
10 takeaways from the 78th Cannes Film Festival
Here are ten takeaways from the 2025 festival...
1. Trump's film tariffs spoil the party
Just when the festival had reclaimed its post-pandemic, post-industry strikes buoyancy, US president Donald Trump cast an economic shadow over the Riviera. His proposed plan to impose tariffs on films made outside the US sent a jolt through the Marché. Tensions simmered among hesitant distributors and producers. If imposed, the tariffs could damage transatlantic co-productions and the already-fragile indie distribution pipeline. It wasn't the kind of drama Cannes was hoping for, but it certainly made for an anxious undercurrent. The stars had their say, as well. Robert De Niro called Trump the 'philistine' president while Richard Linklater scoffed at the tariff proposition exclaiming "That's not gonna happen right? That guy changes his mind like 50 times in one day".
Robert De Niro shared a strong message against Donald Trump's tariff policies on art and cinema. #cannes2025 pic.twitter.com/M8DXBlvH9x
— Brut America (@brutamerica) May 13, 2025
2. Cannes bans red carpet nudity
This year's red carpet came with another new set of rules. The festival decided to ban voluminous outfits and, most notably, nudity of any kind. Organizers insisted it was 'for decency reasons', but others pointed out that Cannes has become as much of a platform for fashion statements and performance art as an exhibition of cinema. Of course, there were still flourishes of defiance. Eva Longoria, Halle Berry and Heidi Klum all showed up in billowing attire while a few - including Miss Universe 2016, Iris Mittenaere - were in more of, let's say, a state of nature. The strict posture felt like an overcorrection but Cannes thrives on controlled chaos and on the red carpet rules are there to be broken.
3. Father-daughter dramas take the spotlight
Some years are defined by form, others by theme. This year, the thematic clarion that called out was the complicated, often tender dynamic between fathers and daughters. Joachim Trier's Sentimental Value led the pack - a meditation on memory and reconciliation, anchored by show stopping performances. Wes Anderson's The Phoenician Scheme explores the strained relationship between wealthy businessman Zsa-Zsa Korda and his daughter Liesl, a nun. Korda appoints Liesl as sole heir to his estate, but this is as much a desperate attempt at winning her forgiveness as a shrewd business decision. Meanwhile, in Sirat, a father, driven by unconditional love, searches frantically for his daughter who disappears at a desert rave in Morocco. Queer Palm winner The Little Sister subverted the trope entirely, with the father's absence felt as a haunting void. In each case, we received truly affecting meditations on regret.
4. The preposterous standing ovations persist
If applause was currency, Cannes could fund its own space program. The ritual of the standing ovation remains one of the festival's more absurd traditions - timed, documented, and weaponised for marketing. Trier's Sentimental Value film got 19 minutes, the third longest ever at Cannes. Jafar Panahi's It Was Just an Accident clocked 12. Ethan Coen's Honey Don't! somehow scraped six and a half. Do they mean anything? Not really. A warm four-minute ovation often says more than an arm-cramping 15. But Cannes, bless it, will never give up its cherished barometer of emotional excess.
5. Panahi's Palme makes It six for Neon
Panahi's It Was Just an Accident, a cerebral portrait of fragmented memory in modern Iran, earned the Palme d'Or - marking film distribution company Neon's sixth consecutive win. It's not just an impressive feat; it's starting to feel like a monopoly. Neon's grip on the Palme has sparked rumours about a curation bias, but the quality of their choices remains beyond reproach. If you're betting on Cannes gold, Neon is the safest horse in the race.
6. MUBI emerges as a Cannes power player
That said, If there was a breakout distributor this year, it wasn't Netflix or Amazon, but MUBI. What began as a streaming service for curious cinephiles has evolved impressively into a production powerhouse - with taste. They walked away from Cannes with multiple aquisitions under their belt in Competition, not to mention the statement $24m purchase of Lynne Ramsay's Die My Love (starring Jennifer Lawrence and Robert Pattinson) as well as buzzy acquisitions like Mascha Schilinski's enigmatic Sound of Falling and Grand Prix winner Sentimental Value. The company's brand of artful, politically alert cinema now rivals the prestige of A24 - only with less merchandise. Cannes has officially found a new heavyweight.
7. Actor-turned-director debuts shine bright
There are regularly directorial debuts from actors that feel like vanity projects. Not this year. Kristen Stewart's The Chronology of Water introduced the former Twilight star as a filmmaking talent to watch while Harris Dickinson stunned with Urchin, a raw, deeply personal drama about homelessness and masculinity on the fringes of society. Scarlett Johansson's Eleanor the Great was a tender portrait of aging and friendship. It's not that actors can't direct, it's just rare that they do so with such precision and humility.
8. Eddington brings back bad memories
Ari Aster's Eddington, a Covid-era quasi-Western set in a dustbowl New Mexico town, was far and away the most divisive film of Cannes' 78th renewal. It captures a harrowing time in very recent history and for some, that struck too close to home. The mere sight of a face mask was enough to send audience members home upset. Aster has garnered a reputation for making challenging, elliptical horror and, although it's had its champions, the reaction to Eddington has been mainly one of confusion and frustration. Either way, it left a mark, but not always the kind you'd hope for.
9. Paul Mescal delivers again, but History of Sound falls flat
Mescal mania continues. With his performance in The History of Sound, the Kildare actor delivered another masterclass in restrained grief. Unfortunately, the much-hyped queer period drama fell flat. Despite an arresting premise - two young men recording folk songs across wartime America - the film never quite gelled and always felt a little too timid for its own good. Mescal and co-star Josh O'Connor have crackling chemistry, no doubt, but the film is afraid to push the boundaries and ends up coming off as uninspired. Still, one mis-step doesn't dull Mescal's ascent. He remains the real deal.
10. The best Cannes in years?
Let's not bury the lede. This was one of the strongest Cannes slates in years. There wasn't a clear dud to speak of. Even the failures were noble. From Chinese sci-fi epics scored by M83 to Brazilian political thrillers, there was a sense that Cannes had found its taste again. It should be noted that Dublin and London-based film company Element Pictures won two awards, for the second year running, for a pair of notable feature debuts - Akinola Davies Jr.'s My Father's Shadow, and Harry Lighton's Pillion. No empty provocation. No gimmickry for gimmickry's sake. Just bold, sincere, frequently strange cinema.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Trump administration better-placed than courts to release Epstein files, says judge
A New York judge has said the Trump administration is in a better position than federal courts to release materials that would satisfy public curiosity about the sex trafficking case of the late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. In rejecting the justice department's bid to unseal records from the grand jury that indicted Epstein in 2019, Manhattan-based US district judge Richard Berman wrote that the 70-odd pages of materials the grand jury saw paled in comparison to the 100,000 pages the government has from its Epstein investigation, but is not releasing. The judge said the bid to persuade him to unseal the records was an apparent distraction from the justice department's decision in July not to release its files and directly cited another judge's decision earlier this month not to release similar materials from the grand jury that indicted Epstein's long-time girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell . 'The instant grand jury motion appears to be a 'diversion' from the breadth and scope of the Epstein files in the Government's possession,' Judge Berman wrote. The justice department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Judge Berman's decision came as president Donald Trump has faced criticism from his conservative base of supporters and congressional Democrats over the justice department's decision not to release the files from its Epstein investigation. [ Epstein scandal: Letters from famous figures published Opens in new window ] Epstein died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. He had pleaded not guilty. His death in jail and his friendships with wealthy and powerful individuals sparked conspiracy theories that other prominent people were involved in his alleged crimes, and that he had been murdered. Mr Trump, a Republican, had campaigned for a second term in 2024 with promises to make public Epstein-related files, and accused Democrats of covering up the truth. But in July, the justice department declined to release any more material from its investigation of the case and said a previously touted Epstein client list did not exist, angering Mr Trump's supporters. To try to quell the discontent, Mr Trump in July instructed attorney general Pam Bondi to seek court approval for the release of grand jury material from Epstein's case. Evidence seen and heard by grand juries, which operate behind closed doors to prevent interference in criminal investigations, cannot be released without a judge's approval. Justice department investigations typically collect more material than prosecutors ultimately present to grand juries. Some of that evidence is at times eventually disclosed to the public during criminal trials. The justice department does not routinely disclose its evidence in cases where a defendant pleads guilty or, like Epstein, never faces trial, but it would not require judicial approval to release such materials. The grand jury that indicted Epstein heard from just one witness, an agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and saw a PowerPoint presentation and call logs, Judge Berman wrote. On August 11th, a different Manhattan-based judge, Paul Engelmayer, denied the justice department's request to unseal grand jury testimony and exhibits from Maxwell's case, writing that the material was duplicative of public testimony at her 2021 trial. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence following her conviction for recruiting underage girls for Epstein. 'A member of the public, appreciating that the Maxwell grand jury materials do not contribute anything to public knowledge, might conclude that the government's motion for their unsealing was aimed not at 'transparency' but at diversion - aimed not at full disclosure, but at the illusion of such,' Judge Engelmayer wrote. Maxwell had pleaded not guilty. After losing an appeal, she asked the US Supreme Court to review her case. – Reuters

The Journal
2 hours ago
- The Journal
Any talks on Ukraine's security without Russia would be 'a road to nowhere', Kremlin says
RUSSIA HAS SAID it has to be part of any discussion on security guarantees for Ukraine and played down the likelihood of an imminent summit with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy, tempering hopes for a quick deal to end the war. It comes after a meeting between Zelenskyy, US President Donald Trump and a host of European leaders at the White House on Monday, three days after the Republican's landmark encounter with Russian president Vladimir Putin in Alaska. Trump called Putin during the talks in Washington, later claiming that the Russian leader had agreed to meet Zelenskyy and accepted that there will be Western security guarantees for Ukraine as part of any agreement to end the war. But Russia has not confirmed this. Speaking today, Moscow's long-serving foreign minister Sergei Lavrov downplayed the meeting in Washington, describing it as a 'clumsy' attempt to change the US president's position on Ukraine. Lavrov cast doubt on an imminent meeting between Putin and Zelenskyy, saying that any summit between them 'must be prepared in the most meticulous way' so it does not lead to a 'deterioration' of the situation surrounding the conflict. He also warned that 'seriously discussing security guarantees without the Russian Federation is a utopia, a road to nowhere'. Trump, who has fiercely criticised the billions in support that this predecessor Joe Biden sent to Ukraine, earlier said European nations were 'willing to put people on the ground' to secure any settlement. Advertisement He ruled out sending US troops but suggested the country might provide air support. Russia has long said it will never tolerate the presence of any Western troops in Ukraine. Meanwhile, NATO military chiefs meanwhile held a virtual summit on security guarantees for Ukraine, the latest in a flurry of global diplomacy aimed at brokering an end to the nearly three-and-a-half year conflict. 'On Ukraine, we confirmed our support. Priority continues to be a just, credible and durable peace,' the chair of the alliance's military committee, Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone, wrote on X after the meeting. Moscow signed the Budapest Memorandum in 1994, which was aimed at ensuring security for Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan in exchange for them giving up numerous nuclear weapons left from the Soviet era. But Russia violated that first by taking Crimea in 2014, and then by starting a full-scale offensive in 2022, which has killed tens of thousands of people and forced millions to flee their homes. On Tuesday, top US officer Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, held talks with European military chiefs on the 'best options for a potential Ukraine peace deal'. Fresh Russian strikes In eastern Ukraine, far from the diplomatic deliberations, Russian forces claimed fresh advances on the ground and Ukrainian officials reported more deaths from Russian attacks. Russia's defence ministry said on Telegram that its troops had captured the villages of Sukhetske and Pankivka in the embattled Donetsk region. They are near a section of the front where the Russian army broke through Ukrainian defences last week, between the logistics hub of Pokrovsk and Kostiantynivka. Related Reads Putin and Zelenskyy agree to meet directly in a 'neutral country' in the coming weeks What parts of Ukraine could Vladimir Putin ask for in exchange for an end to the war? Trump tells Zelenskyy and European leaders that Putin 'accepts' security guarantees for Ukraine 'Our units are engaged in heavy defensive battles against superior Russian forces,' said Ukraine's commander-in-chief Oleksandr Syrsky. Last night, a drone strike on Okhtyrka in the Sumy region injured 14 people. A family with wounded children – 5 months, 4 years, and 6 years old – sought assistance after the attack. In Kostiantynivka, Donetsk region, a glide bomb strike damaged five apartment buildings, and at… — Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) August 20, 2025 Six civilians were killed by Russian attacks across eastern and southern Ukraine today, local authorities said. One person died in Russia's western Bryansk region as a result of a Ukrainian drone strike, the local governor said. Russia's aerial attacks on the northeastern town of Okhtyrka in the Sumy region wounded at least 14 people, including three children, according to regional governor Oleg Grygorov. Zelenskyy said these latest strikes showed 'the need to put pressure on Moscow', including through sanctions, 'until diplomacy is fully effective'. 'Together with the United States, Europe, and all those who seek peace, we are working every day to guarantee security. We need strong security guarantees to ensure a truly reliable and lasting,' he said. With reporting from © AFP 2025 Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal


RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Sony raises PlayStation 5 price in US as tariffs hit
Sony has said it is bumping up the price of PlayStation 5 video game consoles by over €40 in the United States due to a "challenging economic environment". Tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump hike the cost of goods brought into the US, leaving companies like Japan's Sony to decide whether to pass that on to consumers. "Similar to many global businesses, we continue to navigate a challenging economic environment," Sony Interactive Entertainment vice president of global marketing Isabelle Tomatis said in a post. After initially being threatened with a 25% hike, Japan negotiated a 15% tariff with the Trump administration. "As a result, we've made the difficult decision to increase the recommended retail price for PlayStation 5 consoles in the US." The new price for PS5 will be €472, with a "Digital Edition" priced at €430 and a Pro version for €643, according to Tomatis. In May, Sony warned it was considering tweaking prices in the US, estimating that tariffs could wind up costing the company about €583 million in the fiscal year. American companies are feeling the crunch, too. New York-based cosmetics giant Estee Lauder recently estimated the impact of the new tariffs at around €85 million for the 2026 financial year and plans to adjust its prices to offset the additional cost. US snack giant PepsiCo could increase prices of its soft drinks about 10% to mitigate effects of US tariffs, particularly those on imported aluminium used to make soda cans, according to trade magazine Beverage Digest. Meanwhile, California-based energy drink maker Monster Beverages is considering raising prices due to a "complex and dynamic customs landscape," according to chief executive Hilton Schlosberg. The Commerce Department this week said the US broadened its steel and aluminium tariffs, impacting hundreds more products that contain both metals such as child seats, tableware and heavy equipment. Since returning to the presidency, Mr Trump has imposed tariffs on almost all US trading partners. Though the impact of Presidents Trump's tariffs on consumer prices has been limited so far, economists warn that their full effects are yet to be seen. Some businesses have coped by bringing forward purchases of products they expected will encounter tariffs. Others have passed on additional costs to their consumers or absorbed a part of the fresh tariff burden.