Rhayader sisters win at Best of Welsh Business Awards
Rachel Evans and Shan Williams were celebrating at Powys' famous Llangoed Hall earlier this month, as their shop, No8 Clothing, based in Rhayader, won 'Best Clothing/Fashion Store' at the Best of Welsh Business Awards 2025.
Rachel described the win as a surprise and an amazing reward for the duo's hard work – something they are clearly not shy of, as both run the shop alongside full-time jobs.
'We didn't know anything about it,' said Rachel, 52, who revealed she is still not aware who initially nominated No8 for the award, for the Mid Wales region.
The awards work by businesses receiving an initial vote; after which they are notified and can then collect further votes from clients and customers.
Rachel said she first became aware of their nomination a few weeks ago, after receiving an email from organisers.
It was then a case of publishing the news on social media and collecting votes.
'It's very heartwarming to find out people voted for us and appreciate us, it makes the hard work all worthwhile,' said local girl Rachel.
'It's an amazing reward for us, having started in difficult times.'
Rachel and Shan took over the West Street shop from a cousin in November 2019 and sell women's, men's and children's clothing. No8 also sells gifts like candles, as well as bags, jewellery and accessories such as socks and scarves.
They both run the shop alongside full time jobs, while Rachel's daughter Asha is also a big help too.
'We took over just before lockdown, so it has been a hard beginning,' added Rachel.
'For a small, new business, it was tough. It wasn't just lockdown, it took a long time for people to come back out to the high street, but we're still here and getting stronger and stronger.
'To get this award fills us with immense pride. We really appreciate our customers who voted, and it just makes me feel so proud and happy.'
The Mid Wales awards were held at Llangoed Hall on Sunday, April 13. A post on the No8 Clothing Facebook page following the awards evening said: 'We're absolutely thrilled to share that No8 Clothing has been named Best Fashion Store 2025 at the Mid Wales Business Awards.
'A huge thank you to all our amazing customers, friends and family for your continued support since we opened our doors in 2019.
'It's been an incredible journey and this recognition means the world to us.
'Well done to all the other winners and finalists – it was an honour to be in such great company. Here's to the next chapter – we couldn't have done it without you.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
a day ago
- Times
Times letters: How inheritance tax changes affect growth
Write to letters@ Sir, You argue in your leading article 'From Me to You' (Aug 14) that it is 'morally wrong' to levy inheritance tax on 'those who have worked hard throughout their lives to earn something to pass onto the next generation', but the biggest slice of inherited wealth is in the form of a house sale. The amount of income used to acquire a house depends mainly on the size of the mortgage at the time the house was bought — that is, its historic value — not on what it is sold for as part of probate, its current value. An adjustment for inflation may be appropriate, but there is no reason a house should be tax-exempt because its deceased owner 'worked hard to acquire it'.Peter Curwen Leeds Sir, For Rachel Reeves, wealth is a sin and she intends to tax it like other sinful behaviours. Sin taxes have a long history in reducing activities that politicians disapprove of. Sin taxes on smoking, drinking and driving have succeeded. Inevitably, as our sinning diminishes, so do sin tax revenues. Tobacco and fuel duty revenues are both down. Alcohol duty revenue is up, marginally, but on lower per capita consumption because tax rates on stronger booze have increased. Sin taxes on wealth will have the same result. There will be far less of the sinful activity of wealth creation, and eventually tax revenues will fall. The worst sinners are already fleeing our shores. Inheritance tax revenue will disappear as people stop leaving wealth to their children. As you have reported (Jul 28), capital gains tax revenues are already falling, from £14.6 billion in 2022-23 to £12.1 billion in 2023-34 as the sinners prepare to repent. What's more, with far fewer of the '1 per cent club' who pay 30 per cent of total income tax, we can all look forward to even higher tax bills ReeceLondon N4 Sir, I wonder if Rachel Reeves has fully considered the implications of subjecting pensions to inheritance tax. Having worked for more than 40 years and contributed to a pension in the belief that this would relieve the state of any responsibility for me in old age, I am now confused. Obviously I don't know how long I may live, but in the hope it may be a reasonably long time I have invested in UK stocks and shares, both to protect my family and to promote UK stocks and shares. All of us have benefitted, but now I must re-evaluate. Several of my options include selling the UK stocks and shares. Reeves has said she wants pension funds to invest more in the UK stock market, but how will her policies encourage that?Paul Mitchell Thédirac, France Sir, The proposal to 'tighten' rules on the seven-year exemption to IHT on gifts is odd ('Budget may tighten rules on inheritance tax', Aug 13). We seem to have forgotten the reason for this relief, which is to encourage growth. Essentially, it is better for growth for elderly people to pass on assets to younger people who will use them. A simple example is an older person taking cash from their bank and giving it to their child to buy a house. This results in work for estate agents, surveyors, solicitors and contractors, as well as a tax contribution in stamp duty and VAT. For a pro-growth government, to remove the incentive to give these gifts seems HardsBlakeney, Norfolk Sir, John Stewart says (Thunderer, Aug 13) that the proliferation of cycle lanes on main roads is because priority is given to cyclists making longer trips, at the expense of people using side-roads for shorter journeys. The reason priority is given to main roads is that they are where cyclists are in most danger. In many places outside London, it is impossible to make even short journeys without using main roads. I agree, though, that the design of cycle lanes needs review. Bumps and bollards that separate cycle lanes from vehicle lanes are hazards, as are jay-walking pedestrians and car passengers opening doors without looking. Some cycle lanes at junctions are so labyrinthine that they are difficult for both pedestrians and cyclists to navigate. The sad fact is that at present some cycle lanes are so badly designed that it is often safer, and certainly quicker, to avoid SpenceSale, Cheshire Sir, The residents of Streatham Hill are due to suffer more than a year of roadworks as Transport for London and Lambeth council reduce the motor vehicle capacity of the A23 to a single lane. The reason is that it is safer for cyclists and pedestrians to create a segregated cycle lane with floating bus stops and reduce access from residential side roads. I believe that if they wanted to keep everyone safe — and save money — they could ban cyclists from this stretch of the A23 and direct them to the low-traffic neighbourhood along the southbound carriageway. One of reasons the council gave for creating the LTN was that it would make it safer to cycle and CrillyLondon SW16 Sir, Harry Wallop writes (Business, Aug 15) about the poor prospects for delivery riders in the gig economy. These riders and others in such jobs will, at the end of their working lives, have little if any pension and will be dependent on the state. The people running these companies will have retired comfortably and left taxpayers to look after their former workers. Bill ParishBromley, Kent Sir, Sadly, the stone coffins and skeleton that have been on view in the northeast corner of Sherborne Abbey for the last century cannot be those of Alfred the Great's brothers (letter, Aug 14). They lie immediately beneath a 14th-century tiled pavement, within a chantry chapel, and are more likely to be those of a late-medieval abbot. When they were uncovered, in 1925, during the making of WD Caroe's new Lady Chapel, no archaeologist was there to study or record them. If the present vicar wishes to find the burials of Alfred's brothers, I suggest a careful research excavation on either side of the high Tatton-BrownSalisbury Sir, The discussion about the remains of his family brings into focus the location of Alfred himself. After his death, in 899, he was buried in Old Minster, Winchester. He was then moved to New Minster, the church built by his son, King Edward, as the dynastic focus for the family. The Norman destruction of both minsters led to the building of Hyde Abbey, just outside the walls of the city, as the 'final' resting place for Alfred, Edward and other family members. Sadly, Hyde Abbey fell victim to Henry VIII. Alfred's grave was lost until 1788, when the building of a bridewell on the site led to its rediscovery. The authorities allowed the bones to be lost around the building site. So we can now say with some confidence that the bones of Alfred and his immediate family lie scattered and shattered adjacent to the entrance to River Park in Hyde. We have long lobbied Winchester city council for a proper commemoration of Alfred and the story of the abbey in Hyde Gate, almost the last remaining original building within the abbey FennellFounder, Hyde900Winchester Sir, Further to your article 'Rolls-Royce's UK plans go nuclear' (Business, Aug 14), I have no doubt Rolls-Royce's aero-engine business will remain remarkably successful but its enthusiasm for land-based small modular nuclear reactors (SMRs) is commercially misplaced. Firstly, SMRs are essentially experimental prototype scale-ups. I would be surprised if savvy companies such as Google and Amazon were contemplating reliance on experimental tech. Secondly, authoritative research by academics at the University of Pennsylvania, in a paper published in May 2022, demonstrated that SMR radioactive waste is harder to handle than waste from Gigawatt-sized nuclear David LowryInstitute for Resource and Security Studies, Massachusetts, US Sir, Alice Thomson calls for 'honest but calm dialogue' about migration (Comment, Aug 13). She concedes that 'some Islamic countries don't share western values', but understates in my opinion how big a barrier that is to integration. The schism between Catholicism and Protestantism endured for BickleyHuntingdon, Cambs Sir, In response to your question 'Which artist best captures the true spirit of Britain — in a single frame?', (Times2, Aug 15), surely Banksy's Girl with Balloon, his powerful 2002 mural, best encapsulates the nation's sentiments in these troubled times. It was voted the nation's favourite in 2017 and, as well as being one of his most famous works, it is also one of Banksy's most optimistic, as the original mural was accompanied by the words: 'There is always hope.'Adrian BrodkinLondon N2 Sir, Your excellent article overlooked Walter Sickert. Over his long and prolific career, he painted ordinary British people at the music hall and in grimy bedsits. He reinvented himself more than once and has influenced and inspired many who came later. My choice would be BostonKingshill, Kent Sir, David Hockney has spent a great deal of his time on British landscapes, most notably Garrowby Hill, and his innovative artwork on the iPad is ClarkeRye, E Sussex Sir, Anthony Roberts (letter, Aug 14) brings to mind the warning attributed to Henry Longhurst that 'If you call on God to improve the results of a shot while it is still in motion, you are using an outside agency and subject to appropriate penalties under the rules of golf.'John Murray Compton Chamberlayne, Wilts Sir, A friend of my parents had his bicycle stolen. It was found two days later and, being a good Catholic, he went to church to thank St Anthony. On leaving church, he found that it had been stolen YoungSouthampton Sir, Public statues in London have always been controversial, for many reasons (News, Aug 8, and letters, Aug 13 and 14). In 1937, a decision was made to site the memorials to Admiral Jellicoe and Admiral Beatty in Trafalgar Square, which required moving the statues of General Napier and Major General Havelock, and there had even been discussions about moving William IV from his plinth to an island at Virginia Water. It was all too much for Sir Patrick Duff, secretary of the Office of Works, who was still reeling after controversies about the statue of Field Marshal Haig on Whitehall. In a letter to the first commissioner, Sir Philip Sassoon, in January 1938, Duff fumed that the best site for all statues was at the bottom of the CrellinThorner, W Yorks Sir, Marion Brown's letter (Aug 13) revived an old misapprehension of my own. As a child I had a box of watercolour paints with the printed name of the tint under each pan. Owing to inconsistency in the printing I was convinced for many years of the existence of the colour Clive DorrPlymouth Write to letters@
The Independent
2 days ago
- The Independent
Tractor tax more likely to hit working farmers than wealthy landowners, think tank tells Reeves
Rachel Reeves should water down her inheritance tax raid on family farms to protect workers, according to a think tank that championed the controversial Labour policy. The Centre for the Analysis of Taxation (CenTax), which has been broadly supportive of the idea of a so called 'tractor tax', warned that landowners were 'less likely to be impacted by the reform than working farmers '. The move will increase pressure on the chancellor over her plans, which critics say could sound the death knell for many family farms. The changes mean that farms valued at £1m or more will be liable for 20 per cent inheritance tax. The Treasury says that, with tax allowances, in reality only farms worth £3m would be affected – around 28 per cent of family farms. But official Defra figures appear to suggest as many as 66 per cent could be hit. Ministers have defended the changes, saying that they had to take 'difficult decisions' in the wake of what Labour says was a £22bn black hole in the public finances left by the last Tory government. However, CenTax has now said that working farmers are more likely to suffer under the policy, despite Labour's claim to protect working people. It suggested two ways the policy could be better targeted, including capping inheritance tax relief to the first £10m of a claim to allow 100 per cent relief to £2m per estate. It also suggested a 'minimum share rule', to remove inheritance tax relief for passive investors in farmland, so they cannot be used as a 'tax shelter'. Last year, minister Daniel Zeichner told MPs the government had introduced the plans to protect small fares. He said: 'Currently, small farms can find themselves facing the same levels of tax bills as much larger farms, despite having a much smaller asset. Twenty per cent of agricultural property relief is claimed by the top 2 per cent; 40 per cent is claimed by the top 7 per cent. 'That is not fair, it is not sustainable, and sadly, it has been used in some cases by wealthy landowners to avoid inheritance tax. That is why the Government has announced plans to reform agricultural property relief.' CenTax found just 20 per cent of landowner estates would be hit by the tax, compared to 25 per cent of tenant farmer estates, 45 per cent of owner-farmer estates, and 67 per cent mixed tenure estates. CenTax said: 'Landowners are less likely to be impacted by the reform than working farmers, representing 64 per cent of all farm estates but 42 per cent of impacted farm estates. Owner-farmers represent 17 per cent of all farm estates but 37 per cent of impacted farm estates.' Mo Metcalf-Fisher, from the Countryside Alliance, said: 'Labour ministers repeatedly say they want to protect genuine family farming businesses, while tackling tax avoidance, through inheritance tax changes. 'The evidence, however, points to it being these very families and their farms that will be badly impacted by the policy, as it stands. 'There is still time to listen to experts from the farming sector and rethink the policy before it's too late.' Ms Reeves is currently under pressure to find a £50bn hole in the government's finances, according to the National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
Telegraph
2 days ago
- Telegraph
Inheritance tax raid fears ‘are damaging house sales'
Fears of a fresh inheritance tax (IHT) raid by Rachel Reeves have sent a chill through Britain's housing market, a leading estate agent warned. Bosses at Savills, one of Britain's largest property agents, said a 'vacuum' of information on IHT changes from the Government was forcing prospective house buyers to hold fire on purchases. The Treasury has reportedly been exploring plans to rework IHT to fill a gap in the public finances of between £20bn and £70bn. Simon Shaw, Savills' finance chief, said speculation over Ms Reeves's next round of wealth taxes was increasing uncertainty among prospective buyers, especially across middle England where IHT changes bite the most. 'The rhetoric changing towards IHT does not help. It certainly doesn't help in the rural arena,' he said. 'I suspect a lot of things are being market tested through that rhetoric. None of us know what will really happen and what the market will have to contend with. 'What that does mean is, in the interim period, it creates a level of uncertainty in the residential market particularly. It's classic uncertainty. People fill the vacuum with their own fears about what might happen.' The Chancellor is thought to be considering a lifetime cap on the value of gifts that can be passed on before death. At the moment, gifts made seven years before someone's death are not subject to IHT, while a sliding-scale tax rate of between 8pc and 32pc, known as 'taper relief', is applied to gifts given between seven and three years before death. Savills is particularly exposed to UK tax changes, and it blamed a 'difficult' six months of trading on 'the rhetoric around taxation changes in the future'. The property agent saw half-year revenues from housing sales decline by 8pc, blaming the impact of 'actual and potential tax changes on sentiment'. Savills also described a 'dampening effect' on corporate and private investor activity through the second quarter as a result of tax changes and Budget uncertainty, leading to a 13pc reduction in property investment volumes to £21.5bn. The FTSE 250 group is the latest to sound the alarm over Budget tax fears dampening house buyer interest. Marshalls, a building materials supplier, last week said there was growing reluctance from homeowners to spend their savings on renovation projects and a lack of confidence from first-time buyers and employers. Housebuilders Persimmon and Bellway have also flagged weakening demand, pointing to 'affordability constraints' for buyers. A government spokesman said: 'We are delivering the biggest boost to social and affordable housing in a generation, and our landmark planning reforms will help to drive UK housebuilding to its highest level in over 40 years while growing the economy by £6.8bn. 'Thanks to measures taken at the Budget, there will also be an additional 130,000 transactions over the next five years by first-time buyers and others buying a primary residence.'
