logo
Hongkongers warned of legal liabilities ahead of ChatGPT-style AI tool launch

Hongkongers warned of legal liabilities ahead of ChatGPT-style AI tool launch

Using artificial intelligence is a double-edged sword, and users must accept full responsibility if they break the law, according to Hong Kong's technology minister, ahead of the release of a locally developed tool powered by mainland China's DeepSeek for free public use this year.
Secretary for Innovation, Technology and Industry Sun Dong issued the warning on Saturday in response to an incident in which a University of Hong Kong (HKU) law student allegedly used AI tools to create illicit pornographic images of female classmates based on publicly available photos and screenshots from social media.
The university issued a warning letter and is reviewing the case, while Hong Kong's privacy watchdog has initiated a criminal investigation. The city's leader, John Lee Ka-chiu, has also pledged to explore international regulations and 'best practices' for AI governance.
'The use of AI is a double-edged sword as it will prompt many issues while providing convenience to the public and a boost to the economy. So the key is to have proper guidance and a comprehensive legal framework,' Sun told a radio programme.
'AI is just a tool. Eventually, the users have to be responsible for its application and bear the relevant liability.'
Sun added that users should be aware of their legal responsibilities when using AI as Hong Kong prepares for the free public launch of 'HK Chat' in the second half of the year.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New solutions to Hong Kong's old traffic problems are much needed
New solutions to Hong Kong's old traffic problems are much needed

South China Morning Post

time42 minutes ago

  • South China Morning Post

New solutions to Hong Kong's old traffic problems are much needed

Traffic congestion in Hong Kong is not as bad as in many other cities. However, the slow movement of people and goods has been bad enough to steadily 'erode the environment, sustainability, quality of life and competitiveness', according to a 2014 government study. More than two decades of work to expand infrastructure and reduce the number of private cars have not tamed Hong Kong's traffic troubles, so it is good that authorities and lawmakers are searching for new solutions. Advertisement Progressive fees and a cap on how long vehicles can occupy metered parking spaces are among the ideas being put forward. The suggestions followed a slew of recent government proposals to adjust traffic-related charges, including doubling rates at car parks. Officials have also suggested raising tolls at the Aberdeen Tunnel and Shing Mun Tunnels, changes to the licence fee structure and amounts for electric private cars, adjustments to fixed penalties for traffic offences and doubling parking meter charges. Hong Kong had around 20,000 metered parking spaces citywide as of the end of 2024. Abuse of the devices is persistent. Some drivers occupy spots for extended periods – sometimes for days – by continuously feeding meters. Others circle around searching for the relatively cheap metered spots, worsening traffic congestion. If meter fees increase, it would be from HK$2 (25 US cents) to HK$4 per 15 minutes. Lawmakers have suggested restricting the number of hours a car can park in the same spot or a progressive system, so longer stays incur higher fees. Others have called for registering licence plates or even implementing congestion charges or electronic road pricing. Since the 1980s, there have been several trials of such fees on motorists in central areas during rush hour. Advertisement Approaches so far have been piecemeal and lacked resolve. Parking fee increases are long overdue and would be the first since 1994. Additional revenue could be timely support for the city as it struggles with a budget deficit and to reinvigorate the economy.

Sean Stein on why US businesses are walking a tightrope to stay in China
Sean Stein on why US businesses are walking a tightrope to stay in China

South China Morning Post

timean hour ago

  • South China Morning Post

Sean Stein on why US businesses are walking a tightrope to stay in China

Sean Stein is president of the US-China Business Council (USCBC), a Washington-based non-profit organisation that promotes trade between the world's two largest economies. The council represents more than 270 American companies doing business in China. He most recently served as board chair of the American Chamber of Commerce in China and is chair emeritus of the American Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai. Before that, he served for nearly three decades as a diplomat, including as US Consul General in Shenyang and Shanghai. This interview first appeared in SCMP Plus . For other interviews in the Open Questions series, click here It has been broadly assumed the US and China will extend the 90-day pause on tariff increases they agreed to after talks in Geneva by another 90 days. What trade deals could we see by November? What do American companies with business in China expect? How will their voices be heard in Washington? That is correct – it is almost inevitable that the 90-day pause gets extended, particularly since the two sides have announced that there is a framework deal. The alternative is unthinkable. It would mean going back to pre-Geneva, triple-digit tariffs, something neither side wants. Looking at the potential for a broader deal, now that China has added two fentanyl precursors to its list of restricted chemicals, there is some expectation that the US may lower the 20 per cent tariff it put in place due to fentanyl. When that happens, China is expected to lower some of its retaliatory tariffs. This could be a path back toward a more normal trade relationship, but so far, we have not seen the US take steps to reciprocate China's gesture. What the business community is worried about is that virtually all the discussion between the countries has been about tariffs.

Australia should not sabotage its own efforts to boost ties with China
Australia should not sabotage its own efforts to boost ties with China

South China Morning Post

time2 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

Australia should not sabotage its own efforts to boost ties with China

Chinese media outlets were keen to accentuate the positives of Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's visit to China. However, sections of the Australian media played up the idea that China was attempting to drive a wedge between Australia and the United States and members of the Australian opposition criticised the visit, calling some of Albanese's stops 'indulgent'. The visit achieved much in some areas, but otherwise made little progress. Despite reported efforts by Elbridge Colby, US undersecretary of defence for policy, to seemingly sabotage the visit, Albanese deftly refused to allow questions about Taiwan to divert him from his mission of reaffirming the improvement of Australia-China relations. But if Albanese was trying to convince Chinese investors that Australia is a reliable place to invest in, he sabotaged himself. This is best summed up by the Australian Financial Review headline 'PM stares down China retaliation threat over Darwin Port sale'. The Albanese government is moving to overturn the China-based company Landbridge Group's 99-year lease on the port of Darwin just a decade into the lease period. It would be difficult to find a better and more pertinent example of Australia's limited reliability when it comes to long-term investment from China.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store