Trial date set for alleged Palestine Action members accused of damaging planes at RAF base
Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, Jony Cink, 24, Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 36, and Lewis Chiaramello, 22, appeared at the Old Bailey on Friday, and spoke only to confirm their names.
Police previously said the incident in Oxfordshire on 20 June had caused about £7 million worth of damage to the aircraft.
It has previously been alleged the defendants had been heavily involved in Palestine Action at the time.
On the same day they were charged, MPs backed the Government's move to ban the direct action group Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation.
Legislation passed in the Commons as MPs voted 385 to 26, majority 359, in favour of proscribing the group under the Terrorism Act 2000.
Counter Terrorism Policing South East (CTPSE) charged the defendants with conspiracy to enter a prohibited place knowingly for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or interests of the United Kingdom, and conspiracy to commit criminal damage, under the Criminal Law Act 1977.
On Friday, the defendants appeared at the Old Bailey amid heightened security, with a timetable set for the course of the case.
Watched by members of the public in a packed public gallery, the defendants spoke only to confirm their identities, with one mouthing 'I love you' to his supporters.
As the prosecution have claimed the case has a 'terrorist connection', it was heard in the terrorism list before Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb, with the court told a provision trial date had been identified for 18 January 2027.
Prosecutor Jonathan Polnay KC accepted that was 'obviously a considerable distance away' and there was uncertainty at this stage how long any trial would take.
Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb said the 2027 trial date meant an 'inordinately long time' for the four young people to wait in custody.
She said: 'The sooner the real issues in this case are identified the better for everyone, particularly in fixing the trial date.'
The senior judge confirmed the 2027 trial date at the Old Bailey but said she would review it at a plea hearing on January 16 next year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Why Lionesses will no longer take the knee following Jess Carter abuse
England's Lionesses will stand, rather than take the knee, before their Euro 2025 semi-final against Italy. The decision follows "vile" racist abuse received by England defender Jess Carter on social media during the tournament. Lucy Bronze stated the team felt the anti-racism message of taking the knee was no longer as effective, leading to 'anger' and 'sadness' within the squad about abuse directed at Carter. The Lionesses believe football needs to find new ways to combat racism, a sentiment supported by anti-discrimination group Kick It Out, who urged social media companies to do more. Bronze highlighted that online abuse in women's football is escalating with the sport's growth, particularly targeting female players, and called for social media platforms to implement solutions.
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Lucy Bronze explains England's decision to stop taking the knee after Jess Carter abuse
Lucy Bronze said the Lionesses have decided against taking the knee before their Euro 2025 semi-final against Italy because there is a clear argument the anti-racism message is not 'as strong as it used to be' following the abuse of England defender Jess Carter. Bronze revealed there is 'anger' and 'sadness' in the England camp after Carter spoke out against the 'vile' and 'abhorrent' social media abuse she has received while playing for England at Euro 2025. The Lionesses have taken the knee before games since the murder of George Floyd in 2020 but will stand before kick-off against Italy on Tuesday. In a statement, the Lionesses said 'we and football need to find another way to tackle racism' while the anti-discrimination group Kick It Out backed the players' decision and called on social media companies to do more to combat racist abuse. 'It was driven by the group - obviously certain individuals more than others,' Bronze explained. 'I think it was just the fact that we feel as a collective, is the message as strong as it used to be? Is the message really hitting hard? Because to us it feels like it's not if these things are still happening to our players in the biggest tournaments of their lives. 'It's about putting another statement out there to say, it's something that still is a problem, it's something that still needs to be put right. More needs to be done in football, more needs to be done in society. What that is right now as an individual, I don't exactly know.' The Football Association (FA) are in contact with the UK police while Bronze also praised Carter's bravery in speaking out against the abuse. The 27-year-old Carter, who has won 49 caps for her country and has played in all four of England's games at Euro 2025, said she would be taking a step back from social media for the rest of the tournament. Bronze, 33, is appearing at her seventh major tournament for England said online abuse in women' football is getting 'worse and worse' as the game receives more attention. Bronze accepted that the growth of women's football since the Lionesses won Euro 2022 is a 'double-edged sword' as it also leaves players open to more abuse. 'I think it's something that I've spoken about before and a lot of other members of the team have spoken about the fact that the bigger the game gets, the bigger the noise becomes, the more fans there are but the more critics there are,' Bronze said. 'We're obviously open to critics, that's why we love the sport, but we're not open to abuse. 'And I think bigger the sport's got, it seems to be that more abuse has come as well and especially in women's football, the online abuse seems to be getting worse and worse. 'We see it more in the stadiums in men's football and online, but I think with women's football there seems to be a real target online. It's something that we're very aware of and I think with online platforms it's something that we can, we can make a change too. I think it's something in the women's game especially. 'I think with online platforms it's something that we can make a change too. I think it's something in the women's game especially. There is a way to make a change. There is a solution. I don't have the answer to that solution because I'm not head of the social media platform, but I'm sure that there is one.' Bronze said she would be supporting the three other Black players in the England team - Lauren James, Michelle Agyemang and Khiara Kheating - after they were forced to see a team-mate suffer racist abuse while playing for the Lionesses at a major tournament. 'I think we all know that any player of colour that's played for England has probably gone through racist abuse,' Bronze said. 'That's a sad fact in this day and age. In terms of emotions yesterday, I think there was a lot of anger, to be honest, because we're having to go through this, because as players we want to stand up and we want to make a change. 'It's anger and sadness that our teammates have gone through this. We don't want it to happen. We want to be focused on the football. We want to be making changes. We want Jess and anybody else who puts on an England shirt to be brave, to be happy when they play for England, to have the fans support through it all. I think there was a lot of sadness, but definitely a lot of anger as well.' A statement from Kick It Out said: 'We send our support to Jess Carter and back her decision to look after her own well-being. It shouldn't come to a point where players feel the need to take this action; they should feel safe while doing their jobs. They should not be exposed to this sickening behaviour, and those responsible should face the strongest possible consequences. 'But responsibility also lies with social media companies. We support players in whatever actions they choose to take to signify their support in the fight against racism, but the focus should be on the reason behind those actions rather than the actions themselves. 'Social media companies have failed to prevent exposure to this toxicity, and football must continue to use its collective power to hold them to account. We have been working with the government and the regulator, but we know that more urgency is needed from everyone involved.'
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Why are Tesco and Sainsbury's calling on Rachel Reeves to make a fresh U-turn on tax?
R achel Reeves is facing a fresh rebellion, but this time, the opposition is coming from Britain's biggest supermarkets, not the Labour back benches. Tesco and Sainsbury's have joined forces with pubs, restaurants and other hospitality businesses to warn the chancellor against a planned £1.7bn tax raid on the industry. The Independent looks at what the businesses are worried about, and whether their warnings are likely to be heeded. What is the tax raid? The grocery giants' intervention focuses on the chancellor's plans to overhaul the business rates system. Changes outlined by Ms Reeves in her Budget last October will lead to higher payments for department stores, big supermarkets and other businesses with larger sites. At the time, the chancellor said she was creating a 'fairer business rates system' by permanently lowering payments for high street retail, hospitality and leisure properties. To fund lower rates for businesses worth less than £500,000, Ms Reeves outlined plans for those worth more than £500,000 to pay a higher rate. The government is also scrapping a relief enjoyed by the companies, granting them 40 per cent off their business rates bills up to £110,000, which currently costs the Treasury £1.7bn a year. 'This measure will provide certainty and support for the high street,' the government said at the time. What do critics say? Tesco chief executive Ken Murphy told The Telegraph that the changes will threaten 'investments in customers, colleagues and communities'. 'Increasing the burden on large shops would hinder rather than help our town centres. Many of these shops are anchor stores in their local communities,' the retail chief added. And Sainsbury's boss Simon Roberts said big retailers, already struggling with higher national insurance contributions and the minimum wage hike, would 'pull away from our high streets'. He told the paper: 'The changes being proposed will further increase the negative impact of business rates and won't stimulate the growth or investment into our high streets and jobs that we all want to see.' The British Retail Consortium (BRC) estimates that around 4,000 large retailers will be hit by the changes. It argues that these 'anchor stores' drive footfall and help sustain surrounding businesses and communities. What do they want changed? The BRC wants the government to exclude shops from the higher rate payment, the level of which is set to be unveiled in the autumn Budget and take effect from next April. Funding the exemption of shops would require smaller retail, leisure and hospitality firms to pay slightly more. Will the government listen? It is rare for the likes of Sainsbury's and Tesco to publicly speak out against government policy, and the intervention is a sign of the growing frustration among retail and hospitality bosses at Ms Reeves and Sir Keir Starmer. The industry has already been hit with national insurance hikes, a minimum wage increase and is bracing for the imposition of Angela Rayner's employment rights shake-up. Pub bosses have warned they are already seeing record closures and the business rates reforms will cause more to shut down. Labour came to power with a promise to govern as a party of business, and the Treasury will certainly take note of the retailers' calls. However, with the chancellor already under pressure to raise as much cash as possible in her next Budget, any move that critics could paint as a bung to big business will prove politically difficult.
