US scrutinises Chinese AI for ideological bias, memo shows
U.S. State and Commerce Department officials are working together on the effort, which operates by feeding the programs standardized lists of questions in Chinese and in English and scoring their output, the memo showed. The evaluations, which have not previously been reported, are another example of how the U.S. and China are competing over the deployment of large language models, sometimes described as artificial intelligence (AI). The integration of AI into daily life means that any ideological bias in these models could become widespread.
One State Department official said their evaluations could eventually be made public in a bid to raise the alarm over ideologically slanted AI tools being deployed by America's chief geopolitical rival.
The State and Commerce Departments did not immediately return messages seeking comment on the effort. In an email, Chinese Embassy spokesperson Liu Pengyu did not address the memo itself but noted that China was 'rapidly building an AI governance system with distinct national characteristics' which balanced 'development and security.' Beijing makes no secret of policing Chinese models' output to ensure they adhere to the one-party state's 'core socialist values.'
In practice, that means ensuring the models do not inadvertently criticize the government or stray too far into sensitive subjects like China's 1989 crackdown on pro-democracy protests at Tiananmen Square, or the subjugation of its minority Uyghur population.
The memo reviewed by Reuters shows that U.S. officials have recently been testing models, including Alibaba's Qwen 3 and DeepSeek's R1, and then scoring the models according to whether they engaged with the questions or not, and how closely their answers aligned with Beijing's talking points when they did engage.
According to the memo, the testing showed that Chinese AI tools were significantly more likely to align their answers with Beijing's talking points than their U.S. counterparts, for example by backing China's claims over the disputed islands in the South China Sea.
DeepSeek's model, the memo said, frequently used boilerplate language praising Beijing's commitment to 'stability and social harmony' when asked about sensitive topics such as Tiananmen Square.
The memo said each new iteration of Chinese models showed increased signs of censorship, suggesting that Chinese AI developers were increasingly focused on making sure their products toed Beijing's line.
DeepSeek and Alibaba did not immediately return messages seeking comment.
The ability of AI models' creators to tilt the ideological playing field of their chatbots has emerged as a key concern, and not just for Chinese AI models. When billionaire Elon Musk – who has frequently championed far-right causes – announced changes to his xAI chatbot, Grok, the model began endorsing Hitler and attacking Jews in conspiratorial and bigoted terms.
In a statement posted to X, Musk's social media site, on Tuesday, Grok said it was 'actively working to remove the inappropriate posts.' On Wednesday, X's CEO Linda Yaccarino said she would step down from her role. No reason was given for the surprise departure.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
9 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Embassy: Students to US should keep social media public for visa duration
With the new academic season in the US starting next month, all international students applying to study in the country will need to keep their social media profiles public not only while applying for a visa but also during its validity period — in effect, during their entire study course. 'All student and exchange visitor visa applicants (F, M and J visa classes) are requested to adjust the privacy settings on all of personal social media profiles to 'public' in order to facilitate vetting necessary to establish the applicant's admissibility to the United States,' said a spokesperson from the US Embassy in New Delhi in response to a query from The Indian Express. 'Security vetting runs from the time of each application, through adjudication of the visa, and afterwards during the validity period of every issued visa, to ensure the individual remains eligible to travel to the United States,' the spokesperson said. Last month, the Embassy had cited 'public safety and national security' in the visa process while mandating those applying to study in the US to make their social media profiles public. The F category visa in the US refers to the F-1 student visa, meant for international students who wish to pursue academic studies at a US institution, while the M visa (M-1) is a non-immigrant visa for individuals pursuing vocational or other nonacademic studies. The J-1 enables foreign nationals to come to the US to teach, study, conduct research, or receive on the job training for periods ranging from a few weeks to several years. In 2023-24, Indian students formed the largest cohort of international students in the US, with 3.31 lakh enrolments. In the Financial Year 2024, the US issued 4,00,737 F-1, 6,322 M-1 and 3,22,820 J-1 visas, according to State Department data. In May, the Donald Trump administration had asked US embassies around the world to stop scheduling appointments for student visas as it expanded scrutiny of applicants' social media posts following widespread protests on campuses against Israel's bombing in Gaza. At the time, The Indian Express had reported that the decision had led to anxiety among Indian students preparing to begin their studies in the US and those already enrolled in American universities. Several of these students had said they were reviewing their digital footprints to secure their academic future. On June 18, the State Department announced the resumption of student visa interviews. 'Our overseas posts will resume scheduling F, M and J non-immigrant visa applications soon. Applicants should check the relevant embassy or consulate website for appointment availability,' it had said. Asserting that 'US visa is a privilege, not a right', it had said: 'We use all available information in our visa screening and vetting to identify visa applicants who are inadmissible to the US, including those who pose a threat to US national security. Under new guidance, we will conduct a comprehensive and thorough vetting, including online presence, of all student and exchange visitor applicants in the F, M and J non-immigrant classifications.' According to the Embassy, the rule is mandated for all countries and, since 2019, the US has required visa applicants to provide social media identifiers on immigrant and non-immigrant visa application forms. Divya A reports on travel, tourism, culture and social issues - not necessarily in that order - for The Indian Express. She's been a journalist for over a decade now, working with Khaleej Times and The Times of India, before settling down at Express. Besides writing/ editing news reports, she indulges her pen to write short stories. As Sanskriti Prabha Dutt Fellow for Excellence in Journalism, she is researching on the lives of the children of sex workers in India. ... Read More
Time of India
9 minutes ago
- Time of India
Revenge of the vernac! Time to mind your angrezi, mister
A controversy of sorts erupted recently after home minister Amit Shah's declaration at a book launch in Delhi that 'those who speak English will soon feel ashamed — the creation of such a society (in India) is not far away.' The comments attracted widespread criticism from the opposition, which accused Shah of pushing the RSS's agenda of cultural domination. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi said the BJP-RSS did not want underprivileged children to learn English and make progress to become equal. So, what does it mean when a powerful politician hints at shaming people for speaking the language of colonial masters? Is it an unpleasant yet necessary process of the much-needed linguistic decolonisation of our minds, as Shah claims? Credit: Chad Crowe Or is it clever political messaging meant for the vast majority of aspiring young men and women from small towns and villages who speak in the 'vernacular' and hold an irrational grudge against the English-speaking class living in metropolitan India? Just to contextualise, the etymology of the word 'vernacular' is interesting: it is derived from the Latin word 'verna', which means a slave born in his master's house. One of the other variants derived from 'verna' is 'vernaculum' — a low-bred person or proletarian. I was made aware of my 'vernac' identity many years ago when an acquaintance hurled the word at me as an insult. He spoke rather fluent English and kept referring to Hindi speakers as 'vernacs' — a derogatory term to describe those who speak in the vernacular. I, on the other hand, was trying to argue with him in Hindi — the language I am most comfortable in. But my combative antagonist was not willing to stoop to my level by answering in the language of the general hoi polloi. Around the same time, I was offered a job in an upmarket English-language news magazine. But my excitement came crashing down in the very first editorial meeting. While colleagues were rattling off story ideas in their clipped accents and perfect diction, peppering their pitch with public school jokes, I forgot my well-rehearsed lines when my turn came, and could only manage to mumble a few words in Hindi. Suddenly, a thick pall of oppressive silence fell in the editor's room. I could see embarrassed faces all around me; some colleagues looking down at the floor to avoid eye contact. The sacrilege had been committed. A yokel had sneaked into the 'Exclusive Club of the English-speaking Gentry' and defiled it with his lowbrow 'vernacular', or so I thought. That was my first embarrassing encounter with linguistic shame. Dr Lori Gallegos, professor of philosophy at Texas State University, defines linguistic shame as something that 'involves feelings of embarrassment, a sense of inferiority, and attitudes of self-reproach that arise in relation to the way one speaks.' She equates linguicism with other forms of discrimination, like racism and sexism. Apart from direct linguicism, which is still practised in some South Asian convents and public schools, there is another form of discrimination where 'people implicitly view those who do not speak English as uneducated or unintelligent.' PM Modi himself faces this kind of glottophobia regularly when he is mocked for mispronouncing an English word or phrase. Amit Shah's son, Jay Shah, is also trolled for his lack of fluency in English. Against this backdrop, Shah's unapologetic reverse linguicism — though one is not justifying it — becomes somewhat understandable. Ironically, Shah was echoing the sentiments expressed by the celebrated Kenyan-American Marxist writer Ngugi wa Thiong'o, who died last month. Thiong'o shunned the English language back in the 1970s and declared that in future, he would only write in his mother tongue, Gikuyu. It was his way of protesting against the imposition of the language of the colonial masters, which he described as a 'cultural bomb'. So, when the wider Sangh Parivar eulogises India's past, it may appear to be rejecting the effect of the 'cultural bomb' as described by Thiong'o, but there's a big difference between the two. While Thiong'o sees English and many other European languages as an assault on native African languages, the Hindutva narrative is more selective in its approach. Urdu, an out-and-out Indian language, is as much an anathema to them as English. A more troubling thought is how such rhetoric could encourage the right wing's vast army of foot soldiers — often drawn from under-educated and poor marginalised castes who resent the English-speaking elite. Some of them have taken on the role of cow vigilantes who patrol highways. This foot soldier could now potentially have another assignment as a bhasha rakshak dal (defenders of language) vigilante — going from room to room in Delhi Gymkhana or the swanky clubs in South Mumbai, or inspecting seminar halls in universities and the India International Centre to check if the speakers are ashamed enough while delivering a speech in English. Should that dystopia become a reality, will the angreziwallas be then forced to form secret societies where one could only whisper in a language that shall not be named? Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Tarn Taran bypoll: Faced by ex-MLA's defection & Amritpal's party, SAD explores tie-up with grassroots coalition
1 2 Tarn Taran: With its former MLA Harmeet Singh Sandhu defecting to AAP and NSA detainee Amritpal Singh's Akali Dal (Waris Punjab De) likely to eat into its votes, the Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) is now looking at a possible alliance with 'Azad Group' — a coalition of leaders from varied backgrounds, including sarpanches, municipal councillors (MC) and grassroots representatives. After reaching an initial understanding, there is a possibility that the group might merge with SAD during a rally in Jhabal on July 20. This event is expected to serve as a public platform to formalise the emerging partnership, signalling SAD's broader outreach strategy to bring independent and cross-party local leaders into its fold. MC Sanjeev Kundra, a key leader of the Azad Group, said senior SAD leaders had been invited to the Jhabal rally. He said there was a strong possibility of Azad Group merging into SAD, with a joint strategy likely to be announced for the upcoming Tarn Taran byelection. Led by political influencers Ram Namdhari and Paramjit Singh Pamma, the Azad Group comprises leaders from the Congress, BJP, and other parties. The group positions itself as a non-partisan front aiming to field a clean and development-focused candidate for the welfare of Tarn Taran constituency. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Recently, the Azad Group inducted an educationist, Sukhwinder Kaur Randhawa, and it is rumoured that she could be fielded as the SAD candidate for the upcoming elections. "Everything will be clear on July 20," said Randhawa. SAD Tarn Taran district president Alwinderpal Singh Pakhoke confirmed that the party has been invited to attend the Jhabal rally. While he did not share the details, he acknowledged there was a possibility of the Azad Group joining SAD. When asked about the party's strategy following Sandhu's defection, Pakhoke said it made a difference, but it was not the end for SAD. "The gap is soon filled and often with someone better," he added. MSID:: 122638828 413 |
