Blake Lively's link to Judge Lewis J Liman's brother revealed after SHOCKING dismissal of Justin Baldoni's $400M lawsuit; netizens call it 'Conflict of interest'
has come under the radar after social media users uncovered a past connection between the actress and the brother of federal Judge Lewis J Liman, who dismissed Baldoni's $400 million lawsuit.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
On Monday, Judge Liman of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed the 'It Ends With Us' director's defamation and extortion lawsuit against Lively, her husband
, and The New York Times.
Judge Liman ruled that Lively's statements were made within the bounds of legal privilege and could not serve as the basis for a defamation claim. However, shortly after the decision, social media users began circulating a detail that has since gone viral. The viral post claims that the judge is the brother of Hollywood filmmaker
, who directed Lively in the past. The post claimed that the actress was a teen when she worked with director Doug in a 2008 pro-Obama campaign ad for MoveOn.org. The ad also featured Lively's Gossip Girl co-star
.
'FUN FACT: the judge that dismissed Justin Baldoni's claims against Blake Lively is Lewis Liman, brother to Doug Liman. Doug and Blake worked together years ago—small world,' wrote one user on X, triggering a wave of commentary and speculation.
Some critics questioned a potential conflict of interest, despite the brief and indirect nature of the connection. 'I don't understand how he could preside then. That's a conflict of interest, I'd assume,' one commenter wrote.
Others quickly pushed back, arguing that the 2008 collaboration between Lively and Doug Liman—a commercial involving dozens of public figures—hardly constituted grounds for judicial recusal. 'You think this judge would dismiss a lawsuit because Blake did a COMMERCIAL with his brother? Lmfao,' one user replied.
Judge Lewis J Liman, a Harvard and Yale Law School graduate, has served on the federal bench since 2019 following a distinguished legal career that included time as a federal prosecutor and appellate division chief.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
His brother Doug has directed major studio films including The Bourne Identity, Swingers, and Edge of Tomorrow.
There is no indication at this time of any formal conflict of interest or ethics violation. The judge has not commented on the social media reaction, and legal experts have noted that distant, professional overlaps involving family members are generally not disqualifying—especially when no ongoing or personal relationship exists.
Lively celebrated the dismissal on Monday with a public statement, saying, 'I'm more resolved than ever to continue to stand for every woman's right to have a voice in protecting themselves, including their safety, their integrity, their dignity, and their story,' she wrote.
The judge, however, said Baldoni could revise the lawsuit if he wanted to pursue different claims related to whether Lively breached or interfered with a contract. His legal team indicated it planned to do so.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Blake Lively comes face-to-face with Justin Baldoni in day-long deposition; 'It Ends With Us' star questioned under oath on sexual harassment allegations
Actress Blake Lively and 'It Ends With Us' actor-director Justin Baldoni came face-to-face for the first time since their messy legal battle which set off a wave of lawsuits began last December. The Deposition According to TMZ, Baldoni was physically present in the room during Lively's deposition, which forms an integral part of the ongoing legal battle. The deposition was held behind closed doors in a private setting, with only attorneys from both parties, a court reporter, and a videographer in attendance. ABC News confirmed the testimony will be sealed and will not be released to the public. Questioned Under Oath Reports further state that Lively sat for the all-day deposition on July 31, where she was questioned under oath by Baldoni's attorneys about her allegations of sexual harassment and retaliation during the production of the film. The actress in her original complaint, filed in December 2024, had accused the director of engaging in inappropriate behaviour during filming, including discussing his sex life, making comments about her body, and improvising intimate scenes without prior agreement. Baldoni, on the other hand, claimed that Lively, her husband Ryan Reynolds , and her publicist engaged in a coordinated effort to destroy his reputation and filed a $400 million defamation countersuit. The Legal Drama That lawsuit was dismissed in early June by Judge Lewis J. Liman, who ruled that Lively's statements were protected from defamation claims. A separate $250 million libel suit against The New York Times was also dismissed. Following the dismissal of Baldoni's lawsuits, Freedman indicated that his client would not be refiling the defamation claims and would instead focus on challenging Lively's sexual harassment allegations in court. Prior to the deposition, Baldoni's attorney Freedman made headlines for suggesting it be held "at Madison Square Garden, sell tickets or stream it, and donate every dollar to organisations helping victims of domestic abuse.' Upcoming Hearing Freedman has since confirmed that Baldoni will take the stand during the trial, which is scheduled for March 2026. Lively's attorney, Mike Gottlieb, has also confirmed that she will testify during the proceedings. Cameras will, however, not be allowed in the courtroom.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
YouTuber slams Blake Lively for alleged intimidation in Justin Baldoni drama, asks judge for protection
YouTuber Lauren Neidigh, better known as LethalLauren904, is not holding back. After narrowly escaping a subpoena from Blake Lively in her ongoing lawsuit against Justin Baldoni, the content creator fired off a scorching letter to the judge, demanding legal protection from the Gossip Girl actress. YouTuber calls out Blake's legal moves as intimidation tactic Neidigh argued that Lively's subpoena campaign unfairly targeted creators who had expressed critical views about the actress online. She claimed the move was more about silencing unfavourable opinions than fact-finding, branding it a blatant attempt to "intimidate and harass." Subpoena dropped, but threat still looms While Lively later dropped the subpoena against Neidigh, the creator said the damage was done. She pointed out that the possibility of the subpoena being reissued still hangs over her head like a legal guillotine, describing it as an "ongoing threat." Neidigh called the actress's actions an undue burden, claiming Lively's legal tactics were designed to chill free speech and make critics afraid to speak out. She asked the judge to grant her a protective order that would bar Lively from issuing any more subpoenas related to her. Banking info and backlash What sparked Neidigh's outrage? The subpoena requested personal details, including banking information. Neidigh said she tried to speak with Lively's lawyers but was met with silence and no real explanation for why such intrusive data was relevant. Neidigh was not alone. Other creators, including Kassidy O'Connell, also pushed back. They argued that Lively had no grounds to access their private data just because they discussed her legal mess online. Lively's side sticks to the script A rep for Lively maintained that the subpoenas were standard legal tools, not accusations or gag orders. They insisted that the aim was to uncover whether Baldoni orchestrated an online smear campaign against her, especially after she reportedly complained about his behaviour on set. Despite the dropped subpoenas, Lively's legal team is still digging into other creators, trying to piece together what they believe is a covert retaliation plot. With Lively's deposition looming and the trial set for March 2026, this courtroom drama is just heating up.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
YouTuber slams Blake Lively for alleged intimidation in Baldoni drama, asks judge for protection
Inside Blake Lively's net worth | Credit: Instagram | @blakelively ( Image credit : Inside Blake Lively's net worth | Credit: Instagram | @blakelively ) YouTuber calls out Blake's legal moves as intimidation tactic Fill 1 Tap to unmute 00:08 Speed 0.5 X 0.75 X 1 X 1.25 X 1.5 X 2 X Playing in picture-in-picture Subpoena dropped, but threat still looms Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni in It Ends with Us | Credit: Netflix ( Image credit : Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni in It Ends with Us | Credit: Netflix ) Banking info and backlash 'Plays into every sexist trope': Blake Lively slams The Hollywood Report's cover story about her Justin Baldoni drama | Credit: X/popcrave ( Image credit : 'Plays into every sexist trope': Blake Lively slams The Hollywood Report's cover story about her Justin Baldoni drama | Credit: X/popcrave ) Lively's side sticks to the script Marvel wants out of Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni's battle | Credit: Netflix ( Image credit : Marvel wants out of Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni's battle | Credit: Netflix ) YouTuber Lauren Neidigh, better known as LethalLauren904, is not holding back. After narrowly escaping a subpoena from Blake Lively in her ongoing lawsuit against Justin Baldoni, the content creator fired off a scorching letter to the judge, demanding legal protection from the Gossip Girl argued that Lively's subpoena campaign unfairly targeted creators who had expressed critical views about the actress online. She claimed the move was more about silencing unfavourable opinions than fact-finding, branding it a blatant attempt to "intimidate and harass."While Lively later dropped the subpoena against Neidigh, the creator said the damage was done. She pointed out that the possibility of the subpoena being reissued still hangs over her head like a legal guillotine, describing it as an "ongoing threat."Neidigh called the actress's actions an undue burden, claiming Lively's legal tactics were designed to chill free speech and make critics afraid to speak out. She asked the judge to grant her a protective order that would bar Lively from issuing any more subpoenas related to sparked Neidigh's outrage? The subpoena requested personal details, including banking information. Neidigh said she tried to speak with Lively's lawyers but was met with silence and no real explanation for why such intrusive data was was not alone. Other creators, including Kassidy O'Connell, also pushed back. They argued that Lively had no grounds to access their private data just because they discussed her legal mess online.A rep for Lively maintained that the subpoenas were standard legal tools, not accusations or gag orders. They insisted that the aim was to uncover whether Baldoni orchestrated an online smear campaign against her, especially after she reportedly complained about his behaviour on the dropped subpoenas, Lively's legal team is still digging into other creators, trying to piece together what they believe is a covert retaliation plot. With Lively's deposition looming and the trial set for March 2026, this courtroom drama is just heating up.
