KiwiSaver hardship reveals hidden cost of this economic downturn
Inland Revenue figures showed $470.7m was taken out of KiwiSaver in the June financial year, up 56.6% from $300.5m over the prior period.
Looking back through the figures, there has certainly been a big spike in withdrawals in the past two years, but they have been on the rise for several years.
Since Covid, both the number of people withdrawing funds and the amount withdrawn have risen steadily.
As a barometer of the general economic situation, that isn't great.
But the bigger problem with these hardship withdrawals is that the ultimate cost is (quite literally) compounded through the years.
More than $1.3 billion of KiwiSaver funds has been withdrawn for hardship reasons in the past five years.
If we do some back-of-the-envelope calculations and assume this money could have earned around 7% returns for the next 20 years, then we get a figure of more than $5b that will be missing from the nation's pool of retirement funds by 2045.
Given the current trend of withdrawals, I suspect this is a conservative estimate.
I understand why we allow withdrawals for hardship. It doesn't make sense for people to lose their homes or to go hungry when they have thousands of dollars sitting in a KiwiSaver account, so I'm not advocating that we stop allowing the withdrawals.
However, there is a hidden cost and the situation highlights just how crucial it is for the Government to put more focus on retirement savings.
There is a lot more money coming out of the KiwiSaver scheme to fund people into their first homes.
Since Covid hit, an average of about $1.2b a year has been withdrawn from KiwiSaver for first home purchases.
A home is an asset at least, and home ownership is an important step on the path to financial independence.
I suspect we just have to accept the first home buyer withdrawals as a feature of the KiwiSaver scheme.
If young people are in the scheme from the start of their working life and have $10,000 or $20,000 to put towards a house deposit, they are probably ahead of where many in my generation were at the same age.
But the reality is that as a nation, we're well behind on where we need to be with our retirement savings.
According to Stats NZ projections, the percentage of the population aged 65+ will increase from roughly 16-17% in the early 2020s to about 19-20% by 2030. By 2050, around 24-26% of New Zealanders are expected to be 65+.
The old-age dependency ratio (ratio of elderly to working-age population) is expected to nearly double between 2020 and 2050.
Our annual superannuation bill already comes in at more than $20b, and Treasury has projected that to rise to about $45b by 2037.
According to Budget 2025 data, New Zealand Superannuation costs $4352 per person per year, making it the third-largest area of government spending after welfare ($6181 per person) and health ($5804 per person).
From the Treasury's long-term fiscal projections, spending on NZ Super is projected to grow from 4.3% of GDP in 2010 to 7.9% in 2060, an increase of 3.6 percentage points.
It is also rising as a percentage of the Government's total tax revenue – from about 17% now, it is projected to rise above 21% by 2037.
So we know we have a problem.
It seems almost certain that the age of superannuation will have to be raised to 67 in the coming years – despite the current opposition of NZ First and Labour.
Future governments will almost certainly come under more pressure to means-test.
KiwiSaver, which currently has total funds of $122b, is one of our great hopes.
But the total figure is flattering.
There are more than three million KiwiSaver members so the average fund size is just $37,000.
Hopefully, that will be skewed by a lot of young people who will see their savings grow dramatically in the next decades.
That brings us back to the downside of withdrawing funds early for hardship, though.
We need to be saving more, not less.
Moves by the Government to lift the default contribution rate for both employees and employers to 4% from April 2028 were a step in the right direction.
However, they pale in comparison to Australia's compulsory scheme, which requires 12% employer contributions.
The scheme has the equivalent of $4.5 trillion invested, making Australia the fifth-largest holder of pension fund assets in the world, not per capita but in nominal terms.
Australia, for the record, also allows people to withdraw funds for hardship, but one suspects fewer people there need to.
If we want to make the most of the KiwiSaver scheme we have, we need to look more closely at who is withdrawing their money and why.
Meanwhile, young Kiwis are voting with their feet and joining the Australian Superannuation scheme ... by virtue of moving to work there.
Liam Dann is business editor-at-large for the New Zealand Herald. He is a senior writer and columnist, and also presents and produces videos and podcasts. He joined the Herald in 2003.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
22 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Prime Minister and VIPs take historic trip on Auckland's $5.5 billion City Rail Link
Luxon said the project was 'a major, major feat' that would spur another $12b of investment in other economic activity in the city. On the return trip from Waitematā, he described the trip as a bit like Star Trek, the way the tunnels were lit, saying he had spent a lot of time on subway trains travelling to work while living in New York and London. Train driver Vince Ah Kuoi said it was cool to be in the driver's seat for the first passenger train. Photo / Bernard Orsman 'A lot less smelly armpits here than what I observed in Tokyo and London, in particular,' he said. Asked about his first impression, Brown said, 'It's a ride in a train. It was normal and natural, which is what we want. We don't want excitement. We just want to know if this goes quickly? We have proved it is very quick to get from here to there. That is what it is supposed to do, and that is what it is doing.' Finance Minister Nicola Willis was along for the ride. Photo / Michael Craig In a speech before the train ride, Brown said the CRL was a great milestone for Auckland, long overdue and reaching this point had not been easy or cheap. 'Auckland has endured 10 years of disruptive been tough on the city and local businesses who have also suffered big shocks from Covid and economic downturns.' Vince Ah Kuoi, one of two train drivers on the trip, said it was cool being asked to drive the first passenger train. Ah Kuoi - who has been driving trains in Auckland for 18 years - said the CRL was the biggest, grandest, newest piece of rail in that time. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon (left), NZ First leader Winston Peters (centre) and Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown exchange greeting before an historic passenger ride this morning on the City Rail Link. Photo / Michael Craig Pat Brockie, chief executive of City Rail Link Ltd, said that with the heavy construction work finished, work is focused on commissioning and testing all the tunnel and station systems to operate the CRL safely. While Brockie said the finish line is getting closer and there was still a lot of work to be done before the CRL can open to passengers, he would not give any indication of when the CRL will open next year. The City Rail Link was first planned in 2008, but construction did not begin until 2016 under a 50/50 agreement between Auckland Council and the Government. At the time of spades in the ground, the cost was estimated at between $2.8b and $3.4b. In 2019, the cost ballooned to $4.4b, and $5.5b in 2023. When it opens next year, trains will run every four or five minutes at peak times through the central city, with a peak capacity of 19,000 passengers per hour – about a 50% increase from the current 12,000 passengers per hour. Sign up to The Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Scoop
22 minutes ago
- Scoop
Eco-Pulse: Real Wage Squeeze Reinforces Spending Headwinds
Press Release – BNZ Chiefly, unemployment would have lifted by more were it not for discouraged workers leaving the labour force. The labour force participation rate fell to a four-year low. Labour market imbalance widens Squeeze on real wage growth not (quite) done Adds to retail headwinds Or maybe consumers saw it coming? More help from interest rates required Wednesday's smaller-than-expected Q2 lift in the unemployment rate to 5.2% was, on the face of it, better news. But you didn't have to scratch too far below the surface to reach the opposite conclusion. Chiefly, unemployment would have lifted by more were it not for discouraged workers leaving the labour force. The labour force participation rate fell to a four-year low. Youth unemployment and that of our largest city both hit highs not seen for more than 10 years. That's even as Otago printed a jobless rate of 2.9% (all rates seasonally adjusted). It's but the latest example of the southern outperformance story we've been running with for 18 months now. One of the more obscure stats we're still digesting is the fact average hours worked per person, per week fell to the lowest level on record, excluding COVID-era volatility. It's not necessarily an ominous sign as it could reflect a whole bunch of goings on. But it adds to the sense from other indicators that there's heightened capacity even within the employed labour force. It could force additional layoffs should the work not start rolling in soon. We think we're edging towards the top of the unemployment cycle, but it still risks nudging a little higher yet. We've pencilled in a peak rate of 5.3%. A return to economic growth over the second half of this year, if realised, should bring some additional jobs with it, but probably not enough in our view to soak up expected growth in the population. The key takeaway is that prospects for a sustained labour market recovery still look like a story for next year not this. That's one of a few factors casting a pall over on the long-awaited lift in retail spending activity required to kick the broader recovery into gear. Worth highlighting in this regard is that wage growth is coming off the boil at a time short-term inflation is going in the other direction. It's eco-chat for the cost-of-living strains being widely felt. Most of the wage measures released in Q2 (and there are lots), showed the gap between wage growth and inflation being squeezed further. Two of the better wage growth measures we'll focus on here are, first, the Labour Cost Index (LCI), which is adjusted to reflect the cost of labour to complete a certain job to a consistent standard. It controls for the impact of the likes of promotions and productivity that are present in the second measure – the 'unadjusted' LCI. Basically, the first is a pure wage inflation measure, the second a closer approximation to the wage adjustments the average worker receives. The decline in June quarter LCI wage inflation, to 2.4%y/y, means it is now back below the 2.7% annual inflation reported for the same quarter. That ends five quarters' worth of modest inflation-adjusted wage gains. The 'unadjusted' LCI suggests growth in worker compensation is still running ahead of inflation. Although, perhaps tellingly, not so a simple measure of 'essentials' inflation. Our approximation of the latter is based on petrol, energy, food, and rates. Quarterly rates of change in prices and wages are one thing, but for the average consumer, the cumulative change over time probably matters more. The purchasing power lost in a bout of inflation can be felt long after said inflation has subsided. Looking at ratios of wages to prices gives a sense of how the relativities have travelled over the past few years. The chart below indexes wage/price ratios back to 2017 levels. The inflation-adjusted (i.e. 'real') LCI wage index remains below where it was prior to the inflation spike of 2021/22. As noted earlier, this measure is more reflective of wage growth for a standardised job than that of an individual. The real 'unadjusted' LCI index – a measure more closely aligned to growth in labour earnings – has only just clawed its way back to where it was five years ago. The flattish picture for aggregate real wage growth of course just formalises what's been clear for consumers in the supermarket aisles or paying the bills for some time. There will also be a lot of demographic variation around these numbers. Such are the masking effects of top-line macro statistics. Wages are not the only way households can earn income or accumulate wealth. But when we pull in some of the broader trackers of such the above 'flat' conclusion remains. Stats NZ's comprehensive but admittedly dated household disposable income figures show inflation-adjusted growth in all household income sources dipped back into the negative in March. We'd be surprised if the June quarter was any different. Meanwhile, household net wealth has flat-lined since late 2021 as the uplift from financial assets has been offset by non-financial (read: housing) assets. Pulling all the threads together, it's not hard to see why household spending remains under strain. But what of the outlook? In the short-term, it's difficult to foresee much in the way of relief. Our forecasts are for wage growth to ease a little further, and for CPI inflation to rise to a peak of 3.0% in the third quarter. Combined, that's clearly directionally unhelpful for inflation-adjusted incomes. It's another headwind in behind the many others bearing down on retail spending. The 'good' news, perhaps, is that consumer confidence is already so supressed that additional compression in real wage growth may not impose any additional weight on spending appetites. That is, maybe consumers saw it coming? There's a hint of this in the loose correlations in the chart below. From the final quarter of this year some improvement in real wages is anticipated as the short-term spike up in inflation starts to unwind. The long-await cash release from the current period of mortgage re-fixing will also be providing some assistance. But we're still left nursing continued downside risk on the lift in household spending that we (and others like the Reserve Bank) are forecasting for the coming 12 months (forecast tables at back). Certainly, consumer confidence needs to lift a long way from here for these forecasts to have any hope of panning out. The analysis above suggests that might take some time. It's increasingly clear that the wobbling economic upturn needs a little more help from interest rates. We thus maintain our view that the Official Cash Rate will head sub-3% this year with 25bps cuts seen in both August and October. Markets are increasingly coming around to this view boosting the odds we see additional falls in short-term retail interest rates.
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Eco-Pulse: Real Wage Squeeze Reinforces Spending Headwinds
Labour market imbalance widens Squeeze on real wage growth not (quite) done Adds to retail headwinds Or maybe consumers saw it coming? More help from interest rates required Wednesday's smaller-than-expected Q2 lift in the unemployment rate to 5.2% was, on the face of it, better news. But you didn't have to scratch too far below the surface to reach the opposite conclusion. Chiefly, unemployment would have lifted by more were it not for discouraged workers leaving the labour force. The labour force participation rate fell to a four-year low. Youth unemployment and that of our largest city both hit highs not seen for more than 10 years. That's even as Otago printed a jobless rate of 2.9% (all rates seasonally adjusted). It's but the latest example of the southern outperformance story we've been running with for 18 months now. One of the more obscure stats we're still digesting is the fact average hours worked per person, per week fell to the lowest level on record, excluding COVID-era volatility. It's not necessarily an ominous sign as it could reflect a whole bunch of goings on. But it adds to the sense from other indicators that there's heightened capacity even within the employed labour force. It could force additional layoffs should the work not start rolling in soon. We think we're edging towards the top of the unemployment cycle, but it still risks nudging a little higher yet. We've pencilled in a peak rate of 5.3%. A return to economic growth over the second half of this year, if realised, should bring some additional jobs with it, but probably not enough in our view to soak up expected growth in the population. The key takeaway is that prospects for a sustained labour market recovery still look like a story for next year not this. That's one of a few factors casting a pall over on the long-awaited lift in retail spending activity required to kick the broader recovery into gear. Worth highlighting in this regard is that wage growth is coming off the boil at a time short-term inflation is going in the other direction. It's eco-chat for the cost-of-living strains being widely felt. Most of the wage measures released in Q2 (and there are lots), showed the gap between wage growth and inflation being squeezed further. Two of the better wage growth measures we'll focus on here are, first, the Labour Cost Index (LCI), which is adjusted to reflect the cost of labour to complete a certain job to a consistent standard. It controls for the impact of the likes of promotions and productivity that are present in the second measure – the 'unadjusted' LCI. Basically, the first is a pure wage inflation measure, the second a closer approximation to the wage adjustments the average worker receives. The decline in June quarter LCI wage inflation, to 2.4%y/y, means it is now back below the 2.7% annual inflation reported for the same quarter. That ends five quarters' worth of modest inflation-adjusted wage gains. The 'unadjusted' LCI suggests growth in worker compensation is still running ahead of inflation. Although, perhaps tellingly, not so a simple measure of 'essentials' inflation. Our approximation of the latter is based on petrol, energy, food, and rates. Quarterly rates of change in prices and wages are one thing, but for the average consumer, the cumulative change over time probably matters more. The purchasing power lost in a bout of inflation can be felt long after said inflation has subsided. Looking at ratios of wages to prices gives a sense of how the relativities have travelled over the past few years. The chart below indexes wage/price ratios back to 2017 levels. The inflation-adjusted (i.e. 'real') LCI wage index remains below where it was prior to the inflation spike of 2021/22. As noted earlier, this measure is more reflective of wage growth for a standardised job than that of an individual. The real 'unadjusted' LCI index – a measure more closely aligned to growth in labour earnings – has only just clawed its way back to where it was five years ago. The flattish picture for aggregate real wage growth of course just formalises what's been clear for consumers in the supermarket aisles or paying the bills for some time. There will also be a lot of demographic variation around these numbers. Such are the masking effects of top-line macro statistics. Wages are not the only way households can earn income or accumulate wealth. But when we pull in some of the broader trackers of such the above 'flat' conclusion remains. Stats NZ's comprehensive but admittedly dated household disposable income figures show inflation-adjusted growth in all household income sources dipped back into the negative in March. We'd be surprised if the June quarter was any different. Meanwhile, household net wealth has flat-lined since late 2021 as the uplift from financial assets has been offset by non-financial (read: housing) assets. Pulling all the threads together, it's not hard to see why household spending remains under strain. But what of the outlook? In the short-term, it's difficult to foresee much in the way of relief. Our forecasts are for wage growth to ease a little further, and for CPI inflation to rise to a peak of 3.0% in the third quarter. Combined, that's clearly directionally unhelpful for inflation-adjusted incomes. It's another headwind in behind the many others bearing down on retail spending. The 'good' news, perhaps, is that consumer confidence is already so supressed that additional compression in real wage growth may not impose any additional weight on spending appetites. That is, maybe consumers saw it coming? There's a hint of this in the loose correlations in the chart below. From the final quarter of this year some improvement in real wages is anticipated as the short-term spike up in inflation starts to unwind. The long-await cash release from the current period of mortgage re-fixing will also be providing some assistance. But we're still left nursing continued downside risk on the lift in household spending that we (and others like the Reserve Bank) are forecasting for the coming 12 months (forecast tables at back). Certainly, consumer confidence needs to lift a long way from here for these forecasts to have any hope of panning out. The analysis above suggests that might take some time. It's increasingly clear that the wobbling economic upturn needs a little more help from interest rates. We thus maintain our view that the Official Cash Rate will head sub-3% this year with 25bps cuts seen in both August and October. Markets are increasingly coming around to this view boosting the odds we see additional falls in short-term retail interest rates.
