
Colbert's most partisan moments as 'Late Show' host, from leading Biden fundraiser to dancing with Schumer
To sum up, President Donald Trump was gleeful on Truth Social, while prominent Democrats and liberal journalists and celebrities mourned the news and fumed at CBS for axing the progressive favorite.
Under Colbert since he took over in 2015, "The Late Show" became one of late-night's most reliably partisan programs, with Democrats frequently booked for friendly interviews, abundant anti-Trump and anti-Republican jokes in his monologues, and the host himself even helping at a glitzy fundraiser for then-President Joe Biden last year.
Here are some of Colbert's most partisan moments at the helm of "The Late Show."
In summer 2020, Colbert, broadcasting remotely in the middle of the COVID-19 pandemic, gushed that he had no jokes after playing clips of Michelle Obama's Democratic National Convention speech urging America to elect Joe Biden.
"My job is to have a joke for every time somebody says anything in public," he said, smiling. "After watching Michelle Obama's speech, I have never been more happy to fail at my job."
That night, he also said, "For four years, we've looked on in horror as Donald Trump tore down every norm in American life. Well, tonight, the Democrats began what Joe Biden has called a battle for the soul of this nation."
Colbert's admiration for the Obamas was never a secret. At another point in 2017, after playing a clip of the former president just months into the first Trump term, he cooed, "I miss you," to huge cheers from the audience.
A video of the late-night host dancing with Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., at a concert in August 2021 made waves on social media.
Schumer and Colbert were widely criticized on X — then Twitter — for releasing the video in the midst of the Biden administration's chaotic withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan. The video was posted just days after the Taliban seized the capital of Kabul and forced the U.S. Embassy there to evacuate, with American citizens left stranded in the country.
"Life is good for our blue elite while 1000s [sic] of Americans are stranded behind enemy lines," one user wrote.
"Does anyone else throw up a little in their mouth watching this??" another person asked.
"The majority leader when Americans are trapped in Afghanistan," another post read.
Colbert was one of several late-night hosts who enthusiastically celebrated former President Joe Biden's 2020 victory.
An overjoyed Colbert opened his first show after the race was officially called by pouring champagne to toast Biden's win with his wife.
He happily declared, "Ladies and gentlemen, Joe Biden did it! He's our next president!" before dancing. "I'm so happy!" He added that he cried with relief and suggested Trump's political career was finished.
His reaction was quite the opposite after the 2016 and 2024 elections, which he treated like America's funeral.
When it became clear that Trump was on the way to victory on the night of the 2016 election, Colbert appeared stunned.
"Wow. That's a horrifying prospect. I can't put a happy face on that, and that's my job," he admitted during a live election special that aired on Showtime. "How did our politics get so poisonous? Maybe we overdosed. We drank too much of the poison."
After the 2024 election, Colbert said he had begun to lose his faith in humanity.
"It's really hard to see a bright side here," he conceded.
In March 2024, Colbert helped boost Biden's re-election campaign – which Biden later abandoned – with a star-studded fundraiser in New York City. At the glitzy event, he moderated a conversation between Democratic Presidents Biden, Barack Obama and Bill Clinton. The record-setting fundraiser brought in $26 million for Biden's presidential campaign.
The event was a who's who of liberal elites, with Lizzo, Cynthia Erivo, Queen Latifah and other celebrities also in attendance. But Colbert was at the center of its marquee event. Organizers charged a minimum of $250 to attend and up to $500,000 for a more intimate, exclusive reception. For $100,000, guests got a photo with all three presidents taken by famed photographer Annie Leibovitz.
A fawning feature in Vogue praised Colbert for leading "a compelling conversation between Biden, Obama, and Clinton with tact, grace, and a lot of laughter."
"Colbert kicked things off with a series of delightfully mordant questions, among them: 'All three of you have been on Air Force One… that's made by Boeing, right?' 'Do any of you have plans to sell golden sneakers?' and 'Is it nice to live in the White House, or do you always feel like you're in a museum?,'" Vogue's article gushed.
The evening ended with Colbert, Obama and Clinton putting on aviator sunglasses in tribute to Biden as the audience cheered and took pictures.
While not abjectly partisan, Colbert aired a number of odd skits during the pandemic where animated needles did covers of various songs urging people to get vaccinated against COVID-19. Even some vaccine proponents found the presentation off-putting.
In a widely panned live bit after the show returned to a studio audience, Colbert did a dance routine with a quartet of people dressed as vaccines to the song "Tequila."
Although "vaccine" contains only two syllables, Colbert and his dancers sang, "Vaccine!" in place of the song's title, while the liberal crowd awkwardly watched and half-heartedly cheered.
In another COVID-related moment in 2021, Colbert found himself in the strange position of clashing with friend and former Comedy Central colleague Jon Stewart over the lab-leak theory.
Stewart memorably appeared on the show and espoused the lab-leak theory to a visibly troubled Colbert.
He suggested it wasn't far-fetched to believe that the coronavirus pandemic originated from the Wuhan Institute of Virology lab, comparing it to a chocolate outbreak near Hershey, Pennsylvania.
"Oh my God, there's a novel respiratory coronavirus overtaking Wuhan, China, what do we do?" Stewart joked. "Oh, you know who we could ask, the Wuhan novel respiratory coronavirus lab. The disease is the same name as the lab! That's just a little too weird, don't you think?"
"'Oh my God, there's been an outbreak of chocolaty goodness near Hershey, Penn. What do you think happened?' I don't know, maybe a steam shovel mated with a cocoa bean," he said. "Or it's the f---ing chocolate factory! Maybe that's it!"
Colbert, a reliable sycophant for Democrats and liberal talking points, jokingly suggested Stewart was working for Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., with his comments.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I Asked ChatGPT To Explain Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' To Me Like I'm 12 — Here's What It Said
I'm no stranger to sweeping legislation. I have 30 years of combined experience covering politics and state government, advocating for healthcare and education nonprofits, and negotiating policy from both sides of the table. Discover More: Try This: However, when President Donald Trump unveiled his 'Big Beautiful Bill,' even I had to pause. What exactly is in it? What's at stake for everyday people now and in the future? I asked ChatGPT to cut through the noise and condense sprawling policy documents to provide me with a clear, emotionally neutral summary. In other words, I asked ChatGPT to explain it in a way that I would understand, as if I were a 12-year-old. Here's what it said. It's All In the Branding There's no official legislation called the 'Big Beautiful Bill.' According to ChatGPT, it's a branding phrase Trump used to signal his agenda. It includes tax cuts, deep rollbacks, and restructuring of social safety nets, carrying significant implications for energy, education, and public debt. Read Now: What Does It Mean for Average Americans? One of my first questions while reviewing any public policy, including Trump's budget bill, is how it would affect regular citizens. Same with ChatGPT. I asked how Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' would affect average Americans. It said that workers could see slightly larger paychecks if payroll taxes are reduced. However, there's a catch. 'Those same payroll taxes fund programs like Social Security and Medicare, and without a replacement funding mechanism, the long-term stability of those benefits could be in jeopardy,' ChatGPT said. 'We've seen versions of this play out before: short-term relief, long-term risk.' Healthcare on the Chopping Block For those who rely on the Affordable Care Act, it could bring significant disruption. According to ChatGPT, 'Trump has repeatedly signaled interest in dismantling parts of the ACA. That could mean higher premiums, fewer protections for people with preexisting conditions, and a market-wide ripple effect for anyone who buys insurance independently or through the exchanges.' While the bill doesn't eliminate the ACA outright, it lays the groundwork for targeted rollbacks that could weaken coverage and affordability. For millions of Americans, especially gig workers, freelancers, and early retirees, this isn't just a policy; it's a potential threat to their health and finances. Student Debt Relief Could Disappear Tucked into the Big Beautiful Bill are provisions that would unwind key aspects of the Biden administration's student debt relief efforts. While not framed explicitly as an attack on borrowers, the bill signals a sharp policy reversal, one that could shut down or restrict forgiveness programs and income-driven repayment options. According to ChatGPT, 'If you have student loans or are counting on forgiveness programs, they could disappear overnight. The bill includes a rollback of debt relief efforts and the potential return of higher interest rates for federal loans. And if you're a parent planning for college, the financial aid landscape could shift beneath your feet.' Social Security Is Fine Until It Isn't While the Big Beautiful Bill doesn't explicitly cut Social Security, its structural changes to payroll taxes and entitlement spending raise serious questions about long-term funding. By lowering or eliminating certain employer-employee tax obligations, the bill could weaken the primary revenue stream that supports Social Security's solvency. ChatGPT explained: 'Reducing payroll taxes without a clear replacement funding mechanism puts pressure on programs like Social Security and Medicare. Even if benefits aren't cut immediately, the financial sustainability of those programs becomes more fragile.' For retirees and future beneficiaries alike, this isn't just theoretical. A weakened Social Security trust fund could lead to delayed payments, reduced benefits, or increased retirement age, all of which disproportionately affect low-income earners and workers with physically demanding jobs. The Real Power Play From an AI and systems-thinking perspective, the 'Big Beautiful Bill' revealed something deeper: it's not just about the policies; it's about who benefits from speed and opacity. According to ChatGPT: 'Wealthy donors and corporate lobbyists can plan for these changes before they hit. They have access, leverage, and legal teams. The average worker? They're just trying to make rent and keep the lights on.' With a degree of self-awareness, ChatGPT said. 'While AI can help decode the structure, it can't shield anyone from the real-world consequences. That's why clarity, accountability, and deliberate scrutiny still matter. Because in a system where speed favors power, the rest of us need time to see clearly, before the ground shifts beneath our feet.' More From GOBankingRates Clever Ways To Save Money That Actually Work in 2025 This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGPT To Explain Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' To Me Like I'm 12 — Here's What It Said
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
3 Ways Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Could Hit Tesla Investors
Tesla investors have had a rough go in 2025, with a stock price that's down by more than one-fifth year-to-date and a major slump in global electric vehicle sales. I'm a Self-Made Millionaire: Learn More: Now, the Elon Musk-led company faces more grim news in the form of President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful' spending bill, which was signed into law on July 4th. Among other things, the bill will bring an end to federal tax credits on certain EVs. Here are three ways the bill could hit Tesla investors. Tax Credits Will End Federal tax incentives played a big role in boosting Tesla's EV sales in recent years, but those incentives will soon come to an end. Because of Trump's bill, buyers have until Sept. 30 to qualify for the federal tax credits on Tesla EVs before they're terminated, CBS News reported. Before the bill passed, new EVs came with a $7,500 federal tax credit, while used EVs came with credits of up to $4,000. The idea behind the credits was to make EVs more affordable. That's important, because the average purchase price of a new EV is about $9,000 higher in the U.S. than the average new gas-powered car, according to Kelley Blue Book data cited by CBS News. Used EVs cost roughly $2,000 more than comparable gas cars, on average. An end to the tax credit will hurt Tesla — and Tesla shareholders — because it narrows the number of potential EV buyers. I Sold My Tesla: Rival EV Companies Will Get a Boost As Business Insider reported, one key provision in the new bill is that cars made by companies that sold more than 200,000 'accepted' EVs between December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2025 do not qualify for the tax credit. This provision will mainly impact Tesla, which sells a lot more cars than that in a single quarter. In contrast, rivals Rivian and Lucid have not reached the 200,000 milestone, meaning their customers can still get tax credits. This could give them an edge against Tesla, at least over the short term. Sales Could Decline Further Tesla's EV sales have already slumped badly this year. The company recently posted second-quarter car sales of 384,122 — down 13.5% from the previous year, CNN reported. It was the biggest year-over-year decline in Tesla history, and followed a similarly dismal first quarter. Trump's spending bill will likely hurt sales even further because buyers will no longer have the same tax incentives. This means they'll have to dish out more money to buy a Tesla than in the past. 'It's on Tesla to make the case for consumers to even slightly pay up today versus some other EVs,' Seth Goldstein, an equity strategist at Morningstar, told Business Insider. More From GOBankingRates 4 Housing Markets That Have Plummeted in Value Over the Past 5 Years This article originally appeared on 3 Ways Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Could Hit Tesla Investors
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dana White explains why he's hesitant to put Jon Jones on UFC White House card
NEW ORLEANS – Dana White isn't so sure he'd feel comfortable booking Jon Jones on the promotion's highly anticipated card at the White House. With the event just shy of a year away after President Donald Trump's recent announcement, White admits it's too way too soon to matchmake the card. However, Jones repeatedly has mentioned the White House card being what could bring him out of retirement. White explained to reporters at Smoothie King Center on Saturday after UFC 318 that he has some hesitancy to oblige Jones' request. "It's not even about him winning the belt," White told MMA Junkie and other reporters. "You know how I felt about him. You know I can't risk putting him in big positions in a big spot and have something go wrong – especially the White House card." White's hesitance stems from Jones' long history of transgressions, one of which ruined the milestone UFC 200 that was supposed to be headlined by Jones vs. Daniel Cormier. Jones was flagged for an anti-doping violation during fight week, and the bout was canceled. Since Trump's impromptu announcement of a UFC card coinciding with the U.S.'s 250th anniversary on July 4, 2026, fighters have flocked to virtually raise their hands on social media for a spot on the card. From Jones to Conor McGregor to Nate Diaz, the working idea has caught the attention of many. Despite this, White said that, for now, his focus is simply on operational logistics. "I have other problems," White said. "I'm dealing with the logistics and all the things on figuring out how to make this thing happen. How do we want to do it? I'm going to fly out there in about 10 days, two weeks, and we're going to have all the renderings done. We'll sit down with (Trump) and go through the renderings and see what he wants to do and what he doesn't want to do." This article originally appeared on MMA Junkie: Dana White uneasy about putting Jon Jones on UFC White House card