Von der Leyen cools on EU army as Trump fuels demand
Ursula von der Leyen has distanced herself from her past support for an EU army, despite Donald Trump fuelling demands for the creation of a joint European fighting force.
European governments are scrambling to boost their collective defence amid concerns over deteriorating relations with the Trump administration, as well as fears US troops will pull out of Europe and weaken Nato.
These concerns would have been only exacerbated by Volodymyr Zelensky's disastrous Oval Office meeting with Mr Trump on Friday, which descended into a shouting match.
The crisis has boosted calls to ensure Europe can act independently of Washington, and raised the long-distant prospect of an army coming a step closer.
In 2015, the European Commission President who was then Germany's defence minister, said: 'Our future as Europeans will one day be a European army.'
Mrs von der Leyen's officials played down those comments this week when The Telegraph asked if she thought that day was getting nearer.
'The president has always been very clear on the fact that troops and their organisation are absolutely the responsibility of the member states,' a commission spokesperson said.
European leaders faced with Trump's insistence they will police the peace in Ukraine have been shocked into action by the combination of an unreliable US and aggressive Russia.
On Monday, Jose Manuel Albares, Spain's foreign minister, urged plans for a joint rapid reaction force, potentially including commandos, to be accelerated.
He said the 5,000 soldier-strong group 'could be the embryo, even, of a European army that we have often talked about' before EU leaders meet for an emergency summit on defence on March 6. .
'I really believe that the time has come that the armed forces of Europe must be created,' Mr Zelensky said at the Munich Security Conference in February2025.
'Let's be honest, now we can't rule out that America might say 'no' to Europe on issues that might threaten it.'
On Sunday, Friedrich Merz, Germany's new Chancellor in waiting, said Europe had to make itself independent from the US and warned Nato could be dead by June.
He told reporters: 'It is five minutes to midnight for Europe,' days after suggesting Germany could ask for the shelter of Britain and France's nuclear deterrent.
It was an astonishing intervention from an election winner on the night of his victory who was, until recently, one of Germany's most nakedly pro-US politicians.
Mr Merz's opinion matters. The leader of the conservative CDU, which is also Mrs von der Leyen's party, should soon take the reins of Europe's largest economy.
His comments will have come as music to the ears of Emmanuel Macron, the French president, who may be enjoying his 'I told you so' moment.
He has urged his allies to do more on common defence since Mr Trump's first term.
Back in 2018, Mr Macron declared that Europe could not be protected without 'a true European army'.
Jean-Claude Juncker, Mrs von der Leyen's predecessor as commission president, called for an EU army in 2015.
Mr Macron eventually extracted some reluctant words of support from Angela Merkel, then German chancellor, but little progress was made.
The UK, still an EU member, would have opposed any concrete plans on the grounds they risked undermining Nato. Mr Macron now hopes the Paris-Berlin engine of EU policymaking can finally deliver the 'strategic autonomy' he wants.
The European army has long been a niche obsession of fearful Brexiteers and enthusiastic arch-federalists. Could its moment have finally arrived?
The idea of a supranational European military force has periodically raised its head since the European Defence Community was discussed in the 1950s.
France vetoed plans that could have led to a joint armed force among the six original member states in 1954, amid sovereignty fears.
Since then, the pre-eminence of Nato as Europe's security guarantor kept the idea largely on the shelf.
The EU has had multinational battle groups of 1,500 personnel each since 2007 but these have never been deployed.
'First there has to be political will,' one EU diplomat said. 'No leader wants to send troops to die under an EU flag,'
After the chaotic US withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021, Mr Macron and Mrs von der Leyen pushed for the creation of the joint rapid reaction force. The idea was this 5,000-strong unit would mean the EU would never again be solely dependent on the US in the crisis zones of the future.
It is hoped the force would be able to be used to enforce ceasefire zones, secure airlifts, safely evacuate EU nationals and provide emergency humanitarian assistance.
The scheme is supported by France and Germany on the basis of a 'coalition of willing', as long as no EU governments object, and is also supported by Italy and Spain, which backed an even larger formation of up to 50,000 troops.
The hope is that the force, backed up a headquarters with 350 staff members, could be ready to deploy anywhere in the world in 2025.
'We are never going to get a European Union army, we may have a European Nato force, but it'll be extremely difficult,' said Edward Lucas, senior fellow and senior adviser at the Centre for European Policy Analysis
All Nato members were hugely dependent on American equipment and resources, for example in mid-air refuelling.
Command and control in Nato was done by the Americans and that would have to be rebuilt by the Europeans if the Americans pulled out after 80 years of protecting the continent after the Second World War.
'Britain could probably command a division. We can't field one, and most European countries could struggle to put a brigade in the field,' Mr Lucas said.
He added, 'I think we're in a post-Nato era and we're reaping the harvest of our three decades of eating the peace dividend.'
Given such challenges, not to mention the constitutional neutrality of EU member such as like Austria and Ireland, Brussels is now focusing on ramping up the defence industry and finding ways to boost spending.
The EU as a whole spends about 1.8 per cent of its GDP on defence. According to The Economist, it will need to spend between 4 and 5 per cent to be able to defend itself without the Americans.
Among the ideas being considered is the pooling of common debt to buy weapons, which is controversial in several richer member states, further joint research funding and a greater role for the European Investment Bank.
Keir Starmer has held talks with Mrs von der Leyen about how Britain can be involved in raising finance for Europe's collective defence and continued support for Ukraine.
A European Commission spokesperson said: 'The defence industry is an industry in the single market. And industry and the single market are the competence of the commission.'
Brussels could also act on military mobility, which helps 'armed forces and their equipment to move around the EU with ease'.
Military mobility was critical for security and resilience and 'an additional deterrent', the spokesperson said.
'Even if it will not be possible in the short term to make one big jump towards a European army, we can move forward step by step,' said Luc Frieden, Luxembourg's prime minister, in 2024 as he suggested a smaller group of willing states could take the plunge first.
Andrew Duff, a former Liberal Democrat MEP and former president of the Union of European Federalists, believes it has come a step closer.
'But a fully integrated EU army is years away, and will probably only crystallise when Putin has his next crack at Ukraine,' the European Policy Centre think tank fellow said.
He added, 'The top thing now is to fast track Ukraine into the EU. Ukraine as a member state will quicken the development of the EU military dimension.'
Rob Jetten, the leader of the opposition Democrats 66 party in the Netherlands, recently shared an image of tanks, battleships and jets heading into battle under the flags of Europe on social media.
The meme is doing the rounds of the majority pro-EU European Parliament, sources said.
'If we want to protect our own continent, we can do it together. With one strong European army instead of a dozen separate systems,' he posted.'These times call for action!.'
An Ipsos IO survey for state broadcaster NOS this week found that half of Dutch people now supported the creation of an EU army.
But it also found that only 18 per cent of young Dutch people would be prepared to actually join it.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US and China ‘back to square one' after two days of trade talks
Talks between the US and China are 'back to square one' after two days of trade negotiations in London failed to secure a major deal. Howard Lutnick, Donald Trump's commerce secretary, said the two sides had agreed on a 'framework' to put their trading relations back on track and repair the truce initially agreed in Geneva last month. There was little market reaction to the announcement at Lancaster House shortly after midnight, with the dollar strengthening a little and stock markets opening marginally higher. The two sides have until Aug 10 to negotiate a more comprehensive agreement to ease trade tensions, or US tariffs on China will snap back from about 30pc to 145pc, with China's levies on America increasing from 10pc to 125pc. Josh Lipsky, of the Atlantic Council's GeoEconomics Center in Washington, said: 'They are back to square one but that's much better than square zero.' Jim Reid, a Deutsche Bank analyst, added: 'While the mood music has stayed positive, investors may be wary of the pattern that emerged during the previous US-China trade talks in 2018-19, when apparently constructive in-person meetings seemed to take a step back as the negotiating teams returned to their capitals. 'So there's perhaps a little disappointment this morning that we haven't yet got a bigger announcement, even though there's time to hear the full conclusions of the meeting.' Senior officials from Washington and Beijing had gathered in London after accusations from both sides that they had violated the terms of the deal made in Switzerland. Mr Trump and Xi Jinping held a call last week that Mr Lutnick said 'gave the fundamental foundation on which we were able to reach agreement'. Mr Lutnick said: 'We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus and the call between the two presidents. 'The idea is we're going to go back and speak to President Trump and make sure he approves it. 'They're going to go back and speak to President Xi and make sure he approves it, and if that is approved, we will then implement the framework.' In a separate briefing, Li Chenggang, China's vice commerce minister, said a trade framework had been reached in principle that would be taken back to US and Chinese leaders. Mr Lutnick said China's restrictions on exports of rare earth minerals and magnets to the US would be resolved as a 'fundamental' part of the framework agreement. He also said the agreement would remove some of the recent US export restrictions, but did not provide details. Kathleen Brooks, the research director at XTB, a trading platform, said: 'Overall, the US-China trade agreement is taking its time, and it could test the market's patience.' Meanwhile, the European Union reportedly believes it could extend its trade negotiations with the US beyond the initial deadline next month. The EU thinks there could be scope for further talks if it agrees a deal in principle by July 9, which is considered its best-case scenario, according to Bloomberg. The Trump administration is scheduled to enforce 50pc tariffs on EU goods beyond that date unless a deal is reached. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.


Business Upturn
19 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
Donald Trump confirms US-China deal done, says rare earth deal and 55% tariffs finalised
Donald Trump touts 55% tariffs and rare earth supply in pending China deal By News Desk Published on June 11, 2025, 17:56 IST Last updated June 11, 2025, 17:57 IST Former U.S. President Donald J. Trump on Tuesday announced via social media that a new deal with China has been reached, pending final approval from both himself and Chinese President Xi Jinping. According to Trump, the agreement includes upfront Chinese supply of 'full magnets' and 'any necessary rare earths' to the U.S. In return, the U.S. will uphold previously agreed terms, which Trump said include allowing Chinese students to continue studying at American colleges and universities — a relationship he described as 'always been good with me!' Trump emphasized that under the new deal, the U.S. will receive a combined total of 55% in tariffs, while China will get 10%. 'Relationship is excellent!' Trump declared in the post, adding thanks for attention to the matter. The post, shared on June 11, 2025, at 8:04 AM, comes amid ongoing geopolitical and trade tensions between the world's two largest economies. No official confirmation has yet been released by Chinese authorities or the U.S. State Department. News desk at


Business Upturn
19 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
U.S. President Trump says he has no hard feelings for Musk, leaves door open for reconciliation
By Aditya Bhagchandani Published on June 11, 2025, 17:40 IST U.S. President Donald Trump has downplayed recent tensions with Elon Musk, saying he holds 'no hard feelings' despite their very public feud over the past week. His comments come shortly after Musk posted on X, formerly Twitter, that he 'regrets some of [his] posts' about Trump, admitting, 'They went too far.' In an interview addressing the ongoing spat, Trump said he was surprised by Musk's criticism of the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' which the President described as 'phenomenal' and 'the best thing we signed in the country.' 'When he did that, I was not a happy camper,' Trump said, adding, 'I don't know what his problem is… I haven't thought too much about him in the last little while.' Despite the fallout, Trump appeared to extend an olive branch, stating, 'I think he feels very badly he said [those things]… I was disappointed in him, but it is what happens. I don't blame him for anything.' When asked about the possibility of reconciling with Musk, Trump replied, 'I guess I could, but we have to straighten out the country.' This marks a potential cooling in tensions that had escalated sharply in recent days. Musk had accused Trump of suppressing the Epstein files and labeled the tax proposal a 'pork-filled abomination,' prompting Trump to suggest pulling federal contracts from Musk-led ventures. Musk responded by threatening to halt NASA-related SpaceX missions and hinted that Trump owed his 2024 victory to Musk's influence. As of now, no direct meeting has taken place, but Musk's heart emoji response to Trump's earlier 'wish him well' remark has kept speculation alive about an eventual reconciliation between the two powerhouses. Aditya Bhagchandani serves as the Senior Editor and Writer at Business Upturn, where he leads coverage across the Business, Finance, Corporate, and Stock Market segments. With a keen eye for detail and a commitment to journalistic integrity, he not only contributes insightful articles but also oversees editorial direction for the reporting team.