‘Nothing to be surprised about': Governor's office responds to Horne's anti-trans bill complaints
The head of Arizona's public schools said he was surprised that the governor vetoed two pieces of anti-trans legislation that he claimed were common sense and would protect girls and parental rights, even though she's vetoed every measure Republicans have sent her that targeted transgender people.
And Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs already vetoed nearly identical legislation last year.
'It's surprising to me that the governor did not recognize the legislation's value in promoting common sense, girls' privacy, safety, and the rights of parents to be fully informed about what their children are doing while at school or related activities,' Republican Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Horne said in a written statement.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
On May 12, Hobbs vetoed Senate Bill 1002 and Senate Bill 1003, both sponsored by Fountain Hills Republican Sen. John Kavanagh, who has introduced numerous anti-trans bills over the past decade, including bills that mirror the ones that Hobbs vetoed this week.
Senate Bill 1002 would have banned teachers from referring to a student by a name or pronoun that differs from their given name or biological sex without first obtaining written permission from a parent. Senate Bill 1003 would have barred trans students from using locker rooms and bathrooms that don't match their biological sex. It would also ban trans students from staying in the same room as classmates or teammates of the opposite biological sex on school trips.
Hobbs vetoed both proposals alongside numerous others on May 12, and wrote in her veto letters that they would 'not increase opportunity, security or freedom for Arizonans.'
In response to Horne's statements, Hobbs spokesman Christian Slater told the Arizona Mirror that 'there's nothing to be surprised about.'
'Governor Hobbs has made clear time and again that she is focused on increasing opportunity, security and freedom for Arizonans,' he said. 'These bills do not do that. Instead of sending the same bill every year, only to be vetoed, the Legislature should work with the governor to lower costs, protect the border, create jobs and secure Arizona's water future.'
During a March 25 committee hearing, Kavanagh claimed that SB1003 would balance cisgender students' desire for privacy with trans students' discomfort using facilities that don't align with their gender identity. He claimed it would do so by allowing trans students to request other accommodations, such as the use of single-occupancy or staff bathrooms.
But Paul Bixler, a transgender woman and advocate, told the committee that the proposal would create an 'atmosphere of exclusion, alienation and disenfranchisement.'
In a May 12 statement, Kavanagh accused Hobbs of vetoing the bill as a way to pander to the 'extremist liberal community' and claimed that it would expose children to 'sexual violence, harassment and emotional distress.'
'A 13-year-old female should not be forced to stand next to a naked, transgender female, who is in reality an 18-year-old biological male,' Kavanagh said. 'The fact that this bill was vetoed proves just how little Hobbs cares for the development of our youth and how radical she is for Arizona.'
But there's no evidence that allowing transgender people to use bathrooms that align with their gender identity leads to an increase in sexual assaults. In fact, the opposite may be true: Surveys have shown that banning transgender people from using bathrooms that align with their identities puts them at greater risk of being assaulted.
In his statement, Horne argued that girls deserve locker rooms and restrooms that aren't accessible to 'biological males.'
'Public schools are entrusted to educate children, not to interfere with the rights of parents to raise their children as they see fit,' Horne said. 'This veto is contrary to overwhelming public support for protecting girls and parental rights.'
Public support for restrictions on things like participation in sports teams that align with their gender identities and for gender affirming care for minors has increased in the past few years, as Republicans — led by President Donald Trump — continue their attacks on transgender people.
A poll conducted last month by The 19th, a nonprofit newsroom covering gender and public policy, found that 49% of Americans think politicians should not be focusing on transgender issues at all.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
2 minutes ago
- USA Today
California redistricting vote begins with overwhelming support, Newsom pollster says
Newsom has called for a Nov. 4 special election on the new maps. The California state legislature, where Democrats have a supermajority, would first need to vote to put the measure before the voters. WASHINGTON ― California Gov. Gavin Newsom's redistricting proposal aimed at creating five new Democratic congressional seats begins with overwhelming support ahead of a planned November referendum when voters would decide its fate, according to a survey conducted by his longtime pollster. The proposal is backed by 57% of California voters and opposed by 35%, the poll taken by Democratic pollster David Binder found, according to a report by Axios. Another 8% of voters in the heavily Democratic state said they were undecided. Newsom has portrayed his mid-term redistricting push as necessary to offset Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's pursuit to create five new Republican congressional districts in Texas. President Donald Trump has publicly lobbied for the gerrymandering in Texas to boost Republican chances in the 2026 midterm elections. Newsom last week called for a Nov. 4 special election on the new maps. The California state legislature, where Democrats have a supermajority, would first need to vote to put the measure before the voters. The poll found 84% of California's Democratic voters support the redistricting plan while 79% of the state's Republicans oppose it. The 57% in overall support for the redistricting plan is a jump from the 51% who said they backed redrawing California's congressional maps in a July poll. California currently has 43 congressional seats held by Democrats and nine by Republicans. The creation of five new Democratic-friendly districts could sway California's delegation to a 48-5 advantage for Democrats. Yet the move comes with risk for Democrats because it might create several competitive seats that Republicans could target. "I know they say, 'Don't mess with Texas,'" Newsom, widely considered a potential presidential candidate in 2028, quipped at a Democratic rally kicking off the redistricting campaign last week. "Well, don't mess with the great Golden State." California has an independent redistricting commission that is designed to limit partisan influence on the map-drawing process, but Newsom said the measure would allow a new process to draw maps that would go into effect for House elections in 2026, 2028, and 2030, before ceding power back to the commission to draw maps ahead of 2032. Redistricting in all states is required by federal law every 10 years following the release of new U.S. Census Bureau figures; however, Trump pushed Texas Republicans to jumpstart the process in the middle of the decade, setting off a cross-country redistricting fight. Redistricting efforts are also ongoing in Florida and Ohio that could benefit Republicans, while Republican-controlled Indiana and Missouri are also discussing redrawing their maps. Control of the U.S. House of Representatives at stake, with Republicans currently holding a 219-212 majority. Contributing: Erin Mansfield of USA TODAY Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.


The Hill
2 minutes ago
- The Hill
Paxton's lead over Cornyn nearly cut in half: poll
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's (R) lead over incumbent Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) in the state's Senate primary is narrowing, according to a new survey from Texas Southern University's Barbara Jordan Public Policy Research and Survey Center survey. The poll showed Paxton holding a five-point lead among likely primary voters, 44 percent to 39 percent, in a two-way race with Cornyn. Another 17 percent said they were undecided. The last Texas Southern University poll released in May showed Paxton with a nine-point lead over Cornyn. The five-point gap between Paxton and Cornyn remains the same in a hypothetical three-way race with Rep. Wesley Hunt (R-Texas), who has been considering a primary run. Paxton leads with 35 percent while Cornyn trails at 30 percent. Hunt comes in with 22 percent support. Another 13 percent said they were unsure. The poll released on Wednesday comes after a separate Emerson College survey released last week showed the incumbent senator and attorney general locked in a dead heat. That poll showed Cornyn leading Paxton 30 percent to 29 percent, with five percent saying they prefer another candidate and 37 percent saying they were undecided. Most polls released before last week's Emerson College poll showed Paxton with a double-digit lead over Cornyn, leading to questions about the incumbent senator's electability in a primary. Cornyn's allies have pulled out all of the stops in an effort to boost him. According to The Texas Tribune, the Senate GOP leadership-affiliated One Nation has spent more than $4 million in advertising, while Texans for a Conservative Majority, another pro-Cornyn group, has spent $3.2 million. The pro-Cornyn Conservative Majority Project has spent roughly $500,000. The latest poll from Texas Southern University's Barbara Jordan Public Policy Research and Survey Center was conducted from Aug. 6 to Aug. 12, 2025 among 1,500 likely Texas Republican primary voters. The margin of error is plus or minus 2.53 percentage points.
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ohio must redraw its congressional maps in 2025: What's next in that process
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — As high-stakes redistricting battles erupt nationwide, an Ohio coalition is stepping back into the spotlight to fend off partisan gerrymandering. The Equal Districts Coalition — a statewide alliance of environmental, education, civil rights and several other advocacy groups — announced last week it's relaunching to demand fair congressional maps in Ohio, just as lawmakers in Texas and California are also drawing fire for threatening to manipulate political boundaries ahead of the 2026 election. While Texas Republicans are pushing for a mid-decade redraw to expand their congressional edge, California Gov. Gavin Newsom is signaling he will abandon the state's independent redistricting commission in retaliation. Sherrod Brown's first interview on 2026 Senate run: The 'system got worse' Ohio is unique in being the only state required to redraw its congressional map in 2025, a legal consequence of the 2022 map's adoption without bipartisan support under redistricting reform laws. Such maps last only four years; the new map will govern congressional elections through 2030 and likely shape the battleground for control of the U.S. House. 'Ohio is the only state required to redraw its congressional map this year because the last one was gerrymandered so badly,' Equal Districts spokesperson Bria Bennett said. 'Without transparency and public pressure, politicians will use this process to lock in partisan power and set a national gerrymandering playbook. We're here to make sure voters, and not politicians, decide our future.' Procedural roadmap Under Ohio's constitutional redistricting process, the legislature has until roughly Sept. 30 to pass a congressional map with a three‑fifths majority, including support from both parties. If that fails, the Ohio Redistricting Commission steps in with only a month to agree. If that also fails, the legislature makes a simple‑majority map, but it then lasts only four years. The current commission is dominated by Republicans, holding five of seven seats, and the Ohio Supreme Court now leans heavily conservative, making legal challenges more uncertain than in past cycles. After Issue 1's defeat The Equal Districts' relaunch follows the defeat of 2024's Issue 1, a proposed constitutional amendment that aimed to create an independent redistricting commission in Ohio. The ballot measure, backed by several of the same groups now involved in the coalition, was pitched as a solution to end partisan gerrymandering. Supreme Court appeal reignites push to repeal Ohio's same-sex marriage ban Issue 1 was rejected at the polls after a heated and expensive campaign in which opponents framed the measure as an unnecessary overhaul of the current system. The failure of Issue 1 left the existing redistricting structure intact, but Equal Districts is betting that a more organized, informed, and vocal public can still make a decisive difference in shaping what comes next. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword