Chesapeake residents continue to share concerns about proposed data center in Great Bridge area of the city
Planning Commission recommends against Great Bridge data center
The city's quarterly happened at Oscar Smith Middle School, giving city leaders a chance to meet with constituents about any topic.
The hot topic on the minds of many residents from the Great Bridge part of the city is the data center that could be built on 23 acres near Etheridge Manor Boulevard and Centerville Turnpike.
'Why do they want to put this 350,000-square-foot noise machine butting up right against property lines,' said Great Bridge resident Dennis Cashman, a Great Bridge resident, said.
Many who live near the proposed location took the opportunity to come to the town meeting with hopes of getting clarity about the project.
'They're going to hear everybody's concerns, and they're certainly going to hear our concerns too, since we're all part of Chesapeake,' Cashman said.
The facility would be Hampton Roads' first industrial scale data center. Some say that Virginia is the industrial center capital of the world.
'We do need data centers,' Cashman said. 'It's all about location.'
Chesapeake's Planning Commission voted in May not to recommend the project. The proposal is now set to go before City Council at its June 17 meeting, when there will be a final say on whether it will move forward.
'Chesapeake has a lot of already zoned industrial sites,' Cashman said. 'Why don't we build it in an existing zoned industrial site?'
The plans for this facility came about a year ago.
Resident Lee Damore feels they have been left in the dark about the project because they just learned about it recently.
'We residents found out about it a month ago,' Damore said. 'I've been door knocking [to get the] petition signed [and] I'm still getting people giving me deer in the headlights.'
Mayor Rick West told 10 On Your Side outside of the town meeting that the city has heard from a lot of residents about why they don't want this center. He encouraged them to keep sharing their thoughts ahead of the upcoming meeting.
'Talk about the facts, talk about your concern, and then listen and be open to the fact that you know Council is going to make a decision,' Deamore said. 'Chesapeake has a council that's always listening to its citizens, and that's who we are.'
Residents who are opposed to the data center are having a community meeting about it at 6:30 p.m. Wednesday at the Hickory Ruritan Club, at 2752 S. Battlefield Blvd.
10 On Your Side also reached out to the lead developer of the proposed data center for this story and did not receive a response.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Local candidates certified for November election
Aug. 20—Ironton council, school board races will be competitive this election Candidates for local offices were certified on Friday and there are several races with more candidates than open seats and at least one race where a person will have to be appointed to fill a position. The race with the most competition this year is the Ironton School Board race with a pair open seats and four times as that many candidates. Trending * A servant to the public and to God (WITH GALLERY) * In memoriam — Ruby Kerns School Board Races —By far, the most candidates running for open seats is the Ironton School Board, which has two open seats and eight candidates, including two incumbents, Rae Ann Whitt and Kevin Hacker and six new candidates, Sasha Riley, Michael Burcham, Walt DeLong, Brian Pauley, Hugh Scott and John Hammonds. —In the race for Chesapeake school board's two open seat, there is one incumbent, Bobby Hamlin and one new candidate, Jeremy Estep. —At Dawson-Bryant, there are three seats with three incumbents running for another term, Robert Mulkey, who was appointed, Brady Harrison and Debra Hammond and one new candidate, Shanna Murphy. —At Fairland, there are three seats and three candidates including incumbents Jeff Bennett and Martin Appleton and one new candidate, Eric Salyers. Trending * Stuck in the middle with you * TPC Wellness maintains garden at facility —At Rock Hill, there are two open seats and one candidate, incumbent Dennis Hankins. —At South Point, there are two open school board seats and two candidates are incumbents, Tifanie Arbogast and Kevin Southall, who was appointed. —At Symmes Valley, there are three open seats and four candidates, incumbents Uriah Cade and Derek Wilson and two challengers, Montana Runnels and Lacy Kauffman. —At the Education Service Center, there are three open seats and two incumbent candidates, Phil Carpenter and Jamie Murphy, who was appointed. Council Races —In the race for Ironton City Council, there are four open seats and six candidates. There are three incumbents running again, Bob Cleary, Nate Kline and Craig Harvey. George McClavin, Sarah Simmons and Troy Scott are running for council for the first time. —For the South Point Village Council, there are four open seats and six candidates, including incumbents David Classing and James Adkins. New candidates are Sandra Daniel, Maria Chapman, Robert Payne and Charles Withrow. —For the Athalia Village Council, there are four open seats and only three candidates, incumbent Hope Johnson and Deborah Blevins, who was appointed, and new candidate, Andrea Shafer. —For the Coal Grove Village Council, there are four open seats with new candidate, Nick McKnight and three incumbents running, Gregory Massie, as well as Michael McKenzie and Dianna Wise, both of whom were appointed, are all running. —For the Chesapeake Village Council, there are four open seats and only two candidates, incumbents Christina Parsons and Lisa Blake, both of whom were appointed. —For the Proctorville Village Council, there are four open seats and three candidates, incumbent John Mayes and two new candidates, Daniel Swann and Courtney Chapman. Township Trustee Races In most of the township races, the candidates have already served as a trustee. All the trustee races have two open seats. —In Aid Township, incumbents Brian Pancake and George Gabriel Patterson are running for another term. —In Decatur Township, incumbents Ronnie Cox and Timothy Blagg are running for another term. —In Elizabeth Township, incumbents Steve Wilds and Riley Cox are running for another term. —In Fayette Township, incumbents Mike Jones and Travis Wise are running for another term. —In Hamilton Township, incumbents Bob Blankenship and Forrest Kerns Jr. are running for another term. —In Mason Township, incumbents Jeff Odie Estep and Stephen Colegrove are running for another term. —In Perry Township, incumbents Barry Blankenship and George Row are running for another term. —In Rome Township, incumbents Brian Pinkerman and Mark Bailey are running for another term and Ashley Salyer, who was appointed to the position is running to fill the term until 2028. —In Symmes Township, incumbents Ronald Hatfield and Sammy Mitchell are running again and Jason DeLawder is seeking one of the open seats. —In Union Township, incumbents Jason Forbush and Haskell Scott Webb, who was appointed are running for another term. —In Upper Township, incumbents Randall Wise and Tony Sites are running for another term. —In Washing Township, incumbents Jerry Kelly and Robert Jenkins are running for another term. —In Washington Township, incumbents Robert Burcham and Robert Jenkins are competing against Brian Williams for the two open seats. The local options that will appear on the November ballot are being certified by the state and will be available soon. The Ohio General Election will be Tuesday, Nov 4. You Might Like Gallery A servant to the public and to God (WITH GALLERY) News In memoriam — Ruby Kerns Education Stuck in the middle with you Business TPC Wellness maintains garden at facility Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Masimo sues US Customs over approval of Apple Watch imports
By Blake Brittain WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Medical monitoring technology company Masimo sued U.S. Customs and Border Protection on Wednesday over a decision by the agency that allowed Apple to import Apple Watches with blood-oxygen reading technology during a patent dispute between the companies. Masimo said in the lawsuit in Washington, D.C., federal court that Customs improperly determined that Apple can import watches with pulse oximetry technology, reversing its own decision from last year without notifying Masimo. Masimo told the court that it learned of the agency's August 1 decision only after Apple announced it would reintroduce blood-oxygen reading to its watches last week. Spokespeople for Apple and Customs did not immediately respond to requests for comment. A Masimo spokesperson declined to comment. Irvine, California-based Masimo has accused Apple of hiring away its employees and stealing its pulse oximetry technology to use in its Apple Watches. Masimo has separately sued Apple for patent infringement and trade secret theft in ongoing federal court cases. Masimo convinced the U.S. International Trade Commission to block imports of Apple's Series 9 and Ultra 2 smartwatches in 2023 based on a determination that Apple's technology for reading blood oxygen levels infringed Masimo's patents. Apple has continued to sell Customs-approved redesigned watches without pulse oximetry since the ITC's decision. Apple said on Aug. 14 that it would reintroduce its smartwatches' blood-oxygen reading capabilities with approval from Customs. Masimo said the agency's decision to approve the watches without input from Masimo or any "meaningful justification" deprived the company of its rights. "CBP's function is to enforce ITC exclusion orders, not to create loopholes that render them ineffective," Masimo said. Masimo asked the Washington court to halt the agency's ruling and continue to block Apple from selling watches with the blood-oxygen feature. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Medtronic Stock Raced Higher Today
Key Points Investors traded out of the company the previous day following its latest earnings release. The stock came roaring back on Hump Day, however. 10 stocks we like better than Medtronic › A clutch of post-earnings price target increases by analysts helped raise Medtronic's (NYSE: MDT) stock at a healthy rate on Wednesday. The sturdy medical device specialist's shares rose by almost 4% on the day as a consequence, a rate that looked especially good next to the S&P 500's (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) 0.2% drop. Healthy raises Following a trend that began Tuesday after Medtronic published its first quarter of fiscal 2026 figures. The company posted revenue growth of 8% (to almost $8.6 billion), and improved non-GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) adjusted net income by 2% to slightly over $1.6 billion. Both headline numbers beat the consensus analyst estimates, albeit not by much. The market, which collectively loves a crushing beat on analyst estimates, basically shrugged at this. Many investors traded out of Medtronic that day. The sun was shining brighter on Wednesday thanks to that series of price target bumps. By my count, seven analysts tracking the stock upped their fair-value assessments. Among these were pundits at such financial industry heavyweights as Wells Fargo, J.P. Morgan, and international bank UBS. Positive moves from cautious pundits I should note that in all cases, those price target raises were incremental. Nevertheless, the raising analysts frequently sounded bullish notes on Medtronic's prospects. One example was Leerink Partners' Mike Kratky, who only added $1 per share for a new level of $111, but maintained his outperform (read: buy) recommendation. According to reports, Kratky praised several elements of the company's operations, particularly its cardiac ablation solutions unit. Less positively, the analyst wrote that Medtronic suffered from weakness in its domestic sales. Should you invest $1,000 in Medtronic right now? Before you buy stock in Medtronic, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Medtronic wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $654,781!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,076,588!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,055% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 18, 2025 Wells Fargo is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Eric Volkman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Medtronic and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $75 calls on Medtronic and short January 2026 $85 calls on Medtronic. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Medtronic Stock Raced Higher Today was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data