
'Everyone lost': How a Zionist migration programme deprived Morocco of its thriving Jewish community
A covert mission engineered by the Mossad and run by the Jewish Agency, Operation Yachin aimed to increase the population of Jews in the recently proclaimed state by taking them from Morocco. Other similar operations took place all over the world at the time.
Between 1961 and 1964, nearly 90,000 Jews, or 54.6 percent of the kingdom's community, are thought to have left Morocco. Prior to the operation, around 225,000 Jews were living in the North African country.
As many as 160,000 Jews of Moroccan origins are reported to live in Israel nowadays, forming the second largest migrant group after Jews from ex-Soviet republics.
The more unknown aspect of this period is embodied by the Moroccan Jewish community that remained - or returned from Israel just after migrating and living there for a few years. They constitute the 2,000 Jews that live in the country today - the largest remaining Jewish community in North Africa.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Jewish Moroccan author Jacob Cohen describes this once thriving Jewish community as "a rare species".
Born in 1944 in Meknes, Cohen forms part of the minority group who remained in Morocco during the mass migration. He watched his community evaporate before his eyes.
"I was convinced that we had to leave, that Moroccan Jews had no future in Morocco. This is the great success of the Zionist organisations present in Morocco," he told Middle East Eye.
One thing was clear, he said: "There was no overt antisemitism; the few Jews who lived in Morocco had no problems. But there was this widespread feeling that the future was no longer there, if not for themselves, then at least for their children."
'It was a tragedy'
According to various academic sources, Operation Yachin followed an understanding between Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion and the late Moroccan King Hassan II.
To compensate Morocco for the loss of valuable community members, Israel reportedly agreed to pay $500,000, plus $100 per emigrant for the first 50,000 Moroccan Jews who left, and $250 for each additional emigrant. The New York-based Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society reportedly contributed $50 million towards Yachin.
Fanny Mergui, 80, from Casablanca, was one of the thousands who left in 1961. She remembers how Israeli youth movements came to Morocco to convince Jews to leave and, for those like herself who had the "right profile", to join the movement.
'I watched all those people leaving the medina - grandmothers, grandfathers, young and old people… all crying. People weren't leaving with joy in their hearts'
- Fanny Mergui, 80, Moroccan Jew
"[They said that] Morocco was independent [from French colonial rule from 1956], and we had our own country [Israel], we no longer had any reason to stay in Morocco," Mergui told MEE.
She started attending the youth clubs created by the Jewish Agency, the operative branch of the World Zionist Organisation in charge of fostering immigration of Jews to Israel, when she was 10. These clubs were a way of spreading Zionist propaganda to youth.
"I lived to the rhythm of Israeli culture - the homeland, the songs of the pioneers, socialism, freedom, emancipation, fraternity," she said.
The propaganda was efficient, and from her home in the historical district, Mergui was in the prime location to watch the operation unravel.
"They sent buses from entire villages to Casablanca, and I spent my childhood watching those people leave. You could just cross the street and you were right there where the ships docked, right in front of our eyes."
Mergui described the state in which people left as a "kind of departure psychosis".
"I watched all those people leaving the medina - grandmothers, grandfathers, young and old people, with their couscous pots, baskets, spices, all crying. It was a tragedy. People weren't leaving with joy in their hearts," Mergui recalled.
The truth behind Israeli propaganda on the 'expulsion' of Arab Jews Read More »
The Jews were perfectly integrated into the predominantly Muslim Moroccan society, to which they had belonged for over 2,000 years.
"Muslim Moroccans weren't attacking us, they weren't telling us to leave, quite the opposite," she told MEE.
However, at the time, Mergui said the Zionist movement and the migration project promised "modernity" and access to a new world.
"When I left, in my mind, and for many Moroccan Jews, Israel had always existed. We didn't think we were going to a country that had just come into being. To us, it was the Holy Land. It was our country. It was the land of the Bible," she said.
"We were going home, returning home, period. We didn't understand what was really happening. It took me a lifetime to understand what happened to my community," she added.
Returning to Morocco
A well-informed anonymous source told MEE that in addition to travelling for free to Israel, the migrants were offered a permanent place to stay.
However, once in Israel, Moroccan Jews, like other immigrants from Arab countries, realised that reality was not as the Zionist movement had described it to them.
In Israel, Moroccans became the first to form what was called the "Arab neighbourhoods", Mergui said, describing them as "completely desolate areas".
"If you wanted a roof you had to build one yourself," she said, adding that Arab Jews were the poorest out of the arriving communities.
The remaining buildings in the Mughrabi (Moroccan) Quarter in Jerusalem's Old City on 12 June 1967, after its demolition by Israel to broaden the space in front of the Western Wall (Ilan Bruner/Israeli Government Press Office/AFP)
Racism between communities and inequality were also an issue.
"It was a colonial ideology. The European Jews, who were the first to settle in Palestine from Russia back in the 1880s, considered themselves superior to us and we could only ever be second-class citizens."
It did not take long for the new immigrants to contest the situation.
"Moroccan Jews took to the streets with portraits of King Mohammed V, saying 'We want to go back home', but this was not possible; it was a one-way trip," Mergui said. Although Mohammed V passed away in 1961, the protesters used his image as the late king was known for protecting Jews during World War II, when he refused to surrender the Moroccan Jewish population to the Nazi regime.
Returning home was an option that was not readily available to most Jewish Moroccans. As the operation was clandestine, they did not have legitimate travel documents and their passport situation was tied to the agreements concluded with Morocco, she explained.
After the 1967 Arab-Israeli War, Mergui herself wished to return to Morocco and was given the opportunity to by becoming a leader of the Zionist youth club which helped recruit people into the movement.
Documentary brings to light injustices suffered by Israel's 'Arab' Jews Read More »
"I was overjoyed, not because I was going to work for the Zionist movement, but because they gave me the chance to question that rushed departure from Morocco."
Israel was not home for Mergui. "I was immersed in a foreign culture, one I appreciated, of course - I learned a lot, I won't deny it. I became politicised. I met young people from all over the world," she said.
While she used to see Zionism "like any other colonial movement that needed to settle", everything changed for her after 1967 and Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territories.
"I began to realise that was the real issue and understand what was really going on. I gave up completely on living in Israel."
Before returning to Morocco, Mergui studied at the University of Vincennes in Paris, where she learned about the history of Palestine.
"It shaped my academic and political path and my conscience was awakened."
During her time in France, Mergui became active in politics, campaigning both for the Israeli Black Panthers, a group seeking social justice for Sephardi and Mizrahi Jews in Israel, and for the Palestinian cause.
On the 'verge of extinction'
The Moroccan public overtly supports the Palestinian cause and opposes the normalisation deal signed with Israel in 2020 - and Jews in the kingdom seem to share a similar perspective.
Most of the Moroccan Jews keep a low political profile; however, many members of the community condemn Israeli actions. Rabat is home to some renowned pro-Palestine Moroccan activists of Jewish origin, like Sion Assidon, a founding member of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement in Morocco.
However, Middle East politics is not the only reason why the country's Jews decided to stay - or return.
Haim Crespin, born in the northern Moroccan city of Ksar al-Bebir in 1957, described his reason to stay in the kingdom as "not politically motivated".
'Everything is being done to protect, support and preserve [the Jewish identity]. But its end seems inevitable, and even if it survives, it will be reduced to its simplest form'
- Jacob Cohen, Moroccan Jewish author
He was a child when the Jewish mass migration happened.
"My father was a businessman, and we had a good life here. I also opened my restaurant 25 years ago. Not every Jew's reason to stay in Morocco is founded on political aspects," he told MEE.
The restaurateur, who now lives in Rabat, defends his family's choice to remain in the country despite some difficulties that he considers not to be specific to Morocco.
While some Jewish people interviewed by MEE said they perceived a rise in antisemitism in the kingdom, there is no reliable data on the issue. In any case, that is not enough to force people to leave, Crespin said. "People move because of fear, but this happens all over the world, so why move?"
Cohen, on the other hand, is pessimistic about the fate of the Jewish community in Morocco, which the writer likened to being on the "verge of extinction".
He himself decided to leave for France after he said he "encountered certain personal problems" when working as an assistant professor in Casablanca that made him think that "Moroccan Jews were generally right not to consider Moroccan society to be sufficiently tolerant and egalitarian to give Jews the positions they deserve".
However, he recognises that the kingdom has made efforts to safeguard the country's historical Jewish identity.
In 1997 the Foundation of Moroccan Jewish Heritage established the first Jewish museum in the Arab world in Casablanca, which still operates today. The foundation has preserved over 167 Jewish cemeteries and shrines throughout the kingdom.
How a Jewish cemetery is bringing a Moroccan village to life Read More »
In 2011, the new Moroccan constitution recognised the Hebraic identity as an integral part of Moroccan identity and, in 2020, King Mohammed VI approved the rollout of education on Jewish history and culture in primary schools. A prominent Moroccan Jewish adviser to the king, Andre Azoulay, played a role in emphasising the importance of this official recognition.
"Everything is being done to protect, support and preserve it. But its end seems inevitable, and even if it survives, it will be reduced to its simplest form," Cohen said.
"Nothing can be done against this verdict of history," he added, highlighting the major losses posed by Operation Yachin.
"On the Moroccan side, everyone lost. The country lost a potential community of one to two million people who could have contributed to its development, diversity and harmony.
"On the Jewish side, it was the irreversible eradication of a civilisation that had 15 centuries to form and flourish."
When describing the migration period, Mergui likes to use the metaphor of people fleeing a burning building.
"The Moroccan Jewish community was completely at a loss. They had no idea what would become of them, it was like being in a house on fire, and people are fleeing," she said.
"Then what do you do? Well, you run like everyone else."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Middle East Eye
5 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
US: Massachusetts city divests from companies linked to human rights violations in Israel
A city council in the state of Massachusetts on Tuesday voted to divest from entities contributing to human rights violations in Israel's war on Gaza, making it the third municipality in the US to do so. Members of the Medford City Council voted to pass legislation that would divest city funds from weapons manufacturers, private pensions, fossil fuel companies, prisons and other organisations that contribute to human rights violations. Medford City Council president Isaac Bears sponsored the investments ordinance, which overwhelmingly passed with five council members voting in support, one member opposing, and another abstaining. In the initial proposal for the resolution, it said the city of Medford would 'strive to invest its funds in ways that promote the wellbeing of our communities and our environment, favoring investment of its funds in entities that support the needs of peacetime in daily life and meet the city's goals of conducting local government in an 'accountable, transparent, innovative, stable, ethical, representative, and responsible' way'. While the ordinance did not specify companies that support what many human rights experts call a genocide in Gaza, the wording specifically outlined not investing in companies contributing to any human rights violations, including apartheid, genocide, ethnic cleansing and illegal occupation. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Bears explained in an interview that the context of the sweeping ordinance was clear. " Right now, the context is obvious. There are very clear human rights violations happening in Gaza, Ukraine, Congo, Sudan, Myanmar and other places," he told WBUR. Bears added that the ordinance would divest anywhere between $10m to 40m in funds. Media outlet Patch reported that the ongoing events in Gaza directly inspired the motion, titled the "Values-Aligned Local Investments Ordinance". Patch quoted the council vice president Kit Collins as saying, 'This policy is foundationally aligned with my Jewish faith and with the imperative to repair the world." "I feel offended and saddened to know that there are people with whom I share a Jewish identity who see me as illegitimate or claiming a Jewish identity that is not mine because I do not share their politics or ideology about Zionism and the state of Israel.' Largest sovereign wealth fund in the world to review investments in Israel Read More » Additional clauses prohibit investments in companies that obtain more than 15 percent of their revenues from the operating, maintaining, servicing, or supplying jails, prisons, or detention facilities, as well as the combustion, distribution, extraction, manufacture or sale of fossil fuels. reported that Bears said at the meeting on Tuesday: 'If we have these public funds, we are not going to invest them in this global effort that disregards and dehumanizes people in so many different ways, whether that's for political gain or for private profit - or in many cases both - in a neverending cycle of destruction and violence'. Medford is home to almost 60,000 people, and Tufts University is partially based in the city. The Council on American-Islamic Relations (Cair) praised the decision. 'We applaud the leadership and moral courage of the Medford City Council in choosing to divest from companies profiting from crimes against humanist such as those being carried out in Israel's ongoing Gaza genocide. This ordinance reflects a growing national awareness that taxpayer dollars must not fund human rights abuses or international war crimes," a statement on Cair's website said. Precedent The vote makes Medford the third municipality in the country to choose to divest public funds from companies that invest in military weapons after Dearborn, Michigan, and Portland, Maine, did so last year. Dearborn City Council voted to divest from companies providing military equipment or weapons to Israel in October 2024. Meanwhile, the Portland City Council voted to divest from companies involved in weapons sales and other business in Israel in September 2024. The Trump administration threatened US states, cities and territories that boycott Israeli companies or those operating in Israel with not allowing them to access federal funds for natural disaster preparation last week. However, it quietly removed the relevant clause in the Federal Emergency Management Agency's guidelines on Monday after backlash. But the Department of Homeland Security said it would 'enforce all anti-discrimination laws and policies, including as it relates to the BDS movement, which is expressly grounded in antisemitism'. BDS refers to the Palestinian-led Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement that aims to make Israel comply with international law.


Middle East Eye
8 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Leicester Muslims blame Hindutva extremism and police failures for 2022 unrest
A new community-led report into the 2022 unrest in Leicester has concluded that rising Hindutva extremism, policy failures and systemic Islamophobia played a central role in the violence that rocked one of Britain's most diverse cities. The report, co-authored by the UK Indian Muslim Council and the Community Policy Forum, is the first independent inquiry into the unrest in Leicester in August and September 2022. It draws on testimony from nearly 500 Muslim residents in the city, given between 2023 and 2024. It challenges the prevailing narrative that framed the unrest as a clash between two equal sides and instead highlights the asymmetric nature of the provocation and violence. The report finds that the violence - largely involving groups of Hindu and Muslim youths - was not spontaneous, but the culmination of rising tensions over several years. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Respondents attributed this escalation to the spread of imported Hindutva ideology and deliberate acts of provocation by a fringe of extremists. 'We were blamed for our own trauma,' said one respondent. 'Even local leaders wanted us to stay quiet to preserve the illusion of harmony.' 'Our kids were afraid to go outside,' said another participant. 'Women were being harassed, but when we spoke out, we were told not to make it worse.' Respondents stressed that the violence which took place in 2022 should not be blamed on Leicester's Hindu population, but on a "minority of extremists importing these ideologies into our streets". British activist Majid Freeman jailed for 22 weeks over role in Leicester riots Read More » Several said provocative behaviour preceded the violence, such as nationalist chanting, targeted marches, public harassment and fireworks set off outside mosques. "It wasn't spontaneous," said one local Muslim resident. "It was organised. People came into our areas shouting slogans, waving flags in our faces. They wanted us to react - and when we finally did, we were blamed for it." The report links these provocations to a broader Hindutva digital ecosystem, citing influencers, bots and anonymous accounts from the UK and India which amplified Islamophobic content and incited hostility. Following the unrest, Leicester Police confirmed that some of those who took part in the disturbances reportedly came from outside the city. The report also raised concerns about the police and said respondents had lost faith in law enforcement, with some accusing the police of failing to protect them, or even siding with the agitators. 'The police just stood by and watched,' said one participant. 'They were more concerned about avoiding bad press than stopping the violence. Some of us gave up even trying to report what was happening.' Others said they encountered 'hostile attitudes' from officers when reporting threats, with some feeling surveilled rather than supported. The report states that regardless of whether bias was intentional, 'the perception of police bias and inaction has created a serious barrier to rebuilding trust'. Key recommendations made by the report include scrapping the Prevent strategy to replace it with a rights-based public health model, recognition of Hindutva and far-right extremism as domestic threats, reforming the police and recognising a definition of Islamophobia. Identifying Hindutva as a threat The 2022 riots began when nearly 200 Hindu men wearing masks and balaclavas marched through Leicester's Highfield area chanting "Jai Shri Ram", which translates from Hindi to "hail Lord Ram" or "victory to Lord Ram", words that are increasingly appropriated by perpetrators of anti-Muslim violence in India. Following the march, some Muslims came out onto the streets, leading to scuffles between the two groups. Earlier this year, a leaked report produced by the UK Home Office stated that "Hindu nationalist extremism" played a part in the 2022 unrest, identifying it as a proposed target for British counter-extremism efforts for the first time. UK: Lobby group paid for former Home Secretary Suella Braverman's £28,000 trip to Israel Read More » Details of the leaked internal review into the British government's counter-extremism strategy were published by Policy Exchange, a right-wing think tank. It advocated a focus on 'behaviours and activity of concern' rather than ideologies. The Home Office review called for the scope of counter-extremism work to be widened to cover a range of causes and activities, including Hindutva (Hindu nationalism), extreme misogyny, and a fascination with violence. The publication of this report comes after the UK Indian Muslim Council, alongside 200 other Muslim organisations in Leicester, decided not to engage with the government-led inquiry into the unrest, due to deep concerns over the choice of chair and his previous Islamophobic remarks. In early 2023, then-Communities Secretary Michael Gove commissioned former Labour MP Ian Austin to chair a government review into the unrest. His appointment drew immediate condemnation from Muslim organisations, who cited his longstanding support for the discredited Prevent strategy, his ties to the neoconservative Henry Jackson Society, and his consistent record of dismissing Islamophobia while amplifying anti-Muslim tropes. More than 200 local Muslim groups in Leicester publicly refused to engage with the inquiry, branding it a 'cynical exercise in deflection.'


Gulf Today
9 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Israeli military chief opposes Netanyahu's Gaza war expansion
Israel's military chief has pushed back against Benjamin Netanyahu's plans to seize areas of Gaza it doesn't already control, three Israeli officials said, as the prime minister faces increasing pressure over the war both at home and abroad. During a tense, three-hour meeting on Tuesday, Eyal Zamir, the military chief of staff, warned the prime minister that taking the rest of Gaza could trap the military in the territory, which it withdrew from two decades ago, and could lead to harm to the hostages being held there, the sources briefed on the meeting said. The Israeli military says it already controls 75% of Gaza after nearly two years of war, which began when Hamas attacked southern Israeli communities in October 2023. It has repeatedly opposed imposing military rule, annexing the territory, and rebuilding Jewish settlements there - policies advocated by some government members. Netanyahu is under intense international pressure to reach a ceasefire in the coastal enclave, which has been reduced to rubble in the fighting. Most of the population of about 2 million has been displaced multiple times and aid groups say residents are on the verge of famine. The UN has called reports about a possible expansion of Israel's military operations in Gaza 'deeply alarming' if true. The military, which accuses Hamas of operating amongst civilians, has at times avoided areas where intelligence suggested hostages were held and former captives have said their captors threatened to kill them if Israeli forces approached. Netanyahu told Zamir that so far the military had failed to bring about the release of the hostages, the officials said, speaking on the condition of anonymity. Most of those freed so far came about as a result of diplomatic negotiations. Defense Minister Israel Katz wrote on X Wednesday that the military chief has both the right and the duty to voice his opinion, but said that the military would carry out the government's decisions until all war objectives are achieved. The prime minister's office confirmed the meeting with Zamir on Tuesday but declined to comment further and the military did not respond to a request for comment. The prime minister is scheduled to discuss military plans for Gaza with other ministers on Thursday. A fourth source said Netanyahu wants to expand military operations in Gaza to put pressure on Hamas. Netanyahu, who in May said that Israel would control all of Gaza, leads the most right-wing coalition government in Israel's history and some of his key partners have in the past threatened to quit if the government ended the war. Following a 40-minute meeting with the prime minister on Wednesday, opposition leader Yair Lapid told reporters he had advised Netanyahu that the public was not interested in continuing the war and that a full military takeover would be a very bad idea. A public poll last month by Israel's Channel 12 also showed support for a diplomatic deal that would end the war and secure the release of the hostages. There are 50 hostages still being held in Gaza, of whom at least 20 are believed to be alive. Videos released by Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, another group in Gaza, last week of two extremely emaciated captives triggered international condemnation. Close to 200 Palestinians have died of starvation in Gaza since the war began, about half of them children, according to Gaza's health ministry. More than 20 died on Wednesday when a truck believed to be carrying food overturned as it was swarmed by a desperate crowd, according to local health authorities. The latest ceasefire talks in Qatar broke down last month. Hamas insists any deal must lead to a permanent end to the war, while Israel accuses the group of lacking sincerity about giving up power afterward and must be defeated. An expansion of the military offensive in heavily populated areas would likely be devastating. 'Where will we go?' said Tamer Al-Burai, a displaced Palestinian living at the edge of Deir Al Balah in central Gaza. 'Should people jump into the sea if the tanks rolled in, or wait to die under the rubble of their houses? We want an end to this war, it is enough, enough,' he told Reuters by phone. Reuters