logo
MoD braced for £1billion compensation bill after 100k lives put at risk of Taliban death squads by Afghan leak scandal

MoD braced for £1billion compensation bill after 100k lives put at risk of Taliban death squads by Afghan leak scandal

The Sun4 days ago
DEFENCE chiefs are braced for a £1billion compensation bill over a data breach which revealed Afghans who supported UK forces.
Around 100,000 were put at risk of Taliban death squads when their names or loved ones' were revealed in 2022 — with the blunder then 'covered up' by a UK gagging order.
7
7
7
Thousands could sue the MoD after the leak was made public this week.
Almost 900 Afghans on the 'kill list' email leak are ready to sue — with lawyers saying thousands more are poised to join them.
Legal sources claimed victims whose lives were endangered could be entitled 'to five-figure payouts'.
Adnan Malik, at Manchester firm Barings Law, which is representing nearly 900, said: 'The victims have been exposed to not just financial harm, but the real threat of violence and death.
In some cases, these threats have been tragically carried out.
Monies claimed will vary substantially between claimants, we would expect sums upwards of five figures for each person affected.'
That could see the overall compensation bill pass £1billion.
The February 2022 leak was caused by a Special Forces soldier who accidentally shared a list of 18,714 people who had applied to flee to Britain in the wake of the 2021 Taliban takeover of Afghanistan.
The list included their last-known location s, how they served British forces, and in some instances who supported their claims — including MPs, Special Forces and spies.
The leak, which included details of a 'secret route' for some of those affected to come to the UK, was only discovered when excerpts were put on Facebook in August 2023.
Taliban warns thousands of Afghans secretly airlifted to UK 'we will HUNT you down'
The next month, the Tory government used a superinjunction to stop journalists reporting the breach. It was extended until being lifted by a High Court judge this Tuesday.
A defence source said yesterday: 'People on that list had fought with British forces in Afghanistan.
'They fought against the Taliban. First of all we let the Taliban take over, and then when these people came to us for help we put their lives in even more danger.'
The potential huge bill emerged as Nigel Farage claimed 'convicted sex offenders' are among the Afghans secretly airlifted into the UK.
The Reform UK leader said the rescue of almost 20,000 Afghans is a risk to women's safety — triggering a row with Labour and the Tories.
Defence Secretary John Healey insisted everyone had been checked 'carefully' for any criminal records. And he said if Mr Farage had any hard evidence, he should report it to police.
Shadow Chancellor Mel Stride also said Mr Farage should provide evidence for his claims.
PM Sir Keir Starmer said the previous Tory government had serious questions to answer over the leak.
Hunting people down
Sir Ben Wallace, Defence Secretary at the time, insisted there was not a cover-up and the gagging order was to protect at-risk Afghans, and he made 'no apology' for doing so.
Sir Ben also said he applied for a four-month injunction and did not know why it was converted into a superinjunction in September 2023, when Grant Shapps had taken over as Defence Secretary.
7
Ex-Tory MP Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg said Mr Shapps had questions to answer. Mr Shapps has yet to comment.
Meanwhile, Zia Yusuf, head of Reform's Department of Government Efficiency, has launched a petition calling for an independent, judge-led inquiry.
He said: 'We want to know who made these decisions.'
Lawyers insisted the injunction was necessary to protect the lives of people who were named and at risk of Taliban reprisals.
It included hundreds of Afghan Special Forces who had served in units known as the Triples, alongside Britain's SAS and SBS.
The Triples conducted thousands of night raids against senior Taliban leaders and counter-narcotics operations.
Last night, Taliban sources claimed they have had the list for years — and had been hunting down those on it.
A Taliban official said: 'We got the list from the internet during the first days when it was leaked.
'A special unit has been launched to find them and make sure they do not work with Britain. We've been calling and visiting their family members to track them down.'
7
7
In 2023, the Government launched a secret airlift, codenamed Operation Rubific, to smuggle around 4,500 people on the list to Britain.
They are among 34,000 Afghans who have been offered new lives in Britain since the Taliban takeover. That number is expected to rise to 43,000 and the Government predicts the total cost will be £7billion.
An MoD spokesman yesterday insisted a £1billion compensation bill was 'pure speculation'.
He said: 'The Government inherited a deeply complex situation and since taking office, have taken appropriate action in line with the level of risk these individuals faced.
'We will do everything possible to defend against any compensation claims and any we do get, we will fight them hard.'
MINISTERS' BLAME GAME
FORMER Tory ministers have turned on each other as a blame game erupted over the Afghan data leak.
Former PM Liz Truss accused ex-Defence Secretary Sir Ben Wallace of a 'huge betrayal of public trust'.
She said she was 'shocked by the secrecy' of Operation Rubific, which brought 4,500 Afghans to Britain after their details were leaked.
And she demanded those responsible in governments and the bureaucracy needed to be held to account.
But Sir Ben hit back by claiming Ms Truss — Foreign Secretary under Boris Johnson in February 2022 — approved the plan in office.
He replied to her X post: 'Oh dear Liz. Not quite. You were part of the Cabinet that approved the relocation of Afghans and the wider Home Office refugee scheme.'
He also defended his actions, writing: 'I make no apology for applying to the court for an injunction at the time. Imagine if the Taliban had been alerted to the existence of this list.'
Sir Keir Starmer said both former ministers had 'serious questions to answer' about the airlift that may ultimately cost an estimated £7billion.
Ex-Tory MP Sir Jacob Rees Mogg also called on Sir Grant Shapps, who was Defence Secretary when the injunction became a superinjunction, to speak out on the revelations.
And Reform UK's Zia Yusuf has called for a judge-led inquiry into the operation.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HUGO DUNCAN: Too much G7 hubris from Chancellor
HUGO DUNCAN: Too much G7 hubris from Chancellor

Daily Mail​

time10 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

HUGO DUNCAN: Too much G7 hubris from Chancellor

Rachel Reeves likes to brag that Britain is the fastest-growing economy in the G7 – a 'beacon of stability' in an uncertain world. She will soon have to change her tune. Yes, the economy grew by 0.7 per cent in the first quarter, leaving the US, Germany, France and the rest of the G7 in Britain's wake. But it is never wise to dine out on one set of figures, and GDP contracted by 0.3 per cent in April and 0.1 per cent in May, leaving the second quarter looking somewhat iffy to say the least. Britain could soon be at, or close to, the bottom of the G7 pile. What will the Chancellor say then? The harsh reality, as opposed to Reeves' rose-tinted rhetoric, is seen in the latest jobs figures, which make grim reading. Unemployment is now at a four-year high of 4.7 per cent and 178,000 jobs have been lost since the election, according to the Office for National Statistics. As Britain loses its fastest-growing-in-the-G7 crown, we continue to 'lead' the pack in ways the Chancellor is less keen to talk about. At 3.6 per cent, we now have the highest rate of inflation among the group. This muddies the waters for the Bank of England and the outlook for interest rates – though another cut remains likely next month. While Reeves seeks credit for four rate cuts on her watch, which she sees as a by-product of the 'stability' she has fostered, borrowing costs may have in fact fallen further and faster but for her own policies. The £25billion rise in National Insurance Contributions (NICs) that are paid by employers has pushed up prices and hit employment. As has the rise in the minimum wage. Throw in Labour's jobs-destroying workers' rights package, and the menace of stagflation looms large. A pattern is developing. When in Opposition, Reeves described NICs as a 'jobs tax' but, when in office, raised it anyway. At the Mansion House last week she warned that 'regulation acts as a boot on the neck of businesses'. Yet a fresh wave of red tape is coming. And she was right when she said this spring that 'we can't tax and spend our way to higher living standards and better public services'. But that is exactly the policy that she is pursuing, with more tax hikes and spending to come. So while she and her minions in the Treasury boast of 'stability', the country faces a summer of speculation over which taxes will rise and who will be hit. 'Working people' – the legions Labour vowed to protect – is the answer whether they be 'wealthy' or on 'modest incomes'. The damage to the economy and livelihoods will be stark. But perhaps most worrying of all is our standing on the bond markets. Bond yields, which are a measure of what investors charge a country to lend it money, are higher here than in any other G7 country. That's right, it costs the British Government more to borrow than the US, Canada, Germany, France, Italy and Japan. It even costs Britain more to borrow than Greece. According to the Office for Budget Responsibility: 'The UK Government faces the third-highest borrowing costs of any advanced economy after New Zealand and Iceland.' Far from being a 'beacon of stability', we are at the mercy of the bond markets, which are not keen on what they see. Britain's economy does stand apart from other members of the G7 under Labour. But not in the ways that the Chancellor would like.

Ministers face £5bn Nuked Blood bill as they refuse to reveal evidence
Ministers face £5bn Nuked Blood bill as they refuse to reveal evidence

Daily Mirror

time12 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Ministers face £5bn Nuked Blood bill as they refuse to reveal evidence

Ministers have refused to tell Parliament what evidence they have found about human radiation experiments on troops. The Nuked Blood Scandal threatens to land the MoD with a potential £5bn lawsuit Ministers have uncovered government plans to conduct radiation experiments on troops, but refused to give details to Parliament. ‌ It comes days after the Defence Secretary told MPs he was 'deeply uncomfortable' about a super-injunction that prevented him discussing a £7bn data leak about Afghan troops and translators. ‌ Now the Mirror can reveal that his department is again hiding potentially expensive errors behind the cloak of a 'ministerial review' - with final costs estimated at a further £5bn. ‌ Tory grandee Sir John Hayes said: "Given that the ministers will have discovered a great deal in this review, it's important they inform Parliament of it at the earliest opportunity to maintain good faith, and I will be raising this in the House as a matter of urgency." The inquiry was ordered last year after a BBC documentary showcased our investigation of the Nuked Blood Scandal, a Cold War programme of mass blood and urine testing on servicemen conducted in Australia and the Pacific for more than a decade. The results are missing from medical files, effectively denying them war pensions, compensation, and the right medical treatment. MoD officials have repeatedly told Parliament and the courts that blood testing never took place. ‌ Veterans Minister Al Carns has been asked several times by MPs of all parties to reveal his findings from the 10-month review of Ministry of Defence archives, but has rejected the calls, saying he is hunting for evidence of an official policy of blood-testing. 'I will update the house when I am in a position to share the findings of the exercise that is looking at concerns raised with me about some nuclear test veterans' medical records,' he told the Commons. His staff have examined 43,000 files, amounting to more than a million pages. They include a 1957 request from Charles Adams, the scientific director of the Atomic Weapons Research Establishment that blood counts should be done on troops even if others 'thought it unnecessary'. ‌ A second AWRE letter examined by his team says blood tests are needed 'from the medico-legal aspect' for all troops and civilians before they leave the UK because 'we wish to exclude people with existing pathological conditions... we wish to be able to demonstrate that this has been done in any case in which a claim for damage is made'. The review is also thought to have uncovered a 1958 operational order from Bomber Command stating that 'all personnel who go to Christmas Island should have the following blood examinations made and the results recorded in [their file]'. READ MORE: Video of Labour's broken promises to nuke veterans gets 3 million views as pressure grows ‌ It is not known whether these documents have been personally shown or briefed to the minister, but his officials are known to have examined the files between January and July. The MoD is facing a lawsuit from veterans and widows about non-production of the medical records, estimated to top £5bn. Alan Owen of campaign group LABRATS said: 'The data leak which has caused so much outrage was blamed on the previous government, but this happened entirely on Labour 's watch. 'They set up the review, they've been briefed on the findings, and they've refused repeated requests from Parliament to reveal what they know. They don't even have the excuse of a super-injunction to hide behind - this is the government's own doing.' ‌ A spokesman for the MoD said: 'The Minister for Veterans and People has commissioned officials to look seriously into unresolved questions regarding medical records as a priority, and this is now underway. "This work will be comprehensive, and it will enable us to better understand what information the department holds in relation to the medical testing of service personnel who took part in the UK nuclear weapons tests, ensuring that we can be assured that relevant information has been looked at thoroughly.' The spokesman was unable to confirm whether the minister had personally reviewed the files seen by his team.

NIGEL FARAGE: If you're a criminal, I'm putting you on notice. Follow the law or face serious justice
NIGEL FARAGE: If you're a criminal, I'm putting you on notice. Follow the law or face serious justice

Daily Mail​

time12 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

NIGEL FARAGE: If you're a criminal, I'm putting you on notice. Follow the law or face serious justice

Britain is lawless. Over the past 20 years, crime has become commonplace across Britain – something Labour and the Tories have accepted rather than challenged. Labour's relentless focus on restricting free speech, raising taxes, and releasing hardened criminals early has come at the direct expense of policing and public safety. We must hold the Conservatives equally accountable, they've been in power throughout this crisis. They introduced the disastrous £200 shoplifting charter, effectively incentivising theft under that threshold and allowing criminals to face no real consequences. They eroded public trust and safety. There's no question: Britain is lawless and it needs Reform. That is why today I am laying out my party's plans for how we take back control of our streets from the criminals who currently plague them. Over the last 20 years, witnessing and experiencing crime has become normalised, with Britons feeling helpless and an overworked police force struggling to keep up. Government funding seems to be going to everything except keeping the people of this country safe on the streets and secure in their homes. Moreover, the Government seems to be doing everything it can to increase the likelihood of crime by importing droves of unvetted men into our towns and cities. Total crime is now 50 per cent higher than it was in the 1990s, and twice as high as in the 1980s. The current figures today are four times greater than they were in the 1970s. Something is fundamentally wrong with both our justice system and the approach towards criminal prosecutions. Our prison system is broken and, in most cases, at full capacity. Violent repeat offenders are being released early and in many cases people do not feel confident that reporting crimes to the police will lead to justice. A recent study has revealed that 44 per cent of violent crimes go unreported and over 64 per cent of robberies and thefts. One of the greatest measures of how a country is faring is the level of trust the public holds with government officials and their ability to keep us safe. From successive Labour and Conservative governments, that trust has been completely lost. By deporting 10,400 foreign prisoners, Reform will end the crisis of prison overcrowding. There's no justification for taxpayers funding the lives of criminals who shouldn't be here in the first place. Many break the law just by entering the UK, then commit further crimes once here – disrespecting our laws, culture, and civility. The only acceptable response is deportation. Reform will commit to the building of five new 'Nightingale' style prisons across the UK. Similar to what Denmark has done, we will negotiate a deal with countries such as Kosovo to ensure prison overcrowding is not a problem that occurs in Britain. For too long, Labour and the Tories have sent the message that crime in Britain carries little to no consequence. Reform will change that. We will ensure that the punishment actually fits the crime – not our current system where people are jailed for tweets while violent criminals walk free after serving a two-year sentence. Reform will build a justice system that properly investigates and prosecutes all crimes. Britain will no longer send the message that robbery, theft, and antisocial behaviour are acceptable. I will ensure any crime, big or small, will be investigated and perpetrators will face justice. Under a Reform government, we will have full-tariff sentences. Life will mean life if I am your prime minister. There will be no early release and no suspended sentences for serious violent offenders, sexual offenders and knife possession. We will end the £200 shoplifters' charter – all shoplifters will face arrest. We will also introduce mandatory life imprisonment for drug trafficking. Reform UK will be the toughest party on law and order this country has ever seen. We will cut crime in half. We will take back control of our streets, we will take back control of our courts and prisons. If you're a criminal, I am putting you on notice. In 2029 you have a choice to make: be a law-abiding citizen or face serious justice.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store