Abuse in Care Inquiry contributions honoured by King, mixed emotions for survivors
Eugene Ryder and Dame Cindy Kiro.
Photo:
Supplied
Twelve people whose experiences shaped the Inquiry into Abuse in State and Faith-based Care have received King's honours at a ceremony at Government House.
Governor-General Dame Cindy Kiro presented the medals for services to survivors of abuse in care, on behalf of the king, on Monday afternoon, the first in a number of ceremonies this week.
Receiving the insignia of a companion of the King's Service Order were Jim Goodwin, Tristram Ingham, Leoni McInroe, Moeapulu Frances Tagaloa, Gary Williams, and Paul Zentveld.
Receiving the King's Service Medal were Kath Coster, Hanz Freller, Toni Jarvis, Neta Kerepeti, Eugene Ryder, and Darryl Smith.
Dame Cindy Kiro told the room she saluted the courage, the strength and the resilience of those survivors, in the face of daunting odds.
But for many survivors, it had been a difficult decision to accept them.
Ryder, who entered care aged 11 and experienced abuse in boys' homes, faith-based homes and foster care, said he had wrestled with the decision.
In the end, he said he did it for those who could not be there.
"It was important for those survivors who feel they don't have a voice, who feel they can't be represented at the highest level, so that helped me decide to come and accept this award - it wasn't an easy thing."
His mokopuna performed a haka as he left the stage, and he said it brought him to tears. His granddaughter was the first in the family to speak te reo - he called her "our kaitaki reo".
Toni Jarvis and Dame Cindy Kiro.
Photo:
Supplied
Toni Jarvis, who entered care at 10 days old and was abused in a number of boys' homes, including Epuni and Hokio Beach, said there was an irony to accepting a medal from a king whose agencies he had been fighting for decades.
"I'll be honest, I don't stand here with a King's medal for the King, or for the country. I stand here for morehu/survivor whanau, and my loyalty will always be to my morehu/survivor whanau, first and foremost."
He said he took comfort in some words of wisdom he had once heard.
"'The greatest blessing you can receive is the acknowledgement and the blessing of your enemy' - and I never thought of it that way," he said.
"And I'm not here as an enemy of the Crown, I'm here as a very passionate person who wants to see change. I've survived horror, I've survived hell. A lot of our whanau have."
Tristram Ingham and Dame Cindy Kiro.
Photo:
Supplied
Tristram Ingham, a medical academic with lived experience of disability, was tasked with helping the inquiry committee understand the experiences they were hearing.
He said now was the time for change.
"Honours, they're good, they're nice. Apologies, they're helpful. But what we actually need is a fundamental paradigm shift in the way we treat and value members of community who need our aroha and support, not to be ignored."
Did he think change was likely? "I would like to think so."
"The power dynamics between those who have power and control, and those who don't - tangata whaikaha Maori, disabled people, survivors of abuse in care - until those people, until we have the power and control and self-determination, the mana motuhake, to say what's important in our own lives, this is never going to change."
The bulk of survivors are still waiting for news on a redress scheme.
Gary Williams and Dame Cindy Kiro.
Photo:
Supplied
Gary Williams, who experienced abuse and neglect in disability facilities, said he wanted the government to get a move on.
"I just ask the government to get on and do the job that we expect them to do," he said.
Asked whether that included redress, Williams said: "Yes, it includes everything. We can't wait forever, because survivors are dying every day."
Leoni McInroe and Dame Cindy Kiro.
Photo:
Supplied
Lake Ellis survivor Leoni McInroe said she too struggled with whether to accept it. "It was not an easy decision to accept this recognition, because of my fight with the Crown, because of the way that I've been treated by the Crown.
"And I made a decision to accept this medal, because before anyone knew about Lake Ellis, and the publicity, my children have carried that story."
She said her children had never been embarrassed by their mum and always stood by her, but she nonetheless felt embarrassed for them for being known as a child of Lake Ellis. "This washes that away, in my mind."
But she, like so many survivors, said there was still work to do.
"With this beautiful medal, I will continue to fight the Crown for the children of Lake Ellis, for justice, for accountability. No, the fight is not over by any means."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Interim Financial Statements Of The Government Of New ZealandFor The Ten Months Ended 30 April 2025
Jayne Winfield, Chief Government Accountant The Interim Financial Statements of the Government of New Zealand for the ten months ended 30 April 2025 were released by the Treasury today. The April results are reported against forecasts based on the Budget Economic and Fiscal Update 2025 (BEFU 2025), published on 22 May 2025, and the results for the same period for the previous year. The majority of the key fiscal indicators for the ten months ended 30 April 2025 were slightly better than forecast. The Government's main operating indicator, the operating balance before gains and losses excluding ACC (OBEGALx), showed a deficit of $7.4 billion. This was $0.1 billion smaller than forecast. While the core Crown results were favourable to forecast, this was largely offset by the results of State-owned Enterprises. Net core Crown debt was in line with forecast at $184.6 billion, or 43.2% of GDP. Core Crown tax revenue, at $100.4 billion, was $0.7 billion (0.7%) higher than forecast. Corporate tax and other individuals' tax contributed $0.4 billion and $0.2 billion respectively to the above forecast result. Core Crown expenses, at $115.8 billion, were $0.1 billion (0.1%) below forecast. This variance is mostly timing in nature and was spread across a range of agencies. The OBEGALx was a deficit of $7.4 billion, $0.1 billion less than the forecast deficit. When including the revenue and expenses of ACC, the OBEGAL deficit was $11.7 billion, in line with the forecast deficit. The operating balance deficit of $6.7 billion was $2.8 billion higher than the forecast deficit. This reflected both the OBEGAL result and net unfavourable valuation movements. Net gains on financial instruments were $4.3 billion lower than forecast, driven by New Zealand Superannuation Fund (NZS Fund) and ACC's investment portfolios. This unfavourable variance was partly offset by net gains on non-financial instruments being $1.3 billion higher than the forecast loss. This was largely owing to the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme with net gains on the liability being $1.1 billion higher than the forecast loss. The core Crown residual cash deficit of $8.4 billion was $0.1 billion lower than forecast. While net core Crown operating cash outflows were $0.4 billion higher than forecast, net core Crown capital cash outflows were $0.5 billion lower than forecast. Net core Crown debt at $184.6 billion (43.2% of GDP) was in line with forecast. With core Crown residual cash broadly in line with forecast, this and minor movements in non-cash items contributed to the net core Crown debt result. Gross debt at $203.5 billion (47.7% of GDP) was $6.3 billion lower than forecast, largely owing to lower than forecast unsettled trades and issuances of Euro Commercial Paper. Net worth at $181.4 billion (42.5% of GDP) was $3.1 billion lower than forecast largely reflecting the year-to-date operating balance result.
Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
King's Service Medal
Photo: supplied Fergus More Invercargill Services to the Southland community and law Invercargill lawyer Fergus More is officially resting his case — but not before one final verdict is reached. Mr More is ending a 44-year law career with the honour of receiving a King's Service Medal. "I did not expect my career to end with this honour," he said. Less than 30 days after being bestowed with the award, he is hanging up the robes for good and starting retirement. When Mr More opened the mailbox a few weeks ago, he was left "gobsmacked." He was "deeply, deeply honoured", and shocked in the best way possible. "I don't see myself as any different to any other practitioner — I've just been doing it a lot longer." He has worked as a partner at Scholefield Law and with many not-for-profits in the community, but most of his work has been advocating for children and youth. Mr More is the longest-running youth court advocate in New Zealand and longest running lawyer for children in Southland. He has been the lawyer for Child in Care of Children Act and Oranga Tamariki proceedings since 1985. Mr More said he would never have been able to help the community if he himself did not have the help of his wife, and his law partner. His biggest career highlight had been working with, and for, the families and the children of Southland. After 44 years of practising law, and at 72, Mr More said the demands of the job were definitely becoming more intense, and he believed it was time to rest his feet. "I'll leave it in the hands of the younger set now."
Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
What is the future for the Waitangi Tribunal?
Now that the Treaty Principles Bill has been consigned to the bin some who want to keep up the conversation about sovereignty and rangatiratanga (Māori self-determination), are refocusing on the Waitangi Tribunal. On the one hand are those who believe the tribunal should be remade to have the power to make decisions which are binding on the government. This would make the tribunal the highest power in New Zealand, above Parliament. (Incidentally, King Charles may well have concerns if Parliament attempts to cede its authority). On the other hand there are those who say the tribunal has done its job and should be dismantled. One of the earliest documents in our history was the Treaty. This document was intended to provide for a peaceful society by, among other things, describing Queen Victoria as in charge, reserving to each tribe their lands, other possessions and their rangatiratanga. This was interpreted for many years as leaving each Māori tribe authority over their own affairs and assets and that Queen Victoria was generally in charge over all. The Waitangi Tribunal came into being in 1975. Its purpose was to make recommendations on claims relating to the application of the principles of the Treaty. For that purpose it is to determine what the Treaty means and whether certain matters are inconsistent with these principles. It costs around $21 million per annum to run. For most of us this tribunal was set up to right the wrongs perpetrated on Māori by the Crown confiscating lands and other possessions. For many years it has had widespread support from New Zealanders. The law establishing the tribunal specifically denies jurisdiction in regard to any Bill that has been introduced to Parliament, unless Parliament has resolved to refer it to the tribunal. As historical land claims are coming to an end, the publicised work of the tribunal has been taken up with making comment about a wide variety of issues, with a focus on the choices government might make. For example the tribunal has spent some years looking into health. The tribunal made a finding that "the health system has not addressed Māori health inequities in a Treaty-compliant way, and this is in part why Māori health inequities have persisted". When the government disestablished the recently established Māori Health Authority the tribunal found that the Crown prejudiced Māori by not engaging with them over the scrapping of the authority. The Waitangi Tribunal has also been conducting a long-standing inquiry into a variety of claims relating to freshwater. Giving evidence to this inquiry The New Zealand Māori Council in 2018 pushed for a water commission to be appointed (rather than elected) made up of 50% Māori to control all water in New Zealand. A lawyer representing over a dozen hapu and iwi said the way the Crown had managed freshwater and left Māori out of the process was similar to theft. This year the tribunal has found that the Treaty Principles Bill breached Treaty principles by failing to guarantee rangatiratanga. When it looked into the proposed Regulatory Standards Bill it found that, if it were enacted, this Bill would be of constitutional significance, as it seeks to influence the way Parliament makes law and therefore it is inherently relevant to Māori. A potted version of the history could be described as thus. In 1840 the Treaty of Waitangi was signed between the Crown and various Māori tribes in New Zealand. This gave Queen Victoria overall control of New Zealand. Each tribe was guaranteed to keep ownership of their own land and possessions and to have internal control of their own affairs. Every citizen in New Zealand had the protection of the Crown. In 1975 the Waitangi Tribunal was set up to deal with legitimate grievances over confiscation of land and other possessions. It was expanded in 1985 in relation to historical claims. The tribunal has now interpreted its role as making pronouncements over any proposed legislation. It seems to have decided that all legislation can and would affect Māori, and if Māori could become part of a group who become or remain disadvantaged the law proposed is a breach of Treaty obligations. In our society, which now has many more than just British and Māori subjects, how can we best move forward? Will we continue with the tribunal with a focus on Māori to the exclusion of other priorities for government support hoping this will remain viable? Will we elevate the Waitangi Tribunal to make it the supreme decision-maker in New Zealand over all things which could possibly touch on the lives of Māori? Or might it be better to decide once the tribunal finishes its historic claims it is time to close it down, possibly replacing its role of critiquing government policies as they may affect Māori with a cheaper option? The challenge we have is to try to weave the Treaty and whatever arrangements we have around it with the primary duty of a stable democratic country to look after its most vulnerable without fear or favour. One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, One ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them. Like Tolkien said. hcalvert@ • Hilary Calvert is a former Otago regional councillor, MP and Dunedin city councillor.
