logo
Conclusive DNA proof to show mother's blood taken instead of minor's: Prosecution to court

Conclusive DNA proof to show mother's blood taken instead of minor's: Prosecution to court

Indian Express27-06-2025
As the prosecution in the Porsche crash opened its case and presented its argument towards framing of charges before a court, Special Public Prosecutor Shishir Hiray submitted to the court that there was technical and scientific evidence to probe the conspiracy involving all 10 accused, including the DNA evidence that conclusively establishes that the blood sample of the accused minor driver's mother was collected in his place at Sassoon General Hospital.
On May 19 last year, two young IT engineers — Aneesh Awadhiya and Ashwini Koshta — were killed after a speeding Porsche car, allegedly driven by an inebriated 17-and-a-half-year-old from a Pune realtor's family, rammed into their motorcycle at Kalyani Nagar junction.
Special Prosecutor Hiray said, 'Today we opened the prosecution case under CrPC section 226. We submitted to the court what evidence we have against the 10 accused and based on that, what charges can be framed. I submitted that this was a major conspiracy in which all the 10 accused are involved. The conspiracy was to shield the inebriated CCL (Child in Conflict with the Law) and his co-passenger friends from any action by the court. And for this, the evidence was destroyed and fake evidence was fabricated. In this manner, a fraud was committed with the judiciary, which has been our argument from the beginning.' Section 226 of the Criminal Procedure Code pertains to the prosecutor opening the case by describing the charges brought against the accused and stating by what evidence prosecution proposes to prove the guilt of the accused.
Hiray added, 'We explained to the court what evidence we have to prove this conspiracy. We have witness statements, technical evidence, scientific evidence, we have also recovered the money exchanged in the offence as part of the conspiracy and how the evidence established the role of each of the accused. For example we have established how money exchanged hands and how Sassoon doctors tampered with sample collection. We have DNA evidence conclusively proving that in the place of the CCL, his mother's blood sample was taken. Also, how the blood sample of one co-passenger's friend was swapped with that of his father, and another co-passenger's sample was exchanged with that of a third person. We have also established the money trail for the swapping of blood samples of the co-passengers.'
He further said, We have submitted reports of the Test Identification Parade establishing the identities of the accused. We have submitted CCTV footages that place the accused at various locations during the conspiracy. We have also submitted reports of the handwriting experts. We have said that all 10 accused who were part of the conspiracy had the same intention. We have said that all 10 accused need not be at one place to hatch the conspiracy. We thus presented the entire landscape of the conspiracy to the court and requested that the charges be framed against these accused.'
Following the incident on May 19, police investigation unravelled alleged cover-ups, bribery, abuse of power, and tampering with blood samples at the government-run Sassoon General Hospital.
The fatal accident had taken place after the minor and his friends had celebrated their Class 12 exam results at a pub. The minor was allegedly driving a Porsche Taycan luxury car which did not have number plates. Other than the minor driver, the police have till now arraigned and chargesheeted a total of 10 accused. The 51-year-old realtor father and 50-year-old mother of the minor have been charged with criminal conspiracy for allegedly orchestrating a swap of the minor driver's blood sample—collected at Sassoon Hospital—with the mother's. Dr Ajay Taware, then head of the forensic medicine of Sassoon hospital, Dr Shrihari Halnor, then casualty medical officer; Atul Ghatkamble, a staffer at the hospital's morgue; and Ashpak Makandar and Amar Gaikwad, who acted as middlemen between the minor's father and the doctors, have all been arraigned. Pune police have also arrested and charged a 37-year-old man who had given his blood to be swapped with that of a minor co-passenger and along with the father of that co-passenger. The 52-year-old father of another minor co-passenger, was also arrested earlier for giving his own blood sample to be swapped with his son.
Sushant Kulkarni is a Special Correspondent with The Indian Express in Pune with 12+ years of experience covering issues related to Crime, Defence, Internal Security and Courts. He has been associated with the Indian Express since July 2010.
Sushant has extensively reported on law and order issues of Pune and surrounding area, Cyber crime, narcotics trade and terrorism. His coverage in the Defence beat includes operational aspects of the three services, the defence research and development and issues related to key defence establishments. He has covered several sensitive cases in the courts at Pune.
Sushant is an avid photographer, plays harmonica and loves cooking. ... Read More
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AgustaWestland chopper scam: Accused Michel can't be released, CBI, ED tell Delhi court
AgustaWestland chopper scam: Accused Michel can't be released, CBI, ED tell Delhi court

Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • Indian Express

AgustaWestland chopper scam: Accused Michel can't be released, CBI, ED tell Delhi court

THE CBI on Monday told a Delhi court that Christian Michel James, the alleged middleman in the AgustaWestland VVIP chopper scam, should not be released from jail just because his maximum sentence of seven years has been completed. 'This is a case where he's seeking a release… this can't be granted. He has been granted bail in both CBI and ED cases but he's not coming out for whatever reasons,' said Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) and Senior Advocate D P Singh who represented the probe agency before the court. Michel is seeking a release on the grounds that he has already undergone the period of maximum sentence of seven years for the offences he has been charged with. It was argued by Aljo K Joseph, his lawyer, that Michel was entitled to be released under the provisions of Section 436A of the CrPC (maximum period for which an undertrial prisoner can be detained). Michel had been extradited to India on December 4, 2018 and was arrested by the CBI on arrival. Later, he was also arrested by the Enforcement Directorate. On February 18, 2025, Michel was granted bail in the CBI's case by the Supreme Court. A fortnight later, he was granted bail by the Delhi HC in the ED case. But he has refused to furnish the bail bonds and is still staying in Tihar jail, awaiting the renewal of his passport. 'After charges are framed… he has to plead guilty. Only then can my lords say that his sentence is over. Otherwise he has to approach a constitutional court by way of writ,' SPP Singh said. Special Public Prosecutor N K Matta, who appeared for ED, said: 'Remission can be considered only after punishment. Another submission I would like to make… seven years of punishment have not been completed in the ED's case,' he said. Special Judge Sanjay Jindal of Rouse Avenue Courts kept the matter for Tuesday.

Police initiate legal action to evict stalls, vendors from central Nagpur streets
Police initiate legal action to evict stalls, vendors from central Nagpur streets

Time of India

time4 hours ago

  • Time of India

Police initiate legal action to evict stalls, vendors from central Nagpur streets

Nagpur: The city police have launched a robust plan to tackle the chronic issue of encroachments in central Nagpur, aiming to ease traffic congestion and ensure pedestrian safety. The action will cover areas under the jurisdictions of Ganeshpeth, Lakadganj, Shanti Nagar, Pachpaoli, Tehsil and Kotwali police stations. Zonal DCP Rahul Madane is spearheading the initiative, issuing prohibitory notices under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), previously Section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code. These notices target street vendors and encroachers obstructing public spaces. "Our prohibitory notices will act as a deterrent. Any violation will lead to registration of offences and subsequent preventive actions," Madane said, emphasizing a strategic approach to enforcement using provisions from both BNSS and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Handcarts, roadside vendors and stalls have occupied footpaths in areas like Mominpura, Old Bhandara Road, Itwari, Jagnath Budhwari, Mahal, Badkas Chowk, Shanti Nagar, Kamal Chowk and Wardhaman Nagar, forcing pedestrians onto busy carriageways. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Access all TV channels anywhere, anytime Techno Mag Learn More Undo The eviction process through one-to-one legal action will be rolled out in phases, focusing on clearing footpaths and carriageways without requiring extensive security arrangements. Madane stressed that the operation aims to restore order on central Nagpur's congested stretches, where unauthorized commercial activities have long disrupted traffic flow and pedestrian movement. "We are committed to reclaiming public spaces legally and systematically," he said. The move comes after repeated failed attempts by authorities to address the issue, with no long-term solutions in sight until now. The chaotic presence of handcarts and stalls not only hampered mobility but also posed safety risks to pedestrians. Local residents and commuters have welcomed the initiative, hoping it will bring relief to the city's overburdened infrastructure. The police have urged vendors to comply with the notices to avoid legal repercussions. As the phased eviction unfolds, authorities are optimistic that central Nagpur will see improved accessibility and reduced congestion, benefiting both pedestrians and motorists in the long run.

Prajwal verdict: Not hearsay! ‘Res Gestae' rest assured survivor's victory
Prajwal verdict: Not hearsay! ‘Res Gestae' rest assured survivor's victory

Time of India

time5 hours ago

  • Time of India

Prajwal verdict: Not hearsay! ‘Res Gestae' rest assured survivor's victory

Bengaluru: Since witness accounts aren't easy to obtain in sexual-assault cases, courts are allowed to consider, juxtapose or string together disparate events, statements or actions under less-known, but important 'Res Gestae' doctrine. The special court that convicted Prajwal Revanna has deployed this legal reasoning under Sections 6 to 8 of the Indian Evidence Act. For the record, 'Res Gestae' is a Latin term meaning "things done". In legal context, it describes statements made spontaneously and contemporaneously with an event, considered reliable evidence because they are not the result of premeditation or fabrication. The court said the "law allows certain exceptions to the general bar on hearsay", citing Indian and English legal authorities. The court relied on Gentela Vijayavardhan Rao v State of AP (1996) to highlight that spontaneity and contemporaneous conduct or statements may fall within the ambit of this doctrine. In this context, it found admissible the behaviour of the survivor shortly after the incident and other related acts and statements. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru For instance, the court pointed to the testimony of prosecution witness 4, who noticed the survivor appearing distressed and muttering that "they cannot do anything" shortly after completing some work in the Basavanagudi house in Bengaluru. Though minor, the court said this was relevant because it reflected the survivor's mental state immediately after the incident. Further, prosecution witness 2, the survivor's son, testified that on the day of the 2024 parliamentary election, he heard the mother and his sister speak in hushed tones, saying they should not be caught by the police, and was asked to remain quiet. The court noted this was significant as the prosecution alleged the survivor was being hidden due to the circulation of obscene videos involving her and the accused. The court highlighted the accused's own statement under Section 313 of the CrPC, where he acknowledged filing a civil suit and obtaining a stay order against the publication of such videos. This, the court said, showed that the accused was aware of the circulation of the videos before the election and had taken legal steps accordingly. Importantly, during cross-examination of the survivor, the court noted the accused did not specifically claim the video content was morphed, but only suggested that the male in the video was not him. The court held that this conduct, seen through the lens of 'Res Gestae', amounted to a non-denial of the video's content. The court relied on the forensic evidence presented by prosecution witness 22, a scientific officer from the audio-video forensic section of the FSL in Bengaluru. He testified that the videos submitted for analysis showed no signs of editing or morphing. While acknowledging that their lab could not detect deepfakes with precision, the officer said frame analysis had not indicated any signs of tampering. Drawing all of this together, the court concluded that the survivor's post-incident conduct and the accused's actions before and during the trial were relevant and admissible under the 'Res Gestae' principle. These elements, the court said, helped establish the naturalness of the survivor's behaviour and lent credibility to her account.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store