What Britain can learn from France on migration
This is undoubtedly a landmark agreement with France, and puts us in closer alliance with the French. Are there areas where we should be taking lessons from them – perhaps when it comes to our dealings with overseas terrorists, for example?
Oscar Edmondson speaks to Tim Shipman and Madeline Grant.
Produced by Oscar Edmondson.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
a minute ago
- Telegraph
Six in 10 young people fear becoming victims of violent crime
Six in 10 young people fear they could become victims of violence in their communities, a new study has found. The poll of 1,338 adults aged 18 to 30 revealed that 61 per cent were concerned about violent crime where they lived, irrespective of their political allegiance. Sixty-seven per cent of both Labour and Reform UK voters said they feared becoming victims of violence in their areas. The Adam Smith Institute, which commissioned the research, said the findings were a 'wake-up call' about a 'generation that feels increasingly unsafe in their own homes'. Data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) show that the number of violent offences reported to police has increased over the past decade, although the ONS says this is largely the result of better recording of crime by police. Knife crime has also risen since the Covid pandemic to near record levels, with younger people disproportionately more likely to be victims. The British crime survey, which measures people's actual experience of crime, shows that violence has steadily declined over the past decade by 36 per cent to some 1.1 million incidents of violence with or without injury. However, this has not changed young people's perception of violent crime as having increased. 'Violent crime, from knife attacks to robberies, is no longer seen as an isolated issue affecting certain parts of the country; it is a pervasive threat that cuts across ethnic and political lines,' said the Adam Smith Institute. 'For many, the perception that crime is rising and that public safety is deteriorating is only reinforced by the government's failure to tackle these issues effectively. When young people across the political spectrum agree on the same fear, it's clear that Britain's public safety crisis can no longer be ignored.' Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, said: 'Successive Labour and Conservative governments have run down our criminal justice system and left Britons to pay the price. We now live in a country where violent criminals and sex offenders receive shockingly short sentences, while ordinary citizens are prosecuted for social media posts. 'Only Reform UK will invest in our police force, enforce zero-tolerance policing and restore proper justice, where the punishment truly fits the crime.' Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said: 'Young people often bear the brunt of some crime types, such as knife crime and phone snatches. Crime has gone up under Labour and Labour has cut police numbers, with more cuts coming this year. 'Labour won't properly back tactics like stop and search which are proven to make streets safer. And in London, Labour Mayor Sadiq Khan has completely lost control of crime, is presiding over crashing declines in police numbers and is shutting police stations. Labour is letting young people – and everyone – down on crime.' Emma Schubart, the data and insights manager at the Adam Smith Institute, said: 'Our findings should be a wake-up call for anyone still in denial about the state of public safety in the UK. 'When 61 per cent of young Britons, across all backgrounds and political affiliations, are genuinely afraid of violent crime in their communities, we have a serious problem. And the numbers don't lie: knife crime is soaring, robberies are up, and violent crime is no longer just an urban issue, it's everywhere. 'The fact that this crisis is being ignored or dismissed by politicians, particularly those who prefer to label concerned citizens as far-Right, only adds fuel to the fire. People are fed up. This is a generation living in fear, and it's time for the Government to stop playing political games and take action. Enough is enough.' A Home Office spokesman said: 'No one should live in fear of being a victim of violent crime. We are determined to make our streets safer, using every tool available to prevent harm and bring offenders to justice. 'We are investing in frontline policing, expanding Violence Reduction Units, and supporting early intervention programmes that steer young people away from crime. Through targeted enforcement and community-led prevention, we are working to build safer streets and protect communities across the UK. 'This will be further supported by an extra 13,000 neighbourhood officers across England and Wales by the end of this Parliament and providing the police with a £1.2 billion increase in funding this year.'
The Sun
a minute ago
- The Sun
Keir Starmer's plan will send back just 0.2 per cent of illegal migrants – it's pathetic – but I've got tips hapless PM
HOLD the front page! This is it! The Government has at last discovered a way to sort out our illegal migrant crisis. Sir Keir Starmer has struck a deal with the French. Yay. There will be a one-in, one-out system for illegal migrants arriving in rubber boats from France. So that's great, isn't it? For every migrant we send back to France, the French bung us one who has filled his forms in properly in return. So how on Earth is that going to reduce the numbers arriving here? By definition, it won't. And what's more, we're paying for it all. The UK taxpayer will foot the bill. And that's because the Prime Minister has the negotiating skills of half a grapefruit. Asked how many migrants this will see us sending back to France, the Government started looking at its shoes and humming a tune. Off the record they will hazard at a figure. It will be somewhere in the region of 50. Yes, 50. Just to give you the full picture, an estimated 25,000 have already arrived in the UK from France this year. So Sir Keir is proposing to send back just 0.2 per cent of the illegal migrants. Triffic, huh. And the deal only lasts for a year. It's not going to act as much of a deterrent, is it? Can you imagine the migrants being told: 'Well, OK, you can try to cross the Channel in that dinghy if you must. But I have to tell you, Asif, when you get to England you stand only a 94 per cent chance of being allowed to stay. Bear that in mind!' It would be laughable were it not so utterly, mind-blowingly, pathetic. Loophole in PM's swap plan means the more bogus an asylum seeker is, the less chance we have of kicking them out The truth is the Government's intention to 'smash the gangs!' hasn't worked and never was going to work. 'Smash' one gang and another will pop up to take its place. But it would be refreshing, at least, to hear Starmer and his pet Moomin, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, admit at last that the policy was bloody stupid and has failed just as everyone predicted. And so this is what we've got in its place. One-in, one-out. Brilliant. Starmer's hokey-cokey vision of controlling migration. The truth is that Yvette and Surkeir know full well that this is going to make not the slightest difference to the numbers arriving here from the Middle East and beyond. It is a silly and costly performative gesture, nothing more. The Government knows that the public is infuriated by the sheer numbers of asylum seekers arriving every day. It is a public sick of immigration, full stop. And the Government is losing masses of votes to Reform UK as a consequence. 4 Especially in the red wall seats of the north of England. But also in Kent and Essex. So it thought it had better do something. And this is what it came up with. Here's a tip, Starmer. First, stop using hotels to house all those who come. Put them in tents somewhere cold. Second, make it clear that EVERY asylum seeker who arrives here illegally will be automatically barred from ever getting the right to remain here. And then send those who do come to somewhere remote and inhospitable but under British dominion, so the lawyers can't carp. Such as Rockall, or St Helena, or South Georgia. But don't hold yer breath. With this lot in charge, it will never happen. KEIR'S NOT IN CHARGE WE are no longer being led, as a country, by Sir Keir Starmer. Now, you may think this is a good thing, by and large. Until you consider who is actually leading us. Yes, it's Richard 'Plank' Burgon and his lefty mates. The decisions which Starmer has been taking for the past three months are likely not those he would wish to make. They have been imposed upon him by the left-wingers on his backbenches. The debacle over the recognition of Palestine, for example. And the surrender over welfare benefits. Both obvious indicators of change of regime. And it has all happened because Sir Keir, with his majority of more than 170, has a spinal column the consistency of Butterscotch Angel Delight. What the hell were we thinking last summer? Why did we do it? Oh Lord, forgive us for our stupid mistakes. DANES WILL GO WILD FOR FEEDING TIME AT THE ZOO A ZOO in Denmark is asking for donations of 'unwanted pets'. This is so it can feed them to the big cats. They're a bit short of raw meat, apparently. The Danes will euthanise the pets first, which I think is a bit of a disappointment. I think feeding time could be a big draw. 'And now entering the lion enclosure is Fiver, a rabbit owned by six-year-old Inge Svenson. Let's see how long he lasts. The record is 8.5 seconds. Can Fiver beat that?' THE kinder, gentler, Left? I don't think so. Teacher Simon Pearson had more than 20 years' experience but was sacked after an internal investigation found his online posts could bring Preston College into disrepute after he said the jailing of Lucy Connolly was an example of two-tier justice. Connolly is the woman jailed for 31 months for saying horrible things about asylum seekers. Pearson made it clear he believed Connolly's comments were 'obviously wrong'. He just objected to the sentence – as many do. Sacked for holding an opinion which differed from that of the idiots who run the college. CAMDEN Council is considering banning meat and fish from its various canteens. In future, all meals and snacks will be entirely 'plant-based'. So what will happen is that the entire staff will soon be hobbling around with joint deficiencies, anaemia as well as stunning the locals with gusts of fabulously bad breath. But at least Camden is saving the polar bears and stopping the world from catching on fire. Never mind what the workers would prefer to eat – sod them! That's the left-wing way. REEVES IS SO TAXING THE worst Chancellor we have ever had is about to sting you for some more dosh. Rachel Reeves has been backed into a corner. She knows she needs to raise money. 4 But she has been stopped from cutting benefits by the idiots on the left. So now she's pondering a wealth tax. That means the flood of high-achieving people leaving the country will turn into a deluge. We'll all feel the pinch. You'll get stung for more if you try to sell a home, or buy one. Stung for more when paying for the nice things in life. She'll have you paying more for your children's education. Taxed if you save for a rainy day. Everything aspirational will be taxed. A YOUGOV poll out this week suggests that 45 per cent of us wish for immigration to reduce to zero. And for a substantial number of those who have come here recently to be sent back. Those are remarkable figures. After having been lied to about immigration for year after year, the public is at last waking up and letting its views be known.
The Herald Scotland
5 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Sarwar: Dewar would be disappointed at devolution progress
The Labour politician served as first minister from 1999 until his death in 2000, however he is often credited as being the architect of devolution. While Secretary of State for Scotland in Tony Blair's government, Mr Dewar began the devolution process. It resulted in Scotland's first parliament in almost 300 years. Mr Sarwar praised Mr Dewar, adding he was politician who 'believed politics was bigger than himself and bigger than his own party'. He also had to persuade the country – and many within his own party – of the importance of devolution, the Scottish Labour leader said. Mr Sarwar said: 'Donald had to do something that I think others hadn't had to do which is he had to first of all win a referendum to get the Parliament. Read more: 'He then had to build credibility for an institution and he had to persuade people on devolution. He didn't have to persuade just his own country, he had to persuade people in his own political party, in his own political movement. I also think he was a person of immense stature, and also someone that believed politics was bigger than himself and bigger than his own political party. 'He was genuinely a politician that wanted to pull people together. To be honest, and perhaps we will look back on this and think it was a naïve view he had given everything that's happened in the last two decades in particular, but I think Donald genuinely believed that once you've got a parliament together with different people in different parties, we would do politics differently from how we did it in Westminster, and that we'd find common ground and that's what drives us, rather than finding differences.' The Herald's editor Catherine Salmond asked the Scottish Labour leader whether Mr Dewar would be 'disappointed' at the Scottish Parliament's progress since it was re-established in 1999. The Scottish Parliament celebrated its 25th year in September last year. Mr Sarwar said: 'I think he would still be a believer of devolution. I think he would still be a defender of the institution but I think he would feel as if progress and story of devolution in 25 years has not lived up to the opportunity and potential that the Scottish people demanded.' The Scottish Labour leader warned there was a 'real risk' that Scotland's debate would 'suit people who want to live their lives constantly in a constitutional arguments mode'. He added: 'I think it's safe to say that we have to change the drive for leadership, the back stories, and also the level of engagement and intent for ministers in the Scottish Government. 'I too often see ministers looking like they're there to fill a space rather than to drive outcomes. We've got to get back to being an outcome driven country. We've got to get back to being a can-do country, not a can't-do country. 'I honestly believe our people are there I just think – people often say does Scotland lack ambition? Scotland doesn't lack ambition or imagination, they don't lack talent. They lack a leadership that shares that amount of imagination and ambition. 'I want to start with a government that meets the aspirations of the people of Scotland.'
