
‘Turning Point: The Vietnam War' resurfaces ugly truths, exposes America's shameful repeat of history
In marking the 50th anniversary of the Fall of Saigon, Vietnam War documentaries have become a television genre. This week, Netflix joins the trend with 'Turning Point: The Vietnam War.'
The third of Brian Knappenberger's 'Turning Point' miniseries (previous entries looked at 'The Bomb and the Cold War' and '9/11 and the War on Terror'), its five episodes cover much the same ground as Ken Burns' 2017 PBS series ' The Vietnam War ' and ' Vietnam: The War That Changed America,' which Apple TV+ released earlier this year.
That's unavoidable; the historical record is the historical record. But America's mid-20th century involvement in what was essentially a Southeast Asian civil war was so complex and camouflaged in deception — not to mention brutal, racist, socially disruptive and ultimately, unforgivably senseless — that every one of these extended documentaries illuminates new, or at least different, tragedies.
We're talking small degrees of emphasis here. Knappenberger lays out the pertinent aspects more comprehensively than the Apple TV+ series did and in a less plodding manner than Burns. 'Turning Point: The Vietnam War,' may be dense with information, yet is edited and delivered in a manner that feels fleet while still getting the job done.
This show relies a lot on CBS news archives, hence the prominence of network stars Dan Rather (who is also an elderly, insightful talking head here), Morley Safer, Ed Bradley and, of course, Walter Cronkite.
However 'Turning Point,' like its predecessors, prides itself on newly discovered sources such as declassified government records and personal footage taken by U.S. and Vietnamese troops of both sides. Most enraging are secret White House tape recordings. It's clear John F. Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson had reels turning long before the system led to Richard Nixon's Watergate Waterloo. The audio evidence of how all three administrations lied to the public about the war's feasibility makes for an appalling indictment.
Grunts, POWs, anti-war protesters, U.S. military and government higher-ups, historians, Graham Nash (CSNY's 'Ohio' is predictably prominent on the soundtrack) and especially sharp book authors explain America's tactical and moral failings and the resulting, ongoing credibility gap between citizens and our leaders. The complicated story of post-World War II Indochina is cleanly laid out, while a well-balanced array of North Vietnamese, Viet Cong and South Vietnamese combatants and civilians describe the awful things people did to each other in the names of freedom from colonialism or communism.
The program's most chilling sequence is a kind of virtual walk through the My Lai Massacre, when a U.S. unit methodically murdered hundreds of women, children and seniors in a rural hamlet soon after the 1968, attitude-changing Tet Offensive. Ronald Haeberle, a military photographer who took pictures with a personal camera that the Army couldn't censor, provides grisly graphics and soul-throttling commentary of what he saw that day. Wizened Vietnamese survivors will break your heart.
If I recall, My Lai wasn't even mentioned in 'War That Changed America,' which speaks to this docuseries' more traditional, full-picture approach. The Apple TV+ series placed more emphasis on human factors, though Knappenberger is no slouch in that department. The first vet we hear from this time around is Scott Camil, a Marine who also figures prominently in the Apple TV+ show. I think Knappenberger uses the same footage of G.I.s turning their weapons into bongs that we saw a few months ago, as well.
But whatever seems repetitious in these Vietnam documentaries is mitigated by necessity. 'Turning Point' concludes noting the invasion of Iraq was justified by Gulf of Tonkin-style lies, and our 2021 Afghanistan withdrawal looked strikingly like that chaotic, 1975 airlift from Saigon.
Bob Strauss is a freelance writer.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Denver police arrest several marchers during demonstration calling for end to ICE raids
Denver police arrested several people during Tuesday's demonstration against ICE raids in downtown Denver after an early evening protest at the Colorado State Capitol. According to the Denver Police Department, 17 people were arrested. Denver police arrested several demonstrators during a march against ICE raids in downtown Denver Tuesday night. CBS The Denver Police Department confirmed several people were arrested on Tuesday night; three people were arrested for graffiti, one for interference with police authority, one for unlawful throwing of projectiles and failure to obey a lawful order, seven people for obstruction of streets and failure to obey a lawful order, two for obstruction of streets, failure to obey a lawful order and interference with police authority, one for second-degree assault, and two for second-degree assault to a peace officer. Denver police confirmed with CBS News Colorado that officers deployed smoke and pepper balls to disperse crowds that were blocking roadways. The Denver Police Department stated, "...pepper balls are typically fired at the ground as a means of deploying the powdered substance into an area." CBS A large crowd was seen reacting to smoke in the air near 20th Street and Little Raven Street in Denver on Tuesday night. Police also blocked the entrance to Interstate 25 at Broadway so marchers couldn't enter, and there was another large police presence at Market Street and 20th. Several people were arrested during demonstrations in downtown Denver on Tuesday night. CBS Break-off groups from an earlier peaceful protest against Immigration and Customs Enforcement grew more chaotic as the night went on. Denver police told CBS News that rocks and bottles were thrown at officers near Coors Field. Similar confrontations have been happening in several other cities across the U.S., including Los Angeles. Protests and marches have been going on there for days as demonstrators have been clashing with police. Many protests -- including in Texas, in Chicago, and now in Denver -- have come about in response to the situation in California.


The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump, Congress can end abuse of taxpayers by PBS and NPR
Forcing taxpayers to bankroll the left-wing propaganda machine that is PBS and NPR is not just a slap in the face — it is flat-out illegal. President Trump's rescission package, yanking back $1.1 billion in taxpayer funds earmarked for these media behemoths, is precisely the gut punch these broadcasters have had coming for decades. For nearly 40 years, the organization I run has documented PBS and NPR thumbing their noses at the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967, which demands 'strict adherence to objectivity and balance' in controversial programming. Objectivity? Balance? They tossed those out the window faster than you can say 'state-run media.' The liberal media's howling about 'censorship' and waving the First Amendment like a shield is pure theater. The First Amendment protects free speech, not your right to a government handout. PBS and NPR are not entitled to a dime of hardworking Americans' money to amplify their one-sided narratives. For years, we have documented endlessly the seemingly infinite segments framing conservatives as villains, the soft-ball interviews with progressive darlings, and the relentless push for narratives that align with the far-left playbook. This is not journalism — it is activism masquerading as public service. Our archives are bursting with examples of their flagrant disregard for fairness. Trump's rescission is the first step toward dismantling this abuse of public trust. If PBS and NPR want to keep preaching to their choir, they have an audience already — let them do it on their own dime, not ours. Take PBS. A recent Media Research Center study found that liberal Democratic guests on 'PBS NewsHour' outnumbered conservative Republicans by more than four to one. Remove elected officials, and the gap grows to 6.5 to one. Even then, only anti-Trump Republicans were invited. That is not public broadcasting — it is taxpayer-funded activism. Consider PBS's 'On Democracy' series launched under Trump. It claimed to examine threats to democratic institutions. Yet the ratio of liberal to conservative reporters on the guest list (which featured Jeffrey Goldberg and Brian Stelter, for example) was a staggering 22 to 1. Even when the guest lineup appeared balanced, the conservative voices were merely used as straw men. And NPR? Its managing editor dismissed the Hunter Biden laptop story as a 'pure distraction,' even as the New York Post uncovered clear evidence of Biden family influence-peddling. Meanwhile, NPR ran sympathetic profiles on Hunter's addiction and ignored all the core allegations. Time and again, we found NPR promoting the left's agenda without pushback. In a 2022 interview with Biden HHS official Rachel Levine, NPR called 'gender-affirming' care 'lifesaving' and failed to include a single opposing voice, since this is a very controversial claim. By 2023, 67 percent of NPR's audience identified as liberal. Far from making itself an asset to the public generally, it had created a bubble for adherents of just one ideology. Former NPR editor Uri Berliner blew the whistle on NPR bias last year when he revealed that in its Washington headquarters, he found '87 registered Democrats working in editorial positions and zero Republicans. None.' Following that revelation, NPR took a $1.9 million grant to make 'editorial enhancements,' which supposedly included improving its objectivity. In awarding the grant, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting announced that the funding 'provides increased oversight to ensure objective, balanced, transparent, fact-based journalism.' Seven months later, the leftist bias of the taxpayer-funded public radio content organization lives on. Our Free Speech America division recently exposed how Google and Wikipedia helped sanitize NPR's mishandling of the laptop scandal. If you search 'Did NPR hide the Hunter Biden laptop story?' on Google, its AI Overview confidently answers 'No,' citing Wikipedia. That entry conveniently omits NPR's own admissions — coming both from former editor Terence Samuel and current CEO Katherine Maher — that the outlet failed to properly report the story. Such pervasive bias is not without consequences. A poll we conducted in 2020 suggested that the deliberate suppression of the news had acually changed the outcome of the 2020 presidential election. Forty-five percent of Joe Biden voters were unaware of the New York Post's story about the Hunter Biden laptop, likely due to Big Tech censorship and news outlets such as NPR refusing to report the story. Had these Americans been fully aware of it, our analysis suggested that as many of 9.4 percent of Biden's voters would have abandoned him, likely flipping all six of the swing states he won to Trump. Congress now has a unique chance to act. Rescinding these funds will send a clear signal: if you want to push a partisan agenda, don't ask taxpayers to fund it. If NPR and PBS believe in their product, let private donors or advertisers fund it. We will not stop calling out their bias, but exposure alone is not enough. Lawmakers must act. Trump's rescission package is a practical, principled reform. Republicans have fought to defund these institutions for more than 30 years. Now, that goal could finally become a reality. Congress must follow through. This fight is not only about fairness and protecting taxpayer dollars from waste and abuse. It is about ending PBS and NPR lawlessness. Trump and Congress are duty-bound to strip these left-wing media mouthpieces of every taxpayer dime. David Bozell is president of the Media Research Center.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
White House's Kevin Hassett Says Trump Administration Will 'Look At' Medicare Changes If Senate Finds Abuse, Calls Cuts Report 'Fake'
The Trump administration has expressed its readiness to contemplate alterations to the Medicare program, contingent on the Senate's discovery of any fraudulent activities or misuse. What Happened: White House National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett clarified the administration's position on Medicare in a CBS's 'Face the Nation' interview on Sunday. Hassett stated that while Medicare is not a target in the budget proposal, the administration would consider changes if the Senate uncovers any program abuse. Trending: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Dismissing rumors of Medicare cuts as 'a big fake news story,' Hassett emphasized that any identified abuse in the Medicare provision by the Senate would be reviewed. Hassett also noted that he has observed substantial waste, fraud, and abuse in Medicaid and if similar issues are detected in Medicare, they would be promptly addressed. 'If somebody finds waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare, then of course we would look at it,' Hassett said. 'But there have been a lot of false stories about Medicare being on the table, and it's totally not on the table.'Why It Matters: This statement comes as Senate Republicans examine the House-approved budget bill—referred to by President Donald Trump as the 'One Big Beautiful Bill'—which includes significant tax cuts, border security provisions, and changes to Medicaid and food assistance programs. The Trump administration's budget proposal has been a topic of intense debate. The bill, which includes Medicaid cuts and other significant changes, has sparked concerns about the future of healthcare for millions of Americans. The clarification from Hassett provides some insight into the administration's stance on Medicare and the potential for adjustments based on Senate findings. For more context, House Speaker Mike Johnson has defended the bill, arguing that those who lose Medicaid will do so by personal choice. His comments came amid projections that 4.8 million people could lose Medicaid coverage under the new spending bill. Meanwhile, Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought dismissed fears about Medicaid cuts as 'ridiculous,' stating that the Senate would likely vote in favor of a substantially similar bill. Read Next: The average American couple has saved this much money for retirement — How do you compare? Bezos' Favorite Real Estate Platform Launches A Way To Ride The Ongoing Private Credit Boom Image via Shutterstock Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article White House's Kevin Hassett Says Trump Administration Will 'Look At' Medicare Changes If Senate Finds Abuse, Calls Cuts Report 'Fake' originally appeared on