
Markets rattled by ‘credible threat' of Trump trying to fire Powell
In an echo of the havoc that Trump unleashed with his trade war in early April, markets were briefly turned upside-down on Wednesday after a White House official said the president was likely to soon remove Powell.
Stocks, the dollar and long-term US government bonds quickly retreated, while short-term Treasuries rallied on speculation that whomever Trump appoints to replace Powell will bend to the president's will and cut interest rates. Yet in less than an hour, the moves unwound after the president downplayed the possibility, saying he was 'not planning' to fire Powell, someone he's been lobbing almost daily criticisms at for moving too slow.
By most measures, the markets' reaction was relatively muted, in no small part because of Trump's penchant for bluffing — not to mention questions about whether a US president has the legal authority to actually remove a Fed chair whose interest-rate policy he dislikes.
But the message that markets sent was clear. To many, the initial moves reflected a deep-seated uneasiness that Trump will do what had long been unthinkable: That by firing Powell, he will end the Fed's decades-long independence in setting monetary policy, and in the process risk stoking a surge in inflation.
'The markets are taking this as a credible threat,' said Joe Gilbert, portfolio manager at Integrity Asset Management. 'This is unsettling and it remains to be seen if this is just a trial balloon by Trump to gauge market sentiment if indeed he follows through with firing Powell. Ultimately, we believe the legal hurdles will be too substantial to remove Powell.'
To some observers like Wells Fargo macro strategist Erik Nelson, the reaction in major asset classes may convince the administration that firing Powell will not prove to be a panacea for the economy and markets.
The yields on two-year Treasuries, one of the securities most sensitive to the Fed's benchmark policy rate, declined as much as 8 basis points while the rate on the 10-year note trimmed a drop of five basis points. The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index erased a gain of 0.2% to drop as much as 0.7%. The S&P 500, which was up as much as 0.3% early in the session, dipped as much as 0.7%.
Much of those knee-jerk moves quickly reversed after Trump made it clear that Powell's firing was not imminent.
For some, like Bill Gross, the co-founder and former chief investment officer of Pacific Investment Management Co., the timing is less important than who is named to replace Powell.
'If he can sway the committee's thinking over time, bond markets will increasingly go curve positive, the dollar will weaken,' he wrote in a post on X.
Investors wake up!
The timing of the new Fed chair is less significant than the influence he will have on his committee.
If he can sway the committee's thinking over time, bond markets will increasingly go curve positive, the dollar will weaken, and inflation will likely move to…
— Bill Gross (@real_bill_gross) July 16, 2025
Many have expressed concern that even broaching the subject was potentially disruptive to the stability of US markets that have long relied on a central bank that is free from political influence. JPMorgan Chase & Co. CEO Jamie Dimon said on the bank's earnings conference call on Tuesday that the Fed's continued independence is 'absolutely critical' and meddling with the central bank 'can often have adverse consequences.'
While Trump told reporters in the Oval Office that 'no, we're not planning on doing anything,' his comments left open the possibility of an attempt to oust Powell for cause. While Trump and his allies have lambasted Powell for most of the year over the central bank's decision to hold interest rates steady, lately they have seized on the swelling cost of renovations to the central bank's Washington headquarters. Asked Tuesday if the renovation price tag amounts to a fireable offense, Trump said: 'I think it sort of is.'
'Just threatening to 'fire' him is a bad precedent,' said Kathy Jones, chief fixed income strategist at Charles Schwab & Co.. 'It sends the message that 'Hey, I'm willing to break all precedent and cross that line to get what I want.''
George Saravelos, Deutsche Bank's global head of FX strategy, said in a report over the weekend that if Trump were to force Powell out, the subsequent 24 hours would probably see a drop of at least 3% to 4% in the trade-weighted dollar, as well as a 30 to 40 basis point fixed-income selloff.
For now at least, the markets appeared to take Trump at his word that he wasn't about to soon take action to replace Powell before his term is up next year. Yet investors were left gaming out the various scenarios that may unfold if he did.
'What does it mean for markets? Lower market confidence, more rate cuts priced, weaker USD and higher term premium,' Jordan Rochester, head of macro strategy for EMEA at Mizuho International Plc., wrote in a note. 'Trump's denial has stopped the pace of the move but folks now need to consider the possibility in the months ahead.'
Thierry Wizman, global foreign-exchange and rates strategist at Macquarie Group, added that 'the first order of business for traders is to bet on a steepening yield curve in the US. From a more structural long-term perspective, it also means the Fed may pay less attention to inflation and be more fiscally-captured.'
Of course, for some veteran traders accustomed to the market whiplash that often accompanies conflicting news flow out of the Trump White House, it was just another day in the office.
'You can go crazy if you try to trade around these headlines,' said Leah Traub, a partner and portfolio manager on the global rates team at Lord Abbet. 'We stood pat.' –BLOOMBERG
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
28 minutes ago
- The Sun
Trump gains Native American support amid economic concerns
TUBA CITY: Rising gas prices and economic frustrations have led some Native American voters to shift their political allegiance toward US president Donald Trump, marking a surprising trend in traditionally Democratic-leaning communities. Nita Mexican, a 77-year-old Navajo Nation resident, voted for Trump last November, citing his hardline stance on immigration and focus on American jobs. 'America has to come first,' she told AFP. 'Us Natives, we are Americans and we should have the jobs first.' Mexican, a former power plant worker, lives in Tuba City, a remote Arizona desert town within the vast Navajo reservation. She and her husband spend $40 (RM170) daily on gasoline to tend to their sheep, a financial strain worsened by inflation. 'Sometimes we don't have enough to get groceries for the both of us,' she admitted. Trump made notable gains in Navajo County during the last election, doubling his margin from 2020. Similar shifts were seen in other Native American communities, where economic concerns outweighed traditional Democratic loyalty. However, not all residents support Trump. Gilberta Cortes, a 42-year-old mother, criticises his policies and rhetoric, including his mockery of Senator Elizabeth Warren's Native heritage. 'You see a lot of racism,' she said. 'When I go out, I feel like I'm just walking on eggshells.' Others worry about Trump's environmental policies and potential cuts to federal assistance programs. Elbert Yazzie, a Navajo resident, fears reduced food aid will hurt low-income families. 'They voted for him because they thought there would be more jobs,' he said. 'But instead, he's cutting off food stamps.' - AFP


The Star
34 minutes ago
- The Star
Trump revives India-Pakistan conflict claims over jet losses
US President Donald Trump said up to five jets were shot down during recent India-Pakistan hostilities that began after an April attack in India-administered Kashmir, with the situation calming after a ceasefire in May. Trump, who made his remarks at a Friday dinner with some Republican US lawmakers at the White House, did not specify which side's jets he was referring to. 'In fact, planes were being shot out of the air. Five, five, four or five, but I think five jets were shot down actually,' Trump said while talking about the India-Pakistan hostilities, without elaborating or providing further detail. Pakistan claimed it downed five Indian planes in air-to-air combat. India's highest-ranking general said in late May that India switched tactics after suffering losses in the air on the first day of hostilities and established an advantage before a ceasefire was announced three days later. India also claimed it downed 'a few planes' of Pakistan. Islamabad denied suffering any losses of planes but acknowledged its air bases suffered hits. Trump has repeatedly claimed credit for the ceasefire that he announced on social media on May 10 after Washington held talks with both sides. India has differed with Trump's claims that it resulted from his intervention and his threats to sever trade talks. India's position has been that New Delhi and Islamabad must resolve their problems directly and with no outside involvement. India is an increasingly important US partner in Washington's effort to counter China's influence in Asia, while Pakistan is a US ally. The April attack in India-administered Kashmir killed 26 men and sparked heavy fighting between the nuclear-armed Asian neighbours in the latest escalation of a decades-old rivalry. New Delhi blamed the attack on Pakistan, which denied responsibility while calling for a neutral investigation. Washington condemned the attack but did not directly blame Islamabad. — Reuters


The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
The Epstein files obsession, explained
Jack Posobiec, a far-right political activist, carrying a binder labeled 'The Epstein Files: Phase 1' as he exited the White House in February. — Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times) FOR months, Trump administration officials faced mounting pressure by the far right and online influencers to release the so-called Epstein files, the remaining investigative documents of the sex-trafficking investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, a multimillionaire who hanged himself in a federal jail in New York in 2019. On July 7, the US Justice Department issued a memo that sought to put an end to the matter, following what it said had been an exhaustive investigation: 'This systematic review revealed no incriminating 'client list'...There was also no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions.' This came at the heels of former White House adviser Elon Musk's suggestion that Trump was in the Epstein files – a loaded accusation that implies the president might somehow be connected to the financier's crimes. Musk, who made the claim after a vindictive online battle with the US president did not offer any evidence, but soon added, 'The truth will come out.' Simply being mentioned in such files does not necessarily mean much. Criminal case files are frequently full of victim identities, and the names of witnesses and other innocent people who came into contact with suspects or evidence in a case. Trump and Epstein had crossed paths over the years, both fixtures of wealthy social circles in New York and Florida. In a 2002 interview with New York magazine, Trump said he had known Epstein for 15 years, calling him a 'terrific guy' who was 'a lot of fun to be with.' In that same interview, Trump added, 'it is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.' In 2019, after Epstein had been arrested again, the president distanced himself. 'I knew him like everybody in Palm Beach knew him,' he said. 'I don't think I have spoken with him for 15 years. I was not a fan.' The Epstein case has long been a focus of self-styled internet sleuths, conspiracy theorists and partisans who try to link Epstein's crimes to either Democratic or Republican politicians. It generated intense public interest because the first criminal charges Epstein faced were resolved with an unusual plea agreement, which exacted little punishment for what were described as years of sexual abuse of high school girls whom he paid for 'massages.' In July 2019, Epstein was arrested again and charged with more serious federal crimes. He hanged himself in a jail cell the following month while awaiting trial on those charges. But the handling of his case, and his death, have incited years of speculation that powerful people may have covered up their connections to him, leading to demands that the entire case file be released. In February, Trump administration officials, including Attorney General Pam Bondi, released what she called 'Phase 1' of the Epstein files, which were greeted with scorn and derision when it became clear that most of the material had previously been made public. Since then, Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel had enlisted dozens of agents and prosecutors to scrutinise and prepare other Epstein files for release, according to people familiar with the work who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe internal law enforcement operations. 'Phase 2' of the Epstein files has not been released. For months, federal law enforcement officials assigned to the task had wrestled with how to responsibly handle such information, especially when there is a possibility that innocent people named in the documents may suffer significant damage to their reputations when the files are ultimately released. But the clamour for the files, particularly from right-wing online influencers, has been relentless. Often those demands are for release of a 'client list.' That term, however, has little connection to the known facts of the case, in which Epstein repeatedly hired girls to work for him at his homes, giving him 'massages' that he quickly turned into sexual acts. — ©2025 The New York Times Company