logo
Family criticises 'unforgivable' delay in finding soldier's body at Catterick Garrison

Family criticises 'unforgivable' delay in finding soldier's body at Catterick Garrison

ITV News19-06-2025
The family of a soldier found dead in his barracks three weeks after he was last seen say it is "unforgivable" his body lay undiscovered for so long.
The body of father-of-three Lance Corporal Bernard Mongan, 33, was discovered decomposing in his bedroom at Catterick Garrison on 23 January 2020.
An inquest, held at North Yorkshire Coroners' Court in Northallerton, heard L/Cpl Mongan had "obviously been dead for some time" when he was found, and had last been seen around 27 December.
Doctors were unable to determine a cause of death because of the condition of his body.
The hearing, which started on 2 June, was told of claims L/Cpl Mongan was bullied by senior officers and that the family believed he had taken his own life.
Concluding the inquest, coroner Jon Heath said he was unable to say with sufficient certainty that L/Cpl Mongan had taken his own life and recorded an open conclusion.
Speaking afterwards, L/Cpl Mongan's wife Beth criticised the army's failings.
'I know they've apologised, but it doesn't take away the fact that they've failed him in that front and forever will be unforgivable,' she said.
The inquest heard evidence from former corporal Stephen Timmerman, who lived in the same accommodation block as L/Cpl Mongan, that he was 'downgraded' by superior officers, and that 'bullying would be an understatement'.
After an Army investigation into L/Cpl Mongan's death in 2021, Mrs Mongan said her husband "felt bullied" and was "telling people he was afraid".
The inquest heard L/Cpl Mongan had attempted to kill himself several years earlier when his marriage was breaking down.
In the days before he was last seen in January 2020 he gave away his Nintendo to a friend's son, told another friend he 'had bought pills but not taken them,' and made two donations to a suicide charity.
The two most likely causes of death were self-inflicted poisoning, after barbiturates were found in L/Cpl's system – one of which was bought illegally – or a sudden abnormality of the heart.
A Home Office pathologist told the inquest he could not say which of these was most likely.
Dr Nigel Cooper said: 'I've thought about this long and hard but I just don't think I can, I don't think I have enough positive evidence to go in one direction or the other.'
"He was an amazing dad"
Speaking outside court after the verdict, Mrs Mongan said she was expecting the open conclusion 'mainly due to the army's failure of leaving [L/Cpl Mongan] for so long'.
She said: 'I've come to my own conclusions over the years, it's hard not having it for the kids.
'It's been a rollercoaster.
'He was funny, he would try to make anybody joke, anybody laugh, he had a rather weird but wicked sense of humour. He was an amazing dad.'
Emma Norton, director of the Centre for Military Justice, represented Mrs Mongan outside court.
She said it was "shocking and appalling" that L/Cpl Mongan lay dead for so long.
"That failure has had terrible consequences today because it has meant that the coroner cannot be satisfied as to the medical cause of Bernie's death," she said.
'However, his wife Beth has been in court every single day and has heard and read all of the evidence for herself, and the coroner did find today that Bernie was subjected to treatment and was spoken to in a manner by his chain of command that caused him distress.
'The other word for that in his wife's opinion is bullying."
She added: "It remains the view of his wife that Bernie died by his own hand and that he was in lots of ways very badly let down by the army.'
' We deeply regret and apologise'
The Army said it was taking action to prevent similar cases.
A spokesperson said: "We deeply regret and apologise for the shortfalls in our duty of care towards him, which were clearly unacceptable. We're grateful to HM Coroner for the thorough and diligent examination of the circumstances surrounding his death.
'Bernie's service will not be forgotten, and we owe it to his memory, to his loved ones, and to all who serve to ensure that we consistently and diligently provide the duty of care our people need and deserve.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Councils consider legal action over asylum hotels after Epping ruling
Councils consider legal action over asylum hotels after Epping ruling

ITV News

time4 hours ago

  • ITV News

Councils consider legal action over asylum hotels after Epping ruling

Councils across England are considering launching their own legal actions after a district council in Essex secured a High Court victory, temporarily blocking asylum seekers from being housed in a hotel in the area. Conservative-run Broxbourne Council in Hertfordshire said it was taking legal advice 'as a matter of urgency' about whether it could take similar action to Epping Forest District Council, which is also run by the Tories. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage indicated the 12 councils where Reform UK was the largest party would consider legal challenges following Tuesday's ruling. Writing in the Daily Telegraph, Farage said the local authorities would do 'everything in their power to follow Epping's lead.' He added: 'The good people of Epping must inspire similar protests around Britain. Wherever people are concerned about the threat posed by young undocumented males living in local hotels and who are free to walk their streets, they should follow the example of the town in Essex.' Writing on X, Farage also said: "This is a victory for the parents and concerned residents of Epping. They do not want their young women being assaulted on the streets." "This community stood up bravely, despite being slandered as far right, and have won. They represent the vast majority of decent people in this country." "Young, undocumented males who break into the UK illegally should NOT be free to walk the streets anywhere. They must be detained and deported." "I hope that Epping provides inspiration to others across the country." On Tuesday, a High Court judge ruled the former Bell Hotel in Epping must stop housing asylum seekers by September 12. The hotel has been at the centre of a series of protests in recent weeks after an asylum seeker who was staying there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu has denied the charges against him and is due to stand trial later this month. A second man who resides at the hotel, Syrian national Mohammed Sharwarq, has separately been charged with seven offences, while several other men have been charged over disorder outside the hotel. The High Court ruling is said to have angered the Home Office who fear the verdict will interfere with immigration policy and their obligations to house asylum seekers. Migrants must be removed from hotel in Epping after council wins injunction Could the Epping asylum hotel injunction set a precedent for other councils? ITV News' Paul Brand said that sources within the Labour party feel that councils are going to waste taxpayers' money fighting a government that is already working to end the use of hotels by asylum seekers. The Home Office has insisted it has reduced the number of asylum seeker hotels from 402 to 210. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch suggested that the migrants housed at the hotel 'need to be moved out of the area immediately,' while her shadow home secretary Chris Philp said that 'residents should never have had to fight their own government just to feel safe in their own town.' He said: 'Local residents have every right to feel safe in their own streets and every right to object when their community is treated as a dumping ground.' The area saw thousands of people turn out in protest about the housing of migrants in the Bell Hotel. The Home Office had warned the judge that an injunction could 'interfere' with the department's legal obligations, and lawyers representing the hotel's owner argued it would set a 'precedent'. Epping Forest District Council had asked a judge to issue an interim injunction stopping migrants from being accommodated at the Bell Hotel. In a post on Facebook, Broxbourne Council said: 'Broxbourne Council will now take legal advice as a matter of urgency about whether it could take similar action.' Meanwhile, the leader of South Norfolk District Council, which covers the town of Diss where a hotel housing asylum seekers has also been the subject of protests, said the council would not go down the same route. Conservative leader Daniel Elmer said the council was using planning rules to try to ensure it was families being housed in the area rather than single adult males. He said to do so, which would effectively convert the hotels into hostels, should require a change of use. Two men have been arrested and charged in connection with a protest in July outside the hotel in Diss, which houses more than 40 children. Cllr Elmer told the PA news agency: 'We make a big play about integration, and to replace families who have children in the local school system and have integrated into the local community would make no sense.' He added: 'If we can punish people who have put up sheds in their gardens without permission, then we can take action against hotels being converted into hostels without planning consent.' Border security minister Dame Angela Eagle said the Government will 'continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns'. She added: 'Our work continues to close all asylum hotels by the end of this Parliament.' Lawyers for the Home Office had warned the court that an injunction 'runs the risk of acting as an impetus for further violent protests'. Edward Brown KC also said the injunction would 'substantially interfere' with the Home Office's statutory duty in potentially avoiding a breach of the asylum seekers' human rights. In a ruling on Tuesday, Mr Justice Eyre granted the temporary injunction, but extended the time limit by which the hotel must stop housing asylum seekers to September 12. He also refused to give Somani Hotels Limited, the hotel's owner, the green light to challenge his ruling, but the company could still ask the Court of Appeal for the go-ahead to appeal against the judgment.

Police watchdog urges use of seized crime cash to fund fight against gangs
Police watchdog urges use of seized crime cash to fund fight against gangs

STV News

time5 hours ago

  • STV News

Police watchdog urges use of seized crime cash to fund fight against gangs

Scotland's police watchdog chief is calling for talks on allowing money seized from criminals to be reinvested directly into tackling organised crime in Scotland. The latest report from the HM Chief Inspector of Constabulary in Scotland praised Police Scotland's response to recent increase in organised crime-related violence. But he warned that such efforts have come at a 'significant' financial cost. Mr Naylor said he would like discussions to begin about introducing an Asset Recovery Incentivisation Scheme in Scotland, which would allow Police Scotland and other approved bodies to keep a portion of proceeds seized from criminals to spend directly on fighting crime. Similar schemes are already in operation in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Mr Naylor said: 'The early months of 2025 have seen a return of significant violence and disorder associated with serious organised crime groups. 'Police Scotland's operational activity has resulted in a significant number of arrests. 'However, the increasingly complex nature of such criminality reinforces the need to ensure policing continues to have the resources required to protect communities across Scotland from those who seek to cause the greatest harm. 'In England, Northern Ireland and Wales, Proceeds of Crime Act reporting agencies can and do receive money from the proceeds recovered from crime under the Asset Recovery Incentivisation Scheme (ARIS). 'The Home Office encourages agencies to invest ARIS funds into areas that will increase asset recovery or, where appropriate, to fund local crime fighting priorities. 'This process is not applicable in Scotland. 'At a time of increasing demand, I would be encouraged to see conversations to consider if some funding could be released from seized assets to bolster the fight against organised crime – and maintain Scotland's position as a top performer in this area.' iStock Proceeds of crime funding should go towards frontline policing efforts Mr Naylor's annual report states that during 2023-24 more than £10m was recovered in Scotland using Proceeds of Crime legislation. This money goes back into the Scottish Government's CashBack for Communities programme, which is funded by Proceeds of Crime Act (POCA) seizure and provides free activities and programmes for young people. Elsewhere in the UK 'proceeds of crime' assets to the value of £243.3m were recovered from confiscation, forfeiture and civil recovery orders during 2023-24. From this, £98.1m of Asset Recovery Incentivisation Scheme money was distributed to Proceeds of Crime Act reporting agencies – including police forces, to fund local crime fighting priorities. In his 2024–2025 annual report, Mr Naylor said policing reform had clearly strengthened Scotland's ability to tackle organised crime compared to before the creation of a single national force. He said: 'These events are often contained within a limited geographical area, but on this occasion have stretched across the east and west regions of the country.' He added: 'These attacks also remind us of the transnational nature and risk posed by organised crime groups and the need for police and law enforcement agencies to work globally to target those involved in directing such activities.' Mr Naylor said that over the past 12 months, HM Inspectorate of Constabulary in Scotland (HMICS) had carried out a number of detailed inspections, including a review of the Scottish Police Authority (SPA), inspections of road policing, and the police response to missing persons. HMICS had also carried out joint inspections with other scrutiny partners, in areas including adult support and protection, children at risk of harm, and of police custody centres. Mr Naylor said work was underway on a joint review with HM Inspectorate of Prosecution in Scotland to look at the citation system in Scotland, and on a review with Audit Scotland to look at 'Best Value' arrangements across Scottish policing. He welcomed the recent passing of the Police (Ethics, Conduct and Scrutiny) (Scotland) Act 2025 by the Scottish Parliament which strengthens officer vetting and disciplinary powers. However, he said further work was needed to address the financial impact of the new legislation. He said: 'Too little consideration has been given to the wider impact of the legislation – and how this could affect a number of organisations including Police Scotland, the SPA , the Police Investigations and Review Commission (PIRC), and the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service. 'As part of our scrutiny plan for the next three years, we will inspect how Police Scotland – and others – engage in the proactive work required to assess the likely cost – and other demands that this new legislation will bring.' Mr Naylor said Police Scotland had been on a reform journey since its creation in 2013, and opportunities remained to redesign the organisation to meet future budgetary challenges. He added: 'Policing in Scotland is a complex and multifaceted activity. 'The reform journey cannot simply be a further reduction of capability and capacity within policing. 'The work that is underway to improve the organisation even further will be challenging and it will take time to deliver outcomes. 'This has to be done while continuing to deliver the high quality of service that the people of Scotland demand and deserve.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

Labour's migrant hotels policy is in disarray: Asylum seekers are stunned as Epping Council wins legal battle to move them out
Labour's migrant hotels policy is in disarray: Asylum seekers are stunned as Epping Council wins legal battle to move them out

Daily Mail​

time13 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Labour's migrant hotels policy is in disarray: Asylum seekers are stunned as Epping Council wins legal battle to move them out

Labour 's asylum policy was left in chaos after a judge ordered a controversial migrant hotel to shut. The High Court ruling gives The Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex, just 24 days to close after it became the focus of violent protests. Epping Forest District Council's victory could open the floodgates to a series of similar legal actions against other migrant hotels across the country. Ministers scrambled to respond after an 11th-hour Home Office bid to block the action was thrown out. Government lawyers warned the court that granting the injunction on a planning technicality 'runs the risk of acting as an impetus for further violent protests'. Intensifying the pressure on Labour, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said he hoped it gave 'inspiration to others across the country'. Some 32,000 migrants are in about 210 hotels, according to the Home Office, and discontent is building. The injunction left Sir Keir Starmer in an even more woeful position after he scrapped the Tory government's Rwanda asylum deal, in which illegal migrants would have been sent on a one-way ticket to East Africa. The Prime Minister's pledge to 'smash the gangs' was already in tatters, with more than 51,000 small-boat migrants having reached Britain since the election. The legal challenge to The Bell was brought by the local council after a small-boat migrant there was accused of sexual offences. Hadush Kebatu, from Ethiopia, was charged last month with sexual assault, harassment and inciting a girl of 14 to engage in sexual activity. Eight days after he arrived in the UK, Kebatu, 41, allegedly tried to kiss a schoolgirl as she ate pizza, and the next day tried to kiss a woman in the town and put his hand on her leg. He then encountered the girl again and tried to kiss her, Colchester Magistrates' Court was told. Kebatu denies the offences and is in custody. Protesters descended on the hotel following news of his arrest and court appearance, leading to violent scuffles between those opposed to the migrant hotel and 'anti-racism' demonstrators. Recent protests against the hotel have mainly been peaceful, with a group of women nicknamed the 'Pink Ladies' leading marches. Mohammed Sharwarq, 32, a Syrian at the 80-bed hotel, has been charged with seven offences, including kissing a man on the neck on July 25. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said the injunction was 'a victory for the mums and dads in Epping who just want their children to be safe'. She added: ' Putting a hotel full of young, male illegal immigrants in the middle of a community like Epping was always going to lead to issues. They need to be moved immediately. 'But Epping is just one of many towns struggling with asylum hotels. 'Labour have no solution, they're not smashing any gangs and small-boat arrivals are at record highs.' Mr Farage said: 'This community stood up bravely, despite being slandered as far-Right, and have won. 'Young, undocumented males who break into the UK illegally should not be free to walk the streets. They must be detained and deported.' Corina Gander, Tory leader of Broxbourne Borough Council in Hertfordshire, said she was considering similar action. She added: 'It's just given us this massive boost and precedent that we can do something now.' The 12 councils in which Reform UK is the largest party are also said to be exploring the prospect. The legal action was the first to succeed in getting a migrant hotel shut down. Epping Forest council was granted a temporary injunction by Mr Justice Eyre at the High Court in London after arguing that The Bell's owners, Somani Hotels, broke planning rules by changing its use to house migrants. The judge said the firm had 'sidestepped public scrutiny and explanation', writing in his judgement: 'Although the defendant's actions were not flagrant or surreptitious they were deliberate. 'The defendant acted in good faith but chose to take its stand on the position that there was no material change of use.' Home Office lawyers who claimed The Bell's closure would breach asylum seekers' 'fundamental human rights' failed to block the legal challenge. A hearing on a permanent injunction will take place later. Speaking at the Royal Courts of Justice after the ruling, Epping Forest council leader Chris Whitbread said: 'This is a decision that's important to Epping Forest, but also important to councils up and down the country, and it shows that the Government cannot ignore planning rules.' Welcoming the 'fantastic news', Sarah White, 40, one of the protest leaders, said: 'We will start protesting with towns up and down the country. This is bigger than Epping, it is impacting the whole country.' Home Office minister Dame Angela Eagle said the Government would consider the ruling, and would close all asylum hotels by the end of this parliament.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store