Implementing Trump's proposed NASA cuts illegal before Congress passes budget, Democrats say
In the letter dated Wednesday to Sean Duffy, the new acting NASA administrator, the lawmakers cited remarks from senior officials during recent employee town halls that NASA must start adjusting its workforce and structure to align with Trump's budget request, which seeks a $6-billion funding cut and the termination of dozens of science programs and missions.
Making those moves before Congress agrees on its official NASA budget, currently drafted to reject Trump's proposed cuts, would be "flatly illegal" and "offensive to our constitutional system," said Zoe Lofgren and Valerie P. Foushee, ranking members of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
"A presidential budget request is just that: a request to Congress," they said. "The notion that any executive branch agency would unilaterally take steps to implement a budget proposal before its budget is enacted by Congress is therefore offensive to our constitutional system. It would be illegal."
The White House could not be immediately reached for comment.
The letter quoted NASA Deputy Associate Administrator Casey Swails saying during a recent agency town hall, "while the budget's still moving through the legislative process, based on what's proposed, based on the Administration's priorities, we have to take steps now to start realigning our workforce and the resources to meet the mission needs."
NASA Chief of Staff Brian Hughes, speaking at the same town hall, agreed, saying it would "probably be considered irresponsible" to wait for the congressional budget process.
The letter added that Hughes recently ordered NASA science programs targeted for cancellation in Trump's budget request to stop issuing press releases celebrating new scientific results and achievements.
Over 2,000 agency employees are set to voluntarily leave NASA in the coming months under the Trump administration's "deferred resignation" program, a vestige of job cuts by former Trump ally Elon Musk, who is also CEO of NASA's largest contractor, SpaceX.
"This is impoundment in action, and it must stop immediately," the letter said.
A draft spending bill from the House Appropriations Committee, released on Monday, rejects the program cuts and would keep NASA's funding largely the same as its enacted 2025 budget, while shifting some science program funding to NASA's space exploration unit, indicating bipartisan rejection of Trump's request for the space agency.
Republican Senate Commerce Committee Chair Ted Cruz added language to the reconciliation bill that passed this month to provide $10 billion for an array of programs through the next decade that the Trump administration sought to phase out, including NASA's Space Launch System rocket.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Rachel Reeves ‘could extend fuel duty freeze in autumn Budget' in cost of living boost
Rachel Reeves will freeze fuel duty again this autumn in a boost to drivers still struggling with the cost of living, it has eben reported. The chancellor reportedly feels vindicated by a freeze on the levy last October, despite calls from campaigners and economists to hike the tax. As she seeks to fill a multi-billion pound black hole in the public finances, she has faced fresh calls to end the long-running freeze on fuel duty, which has been in place since 2011. Maintaining the freeze, and keeping in place a 5p cut brought in by Rishi Sunak as chancellor in 2022, is expected to cost around £5bn per year - the same as Labour's U-turn on planned benefit cuts. But The i reported a hike in fuel duty in line with inflation will not form part of Ms Reeves' Autumn Budget as she seeks to balance the books. Treasury sources told the newspaper the freeze is an example of the Treasury being 'front-footed' in tackling the cost of living pressures facing households. The headline rate on standard petrol and diesel is 52.95 pence per litre, a level which would ordinarily rise in line with inflation. But the repeated freezing of the measure means that, since George Osborne first made the move, the rate has fallen by more than a third in real terms. The Social Market Foundation, a think tank, said freezes and cuts since 2012 will have cost the government more than £200bn in total by 2028, more than the budget for the NHS. After Ms Reeves kept the rate of fuel duty flat last October, former Institute for Fiscal Studies director Paul Johnson said: 'Almost unbelievably this Government has followed the practice of its predecessor in freezing rates of fuel duties and not allowing the 'temporary' 5p cut to expire, while raising other taxes dramatically and claiming to be focused on tackling climate change.' But Ms Reeves said hiking fuel duty would be the 'wrong choice' as she unveiled what she called 'very difficult decisions' on tax elsewhere. Ms Reeves said: 'To retain the 5p cut and to freeze fuel duty again would cost over £3 billion next year. 'At a time when the fiscal position is so difficult, I have to be frank with the House that this is a substantial commitment to make. 'I have concluded that in these difficult circumstances – while the cost of living remains high and with a backdrop of global uncertainty – increasing fuel duty next year would be the wrong choice for working people. 'It would mean fuel duty rising by 7p per litre. So, I have today decided to freeze fuel duty next year and I will maintain the existing 5p cut for another year, too. 'There will be no higher taxes at the petrol pumps next year.' A Treasury source said they would not comment on speculation ahead of the Budget.
The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Are US tariffs starting to bite? Trump, in denial over rising prices, targets Fed chief Powell
Memo from the White House: inflation is 'right on track', it declared this week, citing the latest official data. Price growth is now 'very low', according to Donald Trump. The actual statistics paint a markedly different picture. Just six months after he regained power, in part by promising to rapidly reduce prices, Trump has presided over the chaotic rollout of tariffs on an array of overseas products that many have argued risk having the exact opposite effect. After a lull, the consumer price index (CPI) is back on the rise. In June, everything from fruit and washing machines to dresses and toys became more expensive. Businesses in the US and around the world have struggled to keep up with the Trump administration's erratic rollout of its aggressive trade strategy: the daily White House soap opera of warnings, threats, confusion, deadlines, delays and drama. Putting to one side the steady stream of twists, cliffhangers and all-caps declarations, each episode has pushed US tariffs higher. The overall average effective tariff rate is now set to hit 20.6%, according to the non-partisan The Budget Lab at Yale, its highest level since 1910. Eventually, someone has to foot the bill. By Trump's telling, the countries he targets will be forced to pay up. But in reality, tariffs are paid by the importer – US-based companies, in this case – and often passed on. Tariffs are a burden. One way or another, the impact typically is felt along each link of the supply chain, from the initial manufacturer to the customer who buys the finished product. 'All through that chain, people will be trying not to be the ones who pick up the cost,' noted Jerome Powell, the Federal Reserve chair, at a recent press conference. 'But ultimately, the cost of the tariff has to be paid and some of it will fall on the end consumer,' added Powell. 'We know that. That's what businesses say. That's what the data says from past evidence. So we know that's coming.' The effect is not immediate, though. It might take Trump a matter of minutes to announce a tariff on Truth Social, but the full effects can take months to work their way through the economy. And so Powell, and the Fed, has waited. For seven months now, at four consecutive meetings, the US central bank's policymakers have sat on their hands and kept interest rates on hold. After dramatically raising rates to combat inflation, they want to see how prices respond to Trump's tariffs before cutting them back. It's early days. Prices are still rising, and by more than the Fed's target of 2% each year. Officials want to know if Trump's plan will make them rise faster. The evidence has so far been mixed. While consumer price growth accelerated slightly between May and June, the annual rate of wholesale price growth slipped. The Fed's latest 'beige book', a semi-quarterly report of anecdotal economic insights from across the US, also released this week, described a relatively calm business landscape, despite persisting uncertainty. Assuming Trump's announced tariffs are enforced, they will dent US economic growth by 0.1 percentage point this year and 0.3 percentage points next, according to modeling by Oxford Economics. 'The drag on the economy is predominantly tied to core inflation, which will temporarily be 0.2bps [basis points] higher than in the current baseline,' said its chief US economist Ryan Sweet. 'Though the boost to consumer prices is modest, it still reduces growth in real disposable income and, by extension, consumer spending.' Inside the Fed's headquarters in Washington DC, Powell and his officials are patiently monitoring the data while deciding their next steps. But less than a mile away, one man is not prepared to wait. In a series of increasingly bitter attacks, Trump has publicly lambasted Powell for being 'too late' to cut rates, and claimed the Fed's inaction is costing the US economy. He has called on Powell (whom he first tapped to be Fed chair in 2017) to quit, and unnerved Wall Street by raising the prospect of firing him. Bharat Ramamurti, former deputy director of the National Economic Council under Joe Biden, said: 'If you replace Jay Powell with someone who is clearly doing whatever Donald Trump wants them to do, expectations about what inflation is going to do in the long run are going to spike and that's going to create a real problem for the Fed in the long term.' The supreme court signaled it views the Fed chair as legally shielded from presidential removal, describing the central bank as a 'uniquely structured, quasi-private entity' in a May ruling about two of Trump's other firings. Trump is 'highly unlikely' to fire Powell, he has asserted, before floating one reason he might have to go: a $2.5bn renovation of the Fed's buildings. 'I mean, it's possible there's fraud involved,' the president claimed. Powell has reportedly asked the central bank's inspector general to review the project. Powell is due to finish his term in May, and has stressed he will remain in post until then. Advocates of the Fed's independence insist the more important question is not whether the president can remove him before then, but if he should. 'Once you no longer have the check of the central bank, which can raise interest rates as needed to curb inflation, you really start to raise the specter of runaway costs, runaway inflation, and it makes the US economy less attractive for investors domestically and abroad,' said Ramamurti. Inflation is 'right on track', according to his administration. Economists are already concerned it is tilting off course – and Trump won't rule out taking action that critics warn would shunt it off the rails altogether.
The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump cannot dispel the ghost of Jeffrey Epstein
Some enchanted evening, Donald Trump saw a stranger across a crowded room. It is likely that there is hardly anyone living who knows exactly under what glowing lights Donald Trump met Jeffrey Epstein, except perhaps Trump himself and Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's former girlfriend who is serving a 20-year prison term for helping to procure minors for sexual abuse. Trump said in an interview in 2002, when his Epstein relationship was still tight, that it had been a 15-year mutual admiration society. Epstein was 'a terrific guy' and 'a lot of fun to be with,' and 'likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side'. Epstein described himself as 'Donald's closest friend for 10 years'. The 1990s and early 2000s were the heyday of the Trump-Epstein romp. Roger Stone, Trump's dirty trickster who was dumped from the 1994 Bob Dole presidential campaign when he and his wife were exposed apparently advertising for threesomes, was a hanger-on in the Palm Beach demimonde. 'There's 100 beautiful women and 10 guys. Look, how cool are we?' he told the Washington Post in 2016. 'I was happy to be invited. I mean, it was great.' The Trump biographer Michael Wolff told me on my podcast The Court of History how Epstein opened his safe in his New York townhouse for him to retrieve a pile of about a dozen photographs of Trump at Epstein's Palm Beach mansion. 'They were kind of spread out like playing cards,' Wolff said. 'And it was Trump – with girls of uncertain age. In two of them, topless girls are sitting on Trump's lap. In another, he has a visible stain on his pants while several girls are laughing and pointing at it.' Wolff said: 'I think it's certainly not unlikely that they were in the safe when the FBI came in after his arrest and took everything.' Wolff initially mentioned his taped conversations with Epstein about his relationship with Trump in the Daily Beast, in which Wolff made a glancing reference to this incident, and in the Yale Review in November 2024. In response to Wolff's latest book on Trump, All or Nothing, on the 2024 campaign, the White House stated Wolff had a 'peanut-sized brain'. In June of this year, after Wolff claimed Trump held a 'grudge' against Harvard because he had applied to be a student and was rejected, Trump posted it was 'False', and that Wolff is 'a Third Rate Reporter, who is laughed at even by the scoundrels of the Fake News'. The White House issued a statement that Trump 'didn't need to apply to an overrated, corrupt institution like Harvard'. Since 10 August 2019, when Epstein's body was found in his cell with an orange sheet wrapped around his neck at the New York Metropolitan correction center under suspicious circumstances, declared a suicide by Attorney General William Barr, he has been raised into a phantasmagorical presence that will not vanish. Epstein has become the Ark of the Covenant in the cosmology of rightwing conspiracies. When its doors are opened it will supposedly reveal the ultimate secrets of deep state pedophiles. A poll in 2021 found that about a quarter of Republicans believed that 'the government, media, and financial worlds in the US are controlled by a group of Satan-worshipping pedophiles who run a global child sex trafficking operation'. The road from Pizzagate, the QAnon predecessor conspiracy theory that Hillary Clinton and other prominent Democrats held child sex slaves in the basement of the Comet Ping Pong Washington pizza parlor, to January 6 was a straight line. Half of Republicans believed that 'leaked email from some of Hillary Clinton's campaign staffers contained code words for pedophilia, human trafficking and satanic ritual abuse – what some people refer to as 'Pizzagate'' was true or probably true, according to a December 2016 Economist/YouGov poll. Trump gave credence to the QAnon pedophile theory in October 2020, when he was asked about it at an NBC News town hall. 'Let me ask you about QAnon,' said Savannah Guthrie. 'It is this theory that Democrats are a satanic pedophile ring and that you are the savior of that.' After replying seven times that he didn't know about it, Trump said: 'Let me just tell you, what I do hear about it, is they are very strongly against pedophilia. And I agree with that. I mean, I do agree with that. And I agree with it very strongly.' A few months later, many in the mob assaulting the Capitol were QAnon believers, though the percentage could not be tabulated. A group of social scientists found that belief in QAnon theories correlated directly with 'support for the January 6 insurrection'. More than a third of Republicans believed that the FBI (ie the Deep State) 'instigated' the January 6 assault, according to a Washington Post/University of Maryland poll. For decades Trump has cultivated paranoid conspiracy theories to foster a cult around himself. His method existed long before Rush Limbaugh loudly burst into talk radio, but Trump inflames paranoia hour by hour to make himself unavoidable. When Trump makes an accusation it's news – Joe McCarthy's technique. The ever-shifting series of conspiracy claims from birtherism onward have been monetized into a reliable cash cow by rightwing media. Bottom-feeding serves the bottom line. Every newly invented plot keeps the machine whirring. Maga is constantly tantalized, addicted and perpetuated. The uses of Trump's conspiracism are complex, from the profane to the holy. The demonology has elevated Trump into a savior of the Magatariat from the globalist elites and fiendish pedophiles. No greater evil can be projected. It's more than a theory; it's a theology. Epstein wraps it all up, explains all, proves all – Pizzagate meets the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Lyndon Johnson had his credibility gap with the Vietnam war. Richard Nixon had his 18-minute gap in his White House tapes. Trump now is bedeviled by his conspiracy theory gap. All the president's men – and women – have stoked the Epstein plot. Dan Bongino, deputy director of the FBI, demanded in 2023: 'What the hell are they hiding with Jeffrey Epstein?' He urged listeners to his talk show 'not let that story go' and blamed 'people in the Washington swamp who are not telling you the truth'. Kash Patel, the FBI director, repeatedly claimed in 2023 that the Biden administration and Democrats in the Congress were withholding documents about Epstein 'because of who's on that list'. On 27 February, Attorney General Pam Bondi welcomed 15 Maga influencers to a press event where she handed out binders labeled 'Epstein Files: Phase 1', which contained no new information. Anger simmered. On 14 March, Bondi stated on Fox News that the Epstein 'client list' was 'sitting on my desk right now to review', raising the expectation among the Maga believers that such a 'client list' existed and that powerful Democrats would be revealed. The 'client list' allegedly contained the names of Democrats for whom Epstein trafficked girls and then blackmailed. On 5 June, Elon Musk, accelerating his orbit away from Trump's gravitation, posted: 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' Musk then deleted his post. But, on 6 July, the Department of Justice issued an unsigned statement that there was 'no incriminating 'client list'', 'no credible evidence … that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals', and that 'no further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted'. Bondi's insistence that Epstein kept no 'client list' of people he supposedly blackmailed may well be true. . But Bondi debunked a falsehood that had become an article of faith for Maga believers. It was bait for the base. The Maga world erupted. 'Please understand the EPSTEIN AFFAIR is not going away,' Michael Flynn, Trump's former national security adviser, posted. 'THIS IS NOT WHAT WE OR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ASKED FOR and a complete disappointment.' Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna, Republican of Florida, for example, posted: 'GET US THE INFORMATION WE ASKED FOR!' Tucker Carlson called it a 'cover-up' of Epstein as a secret agent for Israeli intelligence. 'Why was he doing this, on whose behalf, and where was the money coming from?' Steve Bannon roused the rightwing cadres at the Turning Point USA convention on 13 July. 'Epstein,' he said, 'is a key that picks the lock on so many things, not just individuals, but also institutions, intelligence institutions, foreign governments and who was working with him on our intelligence apparatus and in our government.' Trump's grooming of his followers cannot be undone. Decades of propaganda have become gospel truth. The Maga base and Republicans generally have not cared about Trump's sexual abuse of women. After the two E Jean Carroll trials in which Trump was found liable for defaming her by claiming she was lying about his sexual assault, the hush-money payments to silence Stormy Daniels for her sexual relationship with him, and numerous credible reports of dozens of women who have come forward with allegations of sexual abuse by Trump, a poll in the fall of 2024 conducted by a conservative thinktank, the American Enterprise Institute, showed that only 5% of Trump voters 'believe he did commit sexual assault'. E Jean Carroll told me that a number of women have come to her to relate similar assaults, but do not want to become public figures out of fear of retribution. For Maga, and Republicans, if there is any distinction, these stories are unworthy of attention. They sanitize and dismiss such predations, while claims of child molestation incite them. Justifying a sexual libertine like Trump, they have held him up as a white knight avenger against pedophiles, remade him into a purifying figure, the defender of the innocent. Since Bondi issued her statement that the Epstein 'client list' did not exist, Trump's attempts to stamp out the flames have become more frenetic. He went from urging his supporters to move on to telling them to get lost. His first remark was to chide a reporter who asked about it: 'I can't believe you're asking a question on Epstein at a time like this, where we're having some of the greatest success, and also tragedy with what happened in Texas. It just seems like a desecration.' Trump got more frustrated. 'For years, it's Epstein, over and over again,' Trump posted on Truth Social, blaming the files on Democrats. 'Why are we giving publicity to Files written by Obama, Crooked Hillary, Comey, Brennan, and the Losers and Criminals of the Biden administration.' It was 'all over a guy who never dies, Jeffrey Epstein'. Trump tried to rally his base. 'What's going on with my 'boys' and, in some cases, 'gals'?' Trump posted. 'They are all going after Attorney General Pam Bondi, who is doing a FANTASTIC JOB!' Trump reportedly phoned Charlie Kirk, the head of Turning Point USA, which had served as a forum for criticism of his handling of the Epstein affair, to quiet him. The glib talkshow host announced: 'I'm done talking about Epstein for the time being.' As promised, Kirk shut up, but the Maga chorus kept chirping. Enraged, Trump posted on 16 July that the 'new SCAM is what we will forever call the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax, and my PAST supporters have bought into this 'bullshit,' hook, line, and sinker … Let these weaklings continue forward and do the Democrats' work, don't even think about talking of our incredible and unprecedented success, because I don't want their support anymore!' At a bilateral meeting with the crown prince of Bahrain, Trump lashed out at 'stupid Republicans'. Meanwhile, Speaker Mike Johnson, invariably a loyal soldier, but who felt forced to respond to the disturbance of the base, called for an investigation. Senator Josh Hawley, Republican of Missouri, asked that Ghislaine Maxwell appear as a witness. Do they think an inquiry would not come to focus on the evidence perhaps in the FBI's possession of Trump's gamey relationship with Epstein, rather than the mythical 'client list'? Under the stress of the Epstein controversy that will not disappear at Trump's command, the unpopularity of his One Big Beautiful Bill, the public's rejection of his brutal deportation methods, and the weakening of the economy as a result of his mad tariffs, Trump is becoming more unhinged, speaking openly of firing the head of the Federal Reserve, Jerome Powell, who, unlike Epstein, is a live target. Crashing the economy might serve as a temporary distraction. Then, in a fit of retributive pique, his administration fired James Comey's daughter, Maurene Comey, a prosecutor in the office of the southern district of New York, who had handled the Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell cases. Trump lost more control. Facing backlash, he asked Bondi to seek to release Epstein grand jury material, which almost certainly contained no reference to him and was a substitute for the full files, throwing oil on the fire. Trump pressured the Wall Street Journal and its owner Rupert Murdoch not to publish a letter he wrote in honor of Epstein's 50th birthday. The Journal reported: 'It contains several lines of typewritten text framed by the outline of a naked woman, which appears to be hand-drawn with a heavy marker. A pair of small arcs denotes the woman's breasts, and the future president's signature is a squiggly 'Donald' below her waist, mimicking pubic hair. The letter concludes: 'Happy Birthday – and may every day be another wonderful secret.'' On Friday, Trump sued the Journal and Murdoch. The ghost of Epstein haunts Trump. He cannot dispel his spirit. 'Not a fan, not a fan,' he muttered in the past, trying to distance himself. But Epstein continues to swoop in – 'a guy who never dies'. Until evidence of Trump's participation in Epstein's transgressions is either established or discredited, including the photographs that Michael Wolff claimed Epstein showed him, Epstein will never die. If Epstein were to appear to Trump at night as an apparition, his Marley's ghost, he might warn him that there is no happy ending. Sidney Blumenthal, a former senior adviser to President Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton, has published three books of a projected five-volume political life of Abraham Lincoln: A Self-Made Man, Wrestling With His Angel and All the Powers of Earth. He is a Guardian US columnist and co-host of The Court of History podcast
