Report: Three Labour MPs suspended for persistent defiance of Starmer
Mr Duncan-Jordan, the MP for Poole in Dorset, had consistently refused to toe the line on a range of issues, while Alloa and Grangemouth's Mr Leishman had also criticised plans to close a local oil refinery. Mr Hinchcliff, the North East Hertfordshire MP, has attacked Angela Rayner 's planning reform that would make it easier to build on the green belt, and rebelled over welfare cuts. The action comes weeks after backbenchers managed to water down plans to cut the UK's massive disability benefit bill.
And earlier this month, former Labour MP Zarah Sultana formally quit the party and said she would link up with ex-leader Jeremy Corbyn in a new hard Left party. Mr Duncan-Jordan confirmed he had been suspended, telling the Politics Home website: 'Since being elected I have consistently spoken up for my constituents on a range of issues, including most recently on cuts to disability benefits. 'I understood this could come at a cost, but I couldn't support making disabled people poorer.
'Although I've been suspended from the Parliamentary Labour Party today, I've been part of the Labour and trade union movement for 40 years and remain as committed as ever to its values. 'To my constituents: it's business as usual. I remain your hardworking local MP, I will continue to take up your concerns and speak up for Poole.'
Mr Leishman added: 'I have voted against the Government on issues because I want to effectively represent and be the voice for communities across Alloa and Grangemouth. 'I firmly believe that it is not my duty as an MP to make people poorer, especially those that have suffered because of austerity and its dire consequences.' The Universal Credit Bill cleared the Commons after elements to restrict eligibility to Pip were scrapped, with any changes postponed until after a review led by disability minister Sir Stephen Timms.
Mr Leishman called for the welfare law to be withdrawn, even in the essentially meaningless form it finally passed the Commons at the end of June. The MP for Alloa and Grangemouth voted in favour of a cross-party amendment that would have stopped the Bill before second reading. At the time he said: 'Today was a prime example in how not to legislate.
'A shambolic afternoon with policy being made up off the cuff and on the notion of promises to come. 'The Government should do the honourable and decent thing and withdraw this dreadful Bill.' Liz Kendall insisted this morning that the Government's welfare reforms were in 'the right place' now after she was forced to scrap most of the planned changes in the face of a Labour revolt.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ministers ‘have their fingers in their ears' over bin strikes, says Sharon Graham
Ministers 'have their fingers in their ears' over the ongoing Birmingham bin strikes, the boss of one of Britain's biggest unions has said. The prime minister and Angela Rayner must 'get in the room, sort it out and stop letting this continue for no reason,' Sharon Graham warned. The outspoken Unite chief said she is not the prime minister's ' favourite trade union leader … probably because I call things out'. But, with the bin strikes running since January, Ms Graham called for the prime minister and his deputy to resolve the dispute. The strikes have resulted in huge piles of rubbish across Birmingham as well as rat infestations and unsanitary conditions. The left-winger has been increasingly critical of Labour 's time in government in recent weeks, and Unite is reexamining its relationship with the Labour party, with disaffiliation a real prospect. The union also took the incendiary step this month of voting to suspend Ms Rayner's membership over the strikes, with Ms Graham accusing her of failing to back workers. Ms Rayner had resigned her membership some months earlier. 'Angela Rayner has had every opportunity to intervene and resolve this dispute, but has instead backed a rogue council that has peddled lies and smeared its workers fighting huge pay cuts,' Ms Graham said this month. And, doubling down in an interview with The Times, she called for a major change of course from Labour. 'People were voting for hope,' she said after Labour's first year in power. 'They are not voting for despair, are they?' Ms Graham said she has been 'in more government rooms than I've had hot dinners in the last year', but that 'getting a hearing and being listened to are two very different things'. She warned that if Sir Keir and Ms Rayner keep 'attacking workers' then she would be happy to pull the union's backing of Labour - which would deal a major financial blow to the party. 'Is there something to be said for an authentic voice for workers, independent, strong unions, where your first, second and third priority is the workers?' she told The Times. She added that, if Unite had voted on whether to abandon its link to Labour, it would have passed 'without a shadow of a doubt'. But, with hopes her pressure on the party will force a rethink in Downing Street, she said 'we've got time to recoup this'. 'They've been in for a year. They've made some errors but there's no point going further and faster when you're heading for a cliff. They have time to address some of this stuff, but they're going to have to move fast,' Ms Graham said. She added: 'I think if we're here at the end of next year in the same position, I think there's a real problem.' Ms Graham was also a vocal critic of the government's decision to scrap winter fuel payments for millions of pensioners. Despite the U-turn, she said there are older people who will now never vote Labour again. A Labour Party Spokesperson said: "The Labour Government has introduced the biggest upgrade in workers' rights in a generation to address low pay, insecure work, and poor working conditions, which will benefit 15 million workers across the country. Only Labour is delivering the change working people voted for and so deserve."
Daily Mirror
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
What tax rises could you face as government battles to fix the UK's finances?
Chancellor Rachel Reeves is having to consider a host of different ways to boost the Treasury's coffers - so just what are her options? Rachel Reeves ' 'dream job' of becoming Chancellor must fast be feeling like a nightmare. Saddled with an eye-watering national debt, left to clear up the mess from the Tories and 15 years of pitiful economy growth, and hemmed in on all sides, she and Labour have a battle on their hands after the first year back in office. To hammer it home, the Office for Budget Responsibility recently published its doom-laden summing-up of the country's plight, which included warning from its boss Richard Hughes that: 'The UK cannot afford the array of promises that are displayed to the public.' It further fuelled talk of tax rises in the Autumn Budget, with the debate set to rage. Labour is sticking with its manifesto pledge to not raise income tax, national insurance contributions, and VAT - which together account for two-thirds - of all tax collected. So just what is the state of the country's finances, and what options does the Chancellor have to boost the coffers? The problem The numbers are almost unfathomable. Take how much the UK owes - public sector net debt - at more than £2.8trillion. That is almost as big as what the UK churns out a year - gross domestic product - at 96.4%, the highest level barring the Covid pandemic since 1963. With borrowing soaring, so is the interest racked-up on the nation's credit card. The OBR predicts we will shell out £111billion on debt interest alone this year, around half the NHS 's entire annual budget. One reason is the rates the UK has to borrow - among the highest for any major economy - and more than double Germany's. Shelling out that much means less for the government to spend on essential services. And with outlays outstripping tax income, that means still higher borrowing. Income tax One option is extending the freeze at which income tax and national insurance kicks in. By 2028/29, it is set to mean 4.2 million more people paying income tax, 3.5 million the higher rate of 40%, and another 600,000 the higher still 45% band. Ms Reeves has previously ruled extending the freeze beyond April 2028 because it would 'hurt working people'. The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) says pushing it back to the end of parliament would raise up to £10billion. James Smith, an economist at ING Bank, said: 'The only obvious piece of low hanging fruit is to extend the tax threshold freeze.' But dragging even more people into paying tax - or the higher band - would be controversial. Another option is raising the 45% rate to 50%. Paul Johnson, until recently head of the IFS, warned there was 'real uncertainty' about how much it would raise. Wealth tax Former Labour leader Lord Kinnock recently reignited the debate over a wealth tax by suggesting a 2% levy on assets of above £10million would bring in up to £11billion a year. Downing Street fuelled speculation by not ruling it out. A wealth tax has overwhelming public support but experts say it is devilishly hard to implement, as other countries have found. 'The top 1% of income taxpayers are paying about 30% of income tax,' Paul Johnson told The Rest Is Money podcast. Critics also argue it will drive the super wealthy away - something campaigners reject. Other options could include the effective 60% tax band on incomes between £100,000 and £125,140. But a far more radical route would be overhauling the council tax system. Mr Johnson said: 'A £50million mansion in Westminster pays about the same council tax as a three-bed semi in Hartlepool. It is utterly outrageous.' It would be game-changer but there is a reason successive government have dodged reform. As well as being time consuming, it's home owners in property pricey southern England who would likely come off worse. Pensions Taxing pensions is 'where you can get really serious money,' is Paul Johnson's view, but he warned doing so would be 'terrible idea'. There was speculation ahead of the last Autumn Budget about the amount that people could take tax-free from their pension. In the end, nothing changed, but reports suggest it spooked a flood of people to rush to withdraw savings. A more targeted move could be to cut the upfront tax relief on pension contributions for higher rate taxpayers. Limiting it could raise £15billion a year, say reports, but may also hit middle income workers, including some teachers, nurses and other public sector staff. Labour will also be conscious of not doing anything that deters ordinary people saving for their retirement. One big outlay for the government that looks unlikely to change is the 'triple lock' pledge, the promise that the state pension will rise every year by average wages, inflation or 2.5% - whichever is higher. Fuel duty The levy on petrol and diesel used to rise in line with inflation but was frozen in 2011. Successive government maintained the freeze, and the Tories announces a supposed temporary 5p cut in 2022 - that stayed. Fuel duty is set to bring in £24.4billion for the Treasury this year, equivalent to £850 per household. But the Social Market Foundation estimates maintaining the freeze has deprived the exchequer of about £130billion. Changing the duty - even ending the 5p cut - risks backfiring on the government, given the hit to ordinary drivers. But encouraging motorists to switch to electric cars - the government unveiled taxpayer-funded grants of up to £3,750 this week - mean the tax take from duty is likely to fall. Businesses Labour suffered a backlash from firms when it hiked employers' national insurance in April, in a move designed to raise £25billion a year. Business lobby groups have already warned against using the next Budget to unleash another raid. Corporation tax generates a lot for the Treasury, but Labour has pledged to cap the headline rate at 25% for the lifetime of the this Parliament. It could look at tinkering with other levies, including the bank levy and surcharge. But the Chancellor will be keen to not do anything that will further hit growth. As Helen Miller, the new director of the IFS, said this week: 'I think growth should be the number one mission. We should be throwing the kitchen sink at it', as she questioned whether Labour was doing enough on that front.
BBC News
21 minutes ago
- BBC News
Guildford could have town council for first time
Guildford could soon have its own town council for the first other areas, the Surrey town relies solely on borough councillors to raise "hyperlocal" issues, the Local Democracy Reporting Service new council could oversee things like town events, public toilets, community grants and local planning agreed, Guildford Town Council would be funded through an increase in council tax for those living under its authority. Roughly £300,000 could be spent in the first year to set up the town council, which would be funded by Guildford Borough the number of councillors and a budget would likely be determined through a public proposed town council would likely include wards such as Onslow, Stoke, Holy Trinity and will be asked whether they want the new council through what is known as a community governance review, but ultimately, Guildford Borough Council would have the final say on whether to establish the new body.
