‘Pride Act' aims to protect Ohio parents with LGBTQ+ children
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — An Ohio lawmaker said her new parental rights bill coinciding with Pride Month is designed to combat the 'hostile environment' fostered by anti-LGBTQ+ legislation.
House Bill 327, the 'Parents Rights for Inclusion, Diversity and Equity' Act (PRIDE Act), would protect Ohio parents' access to evidence-based medical and behavioral health care, hygiene care like menstrual care products, and educational opportunities for their children 'that are reflective of and inclusive of all students.'
Out in Ohio: Stonewall Columbus gets ready for Pride 2025
'Most of all, parents have the right to raise their children in an inclusive, respectful, and accepting environment which honors their children's rights to freedoms of speech and expression,' the bill states.
Rep. Karen Brownlee (D-Symmes Township), H.B. 327's primary sponsor, argues the act is needed given the anti-LGBTQ+ bills passed by the Statehouse that she said 'take away the rights of parents who raise LGBTQ kids.'
Brownlee pointed to the 'Parents' Bill of Rights,' legislation requiring schools to notify parents of changes in a student's mental, emotional or physical health. Opponents argue the measure will result in the 'outing' of LGBTQ+ students, and cite a crisis hotline that said it received an increase in calls from Ohio youth within hours after the bill was signed into law in January.
'Parents rights have been a particular focus for the super majority over the past few years and, coupled with their targeting of LGBTQ youth, it's created a hostile environment for many of our young people and the adults who take care of them,' Brownlee said during a June 3 news conference.
Republicans have long said the 'Parents' Bill of Rights' ensures parents are making decisions for their children, not the government. Gov. Mike DeWine told reporters in January that the bill provides a path for parents to be informed about what's going on in their child's life.
Marysville, Westerville LGBTQ+ groups rally Pride funds as businesses pull support
'[Parents are] the first teachers, they're the best teachers, and that's very, very important,' DeWine said, noting that he does not see the bill as harming LGBTQ+ students.
Brownlee listed several other Ohio anti-LGBTQ+ measures, like requiring academic institutions to set separate bathrooms based on students' 'biological sex.' Columbus City Schools said this law is why the district reverted students' names to those reflected on birth certificates and rescinded its trans and gender variant student policy in February.
The mother of two children who identify within the LGBTQ+ community, Brownlee said LGBTQ+ youth are owed 'the same rights, freedoms and access as any other young person' and that she and her husband deserve the 'same rights as other parents to raise their children in a safe and supportive Ohio.'
'When our kids came out to us, we were scared, out of fear for our kids wellness, safety and future here in the state of Ohio,' said Brownlee. 'The continued bullying of our youth is a losing fight. Let's stop fighting with our kids. Let's stop creating manufactured cultural wars that hurt them. Instead, let's listen to them.'
List: 2025 Pride Month events, festivals in central Ohio
Brownlee announced the act during a news conference marking Pride Month with other Statehouse Democrats and LGBTQ+ advocates. Sen. Nickie Antonio (D-Lakewood), Ohio's first openly gay Statehouse lawmaker, touted her new bill to mark 'Love Makes a Family Week,' after Republican legislators introduced plans to designate a month celebrating 'natural families.'
Antonio also recently reintroduced proposals to ban anti-LGBTQ+ conversion therapy and discrimination against the LGBTQ+ community.
Reps. Anita Somani (D-Dublin) and Eric Synenberg (D-Beachwood) announced the reintroduction of the 'Marriage Equality Act,' a House Joint Resolution to codify same-sex and interracial marriage. If passed by the Statehouse, the act would place a constitutional amendment on the November 2026 ballot, providing Ohioans the chance to enshrine marriage equality into Ohio's constitution.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Community organizer, Mizzou librarian to run for Columbia City Council
The field of candidates for the Aug. 5 special election for the Ward 2 seat on the Columbia City Council is widening with the addition of Vera Elwood. Elwood, who was at the empty chair town hall on May 20, said she was running and put out an official announcement Thursday, May 22. "I am running for City Council because I love Columbia. I met my husband here. I started a family here. I found my community here. I believe that my experience in public service, knowledge of Columbia, and dedication to community involvement can help make Columbia a truly safe place for everyone," she said in the announcement. As of now, Elwood will face off against Ken Rice, who has the support of former Ward 2 council member Lisa Meyer, who resigned from the council due to health reasons. Elwood is the current chair of the city's Disabilities Commission and is a member of the city's Commission on Cultural Affairs. Her campaign tenants include "improving infrastructure, creating a safer and more welcoming city and ensuring every voice in the community is heard and uplifted," the announcement noted. She is the third generation of her family to have attended the University of Missouri and returned to the city in 2019 to raise her family. She is an foster and adoptive mother, and said she also brings lived experiences as a queer and disabled woman. "These perspectives have shaped her work leading accessibility, inclusion, and diversity trainings at libraries and organizations across the country," announcement noted. More: Ken Rice makes bid for Columbia City Council after school board loss Along with her roles on the city commissions, she also is Youth Program Coordinator at The Center Project, mid-Missouri's LGBTQ resource center, and is a union organizer with Laborers International Union of North America Local 955 and its Mizzou Workers United campaign. Elwood is a University of Missouri librarian and was able to join LiUNA 955 through that role. "My time in public service has included everything from libraries to community centers to unions to city commissions, but one thing has always remained true. The city can buy as much asphalt as it wants, but if we do not have trained and supported workers to lay it, the potholes aren't getting fixed. Our people should always be our first priority," Elwood said. She also regularly volunteers with True/False Film Fest, Unbound Book Festival, Mid-Missouri PrideFest, and the Central Missouri Humane Society. This article originally appeared on Columbia Daily Tribune: Vera Elwood runs for Columbia Ward 2 council seat in special election
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Senator sues over his own raise, arguing it violates SC constitution
Sen. Wes Climer, R-Rock Hill, in Senate chambers on opening day of the 2024 session, Tuesday, Jan. 9, 2024, at the Statehouse in Columbia. Climer is a plaintiff in a lawsuit claiming a pay raise for legislators is unconstitutional. (Mary Ann Chastain/Special to the SC Daily Gazette) COLUMBIA — A state senator is asking the state's highest court to halt a $2,500-monthly raise that legislators voted for themselves. Sen. Wes Climer, a Rock Hill Republican, filed the request Monday. He and his attorney, former Sen. Dick Harpootlian, a Columbia Democrat, contend the $18,000 annual raise approved as part of the state budget violates the state constitution. Climer and fellow plaintiff Carol Herring, who is identified in the lawsuit as a taxpayer, are asking the state's highest court to stop the payments before the July 1 start of the fiscal year. The state Supreme Court agreed Monday with their request to take the case directly, allowing a quick resolution. 'For a General Assembly to vote to give its own members public money is akin to a judge presiding over his own trial, or to a police officer investigating his own alleged conduct,' the legal filing reads. The central question could become whether the state constitution's ban on legislators increasing their own per diems actually applies to the raises. SC legislators pass $14.7B spending plan despite concerns over legislators' pay raise Generally, a per diem is considered a daily allowance. Legislators do receive a specifically designated $230 subsistence payment for each day of session. That's meant to cover the cost of food and lodging while they're in Columbia, though they don't have to spend it on that. Each legislator gets the same amount, no matter where they live. That's in addition to legislators' annual salary of $10,400, which hasn't changed since 1990. The state's chief accountant says the in-district compensation, which is set to increase from $1,000 to $2,500 per month, is not a per diem. Rather, it's considered personal income and taxed accordingly, unlike the designated per diem, said Kim McLeod, spokeswoman for the Comptroller General's Office. In their lawsuit, Climer and Harpootlian argue the combined $22,400 legislators receive currently for their annual salary and in-district compensation counts as a per diem. The money pays legislators for their services on a daily basis while in session, making it a daily funding allotment, the lawsuit argues. The 1868 version of the state constitution was the first to use the term 'per diem' in addressing legislators' pay. According to the lawsuit, the term was meant to differentiate between legislators' salary, then $6 a day, and mileage reimbursements. Similar language carried over to the 1890 constitution that still governs the state. Along with prohibiting legislators from increasing their own per diems, the state constitution also requires they receive an allowance for mileage in order to travel to the Statehouse and that they get the same amount of pay for meeting outside of normal session as they do during it. Columbia attorney and government transparency advocate John Crangle had initially offered to join the lawsuit but changed his mind after learning the comptroller general didn't consider the money to be a per diem, he said. Crangle still disagreed with the raise conceptually, he said. But in his understanding, considering the raise to be personal income would mean the state constitution doesn't cover it, he said. 'I don't think you can use that as the basis,' he said of the argument that the money counts as a per diem. The in-district compensation is meant to pay for legislative expenses outside the Statehouse, though they can spend it however they want. The money comes in a lump sum, not a reimbursement, so legislators don't have to report how they spend it. If the raise were a reimbursement, that might change things, the lawsuit argued. As is, the money is clearly meant to compensate legislators for their day-to-day work at the Statehouse, the lawsuit argues. 'Most importantly, there are no restrictions on how members may use this money — they may use it entirely for any personal purposes,' the lawsuit reads. 'Periodic payments of money, reported and taxed as personal income, with no restrictions on use for personal purposes, to which the recipient is entitled because of services provided to the entity paying the money, are compensation.' Climer and Herring also criticized legislators for putting a pay raise in place without going through the public hearing process typical of a piece of legislation. 'For shame,' the lawsuit reads. 'The people of South Carolina cannot look over the shoulder of every member of the General Assembly every minute of every day.' Legislators don't have to take the raise. Some, including GOP Reps. Kathy Landing of Mount Pleasant and Sarita Edgerton of Spartanburg, have publicly said they plan to refuse the raise. Others, such as GOP Reps. Brandon Guffey of Rock Hill and James Teeple of Johns Island, said they planned to donate the money to charities. Asking the state Supreme Court to let the lawsuit skip the lower courts, Climer and Harpootlian noted the normal appeals process could take years — longer than the budget is in effect. And the case would eventually reach the justices anyway. Technically, the raise is only for the 2025-26 budget, which is a one-year law. But it would stay in effect indefinitely. That's because spending directives in the budget, called provisos, generally roll over from one budget year to the next, unless legislators take action to remove them. The justices need to rule before the raises take effect, the lawsuit reads, because it could be impossible to force legislators to pay the money back if the payments are later found unconstitutional. 'It is unclear whether those payments could be clawed back months or years after legislators spent the money on their personal affairs,' it reads. This is a developing story. Check back for details.
Hamilton Spectator
2 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Cold Lake raises Pride flag, affirms commitment to inclusivity
celebration of diversity and inclusion. City of Cold Lake Coun. Bob Mattice led the proclamation and flag raising ceremony, stating, 'By raising the flag today, we acknowledge the representation of LGBTQ. It's very important to us that we recognize the achievements and the resilience of the 2SLGBTQ+ community over the years.' Mattice spoke of the City's support for diversity and equality. 'Your struggles do not go unnoticed. We see you. I'd like to take a moment to highlight the safespace that Cold Lake and District FCSS has created - where everyone is welcome.' He praised the FCSS team for their efforts in inclusion, saying, 'The staff there are very kind, understanding, and they do an incredible job at representing the diverseness of our community.' The flag will remain outside City Hall throughout June. 'It is reaffirming the City's commitment to fostering a community who embraces and honours individuals to be their authentic selves and ensuring everyone is welcomed, respected, and accepted,' Mattice said. Guest speaker Janine Heebert shared her personal journey of coming out at 41 years old. 'Telling my then-husband that I was gay was one of the easiest and hardest things I have ever said aloud to be a person,' she said, acknowledging the fear and uncertainty she faced. 'However, I loved myself enough to know I deserve to be a whole me and not just part of a person living a half-life.' Heebert also reflected on her growth and newfound happiness. 'Today I am in a committed relationship with my best friend . . . I am happy. I am currently working through my community social work program here in Cold Lake at Portage College . . . And my goal is to be an advocate for those who are LGBTQ. Thank you for listening to me today. I love you all. You are enough.' Another flag raiser, Shaunna Okemow, a two-spirit Cree woman with Polish ancestry, delivered a call to action. 'Today is a day of reflection, advocacy, and action. It is more than just a celebration. It is a tribute to those who have come before us,' she said. 'And while we celebrate, we must also recommit because across Alberta and Canada we continue to see homophobia, transphobia, and discrimination persist.' She urged the crowd to do more than show up for Pride events. 'Show up, not just for the parade, but for the purpose, not just to wave a flag but to raise your voice . . . Being an ally isn't passive, it's powerful and our children need it more than ever.' Then in a moment of unity, Mattice officially proclaimed that June is Pride Month in the City of Cold Lake. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
