Varma moves SC for quashing of inquiry report, questions in-house procedure validity
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Justice Varma, whose defence team is led by senior advocates including Kapil Sibal, filed the petition faulting the process adopted by the three-member panel to inquire into the cash allegedly found at his bungalow, terming the panel's conclusions about his guilt as mere surmises without evidence.
Varma questions validity of in-house procedure that allows CJI to recommend removal of judge
Interestingly, the day saw a PIL being filed in the SC by advocate Mathews Nedumpara seeking registration of an FIR for the unaccounted cash that was discovered within the premises of the judge's official residence by first responders who reached after a fire on the night of March 14.
Many former judges of Delhi HC shared the view of the PIL petitioner and said only a thorough investigation by a probe agency could unravel the money trail.
In the writ petition filed through advocate Vaibhav Niti, Justice Varma asked why Delhi Police and Delhi Fire Service personnel, who discovered the cash, did not seize it or prepare a 'panchnama', which alone could have been admissible evidence. He accused then CJI Khanna of subjecting him to a media trial by uploading unsubstantiated material against him on the SC's official website.
Repatriated to Allahabad HC during the inquiry, the judge said the panel's report was handed over to him on May 4 and the then CJI 'advised him to resign or seek voluntary retirement by 7pm on May 6, failing which the CJI would 'intimate competent authority to initiate action for his removal''.
The judge, who had been barred from judicial work, said he was denied a personal hearing he had sought, as per the in-house procedure, before the CJI and senior SC judges, prior to the CJI sending the recommendation to the President and the PM on May 8, just five days before CJI Khanna retired.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
He requested that SC declare the CJI's recommendation unconstitutional and ultra vires. He also questioned the constitutional validity of the in-house procedure that empowered the CJI to recommend removal of a constitutional court judge.
This in-house process 'creates a parallel, extra-constitutional mechanism that derogates from the mandatory framework under Articles 124 and 218 of the Constitution, which exclusively vest powers for removal of judges of high courts in Parliament through an address supported by a special majority, following an inquiry under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968', he said.
Justice Varma said power to remove constitutional court judges was given to Parliament by the Constitution after conducting a thorough trial of the charges against a judge with in-built safeguards including framing of charges, cross-examination, and proof beyond reasonable doubt for 'proven misbehaviour'.
Thus, the in-house procedure, as far as it usurps parliamentary procedure to recommend removal of judges, violates the doctrine of separation of powers.
Judiciary cannot assume the role reserved for the legislature in the removal of judges, Justice Varma said.
He said the Constitution conferred no disciplinary or superintendence power with the CJI over HC or SC judges. Thus, the CJI cannot assume, through in-house procedure, an unregulated authority to act as the arbiter of the fate of HC and SC judges, he said.
Justice Varma's challenge mirrors the line Sibal took on his YouTube show last week to dissect the inquiry report with panellists: former SC judges Justices Madan Lokur and Sanjay Kaul and ex-Delhi HC judge Justice Mukta Gupta.
In the show, Sibal argued that the in-house inquiry was not consistent with constitutional provisions.
Cong MPs to sign motion in LS against Justice Varma
Congress MPs will sign the motion that govt will bring in Lok Sabha against Justice Yashwant Varma, with the party saying it will be done to set up a 3-member statutory panel which is required under Judges Inquiry Act before a judge's removal. Party general secretary Jairam Ramesh said opposition will also push govt to move on the motion to remove against Allahabad HC judge Shekhar Yadav, who is accused of making 'hate speech'.
Ramesh slammed non-registration of an FIR against Varma, saying the entire process has been based on a report of the in-house panel of SC. He said Justice Yadav violated his oath with his speech but the notice to remove him is pending with Rajya Sabha chairman for past seven months.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Evening news wrap: PM Modi to visit UK, Maldives this week; Rijiju says government open to discuss Op Sindoor; and more
Prime Minister Narendra Modi will visit UK and Maldives from July 23–26 to strengthen India's regional and global ties. Parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju said the government is open to discussing Operation Sindoor in the Monsoon Session if held per parliamentary norms. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now In Niger, two Indians were killed and one abducted in a terror attack, prompting a call for action from J&K CM Omar Abdullah. Russia signalled openness to Ukraine peace talks but stood firm on its war aims. Meanwhile, Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar met with former Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal and AAP MP Sanjay Singh at his residence. PM Modi to visit UK, Maldives from July 23–26; Malé outreach, bilateral relations among agenda Prime Minister Narendra Modi will embark on a two-nation visit to the United Kingdom and the Maldives from July 23 to 26, the ministry of external affairs (MEA) said on Sunday. This will be his fourth visit to the UK and first since 2018. He will meet British PM Keir Starmer to discuss trade, defence, climate, and innovation. Modi is also expected to call on King Charles III. Govt ready to discuss Operation Sindoor in Monsoon session, says Kiren Rijiju Parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju on Sunday said the government is prepared to discuss Operation Sindoor and other key issues during the Monsoon Session of Parliament, provided the debate follows the rules and traditions of the House. "We are ready for discussions with an open heart... but as per rules and tradition," he said after an all-party meeting. 2 Indians killed, 1 abducted in Niger terror attack; Omar Abdullah seeks MEA intervention Two Indian nationals were killed and one, Ranjeet Singh from J&K's Ramban district, was abducted in a terror attack in Niger's Dosso region last Tuesday. Armed assailants ambushed a Nigerien army unit guarding an electrical line project. Reacting to the incident, Jammu and Kashmir CM Omar Abdullah urged EAM S Jaishankar to intervene urgently to ensure Singh's safe return. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Putin open to Ukraine peace talks, says committed to achieve 'main goal' Russian President Vladimir Putin is open to peace talks with Ukraine, but Moscow remains firm on pursuing its core objectives, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said on Sunday, according to state media. 'President Putin has consistently expressed his intent to reach a peaceful resolution to the Ukraine conflict at the earliest. However, it is a complex and demanding process,' Peskov stated. He added, 'Our primary focus is on fulfilling our clearly defined goals. ' VP Dhankhar meets Arvind Kejriwal, AAP's Sanjay Singh Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar on Sunday met with former Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal and AAP Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh at the Vice-President's Enclave. Sharing details on X, Dhankhar said the leaders had called on him for a courtesy meeting. The post included formal titles and a photo from the meeting.
Hans India
34 minutes ago
- Hans India
Monsoon Session: All-party meet concludes, Kiren Rijiju terms it 'very positive'
New Delhi: After the conclusion of all-party meeting, ahead of Monsoon Session of Parliament, the Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju described it as "very positive," stating that 54 lawmakers presented views and issues which they intend to raise during the upcoming session. The Monsoon Session is scheduled to begin on Monday, July 21. Speaking to reporters after the meeting, Rijiju emphasised that it is the collective responsibility of both the ruling party and the Opposition to ensure the smooth functioning of Parliament. "It was conveyed that it is everyone's responsibility to ensure that the Parliament runs smoothly," he said. Leaders from various political parties attended the preparatory meeting. The government was represented by Kiren Rijiju and Union Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal. "A total of 54 members from 51 groups participated today, and 40 people expressed their party's views. It has been very positive. All the political leaders have expressed their parties' positions and have also presented the issues that they want to bring up in this session. We have noted all these points on behalf of the government," Rijiju stated. He underlined the importance of collaboration, saying, "The government requested that the session run smoothly. The ruling party and the Opposition will have to work together, and coordination among themselves will have to be maintained." "Our political parties may have different ideologies, but it is everyone's responsibility to ensure that the Parliament runs smoothly. The Opposition has a responsibility and the government has a responsibility too," he added. Addressing concerns raised by smaller political outfits, Rijiju noted that their representatives often get limited time to speak due to the numerical strength-based system of the House. "People from small political parties, especially the parties with one or two members, get less time to speak because the system of Parliament runs on the basis of numbers. But we have taken this into our notice and we have also agreed on how to give enough time to small parties with 12 MPs. We will put this in front of the Speaker and the chairman of the house," he said. "The government reiterated its openness to discussion on all key issues raised by different parties, provided they align with parliamentary norms," he added.
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Congress, other parties criticizing new Waqf law want to keep Muslims as vote bank: Kiren Rijiju
Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju accuses Congress and other parties of exploiting Muslims as a vote bank by opposing the Waqf (Amendment) Act. He defends the Act, emphasizing its aim to empower the Muslim community and ensure proper management of Waqf properties for their welfare. Rijiju asserts the government's commitment to justice for all, dismissing claims of unconstitutionality. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju has alleged that the basic purpose of the Congress and some other parties criticizing the Waqf (Amendment) Act is to keep Muslims as their vote bank, and asserted that the Modi government believes in "appeasement to none, justice to all".With the Supreme Court in May reserving interim orders on three key issues after hearing both sides in the Waqf case, Rijiju said he will not make any preemptive statement right now with regard to the matter which is pending in the apex court."But let us make one thing very clear. The job of Parliament is to make laws. The Supreme Court can definitely interpret it in the right way," Rijiju told PTI Videos in an interview."We are very confident that whatever we have done is as per law and as per the provisions and spirit of the Constitution. I am very confident that the role of Parliament will not be taken away," he AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi 's criticism of the new Waqf law, Rijiju said he doesn't want to criticize Owaisi for his opposition to the Waqf (Amendment) Act because he made the remarks against the legislation out of compulsion."The main problem is what I tell you. Some of these leaders, including the Congress party, have treated the Muslims as a vote bank. When you start taking and making a community as a vote bank, then you become irrational."Then you put them into one bracket, that good or bad doesn't matter, they will all be rhetorical," the minister those who criticized the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, are only trying to keep the Muslims poor and ensure that they remain as their vote bank."Our thinking is opposite to that. Ours is appeasement to none, justice to all," Rijiju are many within the Muslim community, lots of groups, women, children and backward communities who have not gotten any benefit out of the Waqf properties, the minister told PTI on Friday."So, India's Waqf properties you know very well are the highest number of Waqf properties in the world. More than 9,70,000 Waqf properties are there which must be put into use for the purpose for which those properties were created," Rijiju pointed out that under the provisions of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, "we are to handle through the mutawallis and the waqf boards proper management for the welfare of the Muslim community, especially the poor.""These (Congress and some other leaders) people know that if the Muslim community becomes better, prosperous then they will be more educated, have more understanding and they will not be the main vote bank for anybody," Rijiju said."So, the basic purpose of Congress and some of the other leaders criticizing the Waqf (Amendment) Bill is to make Muslims as their vote bank and to keep them poor all the time," he said."Otherwise, tell me one reason why they should oppose the Waqf (Amendment) Bill? On a rational basis, they cannot," he the Collector being given more powers under the new law, Rijiju said, "We are making the rules, now it's in the final stage. There is no final authority to any officer. It is only responsibility being given to certain officers. If there are disputes between the government lands and the private, the collector has to decide, but the appeal has to be made to an officer which is higher than the collector. Otherwise, what is the job of the collectors? Collectors are there for revenue purposes primarily.""So, if you don't trust collectors, then who do you trust?" he its observation on the presumption of constitutionality in favour of the law, the Supreme Court in May reserved interim orders on three key issues after hearing both sides in the waqf Centre has strongly defended the Act, saying waqf by its very nature was a secular concept and can't be stayed given the presumption of constitutionality in its though waqf was an Islamic concept, it was not an essential part of Waqf (Amendment) Act was passed by Parliament in April and subsequently came into force through a government the BJP-led NDA had rallied in support of the Bill, the opposition INDIA bloc united in opposing Muslim bodies and opposition MPs had moved the Supreme Court against the law, which the ruling alliance has described as a force for transparency and empowerment of backward Muslims and women from the community. The Opposition has slammed it as unconstitutional and claimed that it infringes on the rights of Muslims.
