logo
Australian taxpayers on the hook to pay Chevron more than $500m to clean up oil wells

Australian taxpayers on the hook to pay Chevron more than $500m to clean up oil wells

The Guardian23-07-2025
The Australian government faces having to pay hundreds of millions of dollars to the American oil and gas company Chevron to help it clean up oil wells on Barrow Island, in Western Australia, under a deal made in the 1980s.
The Western Australian government also faces a hefty bill – estimated to be $129m – to help repair an offshore nature reserve where about 900 wells have been drilled over the past six decades.
Chevron says it has paid more than $1bn in royalties – about $3 a barrel – for oil and gas extracted from beneath the island, which is about 70km off the state's north-west coast. Under state legislation written especially for the project, federal and state taxpayers will have to pay them back about nearly half that amount to help cover remediation costs.
A WA government minute obtained by independent news site Boiling Cold under freedom-of-information laws suggests it will cost Chevron and its venture partners more than $2.3bn to fix the site, which has produced 335m barrels of oil.
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
The legislation stipulates that the company would pay 40% of the difference between Chevron's sales revenue and operational costs, with 75% of the payment going to the federal government and 25% to WA.
The legislation stated that once production ended at the site the calculation would operate in reverse. Chevron and its partners, ExxonMobil and Santos, would be refunded 40% of what they spent on decommissioning the oilfield infrastructure for the following three years, with the federal and state governments again splitting what they paid back 75%-25%.
Oil production at the site stopped in May. According to the newly released documents, the WA Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety did not have an estimate of the expected cost until Nine's WA Today reported on the issue in 2022. That report suggested Chevron could spend $1.3bn on the clean-up in the covered timeframe, triggering a cost to the state of about $129m.
Officials said they intended to 'approach Chevron directly to request cost estimates'. The documents do not show what those discussions yielded.
Under the terms of the deal, the commonwealth would be required to pay three times as much as the state government, implying it could face a bill of $387m. It suggests a total payment to Chevron and its partners of $516m. The final sum could be higher if Chevron spends more on the clean-up before 2028 to maximise its royalty refund.
In response to questions about the expected cost, a WA department spokesman said the refund cost was not included in the state budget forward estimates – covering the next four years – but the potential liability was recognised as 'a non-quantifiable contingent liability' in an annual report on state finances. The finances report acknowledged that 'a significant amount of royalties will need to be refunded' after Chevron paid the costs and the state verified and audited them.
The federal Department of Industry, Science and Resources declined to comment. It is waiting on a WA government assessment of what refund is required under state law.
The clean-up cost may include dealing with a gas leak near old Barrow Island oil wells that Chevron reported to the state regulator in May. The company said an unknown amount of gas was seeping to the surface near its old Barrow Island oil wells.
A Chevron spokesman said data analysis had indicated 'an environmental risk from the subsurface migration of hydrocarbons, primarily gas, to groundwater and the surface'. They said the company had informed regulators and would work with them to 'develop and implement a comprehensive investigation program'.
Sign up to Afternoon Update
Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
The spokesperson said the company took its stewardship of Barrow Island seriously and was 'committed to the responsible management of environmental impacts and risks at our sites in accordance with relevant laws and regulations'.
Mark Ogge, from the Australia Institute, said the revelation showed the 'extraordinary scale of the mismanagement of Australia's gas resources by our governments'.
'Not only have our governments been giving our resources away for free and failing to tax these foreign-owned corporations properly but they are also handing back much of the meagre royalties they have collected,' he said.
'This is entirely the responsibility of the Australian and WA governments. They had 40 years to fix this terrible deal but they have chosen not to. They need to be held to account.'
A WA government database sets out the scale of the required clean-up. About 700 of the wells on the island are more than 40 years old. Up to four drilling rigs will be used to plug the wells before they are abandoned. The procedure is designed to permanently seal the oil and gas underground, usually using cement. Remediation will be needed at 16 sites contaminated with hydrocarbons.
The Gorgon liquefied natural gas plant, also operated by Chevron, will remain on the island after the wells are decommissioned.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BP-Petrobras partnership on Bumerangue block hinges on CO2 levels, sources say
BP-Petrobras partnership on Bumerangue block hinges on CO2 levels, sources say

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

BP-Petrobras partnership on Bumerangue block hinges on CO2 levels, sources say

RIO DE JANEIRO, Aug 6 (Reuters) - A possible partnership between BP and Petrobras ( opens new tab to develop the British firm's oil and gas find in Brazil's pre-salt layer would hinge on carbon dioxide levels in the reservoir, three sources at the Brazilian state-run oil firm told Reuters. BP's (BP.L), opens new tab Chief Executive Murray Auchincloss said on Tuesday that the firm would look to bring in a partner to help develop its find in the Bumerangue block, considered by BP to be its largest global discovery in 25 years. Discoveries nearly two decades ago in Brazil's pre-salt area, defined by vast deepwater fields under a thick layer of salt below the ocean floor, have turned the South American country into one of the world's biggest oil producers. When it announced the discovery, BP noted that it found "elevated levels of carbon dioxide" during a rig-site analysis, raising concerns about the block's commercial viability. Petrobras, the leader in pre-salt exploration, is developing technologies to make discoveries of oil reserves with high CO2 content economically viable to explore, but it is still in the very early stages, a source said on condition of anonymity. A large Petrobras find in the Jupiter field, also in the pre-salt region, went undeveloped due to a higher-than-usual CO2 content, the same source added. A high volume of CO2 in the reservoir could make the discovery economically unviable, experts told Reuters. Gordon Birrell, BP's head of production and operations, said on Tuesday he is not "particularly" concerned about carbon dioxide levels in the Bumerangue block. Two Petrobras executives, also speaking on condition of anonymity, said BP has not yet approached the company to discuss Bumerangue. Despite the CO2 worries, one of the sources said the discovery looks "very promising." A third source said he believes BP will eventually present data from the Bumerangue block to Petrobras, adding that it could happen later as "it appears there is still a long way to go to see the viability of the discovery." BP, which acquired 100% of the Bumerangue block at an auction in 2022, has partnerships in some blocks with Petrobras, including Alto de Cabo Frio Central, in the pre-salt of the Campos Basin. Petrobras did not immediately comment on the matter when contacted. BP declined to comment.

Gas guzzlers making comeback amid Trump's push to exile EVs
Gas guzzlers making comeback amid Trump's push to exile EVs

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Gas guzzlers making comeback amid Trump's push to exile EVs

American gas-powered vehicles, including the country's iconic pickup trucks, will not vanish forever as drivers have turned their backs on EVs. The surge in gas guzzlers is due to Donald Trump's push to exile EVs so the nation's auto industry can thrive - especially in Detroit, the 'car capital' of the world. US automakers are going back to their roots after switching their focus to electric vehicles that first became popular in 2010, and gained more notice in recent years. Although EVs are meant to be better for the planet, car manufacturers have had to use more resources to keep up with the fuel-efficient standards. Ford, a top US car brand based out of Detroit, is already gearing up for the shift and changing its lineup by adding more commercial vehicles and large SUVs and taking out some EVs. 'This is a multibillion-dollar opportunity over the next couple of years,' Jim Farley, the Chief Executive of Ford Motors, said in a call with analysts last week. Trump's car policy changes came after he announced a 25 percent tariff on imported cars that came into effect in April. Most electric cars sold in the US are already built domestically, meaning they won't be affected by the tariff. Still, there are costs associated with EVs that companies have to front. Because of the push to move back to gas cars, the auto industry is looking up because the fees that come with EVs will start to lower. With EVs, the industry has to pay regulatory credits and fuel-economy rule-violation fines. Ford, GM and Stellantis - a Dutch automaker - have shelled out about $10 billion on regulatory credits and fuel-economy rule-violation fines since 2022, according to The Wall Street Journal. Although General Motors has hoped to get rid of internal combustion engines by 2035, the company has since changed its tune and told its investors there are benefits to keeping gas cars in the lineup. During a recent call, Stellantis, who owns car companies like Jeep and Toyota, highlighted how Trump's Big Beautiful Bill allows them to add more gas-powered vehicles to the mix on dealership lots. 'This will mean to us a lot of additional profit,' Antonio Filosa, the CEO of Stellantis, who started the position in June, said. In a July 29 memo reviewed by WSJ, Stellantis wrote that they would prefer to satisfy its customers demands over anything. 'In these uncertain times of heavy competition and tariffs, there are auto workers all over the world who would happily trade their uncertainty for our customer demand and company commitment,' the company stated. In recent months, Stellantis, which also owns Ram, has been dealing with part shortages. Just last week, the automaker had to add shifts to a factory in Michigan in a bid to speed up production for its famed Ram 1500 trucks. Although the set back was not specifically related to the regulatory charges, Stellantis will thrive from the surge in gas cars by not having to pay millions for fines and fuel-economy rule violations. In order to see how the new trend will affect the company, Stellantis plans to keep an eye on the production conflict at the Ram Michigan factory regularly. Companies aren't the only ones excited about the change, as dealerships are also on board. 'Americans do like buying giant vehicles,' Adam Lee, chairman of Maine-based Lee Auto Malls, told the outlet. 'They're going to see how many more giant SUVs they can pump out, because they sell a lot of them and make a lot of money on them.' Despite being excited, Lee said he hopes some EVs will still remain. 'Otherwise, we're going to find out we're the only country in the world not embracing fuel-efficient vehicles and EVs,' he said. With the change, several big brands have back-pedaled with their EV plans as they anticipate the shift. Mary Barra, the CEO of GM, originally planned to make the company fully EV in 10 years, but now she is mulling the idea that gas-powered cars could come back into play. With that, her company continues to roll out EV cars, as she thinks the change will actually give GM a chance to sell more of those vehicles. 'It also gives us the opportunity to sell EV vehicles,' Barra stated while on a recent earnings call. 'Excuse me, ICE vehicles, for longer and appreciate the profitability of those vehicles.'

American icon whose popularity has surged under Trump as drivers shun EVs
American icon whose popularity has surged under Trump as drivers shun EVs

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

American icon whose popularity has surged under Trump as drivers shun EVs

American gas-powered vehicles, including the country's iconic pickup trucks, will not vanish forever as drivers have turned their backs on EVs. The surge in gas guzzlers is due to Donald Trump's push to exile EVs so the nation's auto industry can thrive - especially in Detroit, the 'car capital' of the world. US automakers are going back to their roots after switching their focus to electric vehicles that first became popular in 2010, and gained more notice in recent years. Although EVs are meant to be better for the planet, car manufacturers have had to use more resources to keep up with the fuel-efficient standards. Ford, a top US car brand based out of Detroit, is already gearing up for the shift and changing its lineup by adding more commercial vehicles and large SUVs and taking out some EVs. 'This is a multibillion-dollar opportunity over the next couple of years,' Jim Farley, the Chief Executive of Ford Motors, said in a call with analysts last week. Trump's car policy changes came after he announced a 25 percent tariff on imported cars that came into effect in April. Most electric cars sold in the US are already built domestically, meaning they won't be affected by the tariff. Still, there are costs associated with EVs that companies have to front. Because of the push to move back to gas cars, the auto industry is looking up because the fees that come with EVs will start to lower. With EVs, the industry has to pay regulatory credits and fuel-economy rule-violation fines. Ford, GM and Stellantis - a Dutch automaker - have shelled out about $10 billion on regulatory credits and fuel-economy rule-violation fines since 2022, according to The Wall Street Journal. Although General Motors has hoped to get rid of internal combustion engines by 2035, the company has since changed its tune and told its investors there are benefits to keeping gas cars in the lineup. During a recent call, Stellantis, who owns car companies like Jeep and Toyota, highlighted how Trump's Big Beautiful Bill allows them to add more gas-powered vehicles to the mix on dealership lots. 'This will mean to us a lot of additional profit,' Antonio Filosa, the CEO of Stellantis, who started the position in June, said. In a July 29 memo reviewed by WSJ, Stellantis wrote that they would prefer to satisfy its customers demands over anything. 'In these uncertain times of heavy competition and tariffs, there are auto workers all over the world who would happily trade their uncertainty for our customer demand and company commitment,' the company stated. In recent months, Stellantis, which also owns Ram, has been dealing with part shortages. Just last week, the automaker had to add shifts to a factory in Michigan in a bid to speed up production for its famed Ram 1500 trucks. Although the set back was not specifically related to the regulatory charges, Stellantis will thrive from the surge in gas cars by not having to pay millions for fines and fuel-economy rule violations. In order to see how the new trend will affect the company, Stellantis plans to keep an eye on the production conflict at the Ram Michigan factory regularly. Companies aren't the only ones excited about the change, as dealerships are also on board. 'Americans do like buying giant vehicles,' Adam Lee, chairman of Maine-based Lee Auto Malls, told the outlet. 'They're going to see how many more giant SUVs they can pump out, because they sell a lot of them and make a lot of money on them.' Despite being excited, Lee said he hopes some EVs will still remain. 'Otherwise, we're going to find out we're the only country in the world not embracing fuel-efficient vehicles and EVs,' he said. With the change, several big brands have back-pedaled with their EV plans as they anticipate the shift. Mary Barra, the CEO of GM, originally planned to make the company fully EV in 10 years, but now she is mulling the idea that gas-powered cars could come back into play. With that, her company continues to roll out EV cars, as she thinks the change will actually give GM a chance to sell more of those vehicles. 'It also gives us the opportunity to sell EV vehicles,' Barra stated while on a recent earnings call.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store