After WTC final, ICC decides to change 8 BIG rules of Cricket
Cricket match. (PIC - X)
New Delhi: At this time, the eyes of cricket fans are fixed on the India vs England Test series. Meanwhile, the International Cricket Council (ICC) has announced 8 major changes in all formats of cricket. These changes have been made after the World Test Championship 2025 final. The rules related to Test cricket have come into effect from the start of the World Test Championship 2025-27 cycle. At the same time, the rules related to the white ball format will come into effect from July 2. 8 new rules of ICC: 1- Stop clock rule introduced in Test cricket
After the white ball format, the ICC has now implemented the stop clock in Test matches as well. Under which now the fielding team will have to start the next over within 60 seconds of the end of the previous over. If this does not happen, the umpires will first give two warnings. After this there will be a penalty of five runs every time. The warnings will be reset after 80 overs. 2- Only one ball will be used after 35 overs in ODI
At present, in ODI cricket, a team had to bowl 25-25 overs using two balls. But now from July 2, the team will be allowed to use only one ball after 35 overs in ODI. 3- Changes have also been made regarding saliva rules
Applying saliva on the ball is still banned. In such a situation, many times the team tries to change the ball by applying saliva. But now this will not happen. Now the umpire will decide completely whether the ball should be changed or not. Let us tell you that a penalty of five runs is still given for deliberately violating the rules. 4- Catch will also be checked on no ball
Earlier, when a no ball was given, it was not checked whether the catch was correct or not. But now the catch will be checked even after a no ball. If the catch is correct, then the batting team will get only one run. On the other hand, if the catch is not correct, then all the runs they make on that ball will be counted. 5- Penalty will be imposed for taking short runs
If a batsman deliberately takes a short run, then a penalty of 5 runs will be imposed on the batting team. Also, which batsman will take the strike, this will be decided by the fielding team and the umpires. 6- There are rules for appeal against the batsman for two types of out
Under this rule, if there is an appeal for LBW and run out against the batsman, then the TV umpire will first check the LBW. Because this has happened first and if the batsman is out, then the ball will become dead right there. 7- Big change regarding catch
According to the new rule, now any fielder can touch the ball only once while bouncing in the air outside the boundary. If a fielder pushes the ball inside the boundary while in the air, then it will be considered legal only when he comes inside the boundary and takes the catch. 8- Changes in DRS rules
ICC has also made changes in the DRS rules, if the batsman is given caught out and the review clearly shows that the ball has hit the pad, then now the third umpire will also check for LBW. During this, if 'umpire's call' comes in ball-tracking, then the batsman will be given out.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
Stop clock for Tests, no ball change after use of saliva: New changes to playing conditions approved by ICC
New Delhi [India], June 26 (ANI): The International Cricket Council (ICC) has approved several changes to playing conditions recently for men's international cricket, including the Boundary Law and one-ball rule in ODIs from the 35th over. While come of these rules have already come into force during the ICC World Test Championship (WTC) 2025-27, the rules for white-ball formats will come in effect from July 2 onwards. ESPNCricinfo looks at the notable changes introduced across three formats, having reviewed the playing conditions shared by the world cricket governing body with its member bodies recently. -Introduction of Stop Clock in Tests A year after the introduction of the rule in limited-overs cricket, the ICC has decided to bring it in red-ball cricket, where slow-over-rates have been a massive problem for years. As per the rule, the fielding side is supposed to start an over within 60 seconds of the last one ending. Two warnings will be given on failure to do so, and another failure would result in a five-run penalty on the bowling team. The warnings will be reset to zero after each block worth 80 overs. The rule has come into effect during the ongoing 2025-27 WTC cycle. -No mandatory ball change on deliberate usage of saliva While the saliva ban continues in international cricket since COVID-19, the mandatory ball change by umpires in case of saliva being found on the ball is no longer compulsory. This change is made to prevent teams from changing the balls by deliberately applying saliva to them. Going forward, the condition of the ball will help in deciding if the ball is to be changed or not. If it appears too wet or these is more shine. This decision has been completely left to the umpires. If the ball starts doing things after umpires saying that application of saliva has not changed its condition, it would not be replaced. The batting team would, however, be given five penalty runs. -DRS protocol for secondary review after an out decision Imagine a situation when a batter has been given out caught behind, and he demands a review. The UltraEdge shows the ball brushing the pads without any contact with the bat. With the catch ruled out, the TV umpire checks for second dismissal mode via ball tracking, whether he is lbw or not. So far, the protocol was, once the batter was given 'not out caught', the default decision for the second mode of dismissal, lbw, would be not out. This means, if the ball tracking led to an 'umpire's call' verdict, the batter would remain not out. But in now's updated rule, when the ball tracking is displayed, the original decision label on it would be reading 'out' and if the review yields an umpire call, the batter would be ruled out. -Combined reviews, decisions will be chronological If in case, there is a player review and an umpire review for separate modes of dismissal on the same ball, 'the incidents shall be addressed in chronological order'. Earlier, the TV umpire used to assess the umpire reviews before moving on to the review asked for by a player. Now, the revised playing condition reads, 'If the conclusion from the first incident is that a batter is dismissed, then the ball would be deemed to have become dead at that point, rendering investigation of the second incident unnecessary'. So now, if there is an appeal for lbw and run out, the TV umpire would first take up the lbw review since it occurred first. In case batter is out, then the ball would be declared dead and review for run out would not be done. -Fairness of catch to be reviewed for no-ball As per Wisden, the TV umpire will check for the fairness of a catch even after a no-ball from the bowler. Earlier, if no ball was signalled by the third umpire, the fairness of the catch was not checked. But now, it will be. If the catch is fair, the batting team will get one extra run for a no-ball, and if it is unfair, the batting team will get the runs taken by the batters. -Deliberate short run In case a batter has been caught taking a short run, five runs are shaved off the batting team's total. Now, as per updated rules, if one of the batters does not make their ground deliberately for the sake of stealing an extra run, the umpires would ask the fielding team to decide which batter they want to be on strike. The five-run penalty will continue. 'A deliberate short run is an attempt for batters to appear to run more than one run, while at least one batter deliberately does not make good their ground at one end,' Rule 18.5.1 of the playing conditions says. 'Batters may choose to abort a run, provided the umpire believes that there was no intention by the batter concerned to deceive the umpires or to score the run in which they did not make their ground,' the rule added. -Full-time playing replacement in domestic first-class cricket To compensate for the loss of a player who has suffered a serious external injury, the ICC has requested that cricket boards trial a full-time replacement player in their domestic first-class matches. This replacement player will be like-for-like, similar to a concussion substitute. The injury will have to be evident and visible for match officials before a decision is taken. It would not be applicable to hamstring pulls or niggles. (ANI)
India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
"Australia had ruined our...": Rohit Sharma on iconic T20 WC 2024 win against 50-over champions
Mumbai (Maharashtra) [India], June 27 (ANI): India ODI skipper Rohit Sharma opened up and shared his thoughts on the rivalry between Men in Blue and Australia in the major ICC tournaments. The Men in Yellow defeated the Rohit Sharma-led side in the 50-over World Cup in the 2023 finals by six wickets, which was played at the Narendra Modi Stadium in Ahmedabad on November 19. Next year, in 2024, during the T20 World Cup in West India, Team India registered a 24-run victory over the Australian side in the Super Eight of the competition on June 24. This win helped the Indian side to advance to the semi-final of the tournament. Speaking on taking revenge from the Pat Cummins-led side, Rohit said in an interview on JioHotstar, 'Australia had ruined our and the whole country's November 19 in the ODI WC Final, so we should also give them a gift. These kinds of things were talked about in the dressing room. We had it in our minds that if we win this match, Australia will be out of this T20 World Cup.' Further, Rohit Sharma spoke about his knock against Australia during the T20 World Cup 2024 Super Eight game, where he slammed 92 runs off just 41 balls, which was laced with eight maximums and seven boundaries in his innings. The right-hand batter smashed runs at a whopping strike rate of 224.39 'When I stepped out to play against Australia in the 2024 T20 World Cup, all I had in my mind was that I had to score somehow. I had to perform well against them and score runs against them. I was looking to attack against each and every Australian bowler,' he added. On June 29 last year in Barbados, India ended an 11-year-long ICC Trophy drought, beating South Africa by seven runs to capture the ICC T20 World Cup title for the second time. This was Rohit's second ICC T20 WC title and his first ICC title as a captain, after the heartbreak of losing to Australia in the final of the ICC Cricket World Cup 2023 at home following a ten-match win streak. (ANI)
India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
From the
Mumbai (Maharashtra) [India], June 26 (ANI): India's T20 World Cup winning skipper Rohit Sharma capturing the short format's biggest prize for Men in Blue last year, calling it the 'best moment of his life' where 'each over had its own story'. On June 29, 2024 in Barbados, India ended a 11-year-long ICC Trophy drought, beating South Africa by seven runs to capture the ICC T20 World Cup title for the second time. This was Rohit's 2nd ICC T20 WC title and his first ICC title as a captain, after the heartbreak of losing to Australia in the final of ICC Cricket World Cup 2023 at home following a ten-match win-streak. Speaking about his emotions before the match, he said on JioHotstar during the 'Champions Waali Feeling Phir Se' programme, '13 saal is a lot of time. People do not have careers this long. The last time I won a World Cup was in 2007. To wait that long for a WC win, it could not have been anything bigger. Before the match, I did not sleep the whole night, I felt the nerves, and could not feel my legs. I was just thinking about the World Cup. When I woke up, I was thinking about the result. I remember walking to the ground, just sipping on coffee, not talking to anyone. There was forecast for rain, but I wanted the game to start and end on time since there was so much nervousness, I could not wait for the reserve day and go through those same emotions. India had elected to bat first, but was reduced to 34/3, which led to the 'Hitman', as he said, 'panicking'. But it was another clutch effort from Virat Kohli, who had a pretty dull tournament till then, that calmed everyone down. Three boundaries within the first few balls he faced was an ominous sign that Team India's biggest match-winner in past T20 WCs was going to be at his best. He also had a fine 72-run stand with Axar Patel, who played a counter-attacking 47 in 31 balls, with a four and four sixes. Virat clobbered 76 in 59 balls, with six fours and two sixes. India reached a fighting 176/7 in their 20 overs. 'If you hit three boundaries in the first over, then you've started well. That's what every cricketer wants. It relieves you. The experience of playing for India for so many years helps. You can control your emotions, control your thoughts, and stay in the moment,' said Rohit on Virat. 'I am sure he was thinking the same: 'Today is the day I need to be focused.' Not worrying about what happened before. And he played a brilliant innings--a fantastic partnership with Axar. After losing those three wickets up front, there were obviously a lot of nerves in the dressing room.' 'I was panicking. I wasn't comfortable. I thought we'd let them into the game. Of course, in the back of my mind, I always believed our lower middle order--although it hadn't batted much during the tournament--had made an impact whenever given the opportunity,' he continued. Rohit also hailed the Axar knock as a 'game-changer' and lauded Virat for keeping one end steady. 'Then we had Shivam (27 in 16 balls, with three fours and a six), Axar, and Hardik (5* in two balls), who came in and played their parts. I thought it was a very good total,' Rohit said. Speaking on the final, Rohit said, 'Every over had its own story. There was so much happening, and I had to be spot on with my changes.' On the delivery from Jasprit Bumrah, which landed India their first wicket of Reeza Hendricks, Rohit hailed it as a 'peach of a delivery'. 'Unplayable. A batter could hardly do anything. When you want to win a match, you have to win the powerplay,' he added. The match hung in balance with a partnership of 58 runs between Quinton de Kock and Tristan Stubbs and a 15th over onslaught on Axar by Klaasen, during which he hit 24 runs, left the game in favour of Proteas, who needed 30 in the final 30 balls. 'It was the biggest over. There were so many runs scored. Klaasen converted so many good balls into bad balls. This is his class. I was thinking (of bringing someone else) of it when It was happening. It is not that I curse myself for that decision. I was right. Sometimes, in sports, everything does not go your way. That is what we love about the sport,' he added. But in the 16th over, Hardik produced what described by Rohit, the 'ideal T20 ball' to remove Klaasen for a well-made 52 in 27 balls, which had two fours and five sixes. 'Ideal T20 ball, perfectly pitched in the area and the wider line. You could not hit it four or six, just a single. It was not too short or too high. We knew they had Marco (Jansen) and (Keshav) Maharaj. Cricket is a funny game, you cannot take it for granted. But I felt it was time to squeeze them and feel the pressure, where they will make mistakes. It is not easy for new batters to play shots right from the start,' he added. From then on, India continued to apply pressure, with the match-sealing moment being Suryakumar Yadav's stunning catch, which saw him go out of the boundary ropes before pulling the delivery back within the ropes and catching it to dismiss a dangerous David Miller in the final over. Rohit admitted that he thought it was a six. 'Everyone's heart was in their mouth. I thought it was a six, I was standing opposite to Surya. It would have taken a lot of effort to take the catch. But the wind pulled the ball into the ground. Umpires were checking, and I asked him (Surya), 'Tu hi bata',' he added. SA was reduced to 169/8, despite their best efforts. On the title win, he said, 'It was by far the best moment of my life, of my cricketing career, to lift the trophy. 'It meant so much to all of us, to that group. We had experienced the heartbreak of coming so close and falling short. That is why it was special. We planned meticulously. We worked hard every single day, constantly thinking about how to win the World Cup. 'That is why every player's emotions came pouring out on that day,' he concluded. (ANI)
