logo
Beasts and besties: German chancellors and US presidents through time

Beasts and besties: German chancellors and US presidents through time

Euronews05-06-2025
As Germany's new Chancellor Friedrich Merz meets US President Donald Trump for the first time at the White House on Thursday, he'll be aware of how his predecessors have tackled the transatlantic relationship.
The stars don't augur well, however. During his first stint in office, Trump regularly made disparaging remarks about Germany and developed a non-relationship with Chancellor Angela Merkel characterised by mutual personal dislike.
Trump's erratic trade policy, which has the EU and Germany specifically in its sights, as well as Trump's retreat from traditionally solid transatlantic positions on common defence and Russia, have challenged Merz before he even moved into the Chancellery.
How the mutual relationship between Merz and Trump develops in the future is likely to depend crucially on how the Chancellor completes his first visit to the Oval Office - Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy sends his regards!
Merz's basic problem is that Trump has taken an axe to German-US relations and is not particularly interested in good terms with Berlin.
This situation is a novelty for a German chancellor. Merz's predecessors since 1949 have experienced ups and downs in their relations with the respective US presidents, but the close friendship between the two countries has never been called into question.
So how did they get along?
Konrad Adenauer was 73 when he was elected the first Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany in 1949. Four years after the end of World War II, however, the country was not yet a sovereign state.
Adenauer was only too aware of this. He sought a close and trusting relationship with the US and adheres very closely to instructions from Washington.
In 1953, Adenauer travelled to the US for the first time - it was the first ever visit by a German head of government to Washington! His talks with US President Dwight Eisenhower (1953-61) were friendly.
For Adenauer, the protection, aid and military presence of the United States were indispensable for the democratic development of Germany, as well as for peace and prosperity in Europe.
Adenauer developed close personal relations with Eisenhower and especially his Secretary of State John Foster Dulles, which benefitted German-US relations as a whole.
In contrast, Adenauer's relationship with John F Kennedy (1961-63) was not without problems.
The two are far apart in terms of both age and politics. In 1963, his last year in office, Adenauer was already 87, and Kennedy, 41 years his junior, saw him as a man of the past.
Kennedy felt that the chancellor's stance on the German question was too rigid and lacked flexibility in the face of changing conditions in Europe.
Conversely, Adenauer harbours mistrust of US-Soviet negotiations. He believes that a rapprochement between the two superpowers could only take place at the expense of Germany and its political goal of reunification.
After the discord between Adenauer and JFK, relations between Chancellor Ludwig Erhard and Kennedy's successor Lyndon B. Johnson (1963-69) became very friendly again.
German foreign policy was by now characterised by the conflict between 'Atlanticists' and 'Gaullists', with the latter wanting a close alliance with France, which Erhard rejects in favour of nuclear protection by the US.
Erhard and Johnson met sympathetically from the outset and came together five times during Erhard's short time in office. The first time was just one month after Johnson's inauguration, when the Texan invited the German to his ranch in Texas, a particular honour, especially for a foreigner.
Willy Brandt was the first Social Democrat to become Federal Chancellor in 1974. Brandt sees himself as a self-confident partner of the USA. However, his 'Ostpolitik', which sought an understanding with East Germany (GDR), Poland and the Soviet Union, was viewed with great suspicion in Washington.
US President Richard Nixon (1969-1974) distrusted Brandt, whom he considered to be a 'German nationalist'. Brandt, on the other hand, tried to maintain a good relationship with Nixon and avoided open criticism of the war in Vietnam.
Personally, the two had practically nothing to say to each other. Alluding to Brandt's illegitimate origins, Nixon occasionally calls him 'the bastard' behind closed doors.
In the mid-1970s, German-US relations were better than ever before. US President Gerald Ford (1974-1977) and German Chancellor Helmut Schmidt knew and appreciated each other and were close friends in their private lives.
There was a great deal of agreement on key issues, as well as a trusting openness in discussing differences.
However, Ford lost the 1976 election to his challenger Jimmy Carter (1977-1981).
Carter was inexperienced in foreign policy and relied on a team of advisors disconnected from the think tanks of the East Coast, where Schmidt had been well-connected for decades and enjoyed a high reputation.
Schmidt, who had a tendency to lecture people, saw Carter as a novice who had only a limited understanding of the world's complex problems.
This does not go unnoticed by Carter - relations quickly hit rock bottom.
When it came to the deployment of the neutron bomb, there were serious disagreements. Schmidt, amid great domestic political difficulties, advocated the weapons system desired by Washington.
When Carter stopped its production at the last minute for domestic political reasons, Schmidt felt exposed and abandoned.
Unlike Schmidt, Helmut Kohl had no personal connection to the United States and did not speak English. Nevertheless, he showed transatlantic solidarity from the outset and endeavours to establish a personal relationship with every US president he deals with.
His relationship with Ronald Reagan (1981-1989) even had friendly traits that outlasted even the embarrassing Bitburg controversy.
In 1985, Kohl invited Reagan to visit the Bitburg military cemetery in the Eifel region during his stay in Germany - as a sign of reconciliation between former enemies.
When it was discovered that not only Wehrmacht soldiers but also members of the Waffen SS were buried at the cemetery, a storm of indignation broke out in Washington.
The White House wanted to cancel the visit, but Reagan remained stubborn and thus supported the German chancellor.
Kohl also developed a friendly and close relationship with Reagan's successor George HW Bush (1989-93), which facilitated communication between the two governments during the collapse of the GDR and the German reunification process.
In the 1990s, German-US relations were determined not least by the question of how much responsibility Germany should assume in the world.
US President Bill Clinton (1993-2001), with whom Kohl had an even better relationship than with Reagan, reacted positively to the German decision to send Bundeswehr soldiers to the Balkans as part of an international peacekeeping force.
In his memoirs, Clinton spoke almost affectionately and with great respect about his appreciation for Kohl. He was 'not only physically' the most impressive political leader in Europe for decades, according to Clinton.
The relationship between German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder and US President George W. Bush developed quite differently. The atmosphere between Bonn (later Berlin) and Washington was probably never as icy as in those years.
The reason: the red-green government's no to the war in Iraq.
Mistrust, personal animus, blatant dislike - the rift between the two leaders was total.
This became apparent again years later, when both were no longer in office and both accused each other of lying on the occasion of the publication of Bush's memoirs in 2010.
Under Chancellor Angela Merkel, German-American relations relaxed again. Unlike with Schröder, Bush got on well with Merkel and called her 'a friend'.
In contrast, the chancellor's relationship with Barack Obama was slow to warm.
In 2008, she refused to allow the then-presidential candidate to give a speech in front of the Brandenburg Gate in Berlin - Obama had to make do with the Victory Column.
But after Obama's election, the relationship was increasingly characterised by mutual trust.
Both cultivated a sober and pragmatic political style and a liberal view of the world, which facilitated cooperation.
In a way, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz was lucky: US President Joe Biden was probably the last great old-school US Atlanticist. This made cooperation easier.
Both liked each other, worked together in a spirit of trust and described each other as friends.
In fact, Scholz consulted with Biden more frequently and more closely than with his European colleagues.
When it comes to aid for Ukraine, Scholz did nothing without obtaining Biden's approval.
At their last meeting, both warned against ending military support to Ukraine. This is now a matter for their successors.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump extends pause on China tariffs for another 90 days
Trump extends pause on China tariffs for another 90 days

Euronews

time2 hours ago

  • Euronews

Trump extends pause on China tariffs for another 90 days

US President Donald Trump has extended his tariff truce on China for another 90 days, according to US media outlets. Trump reportedly signed an executive order on Monday, just hours before the last agreement between the world's two biggest economies was due to expire, delaying the implementation of his sweeping tariffs by the same duration they were initially paused for. The previous agreement was set to expire just past midnight on Tuesday. The new order will prevent tariffs on Chinese goods entering the United States from shooting up to 145%. Earlier in the day, Beijing expressed its hope that Washington would seek 'positive trade outcomes' on Monday, on the final day of their 90-day détente, which was reached between the two countries in May. 'We hope that the US will work with China to follow the important consensus reached during the phone call between the two heads of state … and strive for positive outcomes on the basis of equality, respect and mutual benefit,' a foreign ministry spokesman, Lin Jian, said in a statement. Trump however added to the uncertainty, saying 'we'll see what happens' when asked about the his deadline for Beijing. Trump did however offer a glimpse of optimism that his tariffs may not come into effect as he stated that 'China has been dealing quite nicely'. He also praised his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping, noting that their relationship is 'very good'. Last month, Chinese and US officials met in Stockholm to hold another round of trade deal negotiations. Following the meetings, officials said they expected the tariff truce to be extended. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said last week that the US had 'the makings' of a deal with China, but that negotiations were still needed to finetune the framework and agree on the details. The US-China trade deal could have catastrophic economic consequences for the entire world. The US has threatened to tariff Chinese products to the tune of 245%. China has retaliated with its own set of tariffs, which it set preliminarily at 125%. The heated tariff battle between the two powers have rattled global stock markets and increased fears that a global trade war could erupt. The two nations – who between them had a combined GDP of almost $50 billion (€43 billion) in 2024 – will continue to engage in talks over the coming 90 days. US media says White House officials familiar with the matter say they're optimistic a deal can be struck before the extension's expiration.

Trump expects 'constructive conversation' with Putin
Trump expects 'constructive conversation' with Putin

France 24

time4 hours ago

  • France 24

Trump expects 'constructive conversation' with Putin

US President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference at the White House on August 11, 2025 The US president has spent the first months of his second term in office trying to broker peace in Ukraine -- after boasting he could end the conflict in 24 hours -- but multiple rounds of talks, phone calls and diplomatic visits have failed to yield a breakthrough. Trump and Putin will hold a summit in Alaska on Friday in a bid halt the conflict, which was triggered by Moscow's February 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine. It will be the first between sitting US and Russian presidents since Joe Biden met Putin in Geneva in June 2021. "I'm going to speak to Vladimir Putin and I'm going to be telling him 'you've got to end this war,'" Trump told a White House press conference, saying that he would "like to see a ceasefire very, very quickly." "I think we'll have constructive conversations," said the president, noting that he would seek out Putin's "parameters" for peace, then call Zelensky and other European leaders right after the meeting. Trump said last week that "there'll be some swapping of territories to the betterment of both" Ukraine and Russia -- a suggestion Zelensky rejected. 'There'll be some swapping' The Ukrainian president warned Saturday that "decisions without Ukraine" would not bring peace and said his country's people "will not give their land to the occupier." Trump said he was a "little bothered" by Zelensky's stance on territorial concessions, and insisted that land swaps would take place. "There'll be some swapping, there'll be some changes in land," he said. But Trump also stated that he would not make a unilateral agreement: "I'm not going to make a deal, it's not up to me to make a deal," he said, while emphasizing that he thinks "a deal should be made." Three rounds of negotiations between Russia and Ukraine have failed to bear fruit, and it remains unclear whether the Trump-Putin summit would bring peace any closer. Russian bombardments have forced millions of people to flee their homes and have destroyed swathes of eastern and southern Ukraine, and Putin has resisted multiple calls from the United States, Europe and Kyiv for a ceasefire. Trump said he will know fairly quickly into the talks with Putin whether or not a deal would be coming, and that he may still walk away from trying to broker peace in Ukraine. "I may leave and say good luck and that'll be the end. I may say this is not going to be settled," Trump said. The US president said his aim is to bring Putin and Zelensky together, with or without being present himself. "Ultimately I'm going to put the two of them in a room, I'll be there or I won't be there, and I think it'll get solved," Trump said. © 2025 AFP

Trump to deploy National Guard to DC citing 'crime emergency'
Trump to deploy National Guard to DC citing 'crime emergency'

Euronews

time4 hours ago

  • Euronews

Trump to deploy National Guard to DC citing 'crime emergency'

US President Donald Trump said on Monday that he's deploying the National Guard across Washington and taking over the city's police department in the hopes of reducing crime, as the city's mayor noted that crime is falling in the US capital. The Republican president, who said he was formally declaring a public safety emergency, compared crime in the American capital with that in other major cities, saying Washington performs poorly on safety relative to the capitals of Iraq, Brazil and Colombia. Trump also said at his news briefing that his administration has started removing homeless encampments "from all over our parks, our beautiful, beautiful parks." "We're getting rid of the slums, too," Trump said, adding that the US would not lose its cities and that Washington was just a start. US Attorney General Pam Bondi will be taking over responsibility for Washington's metro police department, he said, while also complaining about potholes and graffiti in the city and calling them "embarrassing." For Trump, the effort to take over public safety in Washington reflects a next step in his law enforcement agenda after his aggressive push to stop illegal border crossings. But the move involves at least 500 federal law enforcement officials as well as the National Guard, raising fundamental questions about how an increasingly emboldened federal government will interact with its state and local counterparts. Combating crime Trump said he is invoking Section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to deploy members of the National Guard. About 500 federal law enforcement officers are being tasked with deploying throughout the nation's capital as part of the Trump administration's effort to combat crime, a person familiar with the matter told the AP news agency on Monday. More than 100 FBI agents and about 40 agents with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives are among federal law enforcement personnel being assigned to patrols in Washington, the person briefed on the plans said. The Drug Enforcement Administration, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Marshals Service are also contributing officers. The Justice Department didn't immediately make any comment on the deployments. The National Guard Mayor Muriel Bowser, a Democrat, questioned the effectiveness of using the National Guard to enforce city laws and said the federal government could be far more helpful by funding more prosecutors or filling the 15 vacancies on the DC Superior Court, some of which have been open for years. Bowser cannot activate the National Guard herself, but she can submit a request to the Pentagon. "I just think that's not the most efficient use of our Guard," she said on MSNBC's "The Weekend" programme. Bowser was making her first public comments since Trump started posting about crime in Washington last week. She noted that violent crime in Washington has decreased since a rise in 2023 while Trump's weekend posts depicted the district as 'one of the most dangerous cities anywhere in the World." "Any comparison to a war-torn country is hyperbolic and false," Bowser said. Police statistics show homicides, robberies and burglaries are down this year when compared with 2024. Overall, violent crime is down 26% compared with this time a year ago. Focus on homelessness In a social media post on Sunday, Trump emphasised the removal of Washington's homeless population, though it was unclear where the thousands of people would go. "The Homeless have to move out, IMMEDIATELY," Trump wrote. "We will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital. The Criminals, you don't have to move out. We're going to put you in jail where you belong." Trump said last week that he was considering ways for the federal government to seize control of Washington, asserting that crime was "ridiculous" and the city was "unsafe."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store