Cameroon opposition leader banned from challenging world's oldest president
Only 13 of the 83 names submitted to the country's electoral body Elecam were accepted.
No reason was given for the decision not to allow Kamto to stand. He came second in the 2018 elections amid allegations of fraud.
President Paul Biya, 92, the world's oldest president, was included on the list and he will seek an eighth term in office.
Defying calls to step down, he says he still has a lot to offer Cameroonians despite being in power for nearly 43 years.
Biya will be challenged by two former allies, Issa Tchiroma Bakary and Bello Bouba Maigari, who both come from the vote-rich north of the country.
Social media revamp by 92-year-old president struggles to woo young Cameroonians
Kamto was the candidate for the Cameroon Renaissance Movement (CRM) in 2018 but the party was not allowed to endorse anyone this year due to its lack of elected representatives in parliament or local councils.
So Kamto recently joined the Manidem party, which does have local representation.
Renowned anti-corruption lawyer Akere Muna, Social Democratic Front (SDF) leader Joshua Osih, and lawmaker Cabral Libii are among the other candidates cleared to run.
Firebrand Mayor of Foumban Patricia Tomaino Ndam Njoya is the only female candidate on the list.
Those disqualified from the presidential race have two days to file a challenge at the constitutional council.
More about Cameroon from the BBC:
'Nowhere is safe' - Cameroonians trapped between separatists and soldiers
Art curator Koyo Kouoh dies at height of career
The lawyer risking everything to defend LGBT rights
Paul Biya: Cameroon's 'absentee president'
Go to BBCAfrica.com for more news from the African continent.
Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
BBC Africa podcasts
Africa Daily
Focus on Africa
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
30 minutes ago
- Newsweek
ISIS Is Waging a Deadly War Across Africa That Threatens US
Based on factual reporting, incorporates the expertise of the journalist and may offer interpretations and conclusions. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Militant groups aligned with the Islamic State (ISIS) are ramping up violence across Africa, staging a growing number of attacks and expanding their influence in a way that could ultimately pose a threat far beyond the continent, including to the United States. Over the past week, the jihadis' operations in both the Congo region and Sahel drew headlines as ISIS-affiliated forces claimed a deadly attack against a church in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo on Sunday and took responsibility for the killing of soldiers in Burkina Faso on Thursday. Both incidents are part of a growing trend of ISIS-linked violence that analysts say exploits existing conflicts and capitalizes on deep-rooted insecurity to mount the kind of threat that makes combatting the group in Africa an especially complicated endeavor. "What we're talking about there is a multi-year, prolonged period of investment that realistically the United States doesn't have the capacity to provide," one security expert who has briefed several government and military institutions on the threat posed by ISIS in Africa, told Newsweek. "It has to be provided by the governments in which those communities exist. And so, I think that that's the real challenge." "What makes it complex is that you're dealing with local issues at the end of the day in order to address this larger problem," said the security expert, who requested anonymity because they were not authorized to speak with the media. "And if they're not addressed," the person added, "the risk is that it rises into something much larger that then presents a much greater threat on the global scene, so, a threat direct to the homeland of the United States, or to Europe or outside of Africa, just generally." ISIS is expanding its presence across Africa, "from the Sahel to Somalia to the eastern Congo to Mozambique," and "becoming more lethal." ISIS is expanding its presence across Africa, "from the Sahel to Somalia to the eastern Congo to Mozambique," and "becoming more lethal."The Spread of ISIS in Africa While traditionally associated with the Middle East, ISIS' roots took hold in Africa even before late founder Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi first declared his self-styled "caliphate" upon seizing vast territories in Iraq and Syria in 2014. A year earlier, militants in Libya, taking advantage of chaos in the wake of longtime leader Muammar el-Qaddafi's downfall at the hands of a NATO-backed rebellion, had begun to tie their ideology to what would soon become a global brand of Islamist violence. In 2017, an ISIS acolyte from Libya conducted the group's first Africa-origin attack in the West, killing 22 people at an Ariana Grande concert in Manchester, England. That same year, ISIS' presence in Africa drew headlines when four U.S. soldiers and five Nigerien personnel were killed in an ambush staged by the Islamic State in the Greater Sahara (ISGS), also known as Islamic State Sahel Province (ISSP). Today, ISIS counts a number of partner groups across the continent. They include ISGS, Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP), Islamic State Central Africa Province (ISCAP), Islamic State Mozambique Province and Islamic State Somalia Province. "Sadly, for several years now, Africa has been the frontline of the violence perpetrated by Islamist terrorists, including those affiliated with the so-called Islamic State," J. Peter Pham, former U.S. Special Envoy for the Great Lakes and Sahel Regions, told Newsweek. "For three years now, an absolute majority of deaths due to terrorism globally have been in Africa, including roughly half of all terrorism-related fatalities in the world happening in just the Sahel region," he added. "While the threat level of the various IS affiliates varies, all of them from the Sahel to Somalia to the eastern Congo to Mozambique are becoming more lethal." "Moreover," he added, "they are increasingly demonstrating capacity to hold large amounts of territory or, at the very least, deny governments the ability to function in many areas." Thus far, ISIS franchises across Africa have largely operated in geographical isolation from another, curbing the level to which they can cooperate effectively. But this may be changing. The security expert with whom Newsweek spoke called the situation in the Sahel "a really combustible one" with the potential for ISIS' local affiliates to expand further into Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger and "pose a large enough threat to some of the criminal groups in Northwest Nigeria that maybe it pushes them out." "Maybe it absorbs some of those groups, and now you have a space that's much more densely populated, larger economic activity, and Islamic State Greater Sahara might be able to carve out its own presence in that space," the person added. "I think that's a real risk right now." An infographic with map of Western and Central Africa shows instances of political violence by ISIS-affiliated groups and the Al-Qaeda-affiliated Group for the Support of Islam and Muslims (JNIM), according to ACLED data for one... An infographic with map of Western and Central Africa shows instances of political violence by ISIS-affiliated groups and the Al-Qaeda-affiliated Group for the Support of Islam and Muslims (JNIM), according to ACLED data for one year up to June 6, 2025. More IOANA PLESEA/VALENTINA BRESCHI/AFP/Getty Images Wassim Nasr, a senior research fellow at the Soufan Center, echoed concerns over a potential connection being forged between ISIS' fronts in Sahel and West Africa, where the group has stepped up attacks in Nigeria. Already, he said a "junction" between the two self-proclaimed ISIS provinces is being established, elevating the threat posed by the otherwise geographically isolated outposts of ISIS influence on the continent. "This situation is not comparable with what happened in the Levant, but we should not underestimate neither the way for the ambition of the Islamic State to link territories, which they are doing in between Nigeria and the Sahel, nor the impact of that on their capacities," Nasr told Newsweek. "They don't have it for now," Nasr said, "but they might have it tomorrow." 'The Epicenter of Jihad' The situation in the Sahel presents an especially vexing landscape. With the three junta-led governments of Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger having expelled U.S. and French forces in recent years and now focusing Russia-backed operations against Tuareg rebels, the primary challenger to ISIS in this front is another hardline Islamist group, the Al-Qaeda-affiliated Jama'at Nusrat ul-Islam wa al-Muslimin (JNIM). "The paradoxical thing today is that it is the affiliate of Al-Qaeda that is stopping the attempt of Islamic State moving further south," Nasr said, "because local armies are not efficient." Nasr first observed back in 2017 that "Africa is becoming the epicenter of global jihad." He outlined a complex of array of factors that have allowed the group to thrive in African nations where "you have failed states, you have corruption, you have unsustained borders, and most importantly, you have human rights abuses by local security and armed forces." This combination of conditions risks threatening to set the stage for new attacks once the jihadis find sufficient footing to project their militant plans abroad, as they did from Libya in 2017. "When they had a foothold in Libya, on the shores of the Mediterranean, they did not hesitate one second," Nasr said. "They have the will, and they have the ambition to do it, but they cannot because they do not have the means—yet. If they get the means, of course they will." A vehicle allegedly belonging to the Islamic State West Africa Province is seen in Baga, in northeastern Nigeria's Borno province, on August 2, 2019. A vehicle allegedly belonging to the Islamic State West Africa Province is seen in Baga, in northeastern Nigeria's Borno province, on August 2, 2019. AUDU MARTE/AFP/Getty Images Zacharias Pieri, an associate professor at the University of South Florida who has advised the U.S. and U.K. governments on security issues in Africa, also highlighted the centrality of Africa, and the Sahel, in particular, as it relates to ISIS activity. "The area of the Sahel that intersects Mali and Burkina Faso has become a global epicenter of jihadist terrorism and continues to pose a severe threat," Pieri told Newsweek. "Jihadist terrorism in the region is broadly split between those groups affiliated with Al-Qaeda (eg. JNIM) and those affiliated to the Islamic State (eg. ISIS-Sahel)." "AQ franchises tend to be a little more pragmatic while IS franchises tend to be more ideological," he added. "Both have proven lethal, both have made gains, and both are contributing to the rising death toll." Armies of the Apocalypse The war-ravaged region is just one of many instances in which ISIS has managed to seize on existing conflicts to forge inroads in the continent. Another example is playing out hundreds of miles away in the Democratic Republic of Congo, where the Allied Democratic Forces (ADF), a Ugandan group established in the late 1990s, swore allegiance to ISIS' Central African outfit in 2018. It was this group that claimed responsibility for the slaying of nearly 40 people at a church in the eastern DRC, along with an earlier massacre against another church in February. Such anti-Christian operations, Nasr argued, demonstrated that the group once known as the ADF is now "applying the orders at the top of the Islamic State by the letter." While ISIS has infamously made enemies of all who oppose its ultra-fundamentalist doctrine — including other Muslims — targeting Christians both serves the group's desire to inflame sectarian tensions and live up to the prophetic narratives upon which it was founded. "ISIS affiliated groups have had a history of attacking Christians in DRC but also across other parts of Africa too, and it fits within their playbook," Pieri said. "It also forms part of their apocalyptic narrative about the armies of Islam having to fight against the armies of Rome (sometimes taken to mean Christians) in the end of times." Caleb Weiss, senior analyst at the Bridgeway Foundation, also observed how targeting Christians has played into the ideological leanings of ISIS' presence in the DRC. "The group has in the past made mention of an 'economic war against Christians,' while more recently it has made a more concerted effort to convert local Christians to Islam, in addition to forcing others to pay the jizya [tax on non-Muslims]," Weiss told Newsweek. He also pointed out that "the fact that it primarily combats, or more accurately, kills Christians, has been a main feature of propaganda and internal messaging," but felt that such language was most rooted in the reality that ISIS fighters in the DRC were "operating in an area that is overwhelmingly Christian." Unlike in the majority-Muslim Middle East, where Christians constitute a minority in each country except for the predominantly Jewish state of Israel, Africa is divided near-evenly between Christians and Muslims. Home to more than quarter of the world's Christians, the highest portion among the continents, Africa also hosts around a third of the world's Muslims. As in the case with the DRC, ISIS has not limited itself to operating in overwhelming Muslim areas, as it does in Nigeria. "In Nigeria (as in the Sahel), ISWAP's area of operation is almost entirely in almost-entirely Muslim areas," Ryan O'Farrell, also a senior analyst at the Bridgeway Foundation, told Newsweek. "The group (and Islamic State's central propaganda apparatus, which publishes all official public-facing messaging) consistently emphasizes attacks on Christians and has in the past carried out attacks on churches." "But given the relatively tiny portion of the population that is Christian in their areas of operation," he added, "I think these attacks are probably meant more to antagonize Christians elsewhere in Nigeria—and Christians around the world—than it is to spark religious conflict between Muslim and Christian communities in northeastern Nigeria itself where ISWAP primarily operates." U.S. jets take off from the USS Harry S. Truman aircraft carrier to conduct strikes against ISIS-Somalia positions on February 1, 2025. U.S. jets take off from the USS Harry S. Truman aircraft carrier to conduct strikes against ISIS-Somalia positions on February 1, 2025. U.S. Africa Command Public Affairs Threat to Homeland A number of U.S. officials have come to recognize the threat posed by ISIS and other Islamist militant groups in Africa. "Left unchecked, they will have a direct threat on the homeland," U.S. African Command (AFRICOM) commander General Michael Langley said in response to a senator's question on the issue during an April testimony referred to Newsweek by AFRICOM. Yet even as President Donald Trump's administration has entered into the diplomatic realm in ISIS-affected nations, brokering a peace deal between the DRC and neighboring Rwanda, the issue appears to receive comparatively less policy attention that other theaters. "The problem is not that diplomatic, military, and intelligence professionals have not been tracking all of this," Pham, the former U.S. envoy, said. "The challenge has been that all too many armchair 'experts' who never get into the field—if they travel abroad at all—have are reluctant to acknowledge the problem." He recalled supporting the campaign to have the DRC-based ADF designated as a terrorist organization during his time serving under the first Trump administration, only to "face a great deal of resistance from the inside-the-Beltway policy community," before the decision was ultimately made under President Joe Biden. "I have not seen any regrets from some of the people who opined against the terrorist designation after what happened last weekend at the Catholic parish in Komanda," Pham said. Now, he hoped that the U.S.-facilitated peace deal between the DRC and Rwanda would mark "an important first step in a process which, hopefully, will not only lead to peace and security for the two countries, but also permit attention to be focused on the real threat against both of them and their peoples." "And, as Americans, we have our own strategic interests in that happening," Pham said. "It is not just a matter of the fighting terrorism, it is also about access to critical minerals that are needed for national security and economic growth, which can only be safely extracted and processed in partnership with African countries when there is security." Even with the Trump administration stepping up strikes against ISIS in Somalia, others are more skeptical that the U.S., precisely because of its growing focus on Africa as geopolitical arena to compete for resources, would be the force needed to provide solutions. "U.S. foreign policy has witnessed a significant shift from counterterrorism to competition over resources which has allowed armed groups to take advantage of the situation by spreading into locations beyond America's primary airstrikes," Confidence MacHarry, security analyst at the Lagos-based SB Morgan Intelligence, told Newsweek. "This competition over resources will expose America's vulnerability," MacHarry said, "especially if American economic interests come under attack from ISIS-affiliates in not only Eastern DRC but beyond." He argued that the U.S. setbacks and the escalation in ISIS operations may ultimately push African nations to work together "This gives an opportunity for African states to appreciate the depth of the threat posed by these groups," MacHarry said, "and improve regional collaboration in facing them as history shows that sustained regional pressure goes a long way in improving outcomes."
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
The politics of assassination
Contemplating the crimes of the Idi Amin regime in Uganda in the mid-1970s, Harold Wilson summoned his press secretary Joe Haines to discuss a desperate potential remedy. After seeing reports that the Ugandan president was killing up to 7,000 of his citizens per week, 'Harold called me up to his study and said that he was very concerned about this. He asked me my view about killing Idi Amin, as he thought that was the only way of stopping the slaughter.' Haines agreed, whereupon Wilson took up the matter with the Foreign Office. 'They said, 'We don't have anybody to do things like that.' Apparently, the Foreign Office has a strong line, that if we do that to them, they will do it to us.' Assassination is as old as Cain and Abel. In the 20th century it was used occasionally by democratic governments and much more frequently by autocratic ones, while some who aspired to power regarded it as indispensable. But as Wilson's diplomatic advisers were clearly aware, assassination is not so much a blunt tool as an unpredictable and often ineffective one. For a start, the plot might miscarry, as happened when two Puerto Rican assassins bungled an attempt to murder President Truman in 1950 , leaving one dead and the other apprehended. Then there is the risk of what US officials called 'blowback ', as when Hezbollah operatives, probably working for Bashar al-Assad's Syria, killed the former Lebanese prime minister Rafik Hariri with a massive car bomb in Beirut in 2005, which led to Syria losing its position as de facto power in Lebanon. More fundamental is the question of whether killing an individual will actually solve the problem. Geopolitical confrontations are often reduced to a single, malevolent figure, a Saddam Hussein or Muammar Gaddafi. But as the history of the Middle East has repeatedly shown, a despotic or murderous enemy is as much a symptom as the cause of a security problem. Removing them often turns out to be the easy part. As Simon Ball argues in his book Death to Order, individual assassinations have rarely changed the geopolitical weather except as catalysts in situations already in crisis. The canonical instance is the murder by Gavrilo Princip of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife. Assassination was hardly unknown in central Europe and the Balkans in the decades leading up to 1914: assassins had accounted for a tsar of Russia, kings of Italy and Greece, a king and crown prince of Portugal, a French president, a Spanish prime minister and Franz Ferdinand's aunt , the Empress Elisabeth of Austria . But what turned the murder in Sarajevo from a political tragedy into a global catastrophe was the great power competition in the background: 'The assassination was the spark, but any spark would have done.' Sarajevo was a turning point, Ball argues, for the dark art of assassination itself. He examines the various explanations that circulated during and after the first world war and concludes that the Kingdom of Serbia, through its secret nationalist military society known as the Black Hand, was probably behind the murder of Ferdinand. From this point, assassination became a geopolitical tool for governments, rather than a revolutionary action – 'propaganda of the deed' – as practised in previous decades by European anarchists. Ball traces outbursts of assassination throughout the subsequent decades in countries experiencing political and social unrest, such as Mexico after the first world war, and Cuba and Puerto Rico in the 1930s. Geopolitical shifts, such as Japanese expansionism in the 1930s, also created waves of assassinations, making Shanghai the political murder capital of the world, where communists, nationalists, warlords, terrorists and criminals from China, Japan and Korea killed their enemies and each other at a remarkable pace. Assassination also became a tool of anti-colonial movements, although Ball seems sceptical about whether the murders of figures such as Lord Moyne in Cairo by the Zionist Lehi group in 1944, or Sir Henry Gurney, Britain's high commissioner in Malaya in 1951, made much of a difference to the probably inevitable processes of European decolonisation. Exploding cigars and poisoned toothbrushes were not just the province of the CIA Ball's book suffers from being too broad and too shallow. He treats assassination as any murder for a political purpose, which is reasonable enough in theory but gives him a vast number of incidents to examine. His stated aim is to explore the political effects of assassination, but his analysis is light, and some of the most major incidents – including the murders of Trotsky, Gandhi and John F Kennedy – merit just a few sentences each. It makes for an exhausting and frustrating read. A deeper exploration of case studies would have brought us closer to understanding why assassinations became so common in some places and not others, and what they really did – and can – achieve. The book comes closest to this in its discussion of assassination policies by democracies, notably the French during the Algerian war of independence and the US during the cold war. Despite being a matter of longstanding public record, it is still extraordinary to consider just how normalised techniques such as exploding cigars and poisoned toothbrushes became in Washington from the 1950s to the 70s. This was not just the province of enthusiasts within the CIA but was endorsed by the State Department, the White House and presidents themselves, until Gerald Ford signed an executive order banning political assassinations in 1976. This ban has not stopped the US eliminating its enemies, such as Osama bin Lad en and Qassem S uleimani , the erstwhile mastermind of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, but at least it now does its killing in the open. Despite the official enthusiasm for covert assassination in the cold war, some within the US government machine nevertheless recognised its limitations and drawbacks. In 1961, the head of the CIA's euphemistically named 'executive action' capability recognised that political murder is 'the last resort beyond the last resort and a confession of weakness '. But if assassination 'has never changed the history of the world', as Disraeli remarked, then why do states, including democracies, increasingly engage in what is now called targeted killing? Israel has employed assassination from its foundation, but in the 21st century it has become a prolific practitioner. The government uses its armed forces alongside its feared intelligence service, Mossad , while claiming that international law, which evolved to regulate inter state conflict, has proven to be inadequate in an era of terrorism and covert nuclear weapons programmes. For the Israeli state, assassination is not so much the removal of individuals as a counter-terrorism technique that only works at scale: its own grisly metaphor for this is 'mowing the grass'. The 2024 operation in Lebanon using pagers and walk ie-talkies – nicknamed Operation Grim Beeper – reportedly incapacitated 1,500 Hezbollah operatives in just two days. Israel has also inspired the US to adopt a more systematic approach to assassination, first under George W Bush and then Barack Obama, who held 'Terror Tuesday' meetings in the White House to select targets. Ball suggests that this turn to targeted killing by democracies may arise partly because of advances in technology, such as drones and air-to-ground missiles. But there are surely more fundamental causes. Disraeli was operating his statecraft in an era before mass communication. The purpose of 21st-century targeted killing is not just to remove a political obstacle. It is to send a message of strength and resolve to friends and foes alike. Andrew Glazzard is a professor of national security policy and practice, and author of books including The Case of Sherlock Holmes: Secrets and Lies in Conan Doyle's Detective Fiction Death to Order: A Modern History of Assassination by Simon Ball is published by Yale University Press (£25). Order a copy from The Observer Shop for £22.50. Delivery charges may apply Photograph depicts a Lebanese police officer amid the carnage following the killing of Rafik Hariri in Beirut, 2005. Courtesy
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
In pardoning reality TV stars Todd and Julie Chrisley, Trump taps into a sense of persecution felt by his conservative Christian base
President Donald Trump has never met Todd Chrisley, the reality TV star that he pardoned on May 27, 2025, along with Chrisley's wife, Julie. But the pair have much in common. Both are admired by their fans for their brash personas and salty ripostes. Both enjoy lavish lifestyles: Trump is known for his real estate deals and rococo White House redecoration, and Chrisley for his entrepreneurial skill and acquisitions of sprawling properties. Quick-tempered tycoons, they live large and keep score – especially when people cross them. And maybe most importantly, both have run into legal trouble with Georgia prosecutors. In 2019, The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Georgia indicted the Chrisleys for fraud and tax evasion, and the Fulton County district attorney filed charges against Trump in 2023. In 2022, Todd and Julie Chrisley were tried in Fulton County, found guilty and sentenced to 12- and seven-year sentences, respectively. A year later, a Fulton County grand jury indicted Trump as part of an alleged conspiracy to overturn the 2020 presidential election results in Georgia, a case that's currently in limbo. After the Chrisleys went to prison, their daughter Savannah began campaigning for their release. Her efforts to win over prominent conservatives – including her outspoken support for Trump – led to a prime-time appearance at the 2024 Republican National Convention. 'My family has been persecuted by rogue prosecutors due to our public profile and conservative beliefs,' she told the delegates and a television audience of 15 million viewers. Turning an insult into an accolade, she claimed prosecutors had called them the 'Trumps of the South.' Her framing of her parents' imprisonment aligns with Trump's broader campaign narrative of victimization, redemption and retribution, which critics say he has continued to promote and carry out during his second term. Preaching perfection Like Trump, who starred on 'The Apprentice' for 11 years, the Chrisleys had their own reality television show. 'Chrisley Knows Best' aired on USA Network from 2014 to 2023. I'm familiar with the Chrisleys because I wrote about Todd in a 2018 book I co-edited on religion and reality television. The show was particularly popular among viewers in their 30s, who were fascinated by the Chrisleys' extravagant lifestyle and Todd's over-the-top personality. The self-proclaimed 'patriarch of perfection,' Todd flew twice a month to Los Angeles from Atlanta, and later Nashville, to have his hair cut and highlighted. He spoke freely about using Botox and invited viewers into his room-size closet where his clothes were organized by color. No matter the time of day, Todd was camera-ready: buffed, manicured and dressed in designer clothes. The family enjoyed all the trappings of success: fancy cars, a palatial home and expensive vacations. Yet, in almost every episode, Todd made clear that his life, and theirs by extension, centered on family, religion and responsibility. In fact, many episodes revolved around Todd's efforts to promote these values through his parenting lessons. On the one hand, Todd tried to teach responsibility and the value of hard work to his five children. On the other hand, he bribed and cajoled them into doing what he wanted. Todd seemed to have it both ways: His strictness and traditional values appealed to Christian viewers, but his sass and cussing won over secular audiences. Yet sometimes his words rang hollow. Todd talked a lot about work, but viewers rarely saw him at a job. He frequently quoted the Bible, but audiences seldom saw him in church. He extolled family, but a few years into the series, his two older children, Lindsie and Kyle, disappeared from the show. In 2023, the series disappeared, too. By then, the Chrisleys were in prison. Trump knows best On the day of his inauguration, when Trump pardoned or commuted the sentences of the roughly 1,500 people involved in the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection, he vowed to 'take appropriate action to correct past misconduct by the Federal Government related to the weaponization of law enforcement.' According to the president, the imprisonment of Todd and Julie Chrisley and his pardoning of them is just that. 'Your parents are going to be free and clean and I hope that we can do it by tomorrow,' Trump told Savannah Chrisley in a recorded phone conversation. 'They've been given a pretty harsh treatment based on what I'm hearing.' Trump's pardons, which have freed a number of conservatives convicted of fraud, may stem from his belief that he and many others have been falsely accused and persecuted by the elite, liberal establishment. But the pardons also strike home for his right-wing religious supporters, many of whom think that Democrats will do anything to quash their faith, including using the justice system to specifically target Christians. 'We live in a nation founded on freedom, liberty and justice for all. Justice is supposed to be blind. But today, we have a two-faced justice system,' Savannah Chrisley said during her RNC speech. 'Look at what they are doing to countless Christians and conservatives that the government has labeled them extremists or even worse.' While those claims have been disputed, eradicating anti-Christian bias, at home and abroad, has nevertheless become a centerpiece of Trump's policies during his second term. The lawyers who prosecuted the Chrisleys had a different perspective. They called Todd and Julie 'career swindlers who have made a living by jumping from one fraud scheme to another, lying to banks, stiffing vendors and evading taxes at every corner,' and whose reputations were 'based on the lie that their wealth came from dedication and hard work.' The couple were ultimately found guilty of defrauding Atlanta-area banks of US$36 million by using falsified papers to apply for mortgages, obtaining false loans to repay older loans, and not repaying those loans. They also were convicted of hiding their true income from the IRS and owing $500,000 in back taxes. At his sentencing, Todd said that he intended to pay it all back. At a press conference after his pardon, he said he was convicted for something he did not do. In the days since their release, the Chrisleys announced they were filming a new reality show, which will air on Lifetime. The series will focus on the couple's legal struggles, imprisonment, pardon and reunification. Thanks to the constitutional protections of the presidency, Trump's reelection has shielded him from ongoing federal criminal prosecution. And now, thanks to the stroke of Trump's pen, the 'Trumps of the South' are back in business, too. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Diane Winston, USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism Read more: How the gladiators inspired evangelicals' sense of persecution Trump's Jan. 6 pardon order 'flies in the face of the facts' of violent insurrection, retired federal judge explains Fulton County charges Donald Trump with racketeering, other felonies – a Georgia election law expert explains 5 key things to know Diane Winston does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
