logo
Warning Signs for Tesla: New Model Y Struggles to Find Buyers

Warning Signs for Tesla: New Model Y Struggles to Find Buyers

Yahoo29-05-2025
Tesla's latest Model Y release was supposed to be a game-changer. Instead, it's raising eyebrows across the automotive industry for all the wrong reasons.
The Cool Down reports that industry analysts reveal a troubling pattern: Tesla's new Model Y models are sitting untouched on dealership lots across the country, a surprising twist for a vehicle hyped as one of the year's biggest EV launches.
The telltale signs are there. Tesla is already offering 0% financing on the Model Y—an unusually aggressive tactic for a model so fresh out of the gate. 'Why would you discount and have all these incentives and offers literally out of the gate?' asked Loren McDonald, chief analyst at EV data firm Paren. 'That just doesn't make sense when your margins are already at multi-year lows. That suggests very strongly that there is a demand problem.'
While Tesla's global EV dominance remains intact, the cracks are showing. Sales of competing EVs from rivals like Ford, Hyundai, and even upstarts like Rivian and BYD have surged, while Tesla's numbers have been slipping. Some blame the growing competition, while others point to the controversies surrounding CEO Elon Musk that have cast a shadow over the brand.With Model Y sales stalling, Tesla isn't sitting idle. The company has been promoting the model with heavy incentives and continues work on future projects like the much-discussed Cybertaxi. There are also whispers of cheaper versions of the Model Y and Model S in the pipeline.
But for now, the Model Y's underwhelming launch highlights a new reality for Tesla: the days of instant sellouts and long waitlists may be numbered.
Warning Signs for Tesla: New Model Y Struggles to Find Buyers first appeared on Men's Journal on May 26, 2025
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Investing in Space: All aboard the SpaceX Mars express
Investing in Space: All aboard the SpaceX Mars express

CNBC

timean hour ago

  • CNBC

Investing in Space: All aboard the SpaceX Mars express

It was a matter of time, with governments racing to clinch the first Mars laurels, that private companies would start offering rides to the red planet. Italy's Agenzia Spaziale Italiana (ASI) became the first client who's signed on to send scientific experiments aboard SpaceX's first commercial flights to Mars — where Elon Musk's space company has yet to land. "Italy is going to Mars!" ASI President Teodoro Valente announced on social media, with Italian news outlet ANSA reporting the agency's payloads will feature a plant growth experiment, a weather surveillance station and a radiation sensor for data collection. "#MadeinItaly on #Mars," Italian Industry Minister Adolfo Urso celebrated, while SpaceX President and COO Gwynne Shotwell declared open season for the company's Mars launch bookings. "Get on board! We are going to Mars! SpaceX is now offering Starship services to the red planet," she said on the X social media platform. Notably, no timeline was given for the launch dates of these flights — with the odds of short-term travel to Mars increasingly under question. Both parties to the arrangement have been committed to Mars ventures. ASI barely just made headlines at the end of last month, when it inked a deal to develop the first human lunar outpost with Thales Alenia Space — building on the Italian space agency's 2020 partnership with NASA to coordinate bringing astronauts back to the Moon under the Artemis Accords. Coming in third after France and Germany, Italy contributed 800 million euros ($935 million) — or 15.8% - to the European Space Agency's 7.68 billion euro adopted budget for 2025. It's also been heavily involved in the ExoMars mission, which seeks to launch the Rosalind Franklin rover around 2028. It's meanwhile at once surprising and predictable that SpaceX, which made a name for itself out of commercializing space launches, is already leaping to book Mars excursions. A longtime NASA contractor, the firm's also been offering satellite launch services to Eutelsat's OneWeb and AST SpaceMobile. A few days back, Amazon, whose chief Jeff Bezos owns his own rival rocket company Blue Origin, tapped Musk's company for the second time and launched its fourth batch of Kuiper satellites on SpaceX's 100th mission this year. And Musk has certainly been vocal about his plans to pursue Mars colonization, once echoed by U.S. President Donald Trump's administration. But there's no escaping one (nearly 400-feet) problem. SpaceX's reusable mammoth rocket Starship — the key to materializing Musk's Mars ambitions — has had a long-storied string of publicized test flight failures this year amid technical and refueling woes. We're about to see during its next attempt later this month if it's overcome these challenges in the three months since its last explosive stint. That's skipping over a June incident when a Starship rocket exploded while being loaded with methane and liquid oxygen propellant ahead of its launch — due, Musk later said, citing preliminary data, to problems in the payload bay. Critically for our conversation, Starship is not yet rated crew-ready, and Musk himself has now pushed back his initial targets, flagging a "slight change" of a crewed flight during the next window in 2026, when Earth and the red planet are optimally aligned for travel to Mars. "Slight chance of Starship flight to Mars crewed by Optimus in Nov/Dec next year. A lot needs to go right for that," he said last week on social media. "More likely, first flight without humans in ~3.5 years, next flight ~5.5 years with humans. Mars city self-sustaining in 20 to 30 years." It may seem too early to start selling tickets to Mars, it's no secret that launch capacity worldwide has been struggling to keep up with demand for space access. Time will tell whether ASI's enthusiasm was ultimately strategic or premature. The space law take on NASA's plans for a lunar nuclear reactor — A lawyer reviews the legal backdrop of NASA's next steps to set up a nuclear reactor on the Moon to power satellites and equipment for Mars exploration. — The Conversation Apollo 13 commander dies at 97 — Astronaut Jim Lovell, who commanded the Apollo 13 mission to the Moon and undertook four spaceflights, has passed away. — NBC News What would outer space sound like? — Some scientists have been equating some of the faint sounds in space into rumblings discernible by humans, looking to "sonify" space. — Live Science NASA launches next round of LunaRecycle Challenge — NASA has kicked off phase 2 of the LunaRecycle Challenge asking firms to create recycling systems to convert deep-space mission waste into fabrics, plastics, foam and metals. Submissions are due in January 2026. — Space Daily The return of space insurers — Space insurers are making their way back to the industry, after getting burned on substantial losses years prior. — Space News Data centers set sights on space – Rising data traffic demand and climate risks have compelled tech giants to look skyward for orbital and lunar data server sites. – U.S. to tout new rocket artillery system — The U.S. is set to welcome the new Global Mobile Artillery Rocket System, which completed its initial test firing in New Mexico last week and has a shoot-and-scoot capability allowing it to fire and depart. — The National Interest China unveils rocket recovery ship — Beijing has launched its first ship that will recover reusable rockets, the Xingji Guihang ("Interstellar Return") developed by Chinese private firm iSpace. — South China Morning Post United Launch Alliance CEO outlines plans to reuse tech — United Launch Alliance's Tory Bruno said test flights with the SMART Reuse system aimed at recovering and reusing booster components could begin as early as 2026. — NASA Spaceflight Why does Amazon keep contracting SpaceX launches? — SpaceX's 100th launch of the year carried satellites for Amazon, raising the question of why Jeff Bezos, owner of rocket company Blue Origin, is still employing his rival's services. Ars Technica takes a look. — Ars Technica Northrop Grumman, U.S. Space Force integrate antennas in DARC test — Northrop Grumman and the United States Space Force succeeded to integrate several antennas at the Deep-Space Advanced Radar Capability (DARC) Site 1 for satellite multiple satellites. — Defence Industry Europe Ariane 6 takes off with climate monitoring satellite — Europe's Ariane 6 rocket undertook its third launch, this time to deliver a weather forecasting and climate monitoring satellite. The rocket is critical to lessen Europe's reliance on SpaceX. — EuroNews Aug. 14 — SpaceX's Falcon 9 to take off with Starlink satellites out of Florida Aug. 15 — Landscape's Zhuque-2E rocket to head out with an unknown payload out of Jiuquan Aug. 15 — SpaceX's Falcon 9 to launch with Starlink satellites out of California Aug. 16 — CAS Space's Kinetica-1 to depart with an unknown payload out of Jiuquan Aug. 16 — SpaceX Falcon 9 to leave with Starlink satellites out of Florida Aug. 17 — China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation's Long March 4C to take off with an unknown payload out of Xichang Aug. 20 — Roscosmos' Soyuz 2.1a to launch with a Bion-M satellite out of Kazakhstan

Elon Musk broadens his long-running feud with OpenAI's Sam Altman by bringing in a third party: Apple
Elon Musk broadens his long-running feud with OpenAI's Sam Altman by bringing in a third party: Apple

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk broadens his long-running feud with OpenAI's Sam Altman by bringing in a third party: Apple

Elon Musk's long-standing battle with OpenAI has a new participant: Tuesday, Apple found itself the latest target of Elon Musk's legal threats when the xAI CEO accused the tech giant of using unfair means to promote OpenAI's ChatGPT over his company's rival Grok chatbot in the App Store. Musk called it an 'unequivocal antitrust violation' and threatened to take legal action. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, who is part of an ongoing feud with the billionaire, quickly weighed in on the dispute, calling Musk's accusation a 'remarkable claim.' He, in turn, accused Musk of manipulating his own platform, X, 'to benefit himself and his own companies and harm his competitors and people he doesn't like.' Apple has denied Musk's claims, saying in a statement that the App Store 'is designed to be fair and free of bias.' 'We feature thousands of apps through charts, algorithmic recommendations, and curated lists selected by experts using objective criteria,' a spokesperson said in a statement shared with news outlets. 'Our goal is to offer safe discovery for users and valuable opportunities for developers, collaborating with many to increase app visibility in rapidly evolving categories.' X users, and Musk's own Grok chatbot, were quick to point out that Musk's claim was undermined by apps like DeepSeek and Perplexity having previously taken the top slot on Apple's App Store. The issue may have more to do with Apple's standing deal with OpenAI's ChatGPT. Under a mid-2024 deal, ChatGPT is built into Siri and system-wide writing tools on an opt-in basis. Siri asks for permission before sending queries; no OpenAI account is required; and Apple has said it plans to support additional AI providers over time. Even so, the integration gives ChatGPT a prominent, first-party placement on hundreds of millions of Apple devices, potentially making it harder for rivals like Musk's xAI to win users' attention. With Google weaving its Gemini AI into Android, the mobile AI market could increasingly be shaped by default integrations, which could make it much harder for rivals like xAI to compete. The OpenAI and Apple deal appeared to get under the billionaire's skin when it was announced, with Musk taking to X to complain: 'It's patently absurd that Apple isn't smart enough to make their own AI, yet is somehow capable of ensuring that OpenAI will protect your security & privacy!' Musk went on to threaten to bar all Apple devices from his companies if OpenAI technology was integrated into iOS operating systems. Apple's antitrust issues Apple is currently at the center of several other antitrust battles. Apple's App Store is one of the few key platforms for app distribution. Whoever gets visibility there is effectively handed a huge share of new users, which has been a point of contention for some of its competitors. In the U.S., Apple's App Store practices have been under scrutiny since 2020 when the company was sued by Epic Games over the removal of Fortnite from the App Store for bypassing its payment system to avoid the 30% commission. A federal appeals court recently refused to pause an order from its long-running battle with Epic Games that forces Apple to allow developers to direct users to outside payment options. Last year, the Justice Department filed a landmark antitrust lawsuit accusing Apple of monopolizing the smartphone market, alleging that its App Store policies block new developers and stifle innovation. Apple has denied the allegations, saying that its practices foster innovation and consumer choice. In June, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey denied Apple's motion to dismiss the lawsuit. In a separate case brought against Google by the Justice Department, Apple's $15 billion to $20 billion a year deal with the search giant could also be at stake after a federal judge declared in August last year that Google unlawfully maintained a monopoly in internet search, partly through exclusive agreements with companies like Apple. The deal, which made Google the default search engine on its devices, could be disrupted by the remedies currently being weighed by a judge, with JPMorgan analysts warning that a worst-case ruling could cost Apple about $12.5 billion annually. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

California Coastal Commission opposes SpaceX launch expansion on West Coast, again
California Coastal Commission opposes SpaceX launch expansion on West Coast, again

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

California Coastal Commission opposes SpaceX launch expansion on West Coast, again

By Steve Gorman LOS ANGELES (Reuters) -The California Coastal Commission voted on Thursday against a plan by Elon Musk's SpaceX to nearly double the number of Falcon 9 rocket launches the company is permitted to conduct each year from Vandenberg Space Force Base, from 50 to 95. But as was the case when the commission voted last October to oppose a previous SpaceX launch expansion from 36 to 50 at the installation, the U.S. government can merely override the objections of California regulators and approve the latest plan. The U.S. Department of the Air Force, parent agency of the Space Force, has taken the position that the proposed launch expansion at Vandenberg, about 60 miles (97 km) northwest of Santa Barbara on the central California coast, is a federal activity exempt from further state oversight. A commission staff report countered that of 51 rockets launched last year from Vandenberg, SpaceX Falcon 9s accounted for 46 of them. While SpaceX flies some missions for the Defense Department and NASA, the enlarged launch operations SpaceX envisions are primarily for carrying payloads for the company's own Starlink satellite network, the report said. SpaceX also has sought to expand its launch facilities at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral, Florida. Air Force officials did not attend Thursday's commission meeting in Calabasas, north of Los Angeles, where the panel voted 11-0 against SpaceX. Neither representatives for SpaceX nor the Air Force could immediately be reached for comment. SpaceX has sued the California Coastal Commission over its previous objections, accusing the agency of singling out Musk's company for greater regulation in retaliation for his political views. In addition to allowing as many as 95 launches a year by the company's workhorse Falcon 9, the new plan would permit up to five Falcon Heavy rocket launches annually, and up to 24 landings by the company's reusable rocket boosters, twice as many as previously approved. Two new landing zones at the base would also be built. At-sea landings would also be increased. In recommending disapproval, commission staff cited what it called insufficient information about the plan and concerns over noise pollution and wildlife disturbance from more frequent, louder sonic booms as SpaceX launch activity escalates. The staff report also cited the need for more frequent closures of public beaches and campgrounds that lie within the launch hazard zones around the base. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store