Trump claims Epstein stole women from Mar-a-Lago spa including Virginia Giuffre
It is the latest evolution in his description of how their highly scrutinised relationship ended years ago.
One of the women, he acknowledged, was Virginia Giuffre, who was among Epstein's most well-known sex trafficking accusers.
Mr Trump's comments expanded on remarks he had made a day earlier, when he said he had banned Epstein from his private club in Florida two decades ago because his one-time friend 'stole people that worked for me'.
At the time, he did not make clear who those workers were.
The Republican president has faced an outcry over his administration's refusal to release more records about Epstein after promises of transparency, a rare example of strain within Mr Trump's tightly controlled political coalition.
Mr Trump has attempted to tamp down questions about the case, expressing annoyance that people are still talking about it six years after Epstein took his own life while awaiting trial, even though some of his own allies have promoted conspiracy theories about it.
Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's imprisoned former girlfriend, was recently interviewed inside a Florida courthouse by the Justice Department's No 2 official, though officials have not publicly disclosed what she said.
Her lawyers said on Tuesday that she is willing to answer more questions from the US congress if she is granted immunity from future prosecution for her testimony.
Aboard Air Force One while returning from Scotland, Mr Trump said he was upset that Epstein was 'taking people who worked for me'.
The women, he said, were 'taken out of the spa, hired by him — in other words, gone'.
'I said, listen, we don't want you taking our people,' Mr Trump said.
When it happened again, Mr Trump said he banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago.
Asked if Ms Giuffre was one of the employees poached by Epstein, he demurred but then said 'he stole her'.
The White House originally said Mr Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago because he was acting like a 'creep'.
Ms Giuffre died by suicide earlier this year.
She claimed that Maxwell spotted her working as a spa attendant at Mar-a-Lago in 2000, when she was a teenager, and hired her as Epstein's masseuse, which led to sexual abuse.
Although Ms Giuffre's allegations did not become part of criminal prosecutions against Epstein, she is central to conspiracy theories about the case.
She accused Epstein of pressuring her into having sex with powerful men.
Maxwell, who has denied Giuffre's allegations, is serving a 20-year-prison sentence in a Florida federal prison for conspiring with Epstein to sexually abuse underage girls.
A spokeswoman for the House Oversight Committee, which requested the interview with Maxwell, said the panel would not consider granting the immunity she requested.
The potential interview is part of a frenzied, renewed interest in the Epstein saga following the Justice Department's July statement that it would not be releasing any additional records from the investigation, an abrupt announcement that stunned online sleuths, conspiracy theorists and elements of Mr Trump's political base who had been hoping to find proof of a government cover-up.
Since then, the Trump administration has sought to present itself as promoting transparency, with the department urging courts to unseal grand jury transcripts from the sex-trafficking investigation and deputy attorney general Todd Blanche interviewing Maxwell over the course of two days at a Florida courthouse last week.
In a letter on Tuesday, Maxwell's lawyers said that though their initial instinct was for Maxwell to invoke her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, they are open to having her co-operate provided that legislators satisfy their request for immunity and other conditions.
But the Oversight Committee seemed to reject that offer outright.
'The Oversight Committee will respond to Ms Maxwell's (lawyer) soon, but it will not consider granting congressional immunity for her testimony,' a spokesperson said.
Separately, Maxwell's lawyers have urged the Supreme Court to review her conviction, saying she dd not receive a fair trial.
They also say that one way she would testify 'openly and honestly, in public', is in the event of a pardon by Mr Trump, who has told reporters that such a move is within his rights but that he has not been not asked to make it.
'She welcomes the opportunity to share the truth and to dispel the many misconceptions and misstatements that have plagued this case from the beginning,' they said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Trump has suggested Ukraine swap land with Russia – but that's illegal
Any peace deal that would see Ukraine cede territory to Russia in hopes of ending the war would be deeply unpopular with the Ukrainian people. It would also be illegal under the country's constitution. US President Donald Trump, who is due to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska's Anchorage on Friday, has suggested that a concession involving a swap of Ukrainian territories would be 'to the betterment of both' sides. However, . Kyiv "will not give Russia any awards for what it has done", Mr Zelensky said. "Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier." For the Ukrainian leader, such a deal would be a political disaster, risking significant public outcry after more than three years of intense bloodshed and sacrifice. Crucially, he lacks the authority to sign off on it, as changing Ukraine's 1991 borders runs counter to the country's constitution. For now, freezing the front line appears to be an outcome the Ukrainian people are willing to accept. The current situation in Ukraine Russia occupies about a fifth of Ukraine, from the country's northeast to the Crimean Peninsula, which was annexed illegally in 2014. The front line is vast and cuts across six regions — the active front stretches for at least 1,000 kilometres (680 miles) — but if measured from along the border with Russia, it reaches as far as 2,300 kilometres (1,430 miles). Russia controls almost all of the Luhansk region and almost two-thirds of Donetsk region, which together comprise the Donbas, as the strategic industrial heartland of Ukraine is called. Russia has long coveted the area and illegally annexed it in the first year of the full-scale invasion, even though it did not control much of it at the time. Russia also partially controls more than half of the Kherson region, which is critical to maintain logistical flows of supplies coming in from the land corridor in neighboring Crimea, and also parts of the Zaporizhzhia region, where the Kremlin seized Europe's largest nuclear power plant. Russian forces also hold pockets of territory in Kharkiv and Sumy regions in northeastern Ukraine, far less strategically valuable for Moscow. Russian troops are gaining a foothold in the Dnipropetrovsk region. These could be what Moscow is willing to exchange for land it deems more important in Donetsk, where the Russian army has concentrated most of its effort. 'There'll be some land swapping going on. I know that through Russia and through conversations with everybody. To the good, for the good of Ukraine. Good stuff, not bad stuff. Also, some bad stuff for both,' Mr Trump said on Monday. Ukrainian forces are still active in the Kursk region inside Russia, but they barely hold any territory there, making it not as potent a bargaining chip as Kyiv's leaders had probably hoped when they launched the daring incursion across the border last year. Swapping Ukrainian controlled territory in Russia, however minuscule, will likely be the only palatable option for Kyiv in any land swapping scenario. Conceding land risks another invasion Surrendering territory would see those unwilling to live under Russian rule to pack up and leave. Many civilians have endured so much suffering and bloodshed since pro-Moscow forces began battling the Ukrainian military in the east in 2014 and since the full-scale invasion in 2022. From a military standpoint, abandoning the Donetsk region in particular would vastly improve Russia's ability to invade Ukraine again, according to the Washington-based think tank Institute for the Study of War. Bowing to such a demand would force Ukraine to abandon its 'fortress belt' the main defensive line in Donetsk since 2014, "with no guarantee that fighting will not resume', the institute said in a recent report. The regional defensive line has prevented Russia's efforts to seize the region and continues to impede Russia's efforts to take the rest of the area, ISW said. Ukraine's constitution poses a major challenge to any deal involving a land swap because it requires a nationwide referendum to approve changes to the country's territorial borders, said Ihor Reiterovych, a politics professor in the Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. 'Changes in territorial integrity can be done only by the decision of the people — not the president, the cabinet of ministers or the parliament can change it,' he said. 'In the constitution it is written that only by referendum can changes to Ukraine's territory be conducted.' If during negotiations Mr Zelensky agrees to swap territory with Russia, "in the same minute he will be a criminal because he would be abandoning the main law that governs Ukraine', Mr Reiterovych said. Mr Trump said he was 'a little bothered' by Mr Zelensky's assertion over the weekend that he needed constitutional approval to cede to Russia the territory that it captured in its unprovoked invasion. 'I mean, he's got approval to go into a war and kill everybody, but he needs approval to do a land swap?' Mr Trump added. 'Because there'll be some land swapping going on. I know that through Russia and through conversations with everybody.' Mr Zelensky is still trying to regain the people's trust that was damaged when he reversed course on a law that would have diminished the independence of Ukraine's anti-corruption watchdogs. The move was a red line for those citizens who are protective of the country's institutions and are suspicious of certain members of Mr Zelensky's inner circle. Freezing the conflict seems a lesser evil for Ukraine Analysts like Mr Reiterovych dismiss a land swap as a distraction. Freezing the conflict along the current front line is the only option Ukrainians are willing to accept, he said, citing recent polls. This option would also buy time for both sides to consolidate manpower and build up their domestic weapons industries. Ukraine would require strong security guarantees from its Western partners to deter future Russian aggression, which Kyiv believes is inevitable. Still, freezing the conflict will also be difficult for Ukrainians to accept. Along with the illegal annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the partial occupation of Luhansk and Donetsk after that, it would require accepting that the Ukrainian military is not able to retake lost territories militarily. Kyiv accepted its inability to retake these territories but never formally recognised them as Russian. A similar scenario could unfold in the new regions taken by Russian forces. It also is not a viable long-term solution. 'It is the lesser evil option for everyone and it will not provoke protests or rallies on the streets,' Mr Reiterovych said.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Leaders in frantic phone diplomacy with Trump ahead of Putin summit on Ukraine
Update: Date: 2025-08-13T07:43:27.000Z Title: Zelenskyy expected in Berlin to join Merz in person for Trump call, bilateral talks Content: The German government's spokesperson has confirmed that Volodymyr Zelenskyy will be 'working in Berlin' today, joining Merz in person for the call with Trump and Vance. The pair is also expected to meet for a separate bilateral meeting, expected to be a further show of support from the German chancellor. Update: Date: 2025-08-13T07:42:44.000Z Title: Morning opening: Hello Donald, this is Europe speaking Content: European leaders will speak with the US president, Donald Trump, and his vice-president, JD Vance, today, consulting ahead of this Friday's summit with Russian president Vladimir Putin. Representing Team Europe are the host, the German chancellor, Friedrich Merz, the Finnish president, Alexander Stubb, the French president, Emmanuel Macron, the Italian prime minister, Giorgia Meloni, the Polish prime minister Donald Tusk, and the UK prime minister, Keir Starmer. They will be joined by the European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, and the European Council president, António Costa, and that famous Trump-whisperer, the Nato secretary general, Mark Rutte. They will be also joined by the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who in a further show of unity with his partners will not only be on the call, but will be joining the host in person in Berlin. The series of calls will begin with internal consultations between European leaders and Zelenskyy around 2pm local time, followed by a call with Trump an hour later and a debrief of 'the coalition of the willing' later. The call with Trump will be the European leaders' last chance to substantially shape Trump's thoughts going into the meeting in Alaska on Friday, and repeat some of the red lines put forward by Ukraine. Zelenskyy has previously said Ukraine could not agree to a Russian proposal to give up more of his country's territory in exchange for a ceasefire because Moscow would use what it gained as a springboard to start a future war. Last week Russia indicated it was prepared to consider a ceasefire in the Ukraine war for the first time, in exchange for Ukraine withdrawing from the parts of Donbas it still controlled. Though Trump then suggested that Russia and Ukraine could engage in some 'swapping of territories', Zelenskyy said he understood that Russia was 'simply offering not to advance further, not to withdraw from anywhere' and that swaps were not on the table. With growing uncertainty about which Trump will show up to talks with Putin in Alaska on Friday – the one who repeatedly said was 'disappointed' with Putin, or the one who wants to reset relations with Moscow – this could be one of the most consequential phone calls in years for Europe and Ukraine's future. I will bring you all the key updates here. It's Wednesday, 13 August 2025, it's Jakub Krupa here, and this is Europe Live. Good morning.
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
UK to co-chair talks with European and US leaders over ending war in Ukraine
Pro-Ukraine allies - including the UK and Europe - will meet virtually with US President Donald Trump on Wednesday about ending the war in Ukraine ahead of the US and Russian leaders summit. US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin are expected to meet in Alaska on Friday in a bid to secure a peace deal. But Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has not been invited to the summit, and European leaders have been rallying around Kyiv insisting that Ukraine must determine its own future. Prime Minister Keir Starmer is co-chairing a separate meeting with Zelensky, French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Wednesday afternoon. The leaders will then be joined by Trump and US Vice President JD Vance, where the European leaders will be hoping to convince the US to advance Ukraine's and Europe's interests. Trump has said a peace deal with Russia would require Ukraine to give up some Russian-held territory and could include some "land swapping" with Ukraine. But Zelenskyy said he would not give eastern Ukraine to Russia or withdraw from the territories that it controls, warning it would act as a "springboard for a future new offensive." Ahead of Wednesday's call, a Downing Street spokesperson said Starmer was focused on a solution to the conflict "in Ukraine's national interests". 'He is determined to achieve a just and lasting peace in Ukraine, backed by robust and credible security guarantees that will deter Russia from threatening Ukraine in the future," the spokesperson said. After the call, Starmer will co-chair a Coalition of the Willing meeting to provide an update on what occurred. The coalition is an international effort to support Ukraine towards lasting peace, led by the UK, France and Ukraine. It is made up of 31 countries that have pledged strengthened support for Kyiv, including 27 European countries, as well as Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Japan.
