Xbox handheld console is here. Meet the Xbox Ally's
Remove Ads
Microsoft has unveiled two versions of its new handheld gaming device : the Xbox Ally and the more powerful Xbox Ally X . The Ally X is equipped with AMD's latest handheld processor, the AI Z2 Extreme, which features a built-in NPU delivering 50 TOPs of AI performance essentially turning it into a Copilot+ laptop in handheld form. Meanwhile, the standard Ally uses the less powerful Z2 A chip.The Xbox Ally X arrives just in time for Microsoft to integrate Copilot into the Xbox App. It also mirrors the specs of the Asus ROG Ally X, released in July 2024, boasting a 1080p display, 120Hz refresh rate, and VRR support via Freesync Premium. While it's unclear if the screen is identical, it promises a stunning visual experience regardless.Microsoft has also optimized the software experience for the Xbox Ally X, tailoring it specifically for handheld use. When it launches later this year, the device will boot directly into a newly redesigned, handheld-friendly version of the Xbox App. This updated interface will act as a unified launch hub, seamlessly integrating your PC game libraries including Steam, Epic Games, and more into one place.While an official release date hasn't been announced, Microsoft has indicated that both the Xbox Ally X and the standard Ally are expected to debut during the holiday season. Pricing details have yet to be revealed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Bill Gates decodes the toughest interview question professionals face: ‘Why should we hire you?'
Even the world's most accomplished entrepreneurs confront the same questions that many job seekers find daunting. Billionaire philanthropist and Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates may never need to participate in a formal job interview, yet in a 2020 conversation for NBA star Stephen Curry's YouTube series State of Inspiration , Gates role-played as a young software engineer — a college dropout preparing for his first professional position at Microsoft. This exercise was more than a performance; it offered both graduates and early-career professionals rare insights into how to approach classic interview questions with clarity, strategic thinking, and confidence. The question every candidate fears Among the questions Gates addressed, none carried greater weight than: 'Why should we hire you?' In responding, he emphasized not only his technical skills but also his collaborative potential. He stated, 'You should look at the codes that I've written. I write software programs far beyond any classes that I've taken. I think I've improved over time, so take a look at how ambitious I've been.' The message was clear: Recruiters evaluate more than raw competence. They seek professionals who demonstrate initiative, a commitment to continuous learning, and measurable achievements. Gates reinforced this perspective by highlighting his ability to work in a team and his adaptability. 'I do think I can work well with people. I might criticise their code a little harshly, but overall, I like to be on a team. I like ambitious goals. I like thinking through how we can anticipate the future. Software is fascinating, and I want to be involved,' he explained. Honesty as a professional asset Another important lesson emerged when Gates discussed weaknesses. When asked to reflect on areas for improvement, he candidly admitted, 'I'm not a natural at sales or marketing; I would rather focus on product creation and definition.' This transparency underscores a timeless principle: Self-awareness and honesty can strengthen a candidate's profile, provided it is paired with a clear articulation of the value one brings to an organization. Employers today seek professionals who can identify gaps in their skills, pursue growth opportunities, and communicate effectively without exaggerating or underselling their capabilities. Approaching compensation conversations strategically Discussions about compensation often intimidate applicants, yet Gates approached the topic with thoughtfulness. He stated, 'I hope the option package is good. I'm able to take a risk, and I think the company has a great future, so I prefer to receive stock options even more than cash compensation.' By prioritizing equity over immediate cash, Gates conveyed confidence in the company's trajectory and positioned himself as a long-term contributor. For professionals in 2025, understanding how to balance compensation expectations with company vision and personal growth opportunities remains a critical negotiation skill. Lessons for job seekers in 2025 Stephen Curry summarized the broader takeaway succinctly: Gates' mock interview responses reveal a framework for presenting oneself with confidence, curiosity, and strategic foresight. Modern recruiters evaluate more than technical ability; they also assess teamwork, honesty, adaptability, and negotiation skills. Whether pursuing careers in coding, product strategy, or design, professionals who combine technical competence with foresight and integrity stand out. Gates' approach demonstrates a principle that transcends time and industry: The most compelling candidates are those who couple talent with ambition, ethical professionalism, and the ability to contribute meaningfully to a team's collective objectives. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
India Today
4 hours ago
- India Today
AI engineer Varun Gupta, an IIT grad, gets probation and $34,000 fine for leaking Intel secrets to Microsoft
An ex-Intel engineer who stole 'thousands of files' from his former employer has escaped prison but won't escape the headlines. Varun Gupta, who left the chip giant in early 2020 to join Microsoft, has been handed two years' probation and a fine of $34,472 (around Rs 30,21,510) for lifting confidential documents, data that prosecutors say helped him secure his new role and gave Microsoft an edge in high-stakes negotiations with to Oregon Live, Gupta spent his final days at Intel quietly copying sensitive information from company systems. Among the material he walked away with was a PowerPoint presentation that outlined Intel's pricing strategies for a major client, the kind of playbook most rivals could only dream of report highlighted that Gupta had worked at Intel for a decade, serving as a product marketing engineer, before leaving in January 2020. Just days later, he was in the ranks at Microsoft. Court documents revealed that the files he took were 'instrumental' both to landing his new post and in later discussions between the two tech titans. Assistant US Attorney William Narus, who prosecuted the case, argued that Gupta's behaviour was deliberate and repeated. He urged the judge to impose eight months in federal prison, stressing that Gupta had 'purposefully and repetitively accessed secret documents' in order to bolster his defence painted a different picture. Gupta's lawyer, David Angeli, admitted the theft was a 'serious error in judgment' but insisted his client had already paid a heavy price. Gupta has lost the kind of senior industry roles he once held, and he previously settled a civil lawsuit with Intel to the tune of $40, Angeli argued, was punishment the end, US District Judge Amy Baggio settled somewhere in the middle. While refusing to send Gupta to prison, she did not let him off lightly. The $34,472 fine wasn't plucked out of thin air, it was calculated to reflect the cost of the eight months of federal imprisonment that prosecutors had pushed explained that this unusual figure underscored the seriousness of Gupta's misconduct, signalling that the court did not see it as a 'one-off indiscretion.' But she also noted that Gupta's reputation had already been dragged through the mud, which she considered punishment in its own the case now behind him, Gupta is turning his back on the world of semiconductors. Having paid his fine in full, he has relocated with his family to France, where life looks very different. Instead of battling over chips and contracts, he's swapping servers for say Gupta is currently studying vineyard management and plans to reinvent himself in the wine industry. His ambition? To become a technical director in viticulture.- EndsMust Watch
Mint
5 hours ago
- Mint
Politics beats the market in Trump's pay-for-play chip scheme
The Trump administration's recent reversal of export restrictions on certain Nvidia and AMD's AI chips to China marks a major shift in U.S. policy and has raised legal concerns. But the deeper risks are political and economic—and warrant scrutiny. His administration decided in July to re-allow Nvidia and AMD to sell their H20 and MI308 chips to China—conditional on a 15% revenue remittance to the U.S. government. Export controls on AI chips were initially implemented by the Biden administration in 2022 to curb China's access to advanced processors critical for artificial intelligence and supercomputing, citing national security concerns. But Nvidia's H20 chip was specifically designed for the Chinese market. Even though it is reportedly incapable of training large AI models, the H20 chip is effective for inference tasks—allowing AI systems to respond to queries based on pre-trained data. Chinese engineers have leveraged the H20 chips for applications using open-source models such as DeepSeek and Alibaba's Qwen, which are increasingly popular in China's AI ecosystem. Trump continued these controls—until recently. Critics, such as Rep. Don Bacon (R., Neb.) and Liza Tobin, who served as China director at the National Security Council under the first Trump and Biden administrations, have argued that the sale of these chips, even under revenue-sharing constraints, undermines the strategic intent of the original export controls. Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D., Ill.) likened it to gambling with national security. The Trump administration's reversal appears motivated by revenue generation. Bernstein Research estimates that Nvidia could sell approximately 1.5 million H20 chips in China in 2025, generating $23 billion in revenue; a 15% cut would yield more than $3 billion for the U.S. government. It aligns with Trump's broader strategy of using tariffs and trade deals to bolster government income. However, this revenue-centric approach raises concerns about the erosion of principled policymaking. The arrangement resembles a 'pay-to-play" scheme, where export licenses are granted in exchange for financial contributions. Legal scholars argue that this violates the Export Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits taxes or duties on exports. Moreover, the Export Controls Reform Act of 2018—signed by Trump himself—explicitly forbids charging exporters for licenses. The deal with Nvidia and AMD may also reflect a broader diplomatic calculus. China dominates the global supply chain for rare earth materials, which are essential for military technologies like guided missiles, fighter jets, and radar systems. These materials are also used in manufacturing key components for smartphones and electric vehicles—including batteries, touch screens, and camera lenses. The U.S. is investing in domestic mining and processing of rare earth minerals, such as at the Mountain Pass mine in California, which is the only rare-earth mining and processing facility in the U.S. But it remains heavily reliant on Chinese exports. By easing chip restrictions, the Trump administration may be signaling goodwill in hopes of securing a stable supply of rare earths. This strategic compromise, however, risks emboldening China. If Beijing perceives U.S. export controls as negotiable or monetizable, it may be less inclined to make concessions in other areas of trade or security. The precedent set by this deal could weaken the credibility of future U.S. restrictions, making it harder to enforce technology bans or secure allied cooperation. And then there are the corporate interests. The role of Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang in shaping this policy shift cannot be overlooked. Huang reportedly argued that restricting Nvidia's access to the Chinese market would inadvertently benefit domestic Chinese competitors like Huawei. He emphasized that China's AI development is deeply intertwined with Nvidia's chips and software ecosystem, suggesting that continued engagement would allow the U.S. to retain some influence over China's technological trajectory. Nvidia also maintains a research center in Shanghai. While Huang's argument has merit, it reveals the tension between corporate interests and national security. Nvidia's dependence on the Chinese market and talent pool may compromise its ability to align with U.S. strategic interests. Investors may view all of this as a slippery slope, in which political considerations begin overriding free-market principles, potentially undermining confidence in U.S. financial markets. Ultimately, the reversal of export restrictions on Nvidia and AMD's AI chips to China reflects a transactional approach to national security—one that prioritizes revenue over resilience. About the author: Christopher Tang is a distinguished professor at the UCLA Anderson School of Management. Guest commentaries like this one are written by authors outside the Barron's newsroom. They reflect the perspective and opinions of the authors. Submit feedback and commentary pitches to ideas@
