Pocket FM cuts production cost using AI, generates over 50,000 shows
PTI
New Delhi, Jul 20 (PTI) Audio entertainment platform Pocket FM on Sunday said it has significantly reduced production costs through its proprietary artificial intelligence systems.
The company has scaled its content operations significantly over the past year, producing over 50,000 AI-generated shows, a statement said.
'We are transforming Pocket FM into an AI-led entertainment company, with artificial intelligence now driving content creation, productivity, and global storytelling at scale," said Rohan Nayak, co-founder and CEO of Pocket FM.
'AI is helping us unlock high quality content faster and more efficiently than ever before. Our content costs have been significantly reduced, while creator efficiency has increased tenfold." Known for pioneering long form episodic audio storytelling, Pocket FM has built custom AI infrastructure that enables creators from scripting and voice generation to sound design and multi language localization.
These capabilities have significantly enhanced speed to market while maintaining narrative depth and production quality, it stated.
At the heart of this transformation is a seamless collaboration between human creativity and AI precision, enabling Pocket FM to produce great stories at scale without compromising on quality, the statement said.
The company reported Rs 1,768 crore in revenue for FY25, a 68 per cent year-on-year increase, and is now profitable across core markets.
Launched in 2018, Pocket FM is an AI-powered entertainment platform creating scalable storytelling experiences across audio, text, and visual formats.
Operating in India, the US, and Europe, with ongoing Latin American expansion, it builds borderless IP ecosystems through Pocket Entertainment. Its content spans English, Hindi, Spanish, German, and French.
A recent FICCI EY report projects India's audio entertainment sector to reach USD 2.5 billion by 2030, with AI first platforms like Pocket FM poised to lead this transformation. PTI KKS ANU ANU
view comments
First Published:
July 20, 2025, 11:30 IST
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
21 minutes ago
- India.com
This actor enters Shah Rukh Khan's 'King, will play role of Jackie Shroff's son, ruled hearts of fans by becoming villain in 2023 in..., he is...
An actor who chilled audiences with his dark and intense role in a 2023 action thriller is now gearing up to return in another fierce avatar. Known for his sharp expressions and commanding presence, he left a lasting impact as the antagonist last year. Now, he's set to raise the stakes again in Shah Rukh Khan's much-awaited film King, where he will step into a menacing role once more. While his name remains under wraps for now, his style and silence speak louder than words. Who is this actor? Here we are talking about the 'Rising star of the film industry' and 'Slow Motion King', Raghav Juyal, who will soon be seen in 'King'. This information has been shared by a close source. The source said, 'Raghav Juyal is in the film 'King' and he will play the role of Jackie Shroff's son, who will be seen in the role of a dangerous villain. He revealed that most of the shooting of the film has been completed. He said, 'The main part of the film has been shot. The remaining scenes will be shot in October and some parts will be filmed next year.' More About King 'King' is being directed by Siddharth Anand, who has made a blockbuster film like 'Pathaan'. In this film, along with Shah Rukh Khan, his daughter Suhana Khan will also be seen on the big screen for the first time. However, both of them have previously appeared together in an advertisement directed by SRK's son, Aryan Khan. The film also stars Deepika Padukone, Rani Mukerji, Abhishek Bachchan, Jaideep Ahlawat, Anil Kapoor and Abhay Verma in important roles. Abhishek Bachchan will also be seen playing the villain in this film, which was confirmed recently by megastar Amitabh Bachchan. More about Raghav Juyal Raghav is known for his great dance moves and strong acting in the 2024 film 'Kill'. He recently said that he was busy working on a project. Raghav was also seen in the 2024 action thriller 'Yudhra', starring Siddhant Chaturvedi, Malavika Mohanan, Gajraj Rao, Ram Kapoor, Raj Arjun, and Shilpa Shukla. Raghav Juyal caught the attention of the fans by playing the role of villain in the action thriller film Kill, helmed by Nikhil Nagesh Bhat, released in 2023. At the same time, the film earned Rs 47 crores on a budget of 40 crores, which had brutal action sequences and a compelling narrative, featuring Lakshya and Tanya Maniktala in lead roles.
Indian Express
21 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Share price under Rs 200: Multibagger railway stock secured over Rs 1600 crore order last week
Multibagger railway stock order win: A multibagger railway PSU stock secured back-to-back orders last week, according to exchange filings. The total value of these new contracts exceeds Rs 1,600 crore. Can you guess which one? Here's a hint – as of July 20 (NSE data), this railway company has a market capitalisation of Rs 17,563.19 crore. This railway company is none other than IRCON International Limited. IRCON is a navratna company under the Ministry of Railways. Last week (July 14-18), IRCON bagged three new orders. These are as follows: In an exchange filing on July 18, the company said, 'Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority has awarded the work to Ircon International Limited for CA-233, Line-6, Package-2: Design, Manufacture, Supply, Installation, Integration, Testing and Commissioning of Power Supply and Traction, E & M, Lifts & Escalators including 5 Years of Comprehensive Maintenance after 2 Years of Defect Liability Maintenance Period of Line 6 [Swami Samarth Nagar to Vikhroli (EEH)] of Mumbai Metro Rail Project of MMRDA.' The project cost is Rs 642,44,02,451.34. In a separate filing, the railway company said, ' Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority has awarded the work to Ircon International Limited for CA-239, Line-5, Package-2: Design, Manufacture, Supply, Installation, Integration, Testing And Commissioning of 220 kV receiving Substation Including 220 kV, 33kV & 25kV Cabling Work, Complete 25kV Overhead Catenary System along with switching station, 33kV Auxiliary Power Distribution System Including 33/0.415 kV Auxiliary Sub-Station (ASS) And Complete SCADA System, Electrical and Mechanical works, Lift & Escalator Works for part of Main Line, Stations & Kasheli Depot of Mumbai Metro Rail Line 5 Project of MMRDA Including 5 Years of Comprehensive Maintenance after 2 Years of Defect Liability and Maintenance Period.' The project cost is Rs 471,29,72,820. In a filing on Friday, the company said, ' IRCON has been awarded with Letter of Award for the project floated by RVNL (Participated in this bid in JV mode with M/s JPWIPL (i.e., IRCON – 70% & JPIWL – 30%).' Here the total project amount is Rs 755,78,21,993.63 (IRCON Share – Rs 529,04,75,395.53),' the company said. Shares of IRCON closed in red on Friday (July 18). The PSU railway stock settled at Rs 186.74 apiece, down 1.60 per cent on NSE. IRCON International Limited is a component of the BSE 500. According to the BSE analytics (as of July 20), shares of IRCON gave negative returns in the last 1 week and 2 weeks, by 2.20 per cent and 6.27 per cent, respectively. Shares of the PSU railway stock also fell in the last 1 year by 40.25 per cent. However, in the past 2 years, 3 years, and 5 years, shares of the company rose 116.15 per cent, 405.27 per cent, and 307.03 per cent, respectively. This year, IRCON paid a dividend of Rs 1.65 in February. Last year, the PSU railway stock declared total dividends of Rs 3.10. IRCON issued bonuses in the ratio of 1:1 for the equity shareholders.
Scroll.in
21 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
‘A new route for thinking': Four writers on ten years of Amit Chaudhuri's ‘Literary Activism'
In 2014, writer and academic Amit Chaudhuri wrote the mission statement on ' literary activism ' – as the starting point of the project. It began in 2014 with a series of annual symposia with Ashoka University. Its aim was to create a space for the kind of discussion on creativity no longer available in mainstream contexts (literary festivals, book launches) or in academic ones (conferences, classrooms, monographs). Chaudhuri writes, 'The idea of the symposium arose from a number of impulses: firstly, the belief that it's no longer enough for writers to simply devote themselves to 'creative' practice and teach or study creative writing and have nothing to do with the conceptual underpinnings of their writing and their lives, any more than it is for academics in literature departments to simply produce monographs and shut out the problem of writing itself. Secondly, there's been a feeling among many that there's an urgent need for a conversation, and a forum, that goes beyond what you hear or encounter either at a literary festival or an academic conference. To achieve this one has to, on the one hand, eschew celebrity and book signings in favour of dialogue and response; on the other hand, steer clear of the closed professionalism of the conference and open out the conversation to people from a variety of disciplinary backgrounds who have a stake in the discussion.' He got in touch with academics, novelists, poets, translators, and publishers and offered them the opportunity to speak on the subject in a way that they wouldn't. This established a pattern: an annual two-day symposium in India, and a one-day spin-off on the year's theme at another location: twice in Oxford, and once in Paris. Since 2018, the symposiums have been supported by Ashoka University. The Literary Activism website features a section called ' Magazine ', in which new writing – essays, poetry, fiction – and art and videos are uploaded. Chaudhuri adds, ''Literary activism' is interested in the place of creative (whatever the genre or art-form) and critical practice today. […] A unidirectional flow – say, from London or Delhi or Calcutta towards Brooklyn – drains the life-blood for all involved. Making the flow go in other directions is essential not for the sake of balance, but for the intellectual viability of these practices.' In 2023, Literary Activism, a new publishing imprint of the Centre for the Creative and the Critical at Ashoka University, partnered with Westland Books to publish three books a year under a collaborative imprint. The collaborative imprint publishes books on literature in English and in translation from other languages. The first book to be made available to the readers was Arvind Krishna Mehrotra's Book of Rahim & Other Poems. While launching the imprint, Chaudhuri had said, 'The new imprint, 'literary activism', is meant to carry forward new ambitions in the realm of publishing. The imprint wishes to recall that art and writing are not synonymous with the generalised academic discipline called the 'humanities': they have an angularity to it, and to the social science perspectives the humanities are now subsumed under. The 'literary activism' imprint wishes not only to publish good writing, but to pursue this angularity.' In the following conversation, poet and literary scholar Charles Bernstein, journalist Jonathan Cook, writer and academic Laetitia Zecchini, and novelist and academic Saikat Majumdar talk about the importance of the project and how it has affected the creative–cultural concerns of their own writing since its inception more than a decade ago. What were your first thoughts when you heard about the Literary Activism project? Charles Bernstein (CB): That it was necessary. 'Activism' is often associated with politics and surely political activism is necessary. But so is literary activism – conscientiously challenging the shibboleths and conformity that dominate literary awards, reviewing, and habits of attention. Jonathan Cook (JC): Amit Chaudhuri is a friend and former colleague of mine. When he joined the University of East Anglia, we had some wide-ranging discussions about the state or states of contemporary literature. Out of these discussions, Chaudhuri's analysis of the impact of both the marketplace and the academy on a certain way of writing and reading literature emerged. That analysis remains as pertinent now as it did ten years ago. Laetitia Zecchini (LZ): Amit Chaudhuri once remarked that his first novel was born from the desire to write about a young boy's 'sense of escape and freedom' in Calcutta. This may well be Chaudhuri's deepest impulse, and the driving force behind ''Literary Activism'. Through this project and platform, that is what he has given himself, and what he has given others as well: a sense of escape and freedom for those of us who feel a certain dissonance or discomfort with particular fields, discourses and platforms, and with the hierarchy of values they reinforce. In my case, the academic world which increasingly rewards visibility, citation counts, self-promotion (and self-importance!), buzzwords and 'buzz-genres'! But once academia is dictated by arithmetic success, quantitative impact, and competition – once it becomes a field of power in a sense – it doesn't just lose its purpose, it also becomes tedious. Saikat Majumdar (SM): I knew Amit Chaudhuri for quite a while by that time and also knew of his discontent with the literary culture of our time trapped between the dishonest commercialism of the mainstream and the narrow instrumentalism of academia. So it was exciting to see him launch a series of interventions to do something different. What made you agree to be part of the project? Were there intersections of intellectual ambition and creative-critical concerns between your work and the Literary Activism project? CB: I admire the work of Amit Chaudhuri, as an essayist and literary activist as much as a poet and novelist. We saw the strains of 'literary activism' in each other's work. Coming perhaps from different cultural spheres, East and West, we found we had more in common than those closer to hand. So, this gives me confidence that we can have a non-national exchange, and I use that word rather than trans-national or even international. We are beside one another. JC: I liked its openness to a variety of contributions from writers, academics, artists, film-makers, etc, and the resonance of the topics chosen for each of the symposia. I have a long-standing interest in the relations between the creative and the critical in my work as a critic and biographer, so, yes, there were many intersections. I felt we needed a new way of thinking about literature and its value in a period after the dominance of literary theory and the emergence of creative writing as a university discipline. The Literary Activism project offered a route into this new way of thinking. LZ: What I find so compelling, so necessary about the literary activism platform/project is that it has also restored a sense of delight: the delight in listening to one another and in thinking together; the delight in witnessing the unfolding of critical thought and minds; the delight in paying close attention to texts and to voices, and the delight in the discovery and the encounter of many new texts, voices, personalities; the delight also in being able to say, or hear and share: 'I don't give a damn' (remember: ' f*ck storytelling '!) SM: As a writer who is part of academia, but also someone who works in the literary sphere run by mainstream presses and newspapers, this felt personally connected to me. As someone who writes novels, scholarly criticism, literary essays and op-ed articles, I've long ceased to see any difference between the critical and the artistic. They are for me simply different genres of imaginative writing, such as poetry, prose, and verse. The Literary Activism seemed to feel the same way, and brought together people who felt likewise. Why do you think the Literary Activism project seemed urgent, timely and necessary ten years ago? What has it achieved, if anything at all, in these ten years? CB: In my most recent book, The Kinds of Poetry I Want: Essays and Comedies, I included several key works from Literary Activism: three short works of poetics and a long essay 'Up Against Storytelling' that comes in response to Chaudhuri's conference on that subject. So 'Literary Activism' has become one of the main forums for my work. JC: See above for my thoughts about timeliness and urgency. It has created a space between the academy and the marketplace where there can be serious, witty, open-minded thinking about what it means to write now and what needs to be resisted if a certain idea of literary value is to be both defended and developed. LZ: Chaudhuri has been able to gather around him a community of wonderfully talented people who, precisely, do not take themselves seriously, but who delight in each other's company. It's also in many ways a community of friendship. In the symposia that he organises, there is a real spirit of conviviality, and there is often humour as well, but it never comes at the expense of the gravity and sometimes the difficulty of certain questions and discussions. For me, that space of 'escape and freedom' – even just knowing it exists and persists: 10 years! – has been deeply sustaining. SM: Literature is the most intellectual of all art forms and the most artistic of all intellectual discourses. Consequently, literature and creative writing have easily found a core place at the university, amidst academic disciplines – more than filmmaking, visual or performative arts. This has also made it vulnerable to the malaises of academia. On the other hand, as an art form (at least in principle if no longer in reality), it has also inherited the ailments of the free market as we have moved through neoliberalism. These peculiar features and locations of literary culture made the Literary Activism project timely ten years ago – and it remains timely 10 years later as both academic and free-market cultures continue to move through transformative crises in the 21st century. Already facing this transformative crisis early in the 21st century, literature had more identity problems than one could imagine, and the Literary Activism project had put its fingers on several of them. It has certainly achieved the reality of a persistent set of interrogations. I would love to see it taken up more organically by different stakeholders in literary culture worldwide. What are the things you'd like to see Literary Activism being involved in? JC: I'm not sure it needs to be involved in anything but its own development. There is a valuable website called Creative/Critical and an associated book imprint. It might be worth connecting with them to raise the profile of the thinking underway in the Literary Activism project. But I don't want to lose the polemical edge of Literary Activism. The danger of market hyperbole is matched by the bland conformity of academic discourse. The LA project successfully resists both. What are your thoughts, if any, on the Literary Activism imprint? CB: The books extend the work of the meetings and the website is a necessary way. Because, in the end, books still serve to ground our discourse. JC: It strikes me as a valuable initiative. SM: I think we are becoming people with rapidly receding literary and cultural memories. We're now ruthlessly presentist, and almost immediately, ruthlessly futurist too. But literature and culture are nothing without the past, and memory and affection for it. One key thing the Literary Activism imprint does is to revive thoughts, archives, and books that we need to remember and re-remember. This is something I tried to do with a column I wrote for the Los Angeles Review of Books from 2020 to 2022, 'Another Look at India's Books'. The books published in the new imprint are exquisite, and the plainness of their covers is a bold statement. What does the Literary Activism project – and its timeline – say about our literary culture? CB: We are in a post-post-colonial world. Those of us working with 'Literary Activism' are peers engaged in exchange. For me, that means learning more about West Bengali literature and culture, and more generally Indian culture – beginnng to have a deeper and more resonant sense of the full resources of 20th century thinking and poetics. So then, in the 21st century, I am less hamstrung by the pervasive parochialism and underdevelopment of American culture. 'Literary Activism' wakes me up to the world. JC: The marketisation of literature and writers continues with very little understanding of what might be lost in this process. Since the Literary Activism project began this has been increasingly informed by the presence of social media and, more recently, AI. In the process a certain kind of literary experience is likely to disappear. We need to resist this disappearance and the Literary Activism project offers a way of doing so.
