
Shahed: The $50,000 Iranian drone that Russia is using to launch nightly attacks on Ukraine
On a single night in June, Russia launched 479 long-range drones—most of them Shaheds—toward Ukrainian cities. Since mid-February 2025, when US President Donald Trump publicly pushed for a ceasefire in Ukraine, Russia has averaged over 1,000 drone launches per week, a staggering fivefold increase from the year before, according to analysis by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS.) 'There has not been a single, uninterrupted three-day period without Shahed launches this year,' Yasir Atalan, a CSIS data fellow, told The New York Times. 'Civilians have faced or heard Shaheds almost every night.'
The relentless strikes rely on a drone that costs as little as $50,000 to make—about as a BMW M Sport costs in India. The cost to shoot one down? Often more than a million dollars. As James Black of the RAND Corporation put it, 'the advent of cheap commercial drones has sharply tilted the cost asymmetry towards offense.' Shaheds now define a new form of attritional warfare: one where attackers don't just aim to destroy—they aim to exhaust.
Originally manufactured in Iran and shipped disassembled to Russia in early 2023, Shaheds are now produced locally in Russian factories. The weapon's design has been tweaked: some units include cameras, others feature improved anti-jamming systems and AI-assisted navigation. Investigations by the Associated Press revealed a Russian initiative, dubbed Operation False Target, to create decoy drones that overwhelm Ukrainian radar systems.
The drone itself is crude in appearance but deadly in effect. It looks like a giant black lawn dart, about 11 feet long, with a four-cylinder engine and wooden propeller. The nose holds a warhead, the tail spins the propeller, and the fuselage—sometimes reinforced with honeycombed cardboard between plastic layers—houses off-the-shelf electronics: modems, circuit boards, servo motors, antennas. Many of these components are foreign-made, and easily sourced.
Despite their simplicity, Shaheds can fly more than 1,000 miles, often under radar. They're slow and loud, but effective. Britain's Ministry of Defence recently noted that their predictable flight paths make them 'easy to target using conventional air defenses'—yet there simply aren't enough interceptors to keep up. Israel's Iron Dome, Ukraine's NASAMS, and other Western air defences are designed to stop sophisticated missiles. But when Shaheds come in waves of hundreds, defence systems get saturated and very expensive to reload.
For Russia, the math is simple. A Shahed costs a fraction of a ballistic missile or cruise missile. An Iskander-M runs upwards of $2 million, and a Kh-101 far more. These more advanced weapons often require jets, ships, or bombers to launch—systems that take years to build and millions more to maintain. Shaheds, by contrast, can be fired from racks welded by someone with basic metalworking skills. And unlike missiles, they don't require elite crews to operate.
Ukraine has tried to adapt. Air defences now prioritise more expensive threats. But many Shaheds are not aimed at military targets. They strike power stations, water plants, and residential neighbourhoods. Human Rights Watch and Ukrainian officials say the strikes often violate international laws of war. 'Night after night, Shaheds slam into buildings of no discernible military value,' one official said.
Iran, meanwhile, has made drones a pillar of its military and diplomatic strategy. Iranian-made drones, or local variants, have been used not only in Ukraine, but by Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen, and Shiite militias in Iraq and Syria. In June 2025, Iran launched hundreds of drones and missiles toward Israel, some of them intercepted, others not. In January 2024, a Shahed drone launched by an Iran-backed militia killed three US service members in Jordan.
Though most Shaheds are not autonomous, experts warn that AI integration is rapidly advancing. 'We are now approaching a world where weapons select and engage targets on their own,' said one US defence analyst. The Pentagon defines lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWS) as systems that, once activated, can 'select and engage targets without further intervention by a human operator.' Russia and Iran are believed to be exploring similar technologies.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has warned that the proliferation of Shahed manufacturing is a global threat. Ukrainian intelligence believes Russia is sharing production techniques with North Korea. 'This must be addressed now,' Zelensky said. 'Not when thousands of upgraded Shahed drones and ballistic missiles begin to threaten Seoul and Tokyo.'
With monthly launches now exceeding 4,000, the Kremlin could build up a stockpile of tens of thousands of drones a year, each capable of flying from Russia to the capitals of NATO countries. This shift from large, expensive platforms to swarms of inexpensive, disposable weapons, has reshaped modern warfare.
The future isn't armoured tanks or fighter jets. It's low-tech, black-winged, and buzzing overhead at 3 a.m.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
21 minutes ago
- First Post
Iran replaces air defences damaged during June conflict with Israel
During the conflict in June, Israel's air force dominated Iran's airspace and dealt a heavy blow to the country's air defences while Iranian armed forces launched successive barrages of missiles and drones on Israeli territory. read more Iran has replaced air defence systems damaged during last month's conflict with Israel, the country's Defah Press news agency reported on Sunday, citing senior military official Mahmoud Mousavi. Mousavi, the deputy for operations in Iran's regular army, confirmed that parts of the air defence network were hit during the June clashes, when Israeli air forces gained control of Iranian airspace and inflicted significant damage. 'Some of our air defences were damaged, this is not something we can hide,' Mousavi said. 'But our colleagues have used domestic resources and replaced them with pre-arranged systems that were stored in suitable locations in order to keep the airspace secure.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Before the conflict, Iran operated its own Bavar-373 long-range air defence system along with Russian-made S-300 batteries. The report made no mention of any new imports of foreign air defence systems since the recent hostilities. Following limited Israeli strikes on Iranian missile production sites last October, Iran had showcased Russian air defence systems in a military drill to demonstrate its recovery.


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Israel Prepares Assault on Last Gaza Town as Truce Talks Stall
Israel said Sunday it's moving for the first time into a town in the heart of the Gaza Strip that it had avoided for fear of harming hostages, as it accused Hamas of stalling at US-brokered ceasefire talks. The Israeli military told Palestinians in parts of Deir al-Balah to immediately evacuate southward to a tent city for civilians displaced by the 21-month-old war. The previous truce expired in early May, plunging the conflict into a deeper crisis. Israel shuttered traditional aid distribution channels in favor of a US-backed alternative, known as the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation , which it argued would help sideline Hamas. The UN has called it discriminatory and insufficient to stave off famine for many of the enclave's residents. In parallel, the army launched a set of operations with the declared aim of taking Palestinian territory — an effort to pressure Hamas into releasing the remaining hostages from its Oct. 7, 2023, attack that sparked the war. But while Israel now controls some 75% of Gaza, the Iran-backed Islamist group has stuck to its demand that any ceasefire and hostage release be tied to a full withdrawal of Israeli forces. That's been rejected by Israel. Deir al-Balah is one of a few pockets in the Gaza Strip where Israel's forces haven't maneuvered and entire buildings remain standing. That's because Israeli intelligence assessments were that hostages were held there. It's unclear if that remains the case as the new operation starts. The Hamas attack in 2023 killed 1,200 people in Israel, with another 250 abducted and taken to Gaza. Some 50 hostages remain, of whom 20 are thought to be alive. Hamas hasn't commented on the locations of hostages, whom it's threatened to execute if enemy troops approach. The Hostages and Missing Families Forum, the largest advocacy group pushing for a negotiated hostage release, voiced concern at the Deir al-Balah plan. 'For the hostages, this is not a negotiating 'bargaining chip,' but a clear and present danger to their fates. Enough! A sweeping majority of the nation of Israel wants the war ended in a comprehensive deal that returns all of the hostages,' the forum said in a statement. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on July 6 sent negotiators back to Qatar, a Hamas intermediary, ahead of a White House visit during which he and US President Donald Trump voiced hope for a diplomatic breakthrough that would enable the return of 10 living and 18 deceased hostages. Gila Gamliel, a minister in Netanyahu's security cabinet, accused Hamas of stonewalling and anticipated that Steve Witkoff, Trump's special envoy, would fly in to join the talks. 'The moment he runs things in Doha, we will see what the ramifications are,' Gamliel told Israel's Army Radio, referring to Witkoff. 'Our negotiating team is still there, in hope of coming back with good news.' Hamas, which is on terrorism blacklists in much of the West, has warned that the latest deadlock endangers the hostages. 'We have sustained their survival as much as possible, until now,' Abu Obeida, Hamas armed wing spokesperson, said on Friday. 'If the criminal enemy obstructs or withdraws from this round, we cannot guarantee a return to partial deals or to the proposal for the release of 10 captives,' he said. Israel says it wants to free as many hostages as possible but also wants to destroy Hamas as a military and governing institution. That would entail disarming Hamas and exiling its leaders, Israel says. Hamas has rejected those conditions. The war has killed 58,000 Palestinians, according to the Hamas-affiliated health ministry in Gaza, which doesn't distinguish between civilian and combatant casualties. Israel has lost more than 400 troops in Gaza combat. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.


Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Who dares to defy Trump? Why the world is haunted by this White House
Donald Trump is the 14th US president of my lifetime, and he claims a unique distinction. Through all the previous White House incumbencies, months went by when even educated, informed British, German, Indian, Brazilian, French or Australian people did not give a moment's thought to America's we noticed when a president visited our country or started a war or got impeached or had an incredibly beautiful wife who dressed wonderfully. We knew that the US was the richest and most influential nation on earth, and that on the big things we needed to play follow-my-leader. But even somebody like me, who lived in the US for a couple of years, and visited regularly until January 2025, did not lie awake nights wondering what our neighborhood superpower might do that has changed. We used to mock nervous nellies who went through life terrified that a plane might crash onto their house. Now, however, we know exactly how the plane-crash neurotics feel. We are mesmerized, haunted, by everything Trump says and does, because nobody can predict his next mood swing. This delights the man himself. All he wants from life is unimaginable wealth and the rest of us bowing to his every whim. He is the Sun King, the epicenter of global attention, because he has shown the willingness as well as the power to make rain or shine in accordance with should be allowed to pretend that this is normal. It is absolutely abnormal. It represents political climate change in some ways more bewildering than living on a planet that is getting hotter, because on some days our country — whichever that may be — finds itself microwaved by the White House, while on others it is suddenly exposed to permafrost. The latest example is Trump's announcement that the US will send new air-defense systems to Ukraine, purchased by NATO members, together with long-range missiles. This is unequivocally a good thing. Ukrainian city-dwellers have been enduring a nightly battering from Russian missiles and drones against which they have become almost defenseless, as the flow of US weapons has slowed. The big question is how serious is the president's change of heart after months of rubbishing Ukraine and its leader — and how long it will last. He himself says he is 'disappointed' by Vladimir Putin, but 'not done with him.' Since the inauguration, Russian oligarchs have been freer to do business in the US, and Washington agencies charged with monitoring their activities have been shut has renewed support for Ukraine mostly because he feels personally snubbed by Putin. If that changes, so once again could American policy. Then there is the global economy. Some of the smartest economists say they are unsure whether US business can survive the roller-coaster ride launched by Trump, most conspicuously through tariffs, or whether the economy will tank. Willful uncertainty about the future of Jerome Powell and the Federal Reserve, with attacks renewed this week by Trump, further rocks confidence. The respected Martin Wolf of the Financial Times is among those who characterize the Trump tariffs as 'crazy,' an adjective he reprised this week. Mohamed El-Erian, formerly a Wall Street investment whiz and now a distinguished academic, is among those who admits that he has no idea how the Trump story will play out. We should never underestimate America's resilience and stupendous capacity for innovation. But he writes in the current Foreign Affairs that the only rational course for other nations is to build robust financial defenses and reduce their dependence on the US, while forging new relationships, because there is no early prospect, and perhaps no prospect even after Trump, that the US will resume its historic role as a reliable partner. El-Erian warns both nations and corporations against what behavioral scientists call 'active inertia' — 'when actors recognize that they need to behave differently but end up sticking to familiar patterns and approaches regardless.' The question almost every government in the world is asking itself is whether it dares to defy Trump. Two weeks ago, he warned Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva that he would impose 50% tariffs on the country's exports to the US unless criminal proceedings are dropped against former President Jair Bolsonaro, for his 2022 attempt to stage a coup, to retain power after losing the last election. There is no pretense that this threat is linked to trade balances. It is merely a component in what we can call Trump's dictator protection program. He was a warm supporter of Bolsonaro, widely considered an appalling as well as corrupt national leader. Bolsonaro's son Eduardo has close personal relations with the Trump clan. Lula responded with outrage to Trump's threat, saying 'no one is above the law.' His country's exports to the US amount to only 2% of its gross domestic product, but a 50% tariff will undoubtedly cause disruption. The European Union faces even more serious dilemmas in determining its response to lobbying by Trump, backed by tariff threats, on behalf of US Big Tech. There is an issue here that goes beyond mere commerce. The tech giants profit mightily from running almost open-house content policies, which some of us consider deeply corrupting, especially of the young. Brussels has been striving to regulate social media, and to punish companies that spread anti-social material. But Trump is batting for the tech giants to enjoy free rein — 'free speech' as he and his acolytes call it — and to be spared from EU retribution. So great is Europe's fear of a wider trade war, that its regulators may yet bow to Washington. It is highly debatable whether the EU will risk deploying its Anti-Coercion Instrument against America, even though tariff blackmail offers an obvious justification for it. Then there is Iran. Will the US attempt to parley with the mullahs about their nuclear program, or revert to bombing? My friends, including one very well-informed Israeli, say that Benjamin Netanyahu suckered Trump into joining his war; that the Iranians, though unquestionably a malign force, were not about to produce a nuclear weapon; and that force alone cannot resolve the problems and threats posed by Iranian regional aggression. But whether Trump will fall out of love with Netanyahu as he now professes to have fallen out of love with Putin, we cannot tell. The president himself does not know what he might do, or not do, next Tuesday. It is the not knowing that scares the world so much — and which makes us talk about Donald Trump almost every day.