Carrying chickens by legs causes them pain, Green Party leader warns
The Government has planned to overturn an EU ban on catching and carrying poultry by their legs.
But Green Party co-leader Mr Ramsay has called for animal welfare standards to be 'improved, not stripped back', as he urged ministers to halt their plans.
He has tabled a 'prayer motion', calling for the Welfare of Animals (Transport) (Amendment) Regulations 2025 to be 'annulled' before they come into force next week.
The regulations set out that farmers will be able to catch and carry turkeys weighing 5kg or less and chickens by both legs, but not by one leg.
The existing ban 'does not reflect long-standing policy on appropriate methods of 'catching' chickens set out in GB statutory guidance', according to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra).
Ministers' decision to change the law followed a consultation throughout Great Britain, which found 40% of respondents supported two-leg catching.
The majority of these were 'poultry industry stakeholders' who 'did not consider two-leg catching to be directly detrimental to bird welfare'.
Some industry stakeholders also 'confirmed that young turkeys (weighing 5kg or less) are routinely caught by two legs, while older heavier turkeys (weighing more than 5kg) are routinely caught upright, by a range of different methods'.
But Mr Ramsay told the PA news agency: 'The Government's attempt to quietly weaken animal welfare standards for poultry is deeply troubling.
'After Defra cited this practice in its guidance, ministers are now attempting to restore outdated industry practices in law.
'Allowing chickens to be carried upside down by their legs causes injury, pain and unnecessary distress.
'I want our animal protection laws to be improved, not stripped back further.
'If handling methods widely used on farms don't meet welfare standards, then they need to be improved, not made legal because enforcement has failed.'
His motion has received cross-party backing, including from Conservative MP for Brigg and Immingham Martin Vickers, his running mate in this year's Green Party leadership election Ellie Chowns, and Labour MP for North Ayrshire and Arran Irene Campbell.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
American Military News
an hour ago
- American Military News
EU Budget Proposal Doubles Ukraine Aid And Boosts Military Spending
This article was originally published by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and is reprinted with permission. The European Commission has put forward its vision for the next long-term (2028-2034) European Union budget — a record-high 2-trillion-euro ($2.3 trillion) framework, with a doubling of funds for both Ukraine and EU foreign policy in general, and a fivefold increase in defense-related investment. It is worth remembering that the July 16 proposal is just the opening shot in a battle that will consume Brussels for the next two years. All 27 EU member states, which provide the vast majority of the cash through national contributions linked to their gross national income (GNI), must approve the proposal. But this is not likely to happen until what is expected to be marathon, last-minute negotiations in the latter half of 2027. So don't count on the budget remaining at 2 trillion euros by then — or on Ukraine, foreign policy, and enlargement policy getting as much financial support as the European Commission presented on July 16. Most of the net contributors — in other words, those who pay more into the common budget than they receive back — are mainly richer northern member states such as Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden, and they aren't keen to increase the budget at all. The commission proposal is already a 600-billion-euro ($700 billion) jump compared to the 2021-2027 budget. And with several countries grappling with low growth, ballooning deficits, and budget cuts, the idea of the EU expanding its coffers right now could be useful ammunition for Euroskeptic parties railing against Brussels across the continent. To appease member states on this, the European Commission is proposing two things. First, new 'own resources' so that the budget isn't so dependent on member state contributions. Some of the new ideas include a tobacco tax and levies on large corporations. Few think this will succeed or have much impact. So instead, the second thing that the commission proposes is to send most of the cash back to member states in the shape of support for farmers, fishermen, and poorer regions of the bloc. This is already the biggest section of the budget at the moment — worth a total of 865 billion euro ($1 trillion) of the 2-trillion-euro proposal. It probably won't shrink. Interestingly, there is now a proposal to allocate 131 billion euro ($152 billion) for defense, which would be a fivefold increase compared to the current level. Several member states, notably Denmark and France, have indicated that the EU must become more of a military player, especially as the United States might dedicate fewer military resources to the continent in the coming years. If the proposal is not watered down, this would signal real intent on the issue. So, what about the foreign policy aspects of the commission's plan? It's all grouped under the heading 'A Stronger Europe in the World' and totals €200 billion ($233 billion). This is a doubling of the previous budget and contains everything from humanitarian aid, various foreign missions the bloc has — such as a monitoring mission in Armenia — to pre-accession funds for EU candidate countries in the Western Balkans and the bloc's eastern neighborhood. The money proposed for pre-accession is around 40 billion euros ($46 billion), an increase from before, but there is still no breakdown of how much cash each country will get. What is interesting, however, is that there is a revision clause in the proposal which means that the budget will be reworked if a country joins the club during the 2028-2034 period. After all, members tend to get more money than candidate countries. And given that nations like Albania, Montenegro, and possibly even Moldova could join within this time frame, they stand to gain even more. It is worth remembering here that Ukraine has been given a separate heading altogether. While Kyiv, of course, can benefit from the 200 billion euro of accession and humanitarian cash, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has promised a dedicated 100-billion-euro ($116 billion) pot for the reconstruction of the war-torn country. Between 2024 and 2027, this so-called 'Ukraine facility' amounts to €50 billion ($58 billion) in loans and grants, financed through common EU borrowing, which all member states guarantee to repay. The question is whether a country like Hungary, which has been skeptical about all things Ukraine in recent years, will agree to this — especially as von der Leyen announced that rule of law conditionality applies to all the funds in the new budget. This conditionality existed to a certain degree in the previous budget and allowed Brussels to freeze billions heading to Budapest. Watering down conditionality in order to get more money for Ukraine already seems like one of the many compromises that will now have to be struck for this budget to eventually go through.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Epping protests: Demonstrations continue as man due in court following violence
Protestors continued to gather outside a hotel in Essex believed to be housing asylum seekers on Sunday as a man is due to appear in court on Monday after clashes outside the venue. On Sunday more than 100 demonstrators assembled outside the Bell Hotel in Epping, with some chanting 'save our kids' and holding signs saying 'deport foreign criminals', 'we go home when they go back' and 'defend our girls'. Bottles and smoke flares were thrown towards police vans that blocked the entrance to the hotel. The latest demonstration comes after eight police officers were injured in what started as a peaceful protest outside the hotel on Thursday evening. Keith Silk, 33, of Torrington Drive, Loughton, is due to appear at Chelmsford Magistrates' Court on Monday charged with violent disorder and criminal damage after being arrested on Saturday. Here is what we know about the protests and why they're happening. What are the protests about? There have been a series of protests outside the hotel since 38-year-old asylum seeker Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu was charged with sexual assault following an incident where he is alleged to have attempted to kiss a 14-year-old girl. He denied the charge when he appeared at Chelmsford Magistrates' Court on Thursday, 17 July. The protests come amid a wider debate over the use of hotels to house asylum seekers, with growing tensions in some towns and cities. What has happened now? On Sunday (20 July) more than 100 protestors gathered outside the hotel, with some chanting 'save our kids'. A line of police vans and officers blocked off the entrance to the hotel, with protesters facing them on the other side of the pavement and later throwing bottles and smoke flares. Some protestors held signs saying 'deport foreign criminals', 'we go home when they go back' and 'defend our girls'. A small number were wearing balaclavas and face coverings. What do local politicians say? Local Conservative MPs, Epping Forest's Neil Hudson and Alex Burghart, who represents Brentwood and Ongar, as well as Chris Whitbread, the Conservative leader of Epping Forest District Council, have called for the Home Office to stop housing asylum seekers at the hotel. In a statement last week, Hudson and Burghart said: "The situation regarding the use of asylum hotels in Epping Forest District has become increasingly alarming and distressing in recent days. "From the fires at the Phoenix Hotel and Bell Hotel a few weeks ago leading to a man being charged with arson, and now the alleged sexual assaults in Epping last week, leading to a man being charged, our local communities are becoming increasingly distressed. "It is becoming more apparent that the Home Office do not have a grasp about the seriousness of this situation with regard to local community safety, or accountability or safeguarding of hotel residents. "Together as neighbouring Constituency MPs, along with Epping Forest District Council, we are calling on the Government to immediately close the Bell and Phoenix Hotels and make alternative arrangements accordingly." They said they had requested an urgent meeting with the Home Secretary, adding: "The Government needs to get a grip of this issue both locally and nationally. "Labour made promises that they would end the use of asylum hotels. They also made promises on illegal immigration, but on their watch this has markedly gone up." Whitbread said in a statement: "We have consistently shared concerns with the Home Office that the Bell Hotel is an entirely unsuitable location for this facility and should close. "We continue to press Home Office officials for the immediate closure of the site and are encouraged that our local MPs are now actively supporting our call." What does the government say? Sir Keir Starmer pledged to 'end asylum hotels, saving the taxpayer billions of pounds' during last year's general election. But concerns have been voiced, including from his own backbenchers, over whether the government is achieving its aims of cutting the asylum backlog and housing people in longer term temporary housing. In the wake of the latest protests, a spokesman for the Prime Minister reportedly said it was important that legitimate protest did not cross a line into criminality, adding that there is a clear government policy to reduce the use of asylum hotels. Read more Drone footage shows Bell Hotel deserted after violent asylum seeker riot (SWNS) How the UK became dependent on asylum hotels (The Conversation) Government plan to end use of asylum hotels 'won't be achieved' – inspector (PA Media)
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Epping protests: Demonstrations continue as man due in court following violence
Protestors continued to gather outside a hotel in Essex believed to be housing asylum seekers on Sunday as a man is due to appear in court on Monday after clashes outside the venue. On Sunday more than 100 demonstrators assembled outside the Bell Hotel in Epping, with some chanting 'save our kids' and holding signs saying 'deport foreign criminals', 'we go home when they go back' and 'defend our girls'. Bottles and smoke flares were thrown towards police vans that blocked the entrance to the hotel. The latest demonstration comes after eight police officers were injured in what started as a peaceful protest outside the hotel on Thursday evening. Keith Silk, 33, of Torrington Drive, Loughton, is due to appear at Chelmsford Magistrates' Court on Monday charged with violent disorder and criminal damage after being arrested on Saturday. Here is what we know about the protests and why they're happening. What are the protests about? There have been a series of protests outside the hotel since 38-year-old asylum seeker Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu was charged with sexual assault following an incident where he is alleged to have attempted to kiss a 14-year-old girl. He denied the charge when he appeared at Chelmsford Magistrates' Court on Thursday, 17 July. The protests come amid a wider debate over the use of hotels to house asylum seekers, with growing tensions in some towns and cities. What has happened now? On Sunday (20 July) more than 100 protestors gathered outside the hotel, with some chanting 'save our kids'. A line of police vans and officers blocked off the entrance to the hotel, with protesters facing them on the other side of the pavement and later throwing bottles and smoke flares. Some protestors held signs saying 'deport foreign criminals', 'we go home when they go back' and 'defend our girls'. A small number were wearing balaclavas and face coverings. What do local politicians say? Local Conservative MPs, Epping Forest's Neil Hudson and Alex Burghart, who represents Brentwood and Ongar, as well as Chris Whitbread, the Conservative leader of Epping Forest District Council, have called for the Home Office to stop housing asylum seekers at the hotel. In a statement last week, Hudson and Burghart said: "The situation regarding the use of asylum hotels in Epping Forest District has become increasingly alarming and distressing in recent days. "From the fires at the Phoenix Hotel and Bell Hotel a few weeks ago leading to a man being charged with arson, and now the alleged sexual assaults in Epping last week, leading to a man being charged, our local communities are becoming increasingly distressed. "It is becoming more apparent that the Home Office do not have a grasp about the seriousness of this situation with regard to local community safety, or accountability or safeguarding of hotel residents. "Together as neighbouring Constituency MPs, along with Epping Forest District Council, we are calling on the Government to immediately close the Bell and Phoenix Hotels and make alternative arrangements accordingly." They said they had requested an urgent meeting with the Home Secretary, adding: "The Government needs to get a grip of this issue both locally and nationally. "Labour made promises that they would end the use of asylum hotels. They also made promises on illegal immigration, but on their watch this has markedly gone up." Whitbread said in a statement: "We have consistently shared concerns with the Home Office that the Bell Hotel is an entirely unsuitable location for this facility and should close. "We continue to press Home Office officials for the immediate closure of the site and are encouraged that our local MPs are now actively supporting our call." What does the government say? Sir Keir Starmer pledged to 'end asylum hotels, saving the taxpayer billions of pounds' during last year's general election. But concerns have been voiced, including from his own backbenchers, over whether the government is achieving its aims of cutting the asylum backlog and housing people in longer term temporary housing. In the wake of the latest protests, a spokesman for the Prime Minister reportedly said it was important that legitimate protest did not cross a line into criminality, adding that there is a clear government policy to reduce the use of asylum hotels. Read more Drone footage shows Bell Hotel deserted after violent asylum seeker riot (SWNS) How the UK became dependent on asylum hotels (The Conversation) Government plan to end use of asylum hotels 'won't be achieved' – inspector (PA Media)
