logo
NATO Spy Planes Make Pincer Move Over Russia

NATO Spy Planes Make Pincer Move Over Russia

Miami Herald5 days ago
American and British reconnaissance aircraft flew from England toward Russia, approaching the country from two sides on the same day, according to flight data.
A Newsweek map shows the planes' route amid tensions between NATO and Moscow.
On Monday, the Boeing Royal Air Force (RAF) aircraft RC-135W flew from its base in the U.K. and circled off the coast of the Russian city of Murmansk before heading back.
It happened the same day as the U.S. Air Force (USAF) aircraft RC-135V left a different U.K. base and circled the Russian exclave of Kaliningrad that borders NATO's eastern flank members, Lithuania and Poland. There is no suggestion that Russian airspace was breached.
The Boeing-built aircraft gather signals intelligence and are crewed by more than 30 people, including electronic warfare officers and intelligence operators.
The latest sorties come amid growing tensions between Moscow and the bloc following Russian aircraft buzzing NATO airspace and pledges by the U.S. and the alliance to provide more military help for Ukraine to fight Russian President Vladimir Putin's aggression.
Data from Flightradar24, mapped by Newsweek, shows that the RAF RC-135W took off from the RAF base at Waddington, Lincolnshire, England at 8:11 a.m. on Monday.
The aircraft headed past Norway, Sweden and Finland before turning southeast toward Russia.
Its route took it across the Barents Sea and almost parallel with Murmansk, Russia's Arctic port city, before it returned to the U.K. along the Scandinavian coast and landed at Waddington at 6:38 p.m.
Also on Monday, the USAF RC-135V Rivet Joint, identified by the call sign "JAKE17," took off at 7:08 a.m. from Mildenhall, Suffolk, located further south in England.
The aircraft went on a seven-hour flight that took it across the Netherlands, Germany, Poland and Lithuania before it circled Kaliningrad, the Russian exclave that would be the front line of any hostilities between Moscow and the alliance.
Only days ago, the USAF reconnaissance and intelligence-gathering aircraft skirted around Kaliningrad after it crossed Europe and the three Baltic states.
The Rivet Joint usually flies around NATO's eastern flank and also on the edge of the Black Sea near Russian-controlled Crimea, which Moscow seized from Ukraine in 2014.
Olli Suorsa, an assistant professor in homeland security at the Rabdan Academy in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, previously told Newsweek that the USAF's fleet of RC-135s were "hard pressed of late" because of demands for signals intelligence collection at the U.S.-Mexico border, East Asia, Eastern Europe and the Middle East.
The U.K.'s RAF operates its own Rivet Joint fleet, often sending its reconnaissance aircraft around Kaliningrad and the broader eastern flank of NATO. At the end of last month, the aircraft traveled to and from the Black Sea after circling Kaliningrad.
User @MeNMyRC1, a security analyst, wrote on X, formerly Twitter, next to the map of the RAF RC-135W: "All the way up into the Barents Sea. This area used to get a lot more attention when the Soviet Union had a Navy and Air Force."
NATO continues to conduct regular aerial surveillance of Russia's western border regions, and Russia is likely to continue facing accusations that it is buzzing alliance airspace as part of hybrid measures that add to security concerns for the region known as the "NATO lake."
Related Articles
China Responds to Lindsey Graham Russia ThreatDonald Trump Changes His Tune on NATOList of US Imports From Russia as Trump Threatens Secondary TariffsJohn Bolton Warns Trump's Ukraine Shift Won't Win Him a Nobel Prize
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nebraska Rep. Don Bacon offered kudos to the first lady for opening the Trump's eyes to Putin's false promises.
Nebraska Rep. Don Bacon offered kudos to the first lady for opening the Trump's eyes to Putin's false promises.

Yahoo

time2 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Nebraska Rep. Don Bacon offered kudos to the first lady for opening the Trump's eyes to Putin's false promises.

A Republican congressman has praised First Lady Melania Trump for making her husband realize he'd been played by Russian President Vladimir Putin. Nebraska Rep. Don Bacon said he was 'glad' to see President Donald Trump shift course on pressuring Russia over its war in Ukraine in an interview on NewsNation's The Hill Sunday with Chris Stirewalt, saying, 'I think we owe Melania some thanks here.' Bacon, a longtime critic of Trump's approach to Putin, continued, 'Even the president said that his wife reminds him every day that Russia is bombing Ukrainian cities every night.'

Request to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts likely to disappoint, ex-prosecutors say
Request to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts likely to disappoint, ex-prosecutors say

Boston Globe

time4 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Request to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts likely to disappoint, ex-prosecutors say

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche made the request Friday, asking judges to unseal transcripts from grand jury proceedings that resulted in indictments against Epstein and Maxwell, saying 'transparency to the American public is of the utmost importance to this Administration.' Advertisement The request came as the administration sought to contain the firestorm that followed its announcement that it would not be releasing additional files from the Epstein probe despite previously promising that it would. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Epstein is dead while Maxwell serves a 20-year prison sentence Epstein killed himself at age 66 in his federal jail cell in August 2019, a month after his arrest on sex trafficking charges, while Maxwell, 63, is serving a 20-year prison sentence imposed after her December 2021 sex trafficking conviction for luring girls to be sexually abused by Epstein. Krissoff and Joshua Naftalis, a Manhattan federal prosecutor for 11 years before entering private practice in 2023, said grand jury presentations are purposely brief. Naftalis said Southern District prosecutors present just enough to a grand jury to get an indictment but 'it's not going to be everything the FBI and investigators have figured out about Maxwell and Epstein.' Advertisement 'People want the entire file from however long. That's just not what this is,' he said, estimating that the transcripts, at most, probably amount to a few hundred pages. 'It's not going to be much,' Krissoff said, estimating the length at as little as 60 pages 'because the Southern District of New York's practice is to put as little information as possible into the grand jury.' 'They basically spoon feed the indictment to the grand jury. That's what we're going to see,' she said. 'I just think it's not going to be that interesting. ... I don't think it's going to be anything new.' Ex-prosecutors say grand jury transcript unlikely to be long Both ex-prosecutors said that grand jury witnesses in Manhattan are usually federal agents summarizing their witness interviews. That practice might conflict with the public perception of some state and federal grand jury proceedings, where witnesses likely to testify at a trial are brought before grand juries during lengthy proceedings prior to indictments or when grand juries are used as an investigatory tool. In Manhattan, federal prosecutors 'are trying to get a particular result so they present the case very narrowly and inform the grand jury what they want them to do,' Krissoff said. Krissoff predicted that judges who presided over the Epstein and Maxwell cases will reject the government's request. With Maxwell, a petition is before the U.S. Supreme Court so appeals have not been exhausted. With Epstein, the charges are related to the Maxwell case and the anonymity of scores of victims who have not gone public is at stake, although Blanche requested that victim identities be protected. Advertisement 'This is not a 50-, 60-, 80-year-old case,' Krissoff noted. 'There's still someone in custody.' Appeals court's 1997 ruling might matter She said citing 'public intrigue, interest and excitement' about a case was likely not enough to convince a judge to release the transcripts despite a 1997 ruling by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that said judges have wide discretion and that public interest alone can justify releasing grand jury information. Krissoff called it 'mind-blowingly strange' that Washington Justice Department officials are increasingly directly filing requests and arguments in the Southern District of New York, where the prosecutor's office has long been labeled the 'Sovereign District of New York' for its independence from outside influence. 'To have the attorney general and deputy attorney general meddling in an SDNY case is unheard of,' she said. Cheryl Bader, a former federal prosecutor and Fordham Law School criminal law professor, said judges who presided over the Epstein and Maxwell cases may take weeks or months to rule. 'Especially here where the case involved witnesses or victims of sexual abuse, many of which are underage, the judge is going to be very cautious about what the judge releases,' she said. Tradition of grand jury secrecy might block release of transcripts Bader said she didn't see the government's quest aimed at satisfying the public's desire to explore conspiracy theories 'trumping — pardon the pun — the well-established notions of protecting the secrecy of the grand jury process.' 'I'm sure that all the line prosecutors who really sort of appreciate the secrecy and special relationship they have with the grand jury are not happy that DOJ is asking the court to release these transcripts,' she added. Mitchell Epner, a former federal prosecutor now in private practice, called Trump's comments and influence in the Epstein matter 'unprecedented' and 'extraordinarily unusual' because he is a sitting president. Advertisement He said it was not surprising that some former prosecutors are alarmed that the request to unseal the grand jury materials came two days after the firing of Manhattan Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey, who worked on the Epstein and Maxwell cases. 'If federal prosecutors have to worry about the professional consequences of refusing to go along with the political or personal agenda of powerful people, then we are in a very different place than I've understood the federal Department of Justice to be in over the last 30 years of my career,' he said. Krissoff said the uncertain environment that has current prosecutors feeling unsettled is shared by government employees she speaks with at other agencies as part of her work in private practice. 'The thing I hear most often is this is a strange time. Things aren't working the way we're used to them working,' she said. Associated Press Writers Eric Tucker and Alanna Durkin Richer contributed to this report

Request to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts likely to reveal little, ex-prosecutors say
Request to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts likely to reveal little, ex-prosecutors say

Los Angeles Times

time4 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Request to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts likely to reveal little, ex-prosecutors say

NEW YORK — A Justice Department request to unseal grand jury transcripts in the prosecution of chronic sexual abuser Jeffrey Epstein and his former girlfriend is unlikely to produce much, if anything, to satisfy the public's appetite for new revelations about the financier's crimes, former federal prosecutors say. Attorney Sarah Krissoff, an assistant U.S. attorney in Manhattan from from 2008 to 2021, called the request in the prosecutions of Epstein and imprisoned British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell 'a distraction.' President Trump 'is trying to present himself as if he's doing something here and it really is nothing,' Krissoff told the Associated Press in a weekend interview. Deputy Atty. Gen. Todd Blanche made the request Friday, asking judges to unseal transcripts from grand jury proceedings that resulted in indictments against Epstein and Maxwell, saying in a statement that 'transparency to the American public is of the utmost importance to this Administration.' The request came as the administration sought to contain the public outcry that followed its announcement that it would not be releasing additional files from the Epstein inquiry despite previously promising it would. Epstein killed himself at age 66 in his federal jail cell in August 2019, a month after his arrest on sex trafficking charges, while Maxwell, 63, is serving a 20-year prison sentence imposed after her December 2021 sex trafficking conviction for luring girls to be sexually abused by Epstein. Krissoff and Joshua Naftalis, a Manhattan federal prosecutor for 11 years before entering private practice in 2023, said grand jury presentations are purposely brief. Naftalis said Southern District prosecutors present just enough to a grand jury to get an indictment, but 'it's not going to be everything the FBI and investigators have figured out about Maxwell and Epstein.' 'People want the entire file from however long. That's just not what this is,' he said, estimating that the transcripts, at most, probably amount to a few hundred pages. 'It's not going to be much,' Krissoff said, estimating the length at as little as 60 pages 'because the Southern District of New York's practice is to put as little information as possible into the grand jury.' 'They basically spoon-feed the indictment to the grand jury. That's what we're going to see,' she said. 'I just think it's not going to be that interesting. ... I don't think it's going to be anything new.' Both former prosecutors said that grand jury witnesses in Manhattan are usually federal agents summarizing their witness interviews. That practice might conflict with the public perception of some state and federal grand jury proceedings, where witnesses likely to testify at a trial are brought before grand juries during lengthy proceedings prior to indictments or when grand juries are used as an investigatory tool. In Manhattan, federal prosecutors 'are trying to get a particular result so they present the case very narrowly and inform the grand jury what they want them to do,' Krissoff said. Krissoff predicted that judges who presided over the Epstein and Maxwell cases would reject the government's request. With Maxwell, a petition is before the U.S. Supreme Court, so appeals have not been exhausted. With Epstein, the charges are related to the Maxwell case and the anonymity of scores of victims who have not gone public is at stake, although Blanche requested that victim identities be protected. 'This is not a 50-, 60-, 80-year-old case,' Krissoff noted. 'There's still someone in custody.' She said that citing 'public intrigue, interest and excitement' about a case was probably not enough to convince a judge to release the transcripts despite a 1997 ruling by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that said judges have wide discretion and that public interest alone can justify releasing grand jury information. Krissoff called it 'mind-blowingly strange' that Justice Department officials in Washington are increasingly directly filing requests and arguments in the Southern District of New York, where the prosecutor's office has long been labeled the 'Sovereign District of New York' for its independence from outside influence. 'To have the attorney general and deputy attorney general meddling in an SDNY case is unheard of,' she said. Cheryl Bader, a former federal prosecutor and Fordham Law School criminal law professor, said judges who presided over the Epstein and Maxwell cases may take weeks or months to rule. 'Especially here where the case involved witnesses or victims of sexual abuse, many of which are underage, the judge is going to be very cautious about what the judge releases,' she said. Bader said she didn't see the government's quest aimed at satisfying the public's desire to explore conspiracy theories 'trumping — pardon the pun — the well-established notions of protecting the secrecy of the grand jury process.' 'I'm sure that all the line prosecutors who really sort of appreciate the secrecy and special relationship they have with the grand jury are not happy that DOJ is asking the court to release these transcripts,' she added. Mitchell Epner, a former federal prosecutor now in private practice, called Trump's comments and influence in the Epstein matter 'unprecedented' and 'extraordinarily unusual' because he is a sitting president. He said it was not surprising that some former prosecutors are alarmed that the request to unseal the grand jury materials came two days after the firing of Manhattan Assistant U.S. Atty. Maurene Comey, who worked on the Epstein and Maxwell cases. 'If federal prosecutors have to worry about the professional consequences of refusing to go along with the political or personal agenda of powerful people, then we are in a very different place than I've understood the federal Department of Justice to be in over the last 30 years of my career,' he said. Krissoff said the uncertain environment that has current prosecutors feeling unsettled is shared by government employees she speaks with at other agencies as part of her work in private practice. 'The thing I hear most often is this is a strange time. Things aren't working the way we're used to them working,' she said. Neumeister writes for the Associated Press. AP writers Eric Tucker and Alanna Durkin Richer contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store