
'Pimps' and websites: AI-driven system has no legal standing yet in Pa., but delivers warnings to 'customers'
A search in the Pittsburgh area showed a woman was willing to travel to Somerset County.
Human Trafficking logo
Nick Lembo, an executive director of Street Grace – a Georgia-based organization that uses a Microsoft-developed platform to disrupt human trafficking – searched the website and shared his screen over Zoom with The Tribune-Democrat.
There were male and transgender categories on the website to search. Lembo went to the 'men seeking women' category, which produced a cascade of ads.
'Believe it or not, around the lunch hour can be busier,' he said. 'So it could start picking up right now in your area. And then sometimes guys are getting off work at 4 p.m., so it can start then. And I'd say most of the time, probably from 5 p.m. through 10 p.m. at night are the busiest times.'
However, the women available through the ads are often not engaging in these transactions of their own volition, he said.
'Most of these women are being forced against their wills by pimps,' he said. 'There's this attitude that sex work is a legitimate profession, and these girls are just doing it on their own, and these guys (who purchase) will often say, 'Well, I know they are doing it on their own.' And the reality is, they really don't, because these girls are never going to give up their pimps.
'The pimps want to stay way in the shadows,' he said.
Statistics are unclear on the scope of the human trafficking problem. Research supported by the National Institute of Justice in 2020 revealed that labor and sex trafficking data appearing in the FBI's national Uniform Crime Reporting Program may significantly understate the extent of human trafficking crimes in the United States.
'Researchers concluded that human trafficking incidents identified in law enforcement and social service agency records likely represented only a fraction of the actual incidence,' the institute's website says.
'Forcing these women'
Using an artificial intelligence-human hybrid system called Transaction Intercept, Lembo and teams of civilians working with Street Grace post decoy ads on websites where men go to purchase sex. Street Grace also offers the same platform, at no cost, to law enforcement.
State Sen. Cris Dush has been a proponent of using the technology in Pennsylvania; however, so far, it has not been used in the commonwealth for human trafficking prosecutions, Lembo said.
Lembo and others working with Street Grace engage with men initiating conversations with their decoy ads and attempt to 'crack some humanity' into them, Lembo said.
In one case, he spoke to a U.S. soldier who had returned briefly from deployment. He explained to the man that he was not law enforcement.
' 'We are here to protect you, actually, because if you are caught, this will affect you socially and professionally,' I said. That got to him,' Lembo said. 'I didn't realize it later that he was a soldier, and many guys in the military know their career is very important to them.'
The soldier shared with Lembo that he 'was just looking for some comfort.' He had returned home from deployment, his girlfriend had broken up with him, and he was not scheduled to be home for long. Lembo warned him.
'I said, 'You need to be careful because there are pimps on these websites, and that's who is forcing these women,' ' Lembo said. 'He said, 'Honestly, I didn't know that. ... I'm going to warn my buddies about these websites.' '
If a potential buyer is unwilling to listen, and if Lembo has enough information, then he'll turn it over to police. In other cases, he can be successful in changing a buyer's mind by educating them about human trafficking.
'There's somebody there who still wants to listen to some reason, and probably the biggest thing we run into is educating these men into understanding that most of these women are being forced against their wills by pimps to have sex with them,' he said.
Force, fraud or coercion
At times, victims or people close to victims will call the National Human Trafficking Hotline, the top Google result for help.
Victims from Cambria and Somerset counties have called the hotline and spoken to someone on the other end – such as Malika Said, a hotline supervisor – who will begin the conversation by asking whether the caller is in a safe place where they aren't being monitored by their trafficker.
Said is then obligated to tell callers about the hotline's mandated reporting policies – the hotline must report acts of violence heard over the phone or discussions of minors being abused or neglected.
And then Said gives them a basic summary of what trafficking is and asks the caller whether their situation aligns with that; trafficking situations involve force, fraud or coercion.
'And then we let the callers take it from there,' she said. 'And we assess their needs and provide whatever it is that they want.'
Said may call a local shelter while on the phone with a caller and say: 'We have this person who's on the phone and they are looking for a safe place to stay tonight; can you help them?'
'We don't want the victims to be calling all these places on their own and just get rejected,' she said, 'especially if all the shelters are full, so we try to see if we can connect them to a place first, and if they are OK with that, then we connect them in a three-way call.'
The hotline may also connect callers with case managers from local human service agencies, who can provide access to housing, food support, securing a job – any service that may eliminate the vulnerability that a trafficker is exploiting.
'A lot of times, people are recruited into the trafficking situations because they have certain vulnerabilities, whether it's economic or social vulnerabilities,' she said. 'Because of these vulnerabilities, they will get recruited into a situation where they are forced to do things they don't want to do, and because of all these limitations that the trafficker sets on them, they feel it's hard to get out of the situation.'
If a victim relies on a trafficker for food or housing, for example, it's difficult for the victim to leave that situation on his or her own.
'There's a lot of times that we do get callers who are ready to leave, but find it very difficult so we talk them through the possibilities; we safety-plan with them, we give them the right resources,' according to Said. 'Not everyone is ready to report to police when they call the hotline, so we just talk through all the options that they have.'
Both sex and labor
Consolidating duplicate calls about the same case, the hotline identified a total of 12 likely victims across six trafficking situations in Cambria County from 2015 to 2022.
'Sometimes we have one situation/one victim call, but more often it's one situation/multiple victims,' National Human Trafficking Hotline spokeswoman Sabrina Thulander said.
The hotline's data are not representative of all trafficking in Cambria County, only of the cases that are reported and identified by the hotline. The volume of calls can be affected by factors including awareness of trafficking as an issue and awareness of what help is available, Thulander said.
The Cambria County cases were almost entirely situations and victims of sex trafficking, she said.
More recent data are available, but it has not yet undergone the same level of validation as the data from previous years, she said.
In Somerset County, the hotline identified three likely victims of trafficking from 2015 to 2022. In those cases, two of the three victims reported they were a victim of both sex and labor trafficking, Thulander said.
'I think with labor it tends to be more fraud, whereas, with sex trafficking, it's force or coercion,' she said.
Labor trafficking can occur through a regular job posting, according to Said.
'They don't really outline what's happening and people are desperate for work, and they get sucked into it,' she said. 'There will be recruiters for some farming industries and so they will kind of recruit you into the trafficking situation, and it might be similar to a regular farming position, but you don't know the difference between the two.
'Sometimes it could also be for modeling; it can be a modeling job posting, but then you get recruited into it and all of a sudden you are in a sex trafficking situation.'
'Investigating ... cases'
For Pennsylvania as a whole, from 2015 to 2022, the hotline identified a total of 2,566 likely victims and 1,487 individual situations of trafficking. Of those, 359 of the likely victims were victims of labor trafficking, and 1,933 were victims of sex trafficking.
Some of the most commonly reported venues for labor trafficking were domestic work, restaurants and food service, and agriculture/farms/animal husbandry.
Some of the most commonly reported venues for sex trafficking were illicit massage businesses, hotel/motel-based commercial sex, residence-based commercial sex, pornography, and internet-based commercial sex, Thulander said.
Cambria County District Attorney Greg Neugebauer said human trafficking investigations are underway locally with help from people who make reports.
'We've had tips from doctors, school personnel, religious folks,' he said. 'And sometimes someone just sees something that just doesn't look right, and they call police. We've had a number of cases that have been prosecuted and, frankly, we are actively investigating several cases right now.'
One case locally came about because a search warrant was executed on a completely unrelated matter, he said, 'and we discovered some things that were troubling.'
In another instance, he said, a trafficker ended up going to jail for an unrelated crime, and authorities subsequently discovered that a person had been sex-trafficked.
'We've seen it locally,' he said. 'I think it exists everywhere, and I think the statistics are accurate that it goes unreported. A lot of it.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
27 minutes ago
- Politico
Florida's universities face research overhaul courtesy of Trump and DeSantis
Part of an effort to 'reduce pollution and increase community climate resilience,' the grant was meant to help extend water service to 50 multifamily complexes still dealing with the aftermath of Hurricane Milton. These facilities are running on well water and septic systems that may be contaminated due to polluted stormwater ponds, according to the university. The agency advised USF to tweak the grant proposal by scrapping words like 'disadvantaged,' 'climate change' and 'minority,' yet it was still terminated by the EPA for not being part of the agency's new priorities. The school is appealing and searching for private industry partnerships to keep the project going. 'If that's not your priority, then what is your priority?' said Christian Wells, a professor and director of the Center for Brownfields Research & Redevelopment at USF who is leading the project. At Florida A&M University, the Department of Agriculture canceled a $4.9 million grant to help expand the markets for 'climate-smart' industrial hemp throughout Alabama and Louisiana. In canceling these grants, part of a $3 billion Biden-era program, the USDA argued not enough of the funding was reaching farmers. 'Secretary [Brooke] Rollins has made it clear that all USDA programs, including our research programs, will now put American farmers and ranchers first instead of promoting woke DEI initiatives or far-left climate programs,' a USDA spokesperson said in a statement. FAMU has also been fighting to keep other projects, such as a $16.3 million pharmacy grant targeted by NIH. School leaders are optimistic some grants can be salvaged after they were able to protect some student scholarships that were initially on the termination list. 'We've taken it in stride,' G. Dale Wesson, interim dean and associate vice president for research with the FAMU College of Agriculture & Food Sciences, said about the changes in federal priorities. 'We do the best we can to solve problems they're interested in solving.' Across the country, there is a labyrinth of legal battles playing out in opposition of the federal research changes, including a lawsuit brought by 16 Democrat-led states fighting the NSF. Officials and researchers are challenging the grant terminations, as well as other Trump policies like a proposed cap on research overhead costs shelled out by the federal government. In certain cases, like a California lawsuit and the overhead costs challenge, opponents have been successful in blocking the Trump administration and recouping grant dollars, at least for now. A recent ruling, however, allows the NSF to continue withholding research funds as the lawsuit from Democrats in states like New York, Hawaii, California, Colorado and Connecticut plays out. Conversely, Florida, under DeSantis, is majorly supportive of the federal efforts to reshape education, many of which mirror the state's conservative policies. In at least one instance, Florida's own DOGE team recommended a grant to NSF for cancelation at the University of West Florida. This grant went toward scholarships for teachers completing projects on water quality sampling methods and aspirin synthesis, according to school officials, but got singled out due to 'social justice' language UWF contends was not incorporated.


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Trump rips ‘disgusting degenerate' Pelosi, alleges ‘average' minded husband got rich off ‘inside information'
President Trump blasted former House Speaker Rep. Nancy Pelosi as a 'disgusting degenerate' while alleging that she and her hubby reaped a fortune off 'inside information.' 'Crooked Nancy Pelosi, and her very 'interesting' husband, beat every Hedge Fund in 2024. In other words, these two very average 'minds' beat ALL of the Super Geniuses on Wall Street, thousands of them. It's all INSIDE iNFORMATION!' Trump wrote in a blistering attack on Truth Social late Saturday. Trump also implied that someone should look into Pelosi (D-Calif.) and gloated over how he overcame two impeachment efforts the leading Democrat oversaw. 'Is anybody looking into this??? She is a disgusting degenerate, who Impeached me twice, on NO GROUNDS, and LOST! How are you feeling now, Nancy???' Trump wrote. It is not immediately clear what sparked Trump's broadside against Pelosi, 85, who has fiercely denied any accusations of insider trading. 3 Nancy Pelosi has defended her husband's business ventures as part of the free market. AP 3 President Trump has long seethed at Nancy Pelosi, who was the source of many political headaches for him during his first term. NATHAN HOWARD/POOL/EPA/Shutterstock 'Pelosi does not own any stocks and has no knowledge or subsequent involvement in any transactions,' spokesperson Ian Krager told The Post last month. The Post contacted a Pelosi spokesperson for a response to Trump's latest swipe against her. Nonetheless, the speaker emeritus has long faced scrutiny over her husband Paul's venture capital and other business endeavors. Lawmakers are not required to publicly divulge their net worth, which means it is unclear exactly how much she is worth. An estimate from Quiver Quantitative has pegged it at least $263.23 million, making her the fourth richest member of Congress. But there are open questions about whether she is even wealthier than that. Last year, Paul Pelosi's trades in 2024 outperformed the S&P 500's 25% gain last year, by hauling in some 54% in returns, as The Post previously reported, citing Bloomberg data. In January, Paul Pelosi invested in an artificial intelligence health firm, Tempus AI, buying it when it was worth some $31.83 per share. But then the firm cut a $200 million deal with AstraZeneca and is now worth about $60.87 a share, almost double the price when Paul Pelosi purchased it. 3 Nancy Pelosi and her husband, Paul, have a nine-figure fortune. FilmMagic Other transactions that have raised eyebrows include well-timed trades of NVIDIA, Palo Alto Networks, energy company Vistra, and more. Last year, Paul Pelosi dumped some $2.2 million shares of Microsoft stock, in one of his largest sales in about three years, just a few months before the Federal Trade Commission began an antitrust probe of the company. Back in 2021, Pelosi ripped into a push for a ban on stock trades by members of Congress, arguing that 'we're a free‑market economy.' She has since backed some iterations of such a ban. Last month, Sen. Josh Hawley's (R-Mo.) Preventing Elected Leaders from Owning Securities and Investments (PELOSI) Act cleared a key Senate Committee and drew ire from both Trump and other Republicans. The PELOSI Act restricts lawmakers from owning individual stocks or trading them. Initially, Trump raged against Hawley as a 'second-tier' senator after being left under the impression that the ban would apply to him and require key divestments. Hawley has since appeared to have won Trump over after explaining that the ban would not impact presidents until early 2029, when his term concludes. That bill could come up when the Senate reconvenes from recess next month. Pelosi has not said whether or not she intends to vie for reelection in 2026.


Indianapolis Star
2 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
Trump's immigration raids normalize cruelty toward fellow humans
Americans are still firmly behind President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown, but it appears that at least some of them are getting cold feet as his brutal tactics come into view. The spectacle of masked agents smashing car windows, detaining folks with no court hearings and deporting some of them to dangerous countries like El Salvador and South Sudan is starting to splinter public support. The reality is jarring, and for a growing number of Americans, it's becoming too much to stomach. I just wish more of them would see it now before more people get swept under Trump's indiscriminate campaign against migrants – legal or not. Let's start with the numbers. A recent Wall Street Journal poll found that 62% of voters still support deporting undocumented immigrants, and just over half approve of Trump's overall handling of immigration. But beneath that top-line support is mounting discomfort. Nearly 6 in 10 Americans opposed deporting people without court hearings or legal review. Independents, a key voting bloc, are especially critical. Most say the administration has gone too far, specifically when it comes to detaining and deporting individuals who've never had a chance to see a judge. The policy of offloading migrants to third-world countries – even countries that they are not from – should strike many more as not just impractical, but also fundamentally un-American. Hicks: Indiana shuns immigrants at its own peril This tells us something important and gives me a bit of hope. Americans want stronger border security, but enough of them aren't ready to abandon due process. They might have begun to reject the spectacle of lawlessness cloaked in the language of 'law and order.' Yet, cheers persist, which is why we must never stop speaking up. The slow public reaction and the applause for harsh enforcement reveal a darker side of the American psyche – a creeping comfort with dehumanization, a willingness to look away from suffering as long as it happens to 'others,' in this case, to migrants whom MAGA wants out of the United States at any cost. Nobody denies that the United States has the right and responsibility to protect its borders and deport those living here illegally. Trump didn't invent mass deportations. Every president before him has done it. Democrat Barack Obama, for instance, deported more than 3 million during his presidency. But Trump has done something different – he's normalized cruelty, weaponized it and stripped away even the pretense of procedural justice. Hicks: Immigration is the only hope for Indiana's dying small towns What's more disturbing is how far federal agents have gone under Trump's orders. Americans have watched as Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in full tactical gear raid workplaces, pull people from their cars and drag individuals off the streets. Even a sitting U.S. senator, Alex Padilla of California, was tackled to the ground on national television simply for demanding answers. Legal residents and even U.S. citizens are being swept up, too. Due process isn't just being denied – it's being erased. Arizona Democratic U.S. Reps. Greg Stanton and Yassamin Ansari are sounding the alarm about inhumane conditions in immigration detention centers. But even as elected officials, they've been barred from inspecting facilities like the Eloy Detention Center in Florence, Arizona, where horror stories are emerging. One of those cases involves a green cardholder who has lived in the U.S. for two decades and is now battling leukemia while detained, according to Ansari. Opinion: Trump's $600 'rebate checks' from tariffs are just voter bribes Ansari told reporters that the woman has lost 55 pounds, is in severe pain and is not receiving adequate – or any – pain medication. If they can do this to a legal resident with cancer, and keep members of Congress from even entering the facility, what can't they do? And where is the collective outrage? Why isn't the public speaking louder and showing more than slow discomfort in recent polling? Blame that in part on the fragmented media landscape. The country is not just divided politically, but it's divided informationally, too. Many Trump supporters tune in to outlets and influencers that amplify the administration's narrative – painting ICE raids as righteous missions to capture "the worst of the worst.' The reality on the ground tells a different story. When they see that reality, they begin to wonder. Like Trump supporter Joe Rogan, who is finally questioning Trump's immigration crackdown. Briggs: Remember Jim Banks' tariff cheerleading when the economy tanks "It's insane,' the podcaster recently said. "Not cartel members, not gang members, not drug dealers – just construction workers. ... Gardeners.' "Like, really?' Rogan asked. That shifting narrative in the MAGA media landscape – from a one-dimensional tale of criminals to the undeniable truth of working-class migrants being ripped from their families – just might be starting to enter the national consciousness. I bet if more Americans like Rogan pay attention and speak up about what's really happening under Trump, the cheers will stop.