long-term geopolitical implications became clearer when Trump threatened China with similar measures, demanding Beijing cut Russian oil imports or face 100% tariffs. Suddenly, the two biggest Asian giants, despite their mutual distrust, found themselves standing shoulder to shoulder on one issue: resisting American effect has been quiet coordination. At international forums, India and China began pushing back against US narratives, defending their right to import Russian oil. Moscow, watching this unfold with glee, started nudging both nations toward the long-dormant Russia-India-China framework. The RIC idea isn't new, floating since the early 2000s, but thanks to Trump, it's back in has begun pitching the RIC as an alternative pole to US-led alliances like NATO and the Quad. China smiled. India didn't dismiss it. That alone represents a seismic course, no one is pretending this is a love triangle. India and China still glare at each other across the Himalayas. But the Trump factor has made dialogue between old rivals not just necessary, but strategic. It's not friendship; it's Trump's attempts to reinvent himself as a dealmaker included pushing for a Ukraine ceasefire on suspiciously Kremlin-friendly terms. He openly dismissed full Ukrainian territorial restoration as "unrealistic" and cut Europe out of India and China have clashed militarily, diplomatically, and economically. But when both are targeted by the same actor, old rivalries don't vanish but they pause. Whether at BRICS summits or G20 meetings, both nations began coordinating stances on oil trade, sanctions, and no formal India-Russia-China alliance, no mutual defence pact, no signed economic union. Border tensions between India and China remain real, and mistrust runs deep. But what Trump has created is shared pressure, and pressure creates alignment, even if RIC axis isn't forged in friendship but in fear of US unpredictability, economic punishment, and global instability. Strategic autonomy is no longer a philosophical choice for India but an economic and diplomatic necessity. Trump's wrecking ball approach has made that painfully isn't conspiracy; it's consequence. America may not be prepared for a world where the very powers it tried to divide start working together.- Ends
