$7 Billion Loan In Jeopardy? Pakistan Misses IMF Targets, Bailout At Risk
Pakistan, which relies heavily on foreign funding, might lose USD 7 billion as Islamabad has failed to meet three out of the five targets set by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) ahead of the second review for the bailout package.
The Federal Board of Revenue could not collect PKR 12.3 trillion in total revenues and PKR 50 billion from retailers under the Tajir Dost Scheme during the last fiscal year, the Express Tribune newspaper reported.
The rise in expenditures led to provinces falling short of saving the targeted PKR 1.2 trillion in the last fiscal year, which ended in June, as per a fiscal operations summary released by the Ministry of Finance.
On the contrary, Pakistan kept its budget in surplus for the second consecutive year, the highest in 24 years, surpassing the IMF target. Islamabad generated a primary budget surplus of PKR 2.4 trillion along with the total revenues collected by the four provinces.
Even though the Finance Ministry was trying hard to stay on the fiscal path, Pakistan's hopes to get the bailout were dented by provincial capitals, which were not under the control of the federal government.
The overall fiscal deficit also reduced to 5.4 per cent of GDP or PKR 6.2 trillion, which was well below both the original target of 5.9 per cent. The finance secretary kept a tight check on the expenditure throughout the fiscal year.
The IMF has set about 50 conditions overall under the USD 7 billion bailout package; some of those are monitored on a quarterly and annual basis and are linked with the approval of the loan tranches.
The government has managed to achieve relative fiscal stability, but the official data showed that the federal government's net revenues were still PKR 1.2 trillion less than its needs for just two heads: interest payments and defence spending. The rest of the expenditures are incurred by taking more loans.
Against a primary surplus target of PKR 2.4 trillion, the federal government reported a surplus of PKR 2.7 trillion, or 2.4 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP), according to the ministry.
The provincial governments had given the understanding to the IMF and the federal government to generate PKR 1.2 trillion cash surpluses. However, the four provinces collectively generated a cash surplus of PKR 921 billion, missing the IMF target by PKR 280 billion.
The FBR failed to collect any significant revenue under the Tajir Dost Scheme against the target of PKR 50 billion for the last fiscal year.
Despite these shortfalls, the government is unlikely to face serious hurdles during the upcoming review talks — expected to begin next month — for the release of the next USD 1 billion tranche, due to progress on other critical benchmarks, the report said.
The USD 7 billion package was agreed last year, and it has been instrumental in stabilising the economy of the country.
(with PTI inputs)
view comments
First Published:
August 06, 2025, 22:16 IST
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
2 minutes ago
- India.com
Which countries are biggest buyers of Russian oil, and why is India still in stronger position despite 50% US tariffs?
Which countries are biggest buyers of Russian oil, and why is India still in stronger position despite 50% US tariffs? U.S. President Donald Trump has announced an additional 25 per cent tariff on goods imported from India, starting August 27. This is in addition to the existing 25 per cent tariff and is a response to India continuing to buy oil from Russia. The move has sparked global debate over trade policies, especially among countries that still import large amounts of energy from Russia. Asia becomes Russia's main oil buyer after EU pullback There was a time when the European Union (EU) was the biggest buyer of Russian oil. But after the EU placed sanctions on Russia, Asian countries like China, India, and Turkey stepped in and now lead in buying Russian energy. Asia has now become Russia's largest oil market. At present: China imports about USD 219.5 billion worth of energy (oil, gas, and coal) from Russia. India buys energy products worth around USD 133.4 billion. Turkey imports nearly USD 90.3 billion in energy from Russia. Some European countries, like Hungary, still buy small amounts of Russian oil through pipelines, but most have reduced their purchases due to sanctions. Russia's oil revenue still strong despite sanctions Even with sanctions from the U.S. and Europe, Russia continues to earn big from its oil exports. According to the Kyiv School of Economics, Russia made around USD 12.6 billion just from oil sales in June. For the entire year of 2025, it is expected to earn up to USD 153 billion from oil exports. Why is India in a better position? Even though President Trump has imposed a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods, India is still in a better position compared to China. Under Trump's new trade policy, Chinese imports are facing a much higher 30 per cent tariff, while imports from Vietnam are being taxed at only 20 per cent. This means Indian and Vietnamese products will continue to compete in the U.S. market, but India still has an edge over China. Recently, Fitch Ratings updated its 'Effective Tariff Rate (ETR) Monitor,' a tool that tracks how tariffs affect trade. According to the latest update: The average effective tariff rate in the U.S. has risen to 17 per cent, up from 15 per cent last year. Among all major U.S. trading partners, China's ETR is now the highest at 41.4 per cent, a big jump from its earlier rate of 10.7 per cent. India's ETR stands at just over 21 per cent, which shows that India is still in a relatively better spot compared to China. The Effective Tariff Rate (ETR) helps measure the real impact of tariffs on a country's trade and economic strategies. Liao Yu, a lecturer at Renmin University in China, says that during his second term, Trump has become more aggressive with his 'Make America Great Again' agenda. According to Liao, many supporters of this policy believe free trade has hurt the U.S., and they mainly blame China for it. In the future, China might face even tougher tariff battles. However, since Trump's 'America First' approach is also weakening old U.S. alliances, it could open up some new strategic opportunities for China.
Economic Times
16 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump to nominate top economic aide Stephen Miran to Federal Reserve board
Synopsis President Trump intends to nominate Stephen Miran, chair of the White House's Council of Economic Advisers, to the Federal Reserve's board for a temporary four-month term. This appointment, pending Senate approval, marks Trump's initial step toward influencing the Fed, potentially leading to lower interest rates. Miran's views align with Trump's, contrasting with the current stance of Fed Chair Jerome Powell. AP FILE - Stephen Miran, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors, walks at the White House, June 17, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File) US President Donald Trump said on Thursday he will nominate a top economic adviser to the Federal Reserve's board of governors for four months, temporarily filling a vacancy while continuing his search for a longer-term said he has named Stephen Miran, the chair of the White House's Council of Economic Advisers, to fill a seat vacated by governor Adriana Kugler, a Biden appointee who is stepping down on Friday. Miran, if approved by the Senate, will serve until January 31, appointment is Trump's first opportunity to exert more control over the Fed, one of the few remaining independent federal agencies. Trump has relentlessly criticised the current chair, Jerome Powell, for keeping short-term interest rates unchanged, calling him "a stubborn MORON" last week on social has been a major defender of Trump's income tax cuts and tariff hikes, arguing that the combination will generate enough economic growth to reduce budget deficits. He also has played down the risk of Trump's tariffs generating higher inflation, a major source of concern for choice of Miran may heighten concerns about political influence over the Fed, which has traditionally been insulated from day-to-day politics. Fed independence is generally seen as key to ensuring that it can take difficult steps to combat inflation, such as raising interest rates, that politicians might be unwilling to take. Federal Reserve governors vote on all the central bank's interest-rate decisions, as well as its financial regulatory nomination, if approved, would add a near-certain vote in support of lower interest rates. Kugler had echoed Powell's view that the Fed should keep rates unchanged and further evaluate the impact of tariffs on the economy before making any has said he will appoint Fed officials who will cut interest rates, which he says will reduce the borrowing costs of the federal government's huge USD 36 trillion debt pile. Trump also wants lower rates to boost moribund home sales, which have been held back partly by higher mortgage costs. Yet the Fed does not directly set longer-term interest rates for things like home and car its most recent meeting last week, Fed officials kept their key rate unchanged at 4.3 per cent, where it has stood after three rate cuts late last year. But two Fed governors - Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman - dissented from that decision. Both were appointed by Trump in his first even with Miran on the board, 12 Fed officials vote on interest rate policy and many remain concerned that Trump's sweeping tariffs could push inflation higher in the coming could be renominated to a longer term on the Fed once his initial appointment is concluded, or replaced by another term as chair ends in May 2026. Yet, Powell could remain on the board of governors until January 2028, even after he steps down as chair. That would deny, or at least delay, an opportunity for Trump to appoint an additional policymaker to the Fed's a result, one option for Trump is to appoint Powell's eventual replacement as chair to replace Kugler once the remaining four months of her term are completed. Leading candidates for that position include Kevin Warsh, a former Fed governor from 2006 to 2011 and frequent critic of Powell's chairmanship, and Kevin Hassett, another top Trump economic option for the White House next May would be to select Waller, who is already on the board, to replace Powell, and who has been widely mentioned as a Casiraghi, senior economist at investment bank Evercore ISI, noted that the choice of Miran could be a positive sign for Waller, because Trump did not take the opportunity to nominate someone likely to become chair once Powell steps the July jobs report was released last Friday, Miran criticised the Fed chair for not cutting benchmark interest rates, saying that Trump had been proven correct on inflation during his first term and would be again. The president has pressured Powell to cut short-term interest rates under the belief that his tariffs will not fuel higher inflationary pressures."What we are seeing now in real time is a repetition once again of this pattern where the president will end up having been proven right," Miran said on MSNBC. "And the Fed will, with a lag and probably quite too late, eventually catch up to the president's view." Last year, Miran expressed support for some unconventional economic views in commentaries on the Fed and international November, he proposed measures that would reduce the value of the dollar in order to boost exports, reduce imports and cut the US trade deficit, a top priority for Trump. He also suggested tariffs could push US trading partners, such as the European Union and Japan, to accept a cheaper dollar as part of a "Mar-a-Lago Accord," an echo of the Plaza Accord reached in the 1980s that lowered the dollar's a fellow at the conservative Manhattan Institute, Miran in March 2024 also proposed overhauling the Fed's governance, including by making it easier for a president to fire members of its board of governors. "The Fed's current governance has facilitated groupthink that has led to significant monetary-policy errors," Miran wrote in a paper with Dan Katz, now a top official at the Treasury Department.
India Today
32 minutes ago
- India Today
Billions of dollars flowing into US: Trump after sweeping new tariffs take effect
United States President Donald Trump on Thursday celebrated the official rollout of his wide-ranging new tariffs, targeting imports from more than 90 countries. In a late-night post on Truth Social, just as the higher tariff rates came into effect, Trump said: 'It's midnight!!! Billions of dollars in tariffs are now flowing into the United States of America!'The new tariffs, ranging from 10 per cent to 50 per cent, officially began at 12:01 am on August 7, when US Customs and Border Protection started collecting the revised Trump described the moment as a turning point in US trade policy, claiming that revenues were largely coming from nations that had 'taken advantage of the United States for many years, laughing all the way.''The only thing that can stop America's greatness would be a radical left court that wants to see our country fail!' he added in another rollout followed a week of uncertainty after Trump delayed implementation of most tariffs just hours before an earlier August 1 deadline. According to the New York Post, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent projected that annual tariff revenues could exceed USD 300 countries are seeing steep penalties, while Brazil and India face tariffs as high as 50 per cent. Trump framed Brazil's hike as retaliation for the prosecution of his political ally, former President Jair Bolsonaro. India was targeted over its continued purchase of Russian oil, with Trump initially threatening a 25 per cent tariff before increasing it to 50 per not all US trade partners faced equal treatment. Eight major countries, including Japan, South Korea, and the EU, secured negotiated reductions to 15 per cent. The UK received a 10 per cent rate, while Vietnam, Indonesia, Pakistan, and the Philippines saw duties adjusted to around 19–20 per has also hinted at using tariffs as leverage in future trade showdowns, particularly with China, where an August 12 deadline looms for a possible agreement. Without a deal, tariffs on Chinese goods could rise to a staggering 245 per the administration sees the tariffs as a tool to 'reset the global trading order,' economists warn of broader market disruptions and potential cost increases for American consumers.- EndsTune InMust Watch
