
Judge halts non-binary person's deportation to the U.S. as Trump dismantles trans rights
When Angel Jenkel first came to Canada from the U.S. three years ago, the world was a different place.
Their Canadian boyfriend, who they were visiting, was in good health. And back home, the U.S. was making progress on transgender rights under president Joe Biden.
Now, their financé is ill and requires regular care. And back home, U.S. President Donald Trump is rapidly scaling back the rights of trans people, which could put Jenkel, who is non-binary, in the crosshairs.
So Jenkel overstayed their visa.
"It was just really stressful for me to think of going back to such an environment that was changing and escalating constantly," they told CBC.
Jenkel was scheduled to be deported from Canada this month. But a Federal Court judge issued a stay of removal, arguing the immigration officer who examined their case failed to take into account their role in caring for their fiancé, or the "current conditions for LGBTQ, non-binary and transgender persons" in the U.S.
Advocates for 2SLGBTQ+ migrants say this could set a precedent for other cases like Jenkel's, and help change the way Canada's immigration system deals with applications from the U.S.
Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRRC) declined to comment on Jenkel's case, citing privacy concerns.
Trump's anti-trans executive orders
Jenkel, a 24-year-old artist from Minnesota, came to Canada on a visa in August 2022 to visit their then-boyfriend, now fiancé, a social media influencer and Door Dash driver in Thunder Bay, Ont.
At first, Jenkel says they planned to stay for six months. But their fiancé epilepsy took a sudden turn for the worst, and Jenkel has become his primary source of at-home care.
The couple is now living in London, Ont., so he can be closer to the medical care he needs for his frequent seizures.
Meanwhile, the political climate for transgender people in the U.S. has dramatically changed under Trump's second presidency.
The Republican president has issued a series of executive orders declaring the U.S. will only recognize "two sexes, male and female," halting gender-affirming care for minors, restricting transgender women and girls from participating in sports, and banning transgender people from serving in the military.
As Jenkel watched this unfold from afar, their loved ones in the U.S. warned them to stay in Canada.
"What is weird is hearing my grandma telling me that she's scared for me to come back and, like, people that I would have, in the past, thought of as hardcore America-lovers," Jenkel said. "They are terrified of me coming back to the country."
Deportation order 'failed to reflect the current reality'
Jenkel was ordered to be deported on July 3 after an initial risk assessment determined they didn't face a credible threat in the U.S.
But Justice Julie Blackhawk halted that deportation, pending review. In her ruling, she wrote Jenkel's risk assessment was "flawed and unreasonable."
That's because the immigration officer conducting the review used outdated information — a government dossier on the United States that was last updated in January 2024, says Jenkel's lawyer.
"It's a marked recognition that the conditions have deteriorated ... since the Biden administration has left office," Sarah Mikhail, of Smith Immigration Law in Toronto, told As It Happens host Nil Kӧksal.
"These changes are significant enough that, when assessing trans and non-binary individuals' circumstances in Canada, this is something that needs to be taken into consideration."
Devon Matthews, head of programs at Rainbow Railroad, hailed the ruling. The non-profit organization, which helps 2SLGBTQ+ refugees, stopped resettling people in the U.S. earlier this year.
"We've seen firsthand the deteriorating conditions for LGBTQI+ people in the U.S., from the escalation of anti-trans legislation to targeted violence and growing legal uncertainty," Matthews said in an emailed statement.
Rainbow Railroad is one of several organizations that asked the Canadian government to re-think how it assesses asylum seekers and immigrants who come to Canada from, or through, the U.S.
It called on Canada to repeal or exempt 2SLGBTQ+ applicants from the Safe Third Country Act (STCA), which prevents refugees from claiming asylum in Canada if they come through the U.S.
"This case could set an important precedent in acknowledging that countries traditionally seen as 'safe' cannot be treated as such without scrutiny, especially for marginalized communities," Matthews said.
In an emailed statement, IRCC called the STCA an "important tool for our two countries to work together on the orderly management of asylum claims along our shared border."
The STCA does not apply to U.S. citizens like Jenkel.
What's next?
Mikhail says she's hopeful Blackhawk's ruling will set a precedent, but cautioned that immigration claims are handled on a case-by-case basis.
"At this point, we're not advising people to file for asylum claims, necessarily," she said.
The ruling gives Jenkel a temporary reprieve pending a judicial review of their case, and carves out some time for them to apply for permanent residency, with their fiancé as a sponsor.
They're hopeful they can get on the path to Canadian citizenship, but remain worried about their friends back home.
"Things are actually getting scary," they said. "We thought we were seeing progress and now we're seeing all that progress wiped away."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
9 minutes ago
- CTV News
Lowering Confederation Bridge toll at the top of P.E.I. Premier's list when meeting with Prime Minister
Prince Edward Island's Confederation Bridge is seen on May 31, 2022. (CTV Atlantic) Lowering the Confederation Bridge toll is at the top of Prince Edward Island Premier Rob Lantz's list when he meets with Prime Minister Mark Carney next week. Lantz will travel to Ontario for the First Ministers' Meeting and Council of the Federation from July 21 to 23. 'First and foremost, I will be speaking directly with Prime Minister Carney and his team about the immediate need to follow through on their promise to lower the tolls on the Confederation Bridge to $20 and reduce the Wood Islands Ferry tolls by half,' he said in a news release Friday. Carney said he would lower the tolls during his election campaign in April. Currently, the Confederation Bridge toll is $50.25. Lantz said he also intends to bring up recent issues with the new MV Northumberland and will ask that Transport Canada officials 'monitor the situation closely.' 'It is imperative that we have a consistent, two-vessel ferry service throughout the season to support our economy and maintain confidence in our transportation infrastructure,' said Lantz. The meetings bring together all of Canada's premiers from each of the 13 provinces and territories. 'It enables Premiers to work collaboratively, form closer ties, foster constructive relationships among governments, and show leadership on important issues that matter to Canadians,' reads a news release from the Council of the Federation. Lantz said he also hopes to work with his colleagues to continue to break down internal trade barriers, explore new trading partnerships and increase labour mobility throughout the country. 'With ongoing uncertainty in our trade relationship with the United States, it is more important than ever that we strengthen our domestic economic ties and work together to explore new markets for our products and services around the world,' said Lantz. For more P.E.I. news, visit our dedicated provincial page.


CTV News
9 minutes ago
- CTV News
U.S. deal to top agenda at Carney's premiers meeting: political commentator
Watch Political commentator Scott Reid on key issues expected at PM Carney's meeting with premieres next week, including focus on potential U.S. deal.


CBC
10 minutes ago
- CBC
Ottawa weighs plans on AI, copyright as OpenAI fights Ontario court jurisdiction
Social Sharing Canada's artificial intelligence minister is keeping a close watch on court cases in Canada and the U.S. to determine next steps for Ottawa's regulatory approach to AI. Some AI companies have claimed early wins south of the border, and OpenAI is now fighting the jurisdiction of an Ontario court to hear a lawsuit by news publishers. Evan Solomon's office said in a statement he plans to address copyright "within Canada's broader AI regulatory approach, with a focus on protecting cultural sovereignty and how [creators] factor into this conversation." But there are no current plans for a standalone copyright bill, as Solomon's office is "closely monitoring the ongoing court cases and market developments" to help chart the path forward. It's unclear how long it will take for those court cases to determine whether artificial intelligence companies can use copyrighted content to train their AI products. : Canadian news organizations, including CBC, sue ChatGPT creator 8 months ago CBC/Radio-Canada, Postmedia, Metroland, the Toronto Star, the Globe and Mail, and The Canadian Press have launched a joint lawsuit against ChatGPT creator OpenAI, for using news content to train its ChatGPT generative artificial intelligence system. The news organizations say OpenAI breaches copyright by 'scraping content' from their websites. The sole Canadian case to pose the question was launched late last year by a coalition of news publishers and the Ontario Superior Court is set to hear a jurisdictional challenge in September. The coalition — which includes The Canadian Press, Torstar, the Globe and Mail, Postmedia and CBC/Radio-Canada — is suing OpenAI for using news content to train its generative artificial intelligence system. The news publishers argue OpenAI is breaching copyright by scraping large amounts of content from Canadian media, and then profiting from the use of that content without permission or compensation. They said in court filings that OpenAI has "engaged in ongoing, deliberate and unauthorized misappropriation of [their] valuable news media works." "Rather than seek to obtain the information legally, OpenAI has elected to brazenly misappropriate the News Media Companies' valuable intellectual property and convert it for its own uses, including commercial uses, without consent or consideration." OpenAI challenging jurisdiction OpenAI has denied the allegations, and previously said its models are trained on publicly available data, and "grounded in fair use and related international copyright principles." The company, which is headquartered in San Francisco, is challenging the jurisdiction of the Ontario court to hear the case. It argued in a court filing that it's not located in Ontario and does not do business in the province. WATCH | U.S. media companies sue OpenAI in late 2023: New York Times sues OpenAI, Microsoft for copyright infringement 2 years ago OpenAI also argued the Copyright Act doesn't apply outside of Canada. OpenAI is asking the court to seal some documents in the case. The court is scheduled to hold a hearing on the sealing motion on July 30, according to a schedule outlined in court documents. It asked the court to seal documents containing "commercially sensitive" information, including about its corporate organization and structure, its web crawling and fetching processes and systems, and its "model training and inference processes, systems, resource allocations and/or cost structures." "The artificial intelligence industry is highly competitive and developing at a rapid pace," says an affidavit submitted by the company. "Competitors in this industry are many and range from large, established technology companies such as Google and Amazon, to smaller startups seeking to establish a foothold in the industry. "As recognized leaders in the artificial intelligence industry, competitors and potential competitors to the defendants would benefit from having access to confidential information of the defendants." A lawyer for the news publishers provided information on the court deadlines, but did not provide comment on the case. Numerous lawsuits dealing with AI systems and copyright are underway in the United States, some dating back to 2023. In late June, AI companies won victories in two of those cases. In a case launched by a group of authors, including comedian Sarah Silverman, a judge ruled AI systems' use of published work was fair use and the authors didn't demonstrate that use would result in market dilution. But the judge also said his ruling affects only those specific authors — whose lawyers didn't make the right arguments — and does not mean Meta's use of copyrighted material to train its systems was legal. Judge Vince Chhabria noted in his summary judgment that in "the grand scheme of things, the consequences of this ruling are limited." In a separate U.S. case, a judge ruled the use by AI company Anthropic of published books without permission to train its systems was fair use. But Judge William Alsup also ruled Anthropic "had no entitlement to use pirated copies." Jane Ginsburg, a professor at Columbia University's law school who studies intellectual property and technology, said it would be too simplistic to just look at the cases as complete wins for the AI companies. "I think both the question of how much weight to give the pirate nature of the sources, and the question of market dilution, are going to be big issues in other cases."