Tory claims against cabinet minister Moroz baseless, ethics commissioner rules
The office of Jeffrey Schnoor released the findings Wednesday of its recent probe into the NDP MLA for River Heights, who is minister for innovation and new technology.
The Tories had accused Moroz of wrongdoing for owning shares in Telus and said he used confidential information about a tragic March 22-24 service outage to inform his decision to sell them.
MIKE DEAL / FREE PRESS FILES
Innovation and New Technology Minister Mike Moroz
Moroz issued a statement thanking the commissioner for his prompt investigation that 'accurately reflects that I am innocent of the PC's harmful allegations.'
'I look forward to being able to return to focusing on the important matters in my portfolio, including holding the telecom companies accountable for ensuring that Manitobans have timely access to 911 services when they need it,' the minister said.
MLAs are not prohibited from buying into a publicly traded corporation.
Schnoor pointed that out in his 13-page report, as well as the fact that Telus is regulated by the federal government.
'There is no evidence that Minister Moroz had any confidential information that was not available to the public,' he wrote, referencing the MLA's decision to sell 500 shares in Telus on May 8.
The commissioner noted that Moroz received $10,391.25, which translated into a loss of $1,591.75, after the transaction and followed proper disclosure protocols. He first invested in Telus in April 2021, before he was an MLA.
Dean Switzer, a 55-year-old from the Fisher Branch area, died of a heart attack on March 23 while his loved ones repeatedly and unsuccessfully tried to call 911 on their cellphones.
Two months later, following debate on the subject in the legislature and learning that Moroz had cut his financial ties to Telus, PC MLA Konrad Narth requested an ethics investigation.
Narth alleged his colleague should not have owned shares in Telus in the first place and leveraged his position of power for his own financial interests.
Schnoor dismissed all of Narth's allegations involving sections two, three and four of the Conflict of Interest (Members and Ministers) Act.
His report deemed Moroz's interest in Telus as 'very small' in the context of the company's overall valuation.
'Moroz's interest in Telus was so remote and insignificant that it cannot reasonably be regarded as likely to have influenced him,' the ethics commissioner wrote.
When reached by phone Wednesday, Narth said he accepted the commissioner's findings, but questions remained unanswered.
'If there was no red flag here, why would you be selling at a loss?' he said, noting that he has not received clarity about why Moroz decided to sell his shares.
Narth said he hopes this is a learning opportunity for the minister and NDP caucus.
'The public's ruling of politicians' integrity is more important than the commissioner's ruling, in my opinion,' he said.
Schnoor's detailed timeline indicates Moroz learned about the March 23 fatality from a journalist on April 3.
Wednesdays
A weekly dispatch from the head of the Free Press newsroom.
The day after an article was published, Moroz wrote to the president of Telus to express concerns on behalf of Manitoba and he received a reply two days later on April 11.
Aside from that exchange, the minister's direct correspondence with Telus was limited to an in-person meeting on May 15 — multiple days after he sold his shares, Schnoor found.
The ethics commissioner repeatedly noted that publicly available information about the outage was posted on the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission website.
Telus has revealed its roughly 40-hour outage, which began around 8:15 p.m. on March 22, affected 117 calls made by 59 individual Manitobans.
maggie.macintosh@freepress.mb.ca
Maggie MacintoshEducation reporter
Maggie Macintosh reports on education for the Free Press. Originally from Hamilton, Ont., she first reported for the Free Press in 2017. Read more about Maggie.
Funding for the Free Press education reporter comes from the Government of Canada through the Local Journalism Initiative.
Every piece of reporting Maggie produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.
Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.
Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
5 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Carney's ethics filing shows more than 100 entities under conflict-of-interest screen
Prime Minister Mark Carney must recuse himself from discussions, debates, decisions or votes specifically pertaining to more than 100 corporate entities, newly released ethics documents show. That includes Brookfield Asset Management Ltd., where he held a management role prior to entering politics, but also dozens of companies with ties to Brookfield, even if Mr. Carney personally has no role or direct financial interest. 'In all of his work for Canadians, the Prime Minister will continue to serve with the highest standards for integrity at all times,' spokesperson Audrey Champoux said in a statement. The filings were released Friday in compliance with a deadline under the Conflict of Interest Act requiring public disclosure within 120 days of Mr. Carney becoming Prime Minister in March. He had been pressed to make the information public ever since he launched his bid for leadership of the Liberal Party earlier this year. Carney promises conflict-of-interest screen to prevent him from making decisions for companies he served Mr. Carney came to federal politics after a high-profile career in the private sector, including a stint as board chair for Brookfield Asset Management Ltd., a US$1-trillion asset manager whose investments touch on numerous sectors. Mr. Carney's critics had argued that his connections to the company potentially placed him in a conflict of interest − as Prime Minister, his decisions might not just benefit Brookfield, but also Mr. Carney personally through his own financial relationship with the company. Mr. Carney resigned from his board positions at the start of his leadership campaign, saying if he won he'd begin the process of compliance with ethics law. During the subsequent federal election, he said he had set up ethics screens and put his assets in a trust. But, he resisted calls to publicly disclose the scope of those screens or his holdings ahead of the legally required deadline. As a public office holder, he must report assets, liabilities, income and activities to the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, and then a statement of those holdings must be made public within 120 days. Conflict-of-interest screens can in turn be proposed by the Ethics Commissioner as a preventive measure. The screen means he can't be aware of or participate in any matters specifically involving the companies' interests, but may participate in discussions or decisions that are general in nature or could affect the companies' interests more broadly. Mr. Carney was also required to divest of any assets that could be directly or indirectly affected by government decisions or policy. He opted to place them in a blind trust. That means he no longer has control over how the holdings are managed. Though the financial value of his holdings is disclosed to the Ethics Commissioner, that number is not made public. In addition to his roles with Brookfield, he was a director of the board of payments processor Stripe Inc. and an advisory board for investment giant PIMCO, among other private-sector jobs. The disclosures list hundreds of individual stocks held through an investment account. They include many stocks found in a typical mutual fund or index fund sold to ordinary investors, such as Walmart, Starbucks, video conferencing company Zoom, and tech giants such as Microsoft and That investment account does not include many of the largest Canadian companies, including those in highly regulated industries, such as major Canadian banks, telecommunications companies or energy producers. Mr. Carney also continues to own an interest in Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. He owns stock options and deferred share units in Brookfield and its parent company, Brookfield Corp., worth millions of dollars at current share prices, though their value fluctuates as Brookfield's stock rises or falls. The disclosures reveal that he owns shares of Partners Value Investments LP, a fund through which Brookfield's most senior executives own a large block of Brookfield shares. Those shares are typically only awarded to an exclusive group of Brookfield insiders, demonstrating the prominent position he held at the company. The Prime Minister is eligible to take part in the 'notional long-term inventive plan' for the Brookfield Global Transition Fund, a US$15-billion pool of capital that Mr. Carney spearheaded that makes large investments in technologies such as carbon capture and storage, solar power and batteries, and nuclear services. Mr. Carney could earn bonuses if it performs well. It is not clear if those incentives would be paid in cash, stock, or in carried interest − a cut of the fund's profits after it meets a certain threshold for investment gains. Mr. Carney divided his conflict screen into three sections. One is companies where he had a management position or an oversight role. The second lists Brookfield portfolio companies in the Registry of Lobbyists. The third section is described in the records as 'entities being screened out of an abundance of caution,' identified by the Ethics Commissioner as being Brookfield-related, 'even though I had no role in managing them, and no direct financial interest in them.' The screen is administered by his chief of staff and by the Clerk of the Privy Council. Even before the records were public, Mr. Carney was obligated to recuse himself from decisions that could place him in a conflict of interest. Those recusals must be made public within 60 days. None are listed on the Ethics Commissioner's website. A spokesperson for the opposition Conservatives said Friday that they were not officially commenting until they had a chance to fully review the records.
Edmonton Journal
6 hours ago
- Edmonton Journal
Saturday's letters: Smith's survey bars contrary views
I just tried to complete the Alberta Next survey and was unable to express my opinions. The survey is designed to support the UCP agenda and does not respect that the citizens of Alberta have the right to differ in opinion from Madame Premier. I was under the impression from advertising that the survey was seeking the opinion of all Albertans. Article content Perhaps being a senior and concerned about health care, vaccinations and my pension has put me out of the loop to what is really important. However my vote is important and right now it is going the NDP. Premier Smith says she cares for all Albertans, but she has not learned that her opinion of what is right for all is just her opinion. If she really wants to know what the rest of us think, her survey should offer us the opportunity to actually express ourselves. After all, we are footing the bill. Article content Article content Article content So the UCP town hall meetings are underway with the stated goal of protecting Alberta from Ottawa's attacks while building a more prosperous, strong and sovereign Alberta within Canada. I would much rather have the town halls focus on protecting Albertans from the UCP. It is clear that Albertans do not want an Alberta pension plan nor do we want an Alberta police force which has quietly been thrust upon us. Article content Meanwhile, Danielle Smith continues to push the outsourcing of medical procedures at the expense of public health, our education system is underfunded, and our province is under attack from the Trump administration. Ottawa is not the enemy; the enemy is from within. Article content John Campbell, Edmonton Article content Article content Louise Davis makes a point in her letter about how politicians should step down gracefully. She rightly highlights the issue of disrespect — and that's exactly the word that applies to what's happened with Pierre Poilievre. Article content In his riding, individuals chose to put 90 extra names on the ballot — an act that seems not only undemocratic but deeply disrespectful to our country and to the integrity of our voting system. It undermines the foundation of democracy and disrespects the people who participate in it in good faith. Article content It seems this kind of interference is happening again in the current byelection. We need to be honest: We're comparing apples and oranges when we talk about Poilievre and Singh. Jagmeet Singh's NDP was soundly defeated in the last election, so stepping down was almost inevitable. Poilievre, on the other hand, didn't lose in the traditional sense — his loss was due to chaos caused by people who don't respect how elections are supposed to work.
National Post
6 hours ago
- National Post
'What is a conflict of interest, anyway?' The imagined thoughts of Mark Carney's ethics disclosures
The Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner has released the full details of Mark Carney's asset disclosures, and they reveal a prime minister who appears to be more constrained by conflicts of interest than any other. Article content Carney's years of helping to oversee the trillion-dollar portfolio of Brookfield Asset Management gave him an equity stake over dozens of companies whose fortunes are likely to be directly impacted by the policies of his government. Article content Article content And so, the Ethics Commissioner has accepted a complex arrangement wherein any time one of 103 Carney-linked companies comes up in cabinet discussions, he's supposed to leave the room while declaring that he's doing so. Article content Article content But no, it turns out that all these assets were seen as a liability. A bad thing. The commissioner was prejudicially assuming that just because Mr. Carney happened to own substantial shares of a few dozen companies, this was itself evidence that he would use his public influence for personal gain. For shame, I say. Look within your heart, Canada. An intelligent, beautiful man volunteers to be your prime minister and your first impulse is to assume that he must only be doing it for selfish reasons? Article content Article content Article content What is a conflict of interest, anyway? Mr. Carney is a bipedal mammal who requires oxygen for cellular respiration. Does that put him at a 'conflict of interest' if he takes pro-oxygen positions in public life? Article content I have known Mr. Carney to ride inside automobiles manufactured by Mercedes, Lexus and, if he's slumming it, Volkswagen. Does that put him at a 'conflict of interest' when it comes to foreign relations with the respective governments of Germany and Japan? Article content By your logic, surely his appreciation of the elegant and responsive interior of the 2025 E-class would instantly transform him into a Manchurian candidate loyal only to the whims of Mercedes-Benz AG and the Chancellor of Germany, in that order. Article content Perhaps your next ethical disclosure should uncompromisingly litigate everything that has ever given Mr. Carney joy or satisfaction of any kind. Did he once enjoy a matinee screening of Ladri di biciclette? Watch out; because that surely means he'll sell us out to Italy at the first opportunity.
