I left the US for Canada. Getting a green card seemed impossible, and the uncertainty overshadowed the positives of living in America.
She felt the pathway to a green card was going nowhere, so she eventually moved to Canada.
As a permanent resident, she feels more secure, and she's fine with having taken a salary hit.
This as-told-to essay is based on a transcribed conversation with Sindhu Mahadevan, who moved from the US to Canada in 2021. The following has been edited for length and clarity.
I moved to the US from India in 2012 to study a master's degree in biology.
I graduated and entered the workforce in the States, but slowly began to grow disillusioned with the US immigration system.
In 2021, I decided to stop fighting the system and move to Canada. Although I've left behind the high salaries available in the US, I've traded it for a sense of belonging as a permanent resident in Canada.
I entered the American workforce, but felt vulnerable as an immigrant
I grew up in a city in western India. I had family who lived in the US. I moved there on an F-1 visa for international students and graduated in 2014.
My visa status made me eligible for two types of work authorization — optional practical training (OPT) and curricular practical training (CPT), both of which I used.
I knew that after my student work authorization expired, I'd require a visa sponsorship. Some companies I applied to told me they wouldn't offer sponsorships or ghosted me after they realized I'd eventually need one.
I started a career in the medical device industry and was employed under my work authorization until 2018.
I was very conscious of my immigration status at work. I struggled to have difficult conversations about aligning everyone on compliance issues because I was worried about my job security. Sometimes, I felt this affected how well I could do my job.
The path to a green card didn't feel possible
I got married in 2015, and my husband, who was also on a visa, and I wanted to try to build a life in the US.
I felt I needed permanent residency to do this. I wanted the freedom to visit India and the flexibility to change jobs, which became complicated on an F-1 visa.
In 2016 and 2017, my company tried twice to get me an H-1B visa, which can be a step toward permanent residency in the US. Petitions are chosen for processing through a lottery selection system, but I wasn't picked either time.
Around that time, I started to find out more information about the green card backlog for Indian nationals. There's a cap per country at 7% of all the green cards allocated that year. India has a large population with a lot of applicants, so there is a very long waitlist to have your applications processed.
I felt I was thrashing against the system just to be able to stay in the country and contribute. In a moment of clarity, I realized I wasn't willing to keep fighting.
In 2018, I no longer had work authorization and had to stop working. I didn't like not making an income at all, and it felt like a hard-won career had been yanked away from me.
I moved to Canada as a permanent resident and have found a sense of belonging
As a temporary solution, I tried changing my status from an F-1 to an F-2 visa, which would make me a dependent of my husband's F-1. I was allowed to remain in the US while my application was pending.
Around the same time I filed the application to change my status, I began looking at backup plans. Moving to Canada was on the cards through the "Express Entry" system. It's a points-based system that scores applicants on things like their education, work experience, and language proficiencies. The highest-scoring applicants receive an invitation to apply for permanent residence.
My work experience was American-centric. Canada was a better fit than Europe or Asia. I applied just before the pandemic hit in 2020, when I still hadn't heard back with a final decision about changing my status to F-2.
I received PR in October 2021, and my husband and I went to Canada straight away.
As a permanent resident, I can work and buy property, but I can't vote in elections or stay outside Canada for longer than 730 days in a five-year window.
In the US, I was a passenger along for the ride. In Canada, with PR status, I'm back in the driver's seat. I feel comfortable and in a solid legal position.
As a permanent resident, I can take chances with my career
I haven't had issues getting employment without Canadian experience, a problem some expats face, perhaps because my US experience is seen as valuable in my industry. I had a job lined up before the move.
I've taken a salary hit, but with my PR status I have the freedom to take a chance working for a startup, something I wouldn't have dreamed of while in the US, where if the startup went under and I lost my job, it could mean the end of the road.
Though more politely presented here than in the US, anti-immigrant sentiment in Canada concerns me, even though I haven't personally experienced negativity. People are expressing concerns around strained healthcare and housing, and Canada is experiencing immigration contraction.
I'm fine with Canada's smaller economy
Living in America shaped me in many ways. I admire Americans for their zeal to fight for what they believe in and to speak up. I don't regret moving there. If you're looking for the best universities or economy, the rational choice is the US.
I moved to the US for my education, but the constraints of the immigration system slowly overshadowed the economic opportunities.
I'm fine being in a smaller economy where I have more security.
In a statement to BI, a spokesperson from the Department of Homeland Security said it was "committed to restoring integrity to the visa program" and ensuring people cannot illegally remain in the US.
Do you have a story to share about immigrating to the US? Contact this reporter at ccheong@businessinsider.com.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Volunteers flock to immigration courts to support migrants arrested in the hallways
SEATTLE (AP) — After a Seattle immigration judge dismissed the deportation case against a Colombian man — exposing him to expedited removal — three people sat with him in the back of the courtroom, taking his car keys for safe-keeping, helping him memorize phone numbers and gathering the names of family members who needed to be notified. When Judge Brett Parchert asked why they were doing that in court, the volunteers said Immigration and Custom Enforcement officers were outside the door, waiting to take the man into custody, so this was their only chance to help him get his things in order. "ICE is in the waiting room?" the judge asked. As the mass deportation campaign of President Donald Trump focuses on cities and states led by Democrats and unleashes fear among asylum-seekers and immigrants, their legal defenders sued this week, seeking class-action protections against the arrests outside immigration court hearings. Meanwhile, these volunteers are taking action. A diverse group — faith leaders, college students, grandmothers, retired lawyers and professors — has been showing up at immigration courts across the nation to escort immigrants at risk of being detained for deportation by masked ICE officials. They're giving families moral and logistical support, and bearing witness as the people are taken away. The Northwest Immigrant Rights Project was inundated by so many community members wanting to help that they made a volunteer training video, created 'Know Your Rights' sheets in several languages and started a Google sheet where people sign up for shifts, said Stephanie Gai, a staff attorney with the Seattle-based legal services non-profit. 'We could not do it without them," Gai said. 'Some volunteers request time off work so they can come in and help.' Robby Rohr, a retired non-profit director said she volunteers regularly. 'Being here makes people feel they are remembered and recognized,' she said 'It's such a bureaucratic and confusing process. We try to help them through it.' Recording videos of detentions to post online online Volunteers and legal aid groups have long provided free legal orientation in immigration court but the arrests have posed new challenges. Since May, the government has been asking judges to dismiss deportation cases. Once the judge agrees, ICE officials arrest them in the hallways and put them in fast-track deportation proceedings, no matter which legal immigration pathway they may have been pursuing. Once in custody, it's often harder to find or afford a lawyer. Immigration judges are executive branch employees, and while some have resisted Homeland Security lawyers' dismissal orders in some cases, many are granted. Masked ICE agents grabbed the Colombian man and led him into the hallway. A volunteer took his backpack to give to his family as he was taken away. Other cases on the day's docket involved immigrants who didn't show up. Parchert granted 'removal in absentia' orders, enabling ICE to arrest them later. When asked about these arrests and the volunteers at immigration courts, a senior spokesperson with the Department of Homeland Security said ICE is once again implementing the rule of law by reversing 'Biden's catch and release policy that allowed millions of unvetted illegal aliens to be let loose on American streets." Some volunteers have recorded arrests in courtroom hallways, traumatic scenes that are proliferating online. How many similar scenes are happening nationwide remains unclear. The Executive Office for Immigration Review has not released numbers of cases dismissed or arrests made at or near immigration courts. While most volunteers have done this work without incident, some have been arrested for interfering with ICE agents. New York City Comptroller and Democratic mayoral candidate Brad Lander was arrested after locking arms with a person in a failed attempt to prevent his detention. Lander's wife, attorney Meg Barnette, had just joined him in walking migrants from a courtroom to the elevator. Helping families find their relatives as they disappear The volunteers' act of witnessing has proven to be important as people disappear into a detention system that can seem chaotic, leaving families without any information about their whereabouts for days on end. In a waiting room serving New York City immigration courtrooms, a Spanish-speaking woman with long dark curly hair was sitting anxiously with her daughter after she and her husband had separate hearings. Now he was nowhere to be found. The Rev. Fabián Arias, a volunteer court observer, said the woman whose first name is Alva approached him asking 'Where is my husband?' She showed him his photo. 'ICE detained him,' Arias told her, and tried to comfort her as she trembled, later welling up with tears. A judge had not dismissed the husband's case, giving him until October to find a lawyer. But that didn't stop ICE agents from handcuffing him and taking him away as soon as he stepped out of court. The news sparked an outcry by immigration advocates, city officials and a congressman. At a news conference, she gave only her first name and asked that her daughter's be withheld. Brianna Garcia, a college student in El Paso, Texas, said she's been attending immigration court hearings for weeks where she informs people of their rights and then records ICE agents taking people into custody. 'We escort people so they're not harassed and help people memorize important phone numbers, since their belongings are confiscated by ICE," she said. Paris Thomas began volunteering at the Denver immigration court after hearing about the effort through a network of churches. Wearing a straw hat, he recently waited in the midday heat for people to arrive for afternoon hearings. Thomas handed people a small paper flyer listing their rights in Spanish on one side and English on the other. One man walking with a woman told him 'thank you. Thank you.' Another man gave him a hug. Denver volunteer Don Marsh said they offer to walk people to their cars after court appearances, so they can contact attorneys and family if ICE arrests them. Marsh said he's never done anything like this before, but wants to do something to preserve the nation's 'rule of law' now that unidentifiable government agents are 'snatching' people off the streets. 'If we're not all safe, no one's safe,' he said. __ Attanasio reported from New York City and Slevin from Denver.
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Should You Accelerate Income or Deductions Before 2026? What Tax Experts Say
When it comes to tax planning, timing can be everything, especially with major changes on the horizon. President Donald Trump's recent signing of the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' (OBBB) into law will usher in sweeping updates to the U.S. tax code starting in 2025 and 2026. These include a higher cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions, new limitations on itemized deductions and some limited exemptions for tip and overtime income. Find Out: Read Next: 'Proper tax planning requires a thorough understanding of the current tax law and how it affects your financial picture,' said Brian Tullio, JD, a CFP at Fairway Wealth Management. 'The 'OBBB' brings a host of changes to various individual tax provisions, often with new phase-out or AGI (adjusted gross income) limitations.' We spoke with Tullio and Matt McKinney, senior director and tax expert at Source Advisors, to break down what's changing, who should act now and who might be better off waiting. What's Changing in 2025 and 2026? Several provisions of the bill are poised to be retroactive to 2025 or take effect in 2026, and they may drastically shift how Americans approach tax planning. McKinney said the bill introduces 'several permanent tax changes effective in 2025, including permanent 100% bonus depreciation starting for property acquired after Jan. 19, 2025; a permanent 20% qualified business income (QBI) deduction for pass-through business owners; [and] permanent research and experimental (R&E) expensing.' Other key provisions include: A new $40,000 cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions, with a phase-out for incomes over $500,000 A deduction of up to $25,000 in tip income and $12,500 in overtime pay for taxpayers under $150,000 AGI A new limit on itemized deduction values, capped at a 35% benefit for high earners, starting in 2026 Your tax strategy depends on understanding when these provisions take effect, however. 'Shifting income between tax years must be timed accordingly to ensure the applicable changes in tax policy provide the targeted benefit,' Tullio said. Learn More: When Accelerating Deductions Makes Sense If you're planning major charitable contributions or medical procedures, you might want to act before the end of the year, Tullio urged. 'Waiting until 2026 to do so will erode the overall tax benefit of your contributions by roughly 2/37ths.' He also noted that speeding along some itemized deductions in 2025 may help offset the coming deduction limits for 2026. 'The itemized deductions with the largest potential value are charitable contributions and any major medical procedures to the extent those medical expenses exceed 7.5% of AGI.' If you're not sure you have charitable donations or medical expenses, look to buy a U.S.-made car for a tax break, Tullio said. 'Financing a new car that has a final assembly in the U.S. may also help, as up to $10,000 of interest is deductible for 2025.' When Deferring Income May Save You More In some cases, delaying income to 2026 may result in a better tax outcome, Tullio said. This applies especially to tip or overtime workers who stand to benefit from the new income exemptions. 'Delaying tip income or overtime compensation until 2026 will allow you to take advantage of new applicable deductions.' He also cautioned high earners: 'Accelerating too much income may result in a higher AGI, thereby disallowing the use of new deductions or credits.' Small-Business Owners: Time Your Moves Wisely If you run a businesse or are a self-employed taxpayer, you also have a unique planning opportunity, McKinney said. 'Taxpayers who could benefit from accelerating income before the 2026 tax year include those with research and experimental (R&D) costs,' he said, noting that 'small businesses under $31 million in gross receipts can take advantage of retroactive deduction options.' He also advised businesses to line up capital purchases and projects strategically for tax benefits: 'For clients planning industrial facilities, now is the moment to align construction timelines to secure 100% bonus treatment.' Avoid These Mistakes Not every timing tactic pays off, however. Tullio warned that while delaying income can help you qualify for deductions like the full SALT cap, '[I]t's also possible to miss out if you don't plan correctly or if the phase-out thresholds change.' This is where it's a good idea to turn to a tax professional or financial advisor early. 'Failing to do so may result in losing those tax savings forever,' Tullio said. What To Do Now With the BBB now signed into law, look into doing the following: Consider accelerating deductions like charitable gifts, medical expenses or vehicle interest in 2025. If eligible, consider deferring tip or overtime income to 2026. Business owners should evaluate capital projects and R&D expenses for bonus depreciation benefits. Run multiyear projections with a tax advisor to avoid AGI cliffs or deduction phaseouts. 'Proactive tax planning and multiyear modeling are critically important after new tax legislation passes,' Tullio said. 'The time of 'I will see when I file my return' has passed. At that point, you just have to live with those consequences.' Don't let yourself be caught by surprise by any of these changes — get ahead of them with the support of a financial professional or your own education. More From GOBankingRates Clever Ways To Save Money That Actually Work in 2025 This article originally appeared on Should You Accelerate Income or Deductions Before 2026? What Tax Experts Say
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
District of North Vancouver councillor wants to make bike bells mandatory
A District of North Vancouver (DNV) councillor wants to make bike bells mandatory in his community and wants to see other municipalities in B.C. follow suit. During a June 23 council meeting, Jim Hanson put forward a motion to create a bylaw mandating bells on bicycles out of concern for pedestrian safety. "I think it's important as we move towards active transportation, building out our bike lanes [and] that we make our multi-user paths, pedestrian and cycling paths safe for everyone and courteous," he told CBC's On The Coast. Often, if cyclists don't have bells, they shout "on your left" or some variation of that to let people on foot know there's a bike coming up behind them, so as not to startle them. But Hanson said some people find that "aggressive." "Not everyone who's walking along the paths wants to hear people yelling at them," he said, adding that some people, seniors, for example, may hear the sound of a bell better than the sound of someone's voice. "I just don't believe it to be courteous for cyclists to be hollering out at pedestrians as they go down these paths." He pointed to the City of Vancouver, where the bylaw states that cyclists must have a bell on their bicycle. But not everyone realizes that's the rule; Duncan Wilcock, who often rides his e-bike in communities throughout the Lower Mainland, wasn't aware of that until this motion came about. But he said requiring bells on bikes won't solve the problem of pedestrians and cyclists trying to share pathways respectfully. "Mandating a bike bell is not the same as somebody actually being socially considerate," he said. DNV Mayor Mike Little suggested during the council meeting that bells may, in fact, be required by the province, but the Ministry of Transportation confirmed to CBC News that bicycles are not required to have bells or horns under the Motor Vehicle Act, and those rules are the responsibility of municipalities. Coun. Jordan Back wondered how such a bylaw would be enforced. "I think that would be really challenging," he said during the June 23 meeting. He suggested education and signage instead to encourage courtesy on multi-use paths. "I think any time you start mandating something like this, it just is going to create a whole other thing for us to try and manage and enforce." Wilcock, a volunteer with HUB Cycling — a non-profit organization that promotes cycling in Vancouver — said municipalities should focus on building separate pathways for people on foot and people on bikes. "People in the cars get to travel side by side. Why shouldn't the people walking have plenty of room to walk side by side? Same with people on bikes," he said. "The conflict is happening because people are on a multi-use path, because it's squished too close together, people travelling different speeds. That's the root of the problem." Hanson hopes the DNV does eventually make bike bells a requirement on city pathways and streets, and that other communities on the North Shore follow suit. Ultimately, he said, he plans to take the issue of bike bells to the Union of B.C. Municipalities, calling for bills on bikes as a provincial rule. "I think we need to normalize bell usage. I mean, we've normalized helmet use for cycling. We need to develop a way of life that involves courtesy on our multimodal paths and safety, and I think bells on bikes is an idea whose time has come on a provincewide basis."
