This Dell Tower PC Desktop Is 4X Cheaper Than a MacBook, Amazon Clears Out Stock at 75% Off
The Dell Vostro Tower PC Desktop (14th Gen Intel Core i3, 32GB DDR5 RAM, 1TB PCIe SSD, Windows 11 Pro + mouse and wireless keyboards), which has an everyday price of $2,299, is yours for a mere $599 which is a huge 75% savings and lowest ever price on this model on Amazon.
See at Amazon
Under the hood, this desktop PC features Intel's 14th generation Core i3-14100 processor which is a newly released quad-core and eight-thread processor with incredible speeds (3.5GHz base and up to 4.7GHz turbo). Dell pairs it with a massive 32GB of DDR5 RAM which is far more than most PCs in this price bracket.
Storage is handled by a 1TB PCIe SSD with lightning-fast system boot times and near-instant app launches. Those are the days when you would wait for slow hard drives to disappear; today, you can store high-res media files and backups without a speck of slowdown or worrying about running out of storage space. Data transfer speeds are quick so transferring large files is quick and easy.
This Dell Vostro PC supports WiFi 6 and Bluetooth for seamless and quick wireless connectivity. There are numerous USB ports, Type-A and Type-C, spread across the front and back of the system so you can attach external drives and other devices with ease. You'll also have HDMI and DisplayPort outputs to power dual monitors with sharp images fueled by Intel UHD 730 integrated graphics.
Windows 11 Pro is pre-installed in the bundle so you get robust security, productivity capabilities, and smooth updates from day one.
If you need a strong home office computer at a discount, today's Dell Vostro Tower PC Desktop deal is not easy to pass up.
See at Amazon
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
a minute ago
- Fox News
What Musk's fracture with Trump means for GOP's future: ‘Beating heart of the Republican Party'
From "super genius" to "CRAZY," President Donald Trump has changed his tune about SpaceX and Tesla CEO Elon Musk in a matter of months, while the tech mogul has backpedaled his support for the Republican Party and called for a new, third American political party instead. Musk unveiled the creation of the so-called "America Party" after Trump signed into law his massive tax and domestic policy bill, which Musk staunchly opposed due to concerns that it would increase the federal deficit. "Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom," Musk said in a July 5 X post. While there is an appetite for a third party in the U.S., Musk's so-called America Party is not likely to pick up steam and the tech mogul would have better luck driving reforms in the Republican Party, according to experts. "Elon's effort will go nowhere," Republican strategist Matt Gorman said in an email to Fox News Digital. "But I don't doubt it'll make a lot of consultants rich in the process." Meanwhile, Gorman said candidates undoubtedly would prefer an endorsement from Trump over financial backing from Musk – the largest donor in the 2024 election cycle who contributed approximately $295 million to Republicans. "If given a choice between a Trump endorsement or $20 million in ads from Elon, it's not even a contest," said Gorman, who previously served as the communications director for the National Republican Congressional Committee. "They'd take the Trump endorsement every single time." Political columnist Kristin Tate said that while Musk was helpful in driving public support from wealthy Silicon Valley Americans for Trump, it's unlikely these same tech leaders would abandon Trump and follow Musk instead. "Trump is the beating heart of the Republican Party right now," Tate said in an email to Fox News Digital. "Elon Musk would be better off trying to shape politics from within the Republican Party," Tate said. "A third party effort is doomed to fail. Most of President Trump's supporters see the effort as hostile to Trump and will not support Musk. Meanwhile, all Democrat voters have been conditioned to despise Musk, so they will not support him either." Tate said Trump and Musk should attempt to repair their relationship because "both men bring something important and unique to the GOP. "By leaving Trump, and the GOP generally, Musk will chisel off a small fraction of Republican Party voters – a fraction that will not be nearly big enough for his new party to win elections, but could be a spoiler for Democrats in elections with extremely tight margins," Tate said. Alex Keyssar, a history professor at Harvard Kennedy School of public policy, said that given dissatisfaction with the two-party system right now, it's possible that more third-party candidates could win state and local elections. But it's unclear if that would translate over to national elections because the rules governing elections and who may appear on ballots pose additional limitations for those candidates, he said. "There's a lot of popular sentiment looking for something else that is creating pressures for a third party," Keyssar told Fox News Digital. "In that sense, Elon Musk is on to something." Still, voters don't appear interested in a third party affiliated with Musk. While 49% of U.S. voters said they would consider joining a third party, 77% said they weren't on board if Musk created it, according to a new Quinnipiac University poll released Wednesday. Musk's relationship with Trump first started to unravel, at least publicly, in May toward the end of Musk's tenure overseeing the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Shortly after Musk's exit from DOGE, the two traded barbs over the "big, beautiful bill," where Musk said Trump wouldn't have won the 2024 election without his backing. Likewise, Trump accused Musk of going "CRAZY" over cuts to the electric vehicle credits that benefit companies like Tesla, and said Musk had been "wearing thin." Meanwhile, Trump isn't counting on Musk's political party taking off anytime soon, and told reporters July 6 that he believed another party "just adds to confusion." "Third parties have never worked, so he can have fun with it – but I think it's ridiculous," Trump said.
New York Times
a minute ago
- New York Times
Trump Administration Live Updates: Hostility in Washington Raises Shutdown Worries
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, left, and Jamieson Greer, the U.S. trade representative, second from right, meeting with Chinese officials in Geneva in May. In recent years, one of China's biggest requests of American officials has been that the United States relax its strict controls on advanced artificial intelligence chips, measures that were put in place to slow Beijing's technological and military gains. Last week, the Trump administration did just that, as it allowed the world's leader in A.I. chips, the U.S.-based Nvidia, to begin selling a lower-level but still coveted chip known as H20 to China. The move was a dramatic reversal from three months ago, when President Trump himself banned China from accessing the H20, while also imposing triple-digit tariffs on Beijing. That set off an economically perilous trade clash, as China retaliated by clamping down on exports of minerals and magnets that are critical to American factories, including automakers and defense manufacturers. China's decision to cut off access to those materials upended the dynamic between the world's largest economies. The Trump administration, which came into office determined to bully China into changing its trade behavior with punishing tariffs, appeared to realize the perils of that approach. Now, the administration has resorted to trying to woo China instead. Officials throughout the government say the Trump administration is putting more aggressive actions on China on hold, while pushing forward with moves that the Chinese will perceive positively. That includes the reversal on the H20 chip. The H20 decision was primarily motivated by top Trump officials who agreed with Nvidia's arguments that selling the chip would be better for American technology leadership than withholding it, people familiar with the move say. But Trump officials have also claimed that it was part of the trade talks. After telling Congress in June that there was 'no quid pro quo in terms of chips for rare earths,' Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, reversed those comments on July 15, saying that the H20 move was 'all part of a mosaic' of talks with China. 'They had things we wanted, we had things they wanted, and we're in a very good place,' he said. Image A chip from Nvidia. The company's chief executive, Jensen Huang, has gone on a lobbying blitz in Washington, pushing politicians to open China for A.I. chip sales. Credit... Mike Kai Chen for The New York Times A Chinese Ministry of Commerce official seemed to reject that on Friday, saying that the United States had 'taken the initiative' to approve the H20 sales. China believes the U.S. should continue to remove its trade and economic restrictions, the official said. A person familiar with the talks, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly, said that the H20 chip was not specifically discussed in meetings between Chinese and American officials in Geneva and London this spring. But the reversal was part of a more recent cadence of warmer actions the United States and China have taken toward each other. For instance, Beijing agreed in recent weeks to block the export of several chemicals used to make fentanyl, an issue Mr. Trump has been concerned about. Recent events have underscored the influence that China has over the U.S. economy. When Mr. Trump raised tariffs on Chinese exports in April, some top Trump officials thought Beijing would quickly fold, given its recent economic weakness. Instead, Beijing called Mr. Trump's bluff by restricting rare earths needed by American makers of cars, military equipment, medical devices and electronics. As the flow of those materials stopped, Mr. Trump and other officials began receiving calls from chief executives saying their factories would soon shut down. Ford, Suzuki and other companies shuttered factories because of the lack of supply. Mr. Trump and his top advisers were surprised by the threat that Beijing's countermove posed, people familiar with the matter say. That brought the United States back to the negotiating table this spring to strike a fragile trade truce, which Trump officials are now wary of upsetting. That agreement dropped tariffs from a minimum 145 percent to 30 percent, with the Chinese agreeing to allow rare earths to flow as freely as before. The administration's caution when it comes to China has been amplified by Mr. Trump's desire for an invitation to Beijing later this year. The president, who has been feted on other foreign trips, wants to engage in face-to-face trade negotiations with Chinese leader Xi Jinping. Howard Lutnick, the commerce secretary, has begun recruiting chief executives for a potential delegation, setting off a competition over who will get to ride in Air Force One, according to people familiar with the plans. Craig Allen, a retired diplomat, said both countries were 'clearly preparing for a summit meeting,' adding, 'that's bringing forth measures that the other side wants and it's also holding back measures that the other side doesn't want.' 'It's like a dance,' Mr. Allen said. 'One side makes a move, the other side makes a move to correspond to that.' The Commerce Department declined to comment. The White House, the Treasury Department and the Office of the United States Trade Representative did not respond to a request for comment. 'The government understands that forcing the world to use foreign competition would only hurt America's economic and national security,' John Rizzo, a spokesman for Nvidia, said. A Chinese bargaining chip Opposition to China has fueled bipartisan action for the last decade. Now, Mr. Trump's more hawkish supporters are quietly watching as the president remakes the party's China strategy. Though few are willing to speak out publicly, officials in the Trump administration and in Congress have privately expressed concern that the trade war has given China an opening to finally bring U.S. technology controls onto the negotiating table. Christopher Padilla, a former export control official in the George W. Bush administration, said the fact that the United States was now negotiating over what were supposed to be security restrictions was 'a significant accomplishment for the Chinese.' 'They've been after this for decades, and now they've succeeded,' he said. 'I assume the Chinese are going to demand more concessions on export controls in return for whatever we want next.' Mr. Trump was the first to harness the power of U.S. export controls, by targeting Chinese tech giant Huawei and putting global restrictions on American technology in his first term. But the Biden administration expanded those rules. Concerned that China's growing A.I. capacity would advance its military, Biden officials cracked down on exports of Nvidia chips, seeing them as the most effective choke point over Chinese A.I. capabilities. Image President Trump and Mr. Huang at the White House in April. Mr. Huang argues that blocking U.S. technology from China has created more urgency for China to develop its own technology. Credit... Pete Marovich for The New York Times Since then, when Chinese officials raised their objections to U.S. technology controls in meetings, U.S. officials had responded by insisting that the measures were national security matters and not up for debate. But in the meeting in Geneva in May, China finally had a powerful counterargument. Beijing insisted that its minerals and magnets, some of which go to fighter jets, drones and weaponry, were a 'dual-use' technology that could be used for the military as well as civilian industries, just like A.I. and chips. It demanded reciprocity: If the United States wanted a steady flow of rare earths, Washington should also be ready to lessen its technology controls. It's not clear exactly what the United States agreed to in Geneva: The agreement has never been made public. But when the United States put out an unrelated export control announcement the day after the Geneva summit concluded, China responded angrily, saying the statement 'undermined the consensus' the countries had reached. In a notice on May 13, the Commerce Department said that using Huawei's A.I. chips 'anywhere in the world' was an export control violation. The notice was directed at other nations considering purchasing Huawei chips, people familiar with the move said, not the Chinese. The announcement appeared to take other parts of the Trump administration by surprise, and within hours, the language in the release was walked back, though no policy changes were made. Mr. Bessent and Jamieson Greer, the trade representative, expressed concerns that such moves could damage trade talks with China, people familiar with the incident said. China once again clamped down on rare earth exports. Trying to find its own leverage, the United States responded by restricting exports of semiconductor design software, airplane parts and ethane. The two sides restored their truce in a meeting in London in June. Since then, trade in those products has restarted. But U.S. companies complain that Chinese licenses for rare earth magnets are limited to six months, and that the Chinese government is requesting proprietary information to obtain those shipments. Beijing has also continued to build out its export controls. On June 15, the day after Nvidia said it would be permitted to sell the H20 in China, Chinese officials announced new restrictions on exports of battery technology. The United States has been trying to decrease its dependence on China for rare earths, but there is no quick solution. China has a powerful hold over numerous industries, ranging from pharmaceuticals to solar panels to drones. 'The challenge for the Trump administration is, how do they get out of this quagmire?' said Jimmy Goodrich, a senior adviser for technology analysis to the RAND Corporation. 'It appears some competitive U.S. actions are now at the whims of Beijing, who can now determine the time, place and nature of U.S. tech and trade policy toward China.' Deal makers in the White House The change in the relationship with China has coincided with a separate shift in the administration, in which officials who favor technology controls on China have been sidelined in favor of those who support the tech industry's ambitions to sell abroad. Mr. Lutnick and Marco Rubio, the secretary of state who has long been an ardent China critic, have hewed closely to the position of the president, who is more of a deal maker than a national security hawk. And hawkish members of the National Security Council have been fired in recent months, after being accused of insufficient loyalty. Their absence has paved the way for officials like David Sacks, the White House A.I. czar, who has criticized export controls, to push for tech companies to have freer rein. Nvidia's chief executive, Jensen Huang, has gone on a lobbying blitz in Washington, pushing politicians to open China for A.I. chip sales. Mr. Huang has contended that blocking U.S. technology from China has backfired by creating more urgency for China to develop its own technology. He has argued that the Chinese military won't use Nvidia chips, and pushed back against Washington's consensus that China is an adversary, describing it a 'competitor' but 'not our enemy.' Image The change in the U.S. relationship with China has coincided with a separate shift in the Trump administration, in which officials who favor technology controls on China have been sidelined. Credit... Haiyun Jiang for The New York Times Others have challenged those assertions, pointing to past research that the Chinese military has placed orders for Nvidia chips. Scientific papers published earlier this year also showed Chinese researchers with ties to military universities and a top nuclear weapons lab using Nvidia chips for general research. Mr. Rizzo, the Nvidia spokesman, said in a statement that 'non-military papers describing new and beneficial ways to use U.S. technology promote America.' In a letter on Friday, John Moolenaar, the Republican chairman of the House Select Committee on China, said the H20 chip had aided the rise of the Chinese A.I. model DeepSeek and would help China develop A.I. models to compete with American ones. These arguments do not appear to have persuaded the president. In an Oval Office meeting with Mr. Huang in July, Mr. Trump agreed with Nvidia that keeping American chips out of China would only help Huawei, and decided to reverse the H20 ban. People familiar with Mr. Trump's views say he has always viewed export controls more transactionally. In his first term, Mr. Trump agreed to roll back U.S. restrictions on ZTE at the urging of Mr. Xi. In this term, Mr. Trump and his advisers have begun using America's control over A.I. chips as a source of leverage in negotiations with governments from the Middle East to Asia. With China, Mr. Trump has his own longstanding aspirations. He believes that U.S. businesses have been getting ripped off for decades, and that he can be the one to fix it, particularly if he negotiates directly with Mr. Xi. His advisers have begun strategizing toward a more substantial trade negotiation with China focused on market opening, as well as the potential visit this fall.
Associated Press
a minute ago
- Associated Press
Scandal at Coldplay Concert Exposes a Cracking Culture: The Case for Independent HR Leadership
The HR Innovator Group Is Leading the Shift That's Redefining the Future of HR SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA / ACCESS Newswire / July 20, 2025 / A viral video from the Coldplay concert at Gillette Stadium has ignited national attention, not just for its shock factor, but for what it reveals about organizational integrity. When Astronomer CEO Andy Byron and Chief People Officer Kristin Cabot were broadcast in a compromising moment on the stadium's Jumbotron, the real story wasn't just tabloid fodder. It was a case study in the dangers of blurred lines between HR leadership and executive loyalty. The internal investigation now underway is no anomaly, it's a symptom of a deeper issue in corporate America. What happens when internal HR is too close to the power it's supposed to hold accountable? And what happens when the Board of Directors is just as compromised, too entangled in executive relationships and underqualified to conduct a proper investigation? That's where The HR Innovator Group (HRIG) steps in. As a strategic HR consulting firm pioneering the rise of external, embedded HR leadership, HRIG is at the forefront of a movement reshaping how organizations approach people strategy, culture, and accountability. The firm is leading this shift by proving that when HR operates from the outside in, with independence, clarity, and structural authority, organizations and their employees gain not only trust, but traction. In moments when internal HR teams are fractured, under-resourced, or too close to act, HRIG steps in with a triage-informed model and the full force of an experienced HR team ready to stabilize, support, and lead forward. This isn't just crisis management, it's a new model of HR leadership, purpose-built for modern organizational complexity. 'This story isn't about an affair,' said Stephanie Heathman, Founder and CEO of The HR Innovator Group. 'It's about what happens when power goes unchecked, and the people charged with keeping the check are too close to call it out. When the person responsible for safeguarding people and ethics is embedded in the very power structure that violates them, trust implodes. That's why I believe so deeply in a different model, one where HR is embedded, yes, but not entangled. One where leadership can be advised and supported… but not shielded from consequence.' When HR needs HR, The HR Innovator Group steps in, not just to repair, but to lead. While the firm is equipped to triage and stabilize fractured HR functions in moments of crisis, its true value lies in embedding fast and partnering deeply. HRIG's model is built to bring structure, clarity, and strategy to organizations navigating complexity, confusion, or growth. Whether entering after a cultural rupture or stepping in proactively to support transformation, HRIG becomes an extension of leadership, elevating both people strategy and business results with bold, values-driven guidance. 'We've seen how the fallout from leadership misconduct can paralyze an organization,' added Erin Tisland, Principal HR Consultant at The HR Innovator Group. 'When employees lose trust in HR, they lose trust in the entire system. That's why our work focuses on restoring credibility at every level, through objective leadership accountability, clear cultural alignment, and a deep respect for the human impact.' But HRIG's work goes beyond crisis management. The firm is pioneering a new standard in external HR partnership, one that values independence over proximity, and ethical clarity over internal alignment. This model removes bias, strengthens stakeholder trust, and equips organizations to lead with transparency and integrity. Stephanie's viral LinkedIn thought leadership has helped ignite this movement, resonating with thousands. Her posts expose the quiet truths behind outdated HR norms and call for a new model rooted in strategy, transparency, and shared ownership. This national moment has cast a harsh light on the limitations of in-house HR and passive board governance. As organizations across industries reassess their internal frameworks, firms like HRIG are proving that real accountability doesn't come from inside, it comes from the outside in. About The HR Innovator Group The HR Innovator Group is a culture-first HR consulting firm serving growth-stage companies and mission-driven organizations across the U.S. Through embedded leadership, strategic people alignment, and courageous cultural work, HRIG partners with organizations to build trust, elevate integrity, and redefine what HR can-and should-be in today's workplace. Headquartered in San Diego, CA | Serving clients nationwide Learn more at: Media Contact: Erin Tisland, MSOL, PHR, SHRM-CP Principal Consultant, The HR Innovator Group Contact Information: [email protected] (888) 653-6993 SOURCE: The HR Innovator Group, LLC press release
